Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Animal Nutrition and Metabolism

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1565039

Impact of replacing sow milk with milk replacer on growth performance, intestinal development, bacterial profile and muscular maturation in neonatal and nursery piglets

Provisionally accepted
Yuwei Zhang Yuwei Zhang 1Shiya Liu Shiya Liu 1Qiang Zhou Qiang Zhou 1Yang Liu Yang Liu 1Liang Hu Liang Hu 2Ruinan Zhang Ruinan Zhang 1Zhengfeng Fang Zhengfeng Fang 1Yan Lin Yan Lin 1Shengyu Xu Shengyu Xu 1Bin Feng Bin Feng 1Yong Zhuo Yong Zhuo 1De Wu De Wu 1Lianqiang Che Lianqiang Che 1*
  • 1 Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
  • 2 College of Food Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Along with the increasing litter sizes in pig industry, using milk replacer (MR) as a nutrient supplement has been widely practiced, yet the effects of replacing sow milk (SM) with MR on growth and development of piglets remain unclear. This study evaluated the differential effects of MR versus SM on growth performance, body composition, muscle fiber types, and intestinal health of piglets during the neonatal and nursery periods. Forty 2-day-old piglets, selected from ten healthy sows, were randomly divided into two groups receiving either SM or MR ad libitum until postnatal day 23 (PND 23), then transitioned to be fed with nursery diet until PND 37. Blood, muscle, and intestinal tissues, along with colonic digesta and carcass samples, were collected on PND 12 (n=10) and PND 37 (n=10) for analysis of parameters related to intestinal function, microbiota composition and muscular development. The results showed that MR-fed piglets had lower average daily gain (ADG) and higher diarrhea index during the neonatal period. During the nursery period, however, MRfed piglets had significantly higher average daily feed intake (ADFI) and ADG. Compared to SM-fed piglets, MR-fed piglets had a lower percentage of fast twitch fibers, but a higher percentage of slow twitch fibers on PND 12, along with lower body fat content on both PND 12 and PND 37. In addition, MR-fed piglets had significantly deeper crypt depth, increased mRNA expressions of inflammatory genes, and lower alpha diversity on PND 12. On PND 37, however, MR-fed piglets had higher villus height, increased sucrase activity and alpha diversity. On PND 12, likewise, MR-fed piglets were enriched with Prevotella associated with diarrhea, while SM-fed piglets were enriched with Lachnospiraceae associated with body fat deposition. In contrast, on PND 37, MR-fed piglets were enriched with commonly recognized beneficial bacteria, such as f_Muribaculaceae, g_Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group, f_Oscillospiraceae and f_Rikenellaceae. These findings indicate that piglets fed MR experienced temporary growth check and intestinal complications in neonatal period, but intriguingly MR piglets had higher feed intake, compensatory growth, and recovery of intestinal function during the nursery period.

    Keywords: Swine, Milk formula, Intestinal health, Body Composition, microbiome

    Received: 22 Jan 2025; Accepted: 20 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Liu, Zhou, Liu, Hu, Zhang, Fang, Lin, Xu, Feng, Zhuo, Wu and Che. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Lianqiang Che, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    People also looked at

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more