
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Animal Reproduction - Theriogenology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1562053
This article is part of the Research Topic Recent developments in Animal Reproduction: combining research with practice View all 6 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Cryopreservation, widely used in commercial poultry breeding, often reduces sperm motility, viability, and DNA integrity due to cryopreservation-induced damage. This study evaluates the effects of water bath and dry thawing systems on the post-thaw quality of rooster spermatozoa, addressing these challenges and exploring methods to enhance sperm quality.The study compared the performance of water bath and dry thawing systems, both operated at 37°C for 30 seconds. Post-thaw assessments included sperm motility, morphology, kinematic characteristics, and DNA integrity. Key parameters such as total motility, progressive motility, curvilinear velocity (VCL), average path velocity (VAP), straight-line velocity (VSL), viability, morphological abnormalities, and DNA damage metrics were analyzed.Results: The dry thawing system significantly improved sperm quality compared to the water bath method. Total motility and progressive motility were higher in the dry thawing system (82.38% and 33.18%, respectively) compared to the water bath method (68.14% and 21.20%).Kinematic parameters, including VCL (79.41 µm/s vs. 66.49 µm/s), VAP (47.52 µm/s vs. 37.42 µm/s), and VSL (27.18 µm/s vs. 21.59 µm/s), were superior in the dry thawing system. Viability improved (82.2% vs. 73.7%), while morphological abnormalities were reduced (23.9% vs.). DNA integrity metrics, such as Tail DNA (%) (77.37% vs. 81.11%) and Olive Tail Moment (15.28 vs. 16.93), also showed reduced damage.Discussion: The dry thawing system offers significant operational advantages, including portability, contamination-free operation, and consistent temperature maintenance, making it ideal for on-site applications. These features, combined with its ability to enhance sperm quality, highlight the dry thawing system as an effective alternative for poultry breeding. Its adoption could improve artificial insemination outcomes and address challenges associated with cryopreservation-induced damage during thawing.
Keywords: Comet, Cryopreservation, DNA integrity, dry thawing, Poultry
Received: 16 Jan 2025; Accepted: 17 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 NİZAM, SELCUK and KIRIKKULAK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Mustafa Yiğit NİZAM, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Alsancak, Türkiye
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.