The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Zoological Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1548627
This article is part of the Research Topic Pathogen Transmission at the Domestic-Wildlife Interface: A Growing Challenge that Requires Integrated Solutions - Volume II View all articles
Oral delivery of bovine tuberculosis vaccine to free-ranging white-tailed deer
Provisionally accepted- 1 National Wildlife Research Center, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA), Fort Collins, United States
- 2 Wildlife Services, USDA/APHIS, Gaylord, Michigan, United States
- 3 Wildlife Services, USDA/APHIS Okemos, Michigan, United States, Okemos, United States
- 4 National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Ames, Iowa, United States
- 5 Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, Michigan, United States
- 6 Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Lansing, Michigan, United States
- 7 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
Introduction: Free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are a self-sustaining reservoir for bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in northeastern lower Michigan, (United States) continually putting the area’s cattle industry at risk. Liberal recreational deer harvest, baiting bans, and mitigation measures on farms have reduced but not eliminated bTB in deer nor have they eliminated transmission to cattle. With apparent prevalence in deer being low (1-2%) but constant, vaccination could be an additional tool to aid in addressing the problem and merits investigation. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is a widely used human vaccine for tuberculosis that has also been well studied in domestic livestock and wildlife. It is the primary vaccine candidate, and oral delivery is the logical means for delivering it to free-ranging deer, although this has never previously been attempted. Materials and methods: Building off methods and strategies developed for vaccinating deer, we incorporated BCG vaccine into vaccine delivery units (DUs), consisting of a food-based matrix. We deployed DUs at sites in Michigan with a historically high prevalence of bTB. At each site, 100 DUs were placed systematically 2.5-m apart on 50-m x 10-m grids and monitored with still and video cameras. Consumption, still images, and video data were analyzed to assess uptake of vaccine DUs by deer. Results and discussion: Vaccine DUs were deployed in 2024 at 11 agricultural sites on private land which had previously demonstrated moderate to high deer activity and at all but two sites >50% of distributed vaccine DU’s were consumed, with 100% consumed at two sites. Deer learned to seek out and consume vaccine DU’s in just one to three days, with individuals often eating more than the 1 or 2 needed to vaccinate themselves. This high level of consumption was in spite of an exceptionally warm and dry winter, where deer were less food stressed than usual.
Keywords: BCG, bovine tuberculosis, Disease, Odocoileus virginianus, Oral, Vaccine, White-tailed deer
Received: 19 Dec 2024; Accepted: 28 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 VerCauteren, Feuka, Lavelle, Glow, Kohen, Ryan, Aderman, Duffiney, Palmer, Boggiatto, Kanipe, Hamby, Ruell, Cosgrove, Vanderklok, Snow, Pepin and Campa III. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kurt VerCauteren, National Wildlife Research Center, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA), Fort Collins, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.