data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. One Health
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1538206
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study evaluated vaccination and prophylactic use of antimicrobials as strategies to prevent Porcine Proliferative Enteropathy (PPE) during nursery and growth-finishing phases. Three hundred weaned piglets (~ 29 days old) were distributed into groups: NVMEDno vaccinated against Lawsonia intracellularis but in-feed medicated with antimicrobials (amoxicillin, florfenicol, lincomycin, spectinomycin and tilmicosin); VMEDvaccinated and in-feed medicated; VNMEDvaccinated but no in-feed medicated. Piglets were vaccinated at weaning (Porcilis ® Ileitis, MSD Animal Health). The following variables were assessed: growth and health performance, anti-L. intracellularis IgG levels, L. intracellularis fecal shedding, Pneumonia and Pleurisy Index (PPI) at slaughter, antimicrobial consumption and costs, and vaccination expenses. Average daily gain (ADG) at the nursery phase was lower in VNMED group (p<0.01); however, there was no treatment effect on feed conversion, ADG, and body weight at growth-finishing phase (p≥0.23). Similar anti-L. intracellularis IgG levels were found for VMED and VNMED groups at all evaluated moments (p=0.01). L. intracellularis was only detected in feces samples from 4/90 tested piglets and no difference in health performance was found (p>0.05). Groups presented PPI<0.89. Infeed antimicrobial consumption and related costs were 3 to 3.5-fold higher for NVMED and VMED groups compared to VNMED group. The prophylactic administration of antimicrobials used in this study did not affect the serological performance postvaccination against L. intracellularis. Additionally, vaccine use to prevent PPE reduced the antimicrobial consumption and related costs by ~70%, with no impairments on production outputs.
Keywords: Pig production, lawsonia intracellularis, Vaccination, antibiotics, antimicrobial resistance
Received: 02 Dec 2024; Accepted: 21 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gallina, Quirino, Frandoloso, Tutida, Norenberg, Bianchi, Coldebella and Kich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jalusa Deon Kich, Embrapa Swine and Poultry, Concórdia, Brazil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.