The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1529359
Midline vs. Lateral Flank Approach for Spaying Nutrias (Myocastor coypus) Author names
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- 2 Ambulatorio Veterinario Belvedere, Reggio Emilia, Italy
The nutria (Myocastor coypus), an invasive semi-aquatic rodent in Europe introduced for the fur and meat industry at the beginning of the 20th century, has rapidly become a significant ecological and economic concern. In Italy, the damage caused by nutrias to crops, wetlands, and drainage systems has prompted the development of containment plans. However, these efforts, while effective in the short term, are challenged by rapid recolonization and local resistance. One emerging approach for controlling nutria populations is sterilization. This study compared two surgical techniques for ovariectomy in 60 free-ranging nutrias: 30 animals underwent the flank approach (FA), and 30 underwent the ventral midline approach (VMA). The animals were randomly assigned to one of the two groups and monitored for anesthesia duration, surgery time, recovery, and return to feeding. Results indicated that the FA group exhibited significantly shorter surgical and recovery times than the VMA group, with a positive correlation between body weight and surgery duration only in the VMA group. Additionally, a higher percentage of animals in the FA group resumed feeding within 12 hours, suggesting better post-operative recovery. The FA technique thus demonstrated advantages over the VMA, reducing the risk of intraoperative complications and shortening recovery times. These findings suggest that the FA technique may be more suitable for reproductive control of nutria as part of invasive wildlife management strategies.
Keywords: Myocastor coypus, Nutria, Spaying, Wildlife population control, Exotic animal medicine
Received: 16 Nov 2024; Accepted: 06 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ianni, Pelizzone, Gavezzoli, Fumeo and Vetere. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Martina Gavezzoli, Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, 43126, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.