data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1527279
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The zoonotic transmission of tuberculosis (TB) from cattle to humans has long been recognized while its reverse zoonotic transmission from humans to animals has recently been reported.The socioeconomic situations of the rural communities of Ethiopia are conducive for the zoonotic and reverse zoonotic transmission of TB between cattle and human. The objective of this study was to investigate the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex between cattle and humans in Central Ethiopia.To achieve this objective a cross-sectional study was conducted on 1896 cattle slaughtered in two abattoirs and 392 TB suspicious human subjects visiting health institutions for treatment.Mycobacteriological culture and spoligotyping were used for the study. In addition, the Spoligotype International Types and VNTR (variable number of DNA tandem repeats) International Types (SITVIT2) database and the online "Run TB-Lineage" were used to identify SIT and lineages of the human and cattle isolates.Results: Culture positivity was found in 26.3% (21/80) of the gross TB suspicious tissue lesions of cattle of the lungs and lymph node (mandibular, retropharyngeal, cranial and caudal mediastinal, left and right bronchial, hepatic, and mesenteric lymph nodes). Of the 21 cattle isolates, 12 (57.2%) were M. bovis while the remaining 9 (42.8%) were M. tuberculosis. Similarly, only 22% (86/392) of the sputa samples from TB suspicious humans were culture positive. These 86 human isolates were classified into 81 M.tuberculosis, three M. africanum and two M. bovis by spoligotyping. SIT50, SIT118 and SIT1318 which belong to the human species were isolated from both humans and cattle. The two human M. bovis isolates had the pattern of SB1443, which was not isolated from cattle in this study area.The zoonotic and reverse zoonotic transmissions of TB were confirmed in Ethiopia by the isolation of two M. bovis from human and isolation of nine M. tuberculosis from cattle, which suggested higher role of M. tuberculosis in cattle compared to the role of M. bovis in humans.
Keywords: Ethiopia, Reverse zoonosis, Tuberculosis, zoonosis, Central Ethiopia
Received: 14 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Woldemariam, Mohammed, Zewude, Chanyalew, Khalifa, Mamo Kassa and Ameni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Temesgen Mohammed, Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Gobena Ameni, Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.