
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1527196
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The effect of drug use on physical health, mental wellbeing, and quality of life can extend to family members, including children, and even companion animals. People who use drugs, a medically vulnerable population, face stigma and shaming when accessing healthcare services that engender mistrust and hinder future access. In an emergency where a pet has accidentally ingested drugs, there is no research on whether this stigma may prevent owners from seeking veterinary help. The objectives of this study were to describe actions taken by pet owners after accidental pet drug poisonings in Vancouver, British Columbia and understand how drug use-related stigma is related to owners’ decision to seek veterinary care. We surveyed two populations of pet owners, a general population recruited online (n=82) and a sample recruited in-person at two outreach services that assist low-income pet owners in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver (n=32). Participants who had not experienced a pet poisoning were asked about their actions and attitudes in a hypothetical drug poisoning event. Within the general population sample, 64 (78%) responded based on a hypothetical scenario, and in this group, the concern that a veterinarian might remove their animal was associated with higher self-reported discrimination in three domains, general discrimination, discrimination accessing non-health services, and discrimination accessing health-related services. A higher perceived experience of discrimination within each category was also associated with a greater concern that veterinary staff might report them to the authorities or social services, as well as an increased expectation of hiding information from a veterinarian, including information about what drug the animal ingested and how the animal was exposed. Those who had experienced a poisoning emergency were asked about their actions and encounters in the most recent poisoning. More than half sought veterinary assistance. Among those that did not, some reasons owners avoided veterinary care included confidence in the ability to treat the animal at home (n=5), or fear of discrimination (n=1) or punishment (n=1) during the veterinary visit. Our findings suggest that drug use-related stigma may contribute to a hesitancy to seek veterinary care or fully disclose information in an accidental pet poisoning.
Keywords: illicit drugs, Animal Welfare, companion animals, pet emergency, Harm Reduction
Received: 13 Nov 2024; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chambers, Ly and Protopopova. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Chloe Chambers, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.