data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Comparative and Clinical Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1477554
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical pulmonary disorder with manifestations of pulmonary edema, inflammation, and impaired oxygenation. Establishing reliable animal ARDS models has been critical for investigating its mechanisms and for testing pharmacological interventions. The present study sought to induce a moderate ARDS model in New Zealand White rabbits with a model involving a mix of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), oleic acid (OA), and ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI). Four experimental groups were established: negative control (NC, n=4), OA (OM, n=6), LPS+OA (LOM, n=6), and LPS+OA+VILI (LOV, n=6). Throughout the modeling process, vital signs (MAP and HR), respiratory parameters (Cdyn), and hematological indices (WBC and P/F) were continuously monitored, and lung ultrasound was performed. After the experiment, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected to measure total protein content, and lung tissue samples were collected to determine the wet-to-dry (W/D) ratio. HE-stained lung tissue sections were prepared and scored according to the ATS guidelines for lung injury scoring. The LOV group showed the most severe lung injury, significantly decreasing MAP and Cdyn. Pathological and ultrasound scores were considerably higher in the LOV group compared to the OM and LOM groups (P < 0.05). The lung W/D ratio was significantly higher in the LOM (6.68±0.56) and LOV (7.40±0.56) groups compared to the NC group (5.20±0.16) (P < 0.05). At T6, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the LOV group was ≤200 mmHg, significantly lower than that in the NC group (P < 0.05). Some rabbits in the OM and LOM groups also had PaO2/FiO2 ratios ≤200 mmHg, but the difference compared to the NC group was not statistically significant. In conclusion, this study established a novel moderate ARDS model in New Zealand White rabbits using LPS, OA, and VILI. The model demonstrates severe lung damage, pulmonary edema, and sustained hypoxemia, providing a basis for future research.
Keywords: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, mechanical ventilation, Oleic Acid, lipopolysaccharide, animal model
Received: 08 Aug 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tian, Lu, Huang, Zhong, Lei, Liu, Tao, Yun, Huang, Tan, Liu, Zhou, Peng, Wang, Zhang, Luo and Zhong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xiaoli Luo, Department of Pediatric Critical Medicine, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
Zhijun Zhong, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.