The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases
Volume 12 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1465926
The case for development of a core outcome set (COS) and supplemental reporting guidelines for influenza vaccine challenge trial research in swine
Provisionally accepted- 1 Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
- 2 College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
Previously, we systematically reviewed more than 20 years of influenza vaccine challenge trial research in pigs to answer the question, "does vaccinating sows protect offspring?" Overall, most studies were well designed but clinical heterogeneity made between study comparisons challenging. Studies varied by samples, outcomes, and assays selected for measurement. Additionally, data essential for inclusion of findings in meta-analyses were often insufficiently reported and as a result, summary effect measures were either not derived or were not meaningful. Clinical heterogeneity and reporting issues complicate and limit what can be learned cumulatively from research and both represent two types of avoidable research waste. Here, we illustrate each concern using data collected tangentially during the systematic review and propose two corrective strategies, both of which have broad applicability across veterinary intervention research; i) develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) to reduce unnecessary clinical heterogeneity in future research, and ii) encourage funders and journal editors to require submitted research protocols and manuscripts adhere to established reporting guidelines. As a reporting corollary, we developed a supplemental checklist specific to influenza vaccine challenge trial research in swine and propose that it is completed by researchers and included with all study protocol and manuscript submissions. The checklist serves two purposes: as a reminder of details essential to report for inclusion of findings in meta-analyses and sub-group meta-analyses (e.g. antigenic or genomic descriptions of influenza vaccine and challenge viruses), and as an aid to help synthesis researchers fully characterize and comprehensively include studies in reviews.
Keywords: core outcome set (COS), Evidence based medicine (MeSH), IAV-S vaccine, Reporting guideline adherence, Swine (source: MeSH NLM), Research waste
Received: 17 Jul 2024; Accepted: 27 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Keay, Alberts, O'Connor, Friendship, O’Sullivan and Poljak. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sheila Keay, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.