Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Parasitology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1537171

Global prevalence of Eimeria species in goats: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Endris A Ali Endris A Ali 1Abdul Ghafar Abdul Ghafar 1Juan C Angeles-Hernandez Juan C Angeles-Hernandez 2Muhammad Yaseen Muhammad Yaseen 3Charles G Gauci Charles G Gauci 1Ian Beveridge Ian Beveridge 1Sandra Baxendell Sandra Baxendell 4Abdul Jabbar Abdul Jabbar 1*
  • 1 The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • 2 National Autonomous University of Mexico, México City, México, Mexico
  • 3 School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States
  • 4 Goat Veterinary Consultancies, Queensland, Australia, Keperra, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Coccidiosis is a protozoal disease caused by Eimeria species, the main symptom of which is diarrhoea. Eimeria spp. infection can cause weight loss and ill-thrift in goats, and in severe cases, it can lead to mortality in kids, resulting in economic losses for the goat industry. This study aimed to determine the global prevalence of Eimeria spp. in goats and to identify the possible predictors of heterogeneity among selected studies.Methods: Data were retrieved from five databases of major global importance (PubMed, Web of Science, CAB Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar), with 255 studies published between 1963 and 2022 being included. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI), followed by subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis to identify factors contributing to high prevalence and explore sources of heterogeneity among studies.The estimated global prevalence of Eimeria spp. in goats was 62.9% (95% CI: 58.6-67.2). Our results indicated high inter-study variability (inconsistency index (I 2 ) = 99.7%, P < 0.01). Among the variables analysed, regions and quality of studies were the most significant predictors of heterogeneity. According to the region-based subgroup meta-analysis, North America had the highest estimated prevalence of Eimeria spp. (92.2%, 95% CI: 82.7-98.2), followed by Europe (86.6%, 95% CI: 79.8-92.3), while Asia had the lowest prevalence (52.0%, 95% CI: 45.9-58.1). Most countries (n = 42/56) had an estimated prevalence above the overall pooled estimate (>62.9%). The subgroup of studies conducted in 2000 or later presented a lower prevalence of 59.6% (95% CI: 54.7-64.3). Studies with a score of 5-7 had a significantly higher prevalence (72.4%, 95% CI: 66.2-78.2) than studies with low or medium scores (p < 0.01). The prevalence of Eimeria spp. in goats detected with conventional and molecular methods was 67.3% (95% CI: 47.0-84.7). Only 47% (119/255) of the studies provided details on identifying Eimeria at the species level. Overall, more than 26 Eimeria spp. werehave been identified in goats globally, with . Among these, the most frequently reported and pathogenic species were E. arloingi, (115/119), E. ninakohlyakimovae, (108/119), E. christenseni,

    Keywords: Eimeria, Goat, Global prevalence, Meta-analysis, Systematic review

    Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 30 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ali, Ghafar, Angeles-Hernandez, Yaseen, Gauci, Beveridge, Baxendell and Jabbar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Abdul Jabbar, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.