Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1513141
This article is part of the Research Topic Animal wellbeing, conservation, research, and education: Supporting people in caring professions View all 7 articles

Perceptions of swine euthanasia among Brazilian caretakers from nonintegrated swine farms

Provisionally accepted
Laya Kannan Silva Alves Laya Kannan Silva Alves 1,2Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia 2*Andreia Goncalves Arruda Andreia Goncalves Arruda 3Cecília Archangelo Ferreira de Melo Cecília Archangelo Ferreira de Melo 1*Nadia de Almeida Ciriaco Gomes Nadia de Almeida Ciriaco Gomes 1Roberta Yukari Hoshino Roberta Yukari Hoshino 1*Cesar Augusto Pospissil Garbossa Cesar Augusto Pospissil Garbossa 1
  • 1 Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil
  • 2 Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 3 Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Timely and humane euthanasia is crucial for animal welfare on swine farms, yet challenges persist in its implementation, particularly in Brazil, where the responsibility often falls to caretakers lacking training. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of swine caretakers regarding euthanasia across non-integrated farms (ranging from 1,000 to 3,500 housed sows) and different experience levels (from less than a month to 40 years working with pigs). A total of 117 people directly working with pigs participated in a survey designed to evaluate their decision-making skills, euthanasia competencies, and understanding of Brazilian guidelines for euthanasia methods. Using Cluster analysis, we identified two distinct groups of caretakers: 1) Empathetic, self-sufficient, apathetic about euthanasia; and 2) Empathetic, knowledge seeker, uncomfortable with euthanasia. Both Clusters exhibited high empathy toward pigs and confidence in identifying sick animals but differed in their attitudes toward euthanasia. The risk factor analysis showed a tendency for younger respondents (under 36 years old) and those from smaller farms (less than 2,000 sows) were more likely to belong to Cluster 2, while older caretakers (over 36 years) and those working on larger farms (more than 2,000 housed sows) tended to belong to Cluster 1. Furthermore, a significant proportion of caretakers lacked knowledge of the euthanasia Brazilian guidelines, as evidenced by incorrect responses regarding acceptable euthanasia methods, such as performing cardiac perforation or using non-penetrating captive bolt guns on growing-finishing pigs. This study highlights the variability in caretaker experience and attitudes toward euthanasia, suggesting a critical need for targeted training programs and euthanasia protocols that address both emotional and practical aspects. Improved understanding of caretaker attitudes can enhance both human and animal welfare on farms.

    Keywords: attitudes, decision-making, On-farm euthanasia, pigs, Timely euthanasia, training, welfare

    Received: 17 Oct 2024; Accepted: 09 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Alves, Pairis-Garcia, Arruda, de Melo, Gomes, Hoshino and Garbossa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia, Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27607, North Carolina, United States
    Cecília Archangelo Ferreira de Melo, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 05508-270, Brazil
    Roberta Yukari Hoshino, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, 05508-270, Brazil

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.