Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1492418

Rabies Vaccinations at the Rural-Urban Divide: Successes and barriers to dog rabies vaccination programs from a rural and urban campaign in Zambia

Provisionally accepted
Ricky Chazya Ricky Chazya 1Chilufya Aneta Susan Mulenga Chilufya Aneta Susan Mulenga 1Andy Gibson Andy Gibson 2Frederic Lohr Frederic Lohr 2Cassandra Boutelle Cassandra Boutelle 3Sarah Bonaparte Sarah Bonaparte 3Oline Sinywibulula Oline Sinywibulula 1Gareth Thomas Gareth Thomas 2Patricia Bwalya Patricia Bwalya 1George Dautu George Dautu 1Linous Munsimbwe Linous Munsimbwe 1Geoffrey Munkombwe Muuka Geoffrey Munkombwe Muuka 1Luke Gamble Luke Gamble 2Ryan M. Wallace Ryan M. Wallace 3Michelle Ann Waltenburg Michelle Ann Waltenburg 3*
  • 1 Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Lusaka, Zambia
  • 2 Mission Rabies, Cranborne, Dorset, United Kingdom
  • 3 National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Dog vaccination against rabies is considered one of the most effective strategies at preventing human deaths from rabies and is a key strategy for eliminating dog-mediated human rabies deaths. Traditional vaccination approaches in Zambia rarely collect operational data to assess coverage and inform subsequent campaigns. Following mass vaccination campaigns in rural (Itezhi tezhi) and urban (Lusaka) communities, we evaluated vaccination coverage achieved during the campaigns and characterized and estimated the dog population in these communities. Herd immunity (i.e., 70% vaccination coverage) was not achieved in the Lusaka campaign, likely due to challenges in pre-campaign community sensitization and distance to vaccination sites in the central point campaign approach. Dog population density showed a strong exponential association with human density (R2 = 0.89). Extrapolating this relationship nationally, there are an estimated 3.2 million dogs in Zambia (human-to-dog ratio 5.8:1) with 86% residing in rural communities at a very low density of less than 6 dogs per square kilometer. As most dogs were found to reside at very low densities, unique challenges to large-scale dog vaccination approaches may impact Zambia, due to high logistical costs associated with these settings. Prioritizing vaccinations in higher-density free-roaming dog populations could maximize effectiveness in resource-limited settings. Private veterinary services were commonly utilized among surveyed dog owners in urbanized communities in Lusaka, suggesting that they are an important collaborator for achieving rabies herd immunity. With improved knowledge of dog population and ownership characteristics, Zambia is well-prepared to design more effective vaccination campaigns as the rabies elimination program expands.

    Keywords: Rabies, Rabies vaccination, dog vaccination programs, dog-mediated rabies, dogmediated human rabies elimination

    Received: 06 Sep 2024; Accepted: 19 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Chazya, Mulenga, Gibson, Lohr, Boutelle, Bonaparte, Sinywibulula, Thomas, Bwalya, Dautu, Munsimbwe, Muuka, Gamble, Wallace and Waltenburg. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Michelle Ann Waltenburg, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, 30329, Georgia, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.