Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Anesthesiology and Animal Pain Management
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1478732

Blind supratemporal retrobulbar block in cats: a feasibility cadaveric study and its efficacy in a group of subjects undergoing corneal or intraocular surgery

Provisionally accepted
Elena Lardone Elena Lardone 1*Manuela Crasta Manuela Crasta 2Pier Carlo Ostan Pier Carlo Ostan 2Paola Gherlinzoni Paola Gherlinzoni 1Alessandra Landi Alessandra Landi 1Paolo Franci Paolo Franci 1
  • 1 University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • 2 AniCura VisionVet, San Giovanni in Persiceto, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The supratemporal retrobulbar block (RB) has not been comprehensively described in cats. Materials and methods: cadaveric study: a modified supratemporal retrobulbar injection of 0.1 ml/kg of iomeprole and saline (1:3) was executed using a Tuohy needle in recently deceased cats. Cadavers underwent computed tomography before and following injections. Injectate distribution within the intraconal space was evaluated. Extraconal injections were considered a failure. Clinical study: cats undergoing corneal/intraocular surgery were included. After intramuscular premedication with methadone 0.3 mg/kg, dexmedetomidine 3 mcg/kg and alfaxalone 2 mg/kg and induction with intravenous (IV) alfaxalone to effect, isoflurane anaesthesia was maintained with a target end-expired fraction of 1.1%. Cats were randomly allocated in the retrobulbar group [RG, receiving a modified supratemporal RB with 0.1 ml/kg of a mixture of 2% lidocaine (5.5 ml) and 0.75% ropivacaine (2 ml)] or control group (CG). When heart rate or mean arterial pressure increased above 20% of the pre-incisional values, fentanyl (1 mcg/kg IV) was administered. Alfaxalone (0.5 mg/kg IV) was injected when anaesthesia was deemed too light. After a total of 3 interventions regardless the type of drugs (fentanyl/alfaxalone), a constant rate infusion of fentanyl (5 mcg/kg/h IV) was started. Anaesthetist interventions, quality of recovery (blindly assessed using a descriptive score scale), postoperative eye rubbing, complications were studied. Results: in the cadaveric study 8 eyes were included (success rate = 87%). The contrast agent spread was scored "moderate-to-large" or "large" in 85.7% of cases and a median 360° (180-360) distribution around the optic nerve was reported. In the clinical study 12 cats were included (6 in RG, 6 in CG). The median time to perform the RB was 35 seconds (20-50). Only the controls required anaesthetist interventions [total amount of 6 (p=0.0276): fentanyl (3/6) and alfaxalone (2/6)]. The RG had a significantly better recovery score (p=0.0012) than CG. Only controls showed eye rubbing (3/6). Conclusions: the modified supratemporal RB is an achievable and rapidly performed technique. In this study it reduced intraoperative drug administration and improved recovery quality in cats undergoing corneal or intraocular surgery.

    Keywords: supratemporal, Retrobulbar block, cat, Corneal surgery, intraocular surgery Words count: 4298

    Received: 10 Aug 2024; Accepted: 05 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Lardone, Crasta, Ostan, Gherlinzoni, Landi and Franci. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Elena Lardone, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.