Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1465844

Effects of lidocaine-plus-meloxicam treatment on behavioral and physiological changes, and leukocyte heat shock protein 90 gene expression after surgical castration in Hanwoo bulls

Provisionally accepted
Ingu Cho Ingu Cho 1Seonpil Yoo Seonpil Yoo 2Da Jin Sol Jung Da Jin Sol Jung 1Jaesung Lee Jaesung Lee 1Seok-Hyeon Baek Seok-Hyeon Baek 1Sang Yeob Kim Sang Yeob Kim 1Jinoh Lee Jinoh Lee 1Dohyun Kim Dohyun Kim 1Hyun Jin Kim Hyun Jin Kim 1Myunggi Baik Myunggi Baik 1*
  • 1 College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2 Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study examined the effects of surgical castration and lidocaine-plus-meloxicam treatment on growth, physiology, behaviors, and leukocyte heat shock protein 90 (HSP 90) gene expression in Hanwoo (Korean cattle) bulls. Twenty Hanwoo bulls (body weight 248.8 ± 28.5 kg, age 9.4 ± 1.04 months) were assigned to three treatments: surgical castration with lidocaine injection (5 mL in the scrotum) and oral meloxicam administration (1 mg/kg body weight) (LM; n =7); surgical castration with placebo injection (5 mL of 0.9 % NaCl) and oral placebo administration (lactose, 1 mg/kg body weight) (CAS; n=7); and shame castration (SHAM; n = 6). Meloxicam and lactose were administered 3 h before castration, and lidocaine and NaCl were injected immediately before castration. Surgical castration was performed with a Newberry knife and a Henderson castration tool. Wight was measured the day before and 14 d after castration, and behavior was observed from 0.5 h to 4.5 h post-castration. Blood was collected at -1 d, 0.5 h, 6 h, 1 d, 3 d, 7 d, and 14 d after castration to measure plasma cortisol, haptoglobin, and leukocyte HSP 90 mRNA. Castration tended to decrease average daily gain (p = 0.06), but the LM treatment did not affect weight gain. Bulls in CAS showed higher cortisol concentration (p < 0.05) at 0.5 and 6 h after castration compared to SHAM, with no difference between CAS and LM. Castration increased haptoglobin concentration at 1 and 3 d after castration (p < 0.05) while LM bulls showed decreased haptoglobin concentration (p < 0.05) than CAS bulls at these times. HSP90 mRNA was increased at 6 h post-castration while LM did not reduce its expression, suggesting HSP90 may serve as an acute stress marker in castrated bulls. Castration increased (p < 0.05) frequencies of drinking, lying, walking, leg lifting, kicking, and stiff gait, while decreasing (p < 0.05) eating frequency. LM alleviated (p < 0.05) drinking, leg lifting, kicking, and stiff gait. Collectively, castration resulted in physiological changes, increased leukocyte HSP90 gene expression, and altered behaviors. These findings suggest that lidocaine-plus-meloxicam treatment partially mitigates pain and inflammation in the castrated bulls.

    Keywords: welfare, stress, Bull, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, Local anesthetic

    Received: 17 Jul 2024; Accepted: 13 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cho, Yoo, Jung, Lee, Baek, Kim, Lee, Kim, Kim and Baik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Myunggi Baik, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.