- 1Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, AC, Mazatlan, Mexico
- 2Departamento de Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad de Guanajuato, Irapuato, Mexico
Editorial on the Research Topic
Fish behaviour and welfare
World fish production from both aquaculture and fisheries increased in 2022, with a record number of around 223.2 million tons, from which 185.4 million tons consist of aquatic animals and 37.8 million tons are algae (1). Fish culture is an important source for many households in different parts of the world. One of its principal objectives is to effectively apply dry feed (pelleted feed) for promoting fish growth. In 2022, global aquaculture surpassed the 130.9 million tons, of which 94.4 million tons were aquatic animals, 51 percent of the total aquatic animal production. The principal source of fish, as one could see, is aquaculture. Number of fish farms has increased considerably so that the demand of higher population and the need for water related products are met. This has resulted in public concern on how to produce aquaculture products for human consumption, principally on the area of fish welfare. Fish (food) can be produced in an environmentally correct way without causing undue suffering to cultivated organisms. Captivity conditions must contribute to the health and welfare of each animal. Fish must be cared for by trained and experienced personnel, including providing veterinary care, and researchers must be strictly qualified and have sufficient experience and training before undertaking animal research (2). Different approach to different welfare topics of different species are presented in this book. All the different topics have in common the wellbeing of the fish that is being cultured for our benefit: Fish life cycle; from egg to slaughter: monitoring the welfare of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, throughout its entire life cycle in aquaculture (Pedrazzani et al.). Welfare indicators under farm conditions: welfare indicators in Tilapia: an Epidemiological Approach (Flores-García et al.), and Qualitative Behavioral Assessments, a welfare indicator for farmed Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) in response to a stressful challenge (Wiese et al.). Reproduction: Use of male-to-female sex reversal as a welfare scoring system in the protandrous farmed gilthead sea bream (Spaurus aurata) (Holhorea et al.). Farm conditions: Experimental study on the effect of sound stimulation on hearing and behavior of juvenile black rockfish (Sebastes schleglii) (Wang et al.); The effects of aerator noise on the swimming, feeding, and growth of Micropterus salmoides (Zhang et al.); and Behavior analysis of juvenile steelhead trout under blue and red light color conditions based on multiple object tracking (Li et al.). Sedation: Does sedation with AQUI-S® mitigate transport stress and post transport mortality in ballan wrasse (Labrus bergyltae)? (Calabrese et al.). Killing methods: Farmed fish welfare during slaughter in Italy: survey on stunning and killing methods and indicators of unconsciousness (Clemente et al.); and Humane slaughter in Mediterranean Sea bass and bream aquaculture: farm characteristics, stakeholder views, and policy implications (van Pelt et al.).
Author contributions
PA-R: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ACP-C: Writing – review & editing. RM-Y: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. FAO (2024). In Brief to The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. Blue Transformation in Action. Rome: FAO. doi: 10.4060/cd0690en
2. CCAC (2024). Canadian Council on Animal Care. Redefining our view of animal welfare in science. Available at: https://ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Guidelines/CCAC_guidelines-Categories_of_welfare_impact.pdf (accessed August 26, 2024).
Keywords: fish, health, welfare, behavior, aquaculture
Citation: Almazán-Rueda P, Puello-Cruz AC and Martínez-Yáñez R (2024) Editorial: Fish behaviour and welfare. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1462812. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1462812
Received: 10 July 2024; Accepted: 19 August 2024;
Published: 03 September 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Laura Ann Boyle, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ireland
Copyright © 2024 Almazán-Rueda, Puello-Cruz and Martínez-Yáñez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pablo Almazán-Rueda, YWxtYXphbiYjeDAwMDQwO2NpYWQubXg=; Ana C. Puello-Cruz, cHVlbGxvJiN4MDAwNDA7Y2lhZC5teA==