Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1459293

A systematic review of epidemiological modelling in response to Lumpy Skin Disease outbreaks

Provisionally accepted
Simin Lee Simin Lee 1*Christopher Baker Christopher Baker 2,3,4Emily Sellens Emily Sellens 5Mark Stevenson Mark Stevenson 1Sharon Roche Sharon Roche 5Robyn N. Hall Robyn N. Hall 6Andrew C. Breed Andrew C. Breed 5Simon Firestone Simon Firestone 1
  • 1 Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • 2 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • 3 Melbourne Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 4 Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, School of Biosciences, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 5 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • 6 Ausvet, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is an infectious disease currently spreading worldwide and poses a serious global threat. However, there is limited evidence and understanding to support the use of models to inform decision-making in LSD outbreak responses. This review aimed to identify modelling approaches that can be used before and during an outbreak of LSD, examining their characteristics and priorities, and proposing a structured workflow. We conducted a systematic review and identified 51 relevant publications on LSD outbreak modelling. The review identified six categories of question to be addressed following outbreak detection (origin, entry pathway, outbreak severity, risk factors, spread, and effectiveness of control measures), and five analytical techniques used to address them (descriptive epidemiology, risk factor analysis, spatiotemporal analysis, dynamic transmission modelling, and simulation modelling). We evaluated the questions each analytical technique can address, along with their data requirements and limitations, and accordingly assigned priorities to the modelling. Based on this, we propose a structured workflow for modelling during an LSD outbreak. Additionally, we emphasise the importance of pre-outbreak preparation and continuous updating of modelling post-outbreak for effective decision-making. This study also discusses the inherent limitations and uncertainties in the identified modelling approaches. To support this workflow, highquality data must be collected in standardised formats, and efforts should be made to reduce inherent uncertainties of the models. The suggested modelling workflow can be used as a process to support rapid response for countries facing their first LSD occurrence and can be adapted to other transboundary diseases.

    Keywords: Lumpy Skin Disease, outbreak response, modelling workflow, Decision Making, Systematic review

    Received: 04 Jul 2024; Accepted: 28 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Lee, Baker, Sellens, Stevenson, Roche, Hall, Breed and Firestone. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Simin Lee, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Victoria, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.