Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1454032

A Mixed Method Approach to Analysing Patterns and Drivers of Antibiotic Use and Resistance in Beef Farms in Argentina

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • 2 Centro de Investigación Veterinaria Tandil, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tandil, Buenos Aires, Argentina

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Antimicrobial resistance is a challenge to be faced by all sectors; within beef farming, antibiotic use patterns vary by country and management practices. Argentina is a country with high beef consumption but limited information surrounding antibiotic use. The aims of our project were to understand how antibiotics are being used across the beef industry in Argentina and exploring drivers of usage. We collected data via four methods: A survey of farms including antibiotic use (from purchase data); a detailed survey of two farms’ therapeutic antibiotic use; a survey of vets' views on certain antibiotic practices; a focus group of farmers and vets focusing on wider influences affecting decision making. Antibiotic use data was calculated using mg/population corrected unit (PCU) using the European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption method (ESVAC). The median use across 17 farms that supplied purchase data was 76.52 mg/kg PCU (ESVAC) (IQR = 36.81 mg/kg PCU [ESVAC]). The detailed farm records showed that the largest reason for treatment was group treatments (72.92% of treatments) followed by treatment for respiratory disease (12.75% of treatments). Macrolides accounted for 76.37% of treatments. Nearly half of farms used routine prophylactic treatment for arriving animals (n = 7/18). The use of quarantine and sick pens were seen as important by surveyed vets with antibiotic prophylaxis and in-feed antibiotics seen as contributors to antibiotic resistance. The focus group highlighted the effect of the economic and political landscape on the way they farmed and recognised the responsibility the farming sector had towards antibiotic stewardship. Overall, Argentine beef farms resemble North American beef farms in terms of antibiotic practices but with considerably lower usage. Monensin is widely used in Argentine beef farms and represents a large proportion of total ABU. The adaptation period presents a challenge to animal health; antibiotics are used in a range of measures from prophylaxis to individual treatment depending on farm management practices. Further research into internationally comparable measures of ABU and detailed cost breakdowns of practical on farm interventions are needed to aid improved antimicrobial stewardship in countries such as Argentina.

    Keywords: Antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, Feedlots, Beef farms, bovine respiratory disease, Argentina, qualitative research

    Received: 24 Jun 2024; Accepted: 11 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Bedford, Galotta, de Yaniz, Oikonomou, Nardello, Davies and Sanchez Bruni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Cherrill Bedford, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Peers Davies, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.