The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1452109
This article is part of the Research Topic New Challenges in Animal Welfare, Volume II View all 5 articles
Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Quails Reared for Meat Production
Provisionally accepted- Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Barcelona, Spain
An estimated 1.4 billion quails are reared each year for their eggs and meat, but animal welfare assessment protocols for this species have yet to be established. The aim of the present study wasis to implement an animal welfare-assessment protocol developed through a multidimensional approach and containing a number of animal-based indicators (ABIs) for quails (Coturnix japonica) reared for meat production. Fourteen Spanish farms in the first year of integration in an animal welfare certification scheme were visited during 2021 and 2022 and audited by the same auditor. The protocol is divided into four principles and 12 criteria. The Good feeding principle includes six indicators (one ABI), Good housing includes 10 indicators (five ABIs), Good health includes 12 indicators (nine ABIs), and Appropriate behaviour contains eight indicators (five ABIs). The final welfare assessment at farmlevel is based on the calculation of scores from the on-farm recordings. The assessment is a step-wise weighted sum of scores between the different indicators and the final score ranges from 0 to 100. The main welfare problems detected in all farms were the lack of temperature and humidity records, the lighting pattern as well as the absence of outdoor range or the provision of outdoor access. To a lesser degree, but also found in some on a significant number of farms, were excessive numbers of birds per feeder, presence of improperly functioning drinkers (i.e. not working, inadequate water flow or dripping water), poor litter quality and high prevalence of birds with dirty plumage and lameness.Despite of this, the farms obtained a good overall score being rated as 'enhanced' (n = 11) and 'acceptable' (n = 3). The tool proved useful for identifying specific welfare issues at farm level and conducting benchmarking.
Keywords: animal-based protocol welfare, Assessment Protocol, behaviour, Certification, feeding, Health, Housing, outputs
Received: 20 Jun 2024; Accepted: 30 Aug 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 DALMAU, Padilla, Varvaró-Porter, Xercavins, Velarde and Contreras-Jodar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
ANTONI DALMAU, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Barcelona, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.