Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1444887

Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia's working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis project dataset

Provisionally accepted
Tessa R. Cornell Tessa R. Cornell 1*Biram L. Fye Biram L. Fye 1Edrisa Nyassi Edrisa Nyassi 1Fatou Ceesay Fatou Ceesay 1Mahmud Jallow Mahmud Jallow 2R F. Langendonk R F. Langendonk 1Dan G. Wootton Dan G. Wootton 1,3Gina Pinchbeck Gina Pinchbeck 1Claire E. Scantlebury Claire E. Scantlebury 1
  • 1 Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, North West England, United Kingdom
  • 2 Department of Livestock Services (DLS), Ministry of Agriculture, Abuko, Gambia
  • 3 NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, Liverpool, North West England, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Exposure rates to Histoplasma species, the causative agent of equine Epizootic Lymphangitis (EL), are unknown amongst working equids in The Gambia.The primary aims of this study were to estimate anti-Histoplasma antibody seroprevalence in the equid population in rural The Gambia, and to explore risk factors for seropositivity. A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted(February-July 2022), representing baseline measurements of a longitudinal cohort study.Horses(n=463) and donkeys(n=92) without EL signs were recruited in 18 study sites. Following informed owner consent, equid clinical and management data were recorded.Blood samples were collected by jugular venepuncture and sera were subject to IMMY Latex Agglutination Histoplasma test (LAT).Seropositivity risk factors were explored by multi-level, multivariable logistic regression analysis.Study site and household variance were described using latent-variable approach.Whole blood DNA extractions were subject to nested ITS-PCR to detect Histoplasma capsulatum var farciminosum(HCF), and agreement with LAT results was measured using Cohen’s kappa statistic. Anti-Histoplasma antibody seroprevalence in horses and donkeys was 79.9% (95% CI 76.0-83.5%) and 46.7% (95% CI 36.3-57.4%), respectively.In horses, two multivariable models explained the maximum amount of data variability. Model 1 demonstrated increased odds of seropositivity in mares (OR=2.90 95% CI 1.70-4.95, p<0.001) and decreased odds in horses <2.5 years (OR=0.46 95% CI 0.22-0.95, p=0.04; reference: ≥4.5 years).Model 2 demonstrated increased odds in horses recruited during rainy season (OR=2.03 95% CI 1.08-3.84, p=0.03) and those owned by farmers reporting previous EL in their equids (OR=1.87 95% CI 1.04-3.37, p=0.04).Decreased odds were measured in horses <2.5 years (OR=0.37 95% CI 0.18-0.78, p=0.01) and horses reported to transport firewood (OR=0.45 95% CI 0.28-0.74, p=0.001).On multivariable analysis of donkeys, decreased odds of seropositivity were demonstrated amongst donkeys owned by households also with horses (OR=0.23 95% CI 0.06-0.85, p=0.03).HCF infection prevalence in horses and donkeys were 22.0% (n=102/463, 95% CI 18.3-26.1%) and 5.4% (n=5/92, 95% CI 1.8-12.2%), respectively.No significant agreement was measured between LAT and nested ITS-PCR results (κ<0.00). High Histoplasma spp. exposure was demonstrated amongst equids in The Gambia.Investigation of risk factors including equid husbandry and management strategies, and geoclimatic variations, are warranted.Outcomes may inform sustainable and equitable EL control strategies in The Gambia and comparable settings worldwide.

    Keywords: Histoplasma, the Gambia, Equine epizootic lymphangitis, Equine histoplasmosis, Cross-sectional study, seroprevalence, infection prevalence, Working equids

    Received: 06 Jun 2024; Accepted: 29 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cornell, Fye, Nyassi, Ceesay, Jallow, Langendonk, Wootton, Pinchbeck and Scantlebury. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Tessa R. Cornell, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, CH64 7TE, North West England, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.