Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci., 04 November 2024
Sec. Livestock Genomics

Effect of NR1D1 on the proliferation and differentiation of yak skeletal muscle satellite cells

Yuqi Zhe,Yuqi Zhe1,2Zhijuan Wu,Zhijuan Wu1,2Sibinuer Yasenjian,Sibinuer Yasenjian1,2Jincheng Zhong,Jincheng Zhong1,2Hui JiangHui Jiang3Ming Zhang,Ming Zhang1,2Zhixin Chai,
Zhixin Chai1,2*Jinwei Xin
Jinwei Xin3*
  • 1Key Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Animal Genetic Resource Reservation and Utilization, Sichuan Province and Ministry of Education, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China
  • 2Sichuan Qinghai Tibet Plateau Herbivore Livestock Engineering Technology Center, Chengdu, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Hulless Barley and Yak Germplasm Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Research, Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa, China

The severe conditions at high altitudes, where yaks inhabit, contribute to delayed muscular growth and compromised tenderness of their muscle tissue. Myosatellite cells are responsible for the growth and regeneration of skeletal muscle after birth and have the potential to proliferate and differentiate, its development is closely related to meat quality, and the nuclear receptor gene NR1D1 is involved in muscle formation and skeletal muscle regulation. Therefore, in order to understand the effect of NR1D1 on muscle satellite cells, we identified the mRNA expression levels of marker genes specifically expressed in muscle satellite cells at different stages to determine the type of cells isolated. Eventually, we successfully constructed a primary cell line of yak muscle satellite cells. Then we constructed NR1D1 overexpression vector and interference RNA, and introduced them into isolated yak skeletal muscle satellite cells. We performed qPCR, CCK8, and fluorescence-specific to detect the expression of genes or abundance of proteins as markers of cell proliferation and differentiation. Compared with those in the control group, the expression levels of proliferation marker genes KI-67, CYCLIND1, and CYCLINA were significantly inhibited after NR1D1 overexpression, which was also supported by the CCK-8 test, whereas differentiation marker genes MYOD, MYOG, and MYF5 were significantly inhibited. Fluorescence-specific staining showed that KI-67 protein abundance and the number of microfilaments both decreased, while the opposite trend was observed after NR1D1 interference. In conclusion, we confirmed that NR1D1 inhibited the proliferation and differentiation of yak skeletal muscle satellite cells, which provides a theoretical basis for further research on the effect of NR1D1 on improving meat quality traits and meat production performance of yaks.

1 Introduction

Yaks (Bos grunniens) are an important livestock on the Tibetan Plateau, providing meat and other necessities for Tibetans. Skeletal muscle is the most abundant muscle tissue among adult animals, is an important source of protein, and is important in maintaining homeostasis, movement, and respiration (1). Skeletal muscle is also the most economically valuable tissue of meat-producing animals, and its yield and quality directly determine the productivity benefits of animals. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms that influence skeletal muscle to enhance yak resistance to harsh conditions and improve yak meat yield and quality.

Skeletal muscle accounts for 75–90% of muscle volume and is composed mainly of Muscle satellite cells (SCs), fibers, immune cells, basement membrane, and nerves (2), all of which are key to maintaining normal physiological muscle function. Muscle development depends on muscle cell formation and adipogenesis (3), and SCs are skeletal muscle progenitors. When activated by myoblasts, SCs multiply and differentiate into new muscle fibers (4). Thus, the development and regeneration of skeletal muscle depends on the maintenance of myoblastic properties of SCs, such as their ability to proliferate, differentiate, and self-renew. The growth and development of skeletal muscle depends on the regulation of many genes and pathways. Artificially changing the regulatory factors can promote muscle development and improve meat quality, and help to achieve the goal of modern animal husbandry. Regulatory factors involved in the activation, proliferation, and differentiation of SCs and their mechanisms have been studied extensively, but the individual interaction mechanisms and signaling pathways among the related factors need further study (5). Recent reports have outlined the regulatory impacts of diverse genes on stem cells (SCs) (69). However, there remains a scarcity of studies pertaining to yak SCs.

Nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D member 1 (NR1D1), also known as REV-ERBα, is a clock gene in the biological clock system. NR1D1 was first isolated from rat pituitary tumor cells by Lazar et al. (10). As a transcriptional suppressor, NR1D1 can inhibit downstream genes. NR1D1 is distributed in all tissues and organs of the body, and its expression has a circadian rhythm (1113). Studies have shown that NR1D1 regulates body metabolism (14, 15), inflammation (16) and cell proliferation (17). It is also highly expressed in skeletal muscle and participates in the regulation of multiple physiological processes through various pathways, including mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative capacity, myogenesis, and myofiber size in skeletal muscle (18, 19). The absence of NR1D1 in skeletal muscle can result in increased expression of atrophy genes that are associated with decreased muscle mass and reduced fiber size (18). The lack of NR1D1 in mice impairs sarcoplasmic reticulum/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase-dependent sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium uptake in skeletal muscle (20), while the overexpression of NR1D1 can improve mitochondrial respiration and exercise in skeletal muscle (21). These findings collectively demonstrate the crucial regulatory role of NR1D1 in skeletal muscle function.

This study aims to investigate the role of the NR1D1 gene in yak tissues and SCs. By cloning and constructing NR1D1 overexpression vectors and interference RNA, these were transfected into yak SCs. Using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qPCR), CCK-8, and specific fluorescent staining, we aim to establish a comprehensive and referenceable system for the isolation and culture of yak skeletal muscle satellite cells. Meanwhile, we aim to elucidate the effects of NR1D1 on different yak tissues and SCs, while exploring its potential mechanisms for influencing skeletal muscle.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Animal materials

The animals used for qPCR tissue experiments were Jiulong yaks sourced from Jiulong County, Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province. Hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, kidneys, longissimus dorsi muscles, and pectoral muscles were collected from three female yaks. After being rinsed with DEPC water, the tissues were wrapped in aluminum foil, labeled, and quickly immersed in liquid nitrogen for subsequent experimental use. All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Southwest Minzu University and conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations set by the local animal ethics committee.

2.2 Isolation, culture, and induced differentiation of yak SCs

The animals used for cell culture were sourced from the Qinghai-Tibet Base Yak Breeding Center of Southwest Minzu University, located in Hongyuan County, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province. Two-month-old newborn Maiwa female yak was selected, slaughtered, and samples were collected from their anterior limb skeletal muscle tissue. After partially shaving and sterilizing the yak in the dissection room, the radial carpal extensors were successfully isolated from the animal (Supplementary Figure S1). The sample was immersed in 75% alcohol for 10–15 min and washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing antibiotics, then placed in PBS containing antibiotics, transported on ice, and quickly transferred to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the samples underwent an additional washing process three times with PBS containing antibiotics. The muscle tissue was placed in a petri dish, a small amount of PBS containing antibiotics was added, and the blood vessels, fat and connective tissue were carefully removed. An equal volume of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Waltham, MA, United States), containing antibiotics was added, and subsequently, the sample was minced into shreds. The tissue block was transferred to a 50 mL centrifuge tube with sterilized tweezers or a spoon and centrifuge at 400 × g for 5 min. Add 3 times the volume of digestive solution A precipitated in the previous step (1 mg/mL pronase E, formulated with DMEM containing antibiotics) was added. Digestion was performed at 37°C for 1 h, then the tube was centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded and the cell mass was resuspended in the digestive termination solution and left to rest. The supernatant containing SCs was retained. This process was repeated 3 times. The collected supernatant was filtered with a 40-μm cell screen, then centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min to collect cells. The cell clusters were cultured aseptically in a Thermo Scientific incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) at 37°C and 5% CO2. Routine cultures were performed in DMEM with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin, 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B, and 4 mM glutamine. Adherent cells (mainly myofibroblasts) were cultured for 1 h, and unadherent cells (mainly SCs) were transferred to a new culture bottle for culture. The adherent cells were supplemented with 5 mL–10 mL growth medium. Cells differentiation were induced using induction differentiation medium (DMEM + 2% horse serum (HS; Gibco) + 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin + 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B + 4 mM glutamine) (Figure 1).

2.3 Subculture and induced differentiation

After three days of culture in growth medium, the SCs adherent to the culture dish. When the cells were cultured to 70–80%, digested with trypsin, and passaged. On the 6th day of culture, the culture medium was replaced with differentiation medium (2% HS) to induce cell differentiation, which was observed. The mRNA expression levels of PAX7, MYF5, MYOD, MRF4, MEF2C, MYMK, MYOG, and DES were obtained by qPCR. All primers were synthesized by Tsingke Biotech (Beijing, China) (Supplementary Table S1).

2.4 Cloning of NR1D1

Primer Premier 5.0 software was employed to design the NR1D1 primers (Supplementary Table S1), utilizing the NR1D1 sequence (NM_001078100.2) from GenBank as the template for the design process. The coding sequence (CDS) of NR1D1 was amplified using yak longissimus dorsi cDNA as the template. PCR products were identified through agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by gel recovery. The recovered products were then ligated into the vector, adhering to the instructions outlined in the pMD 19-T Vector Cloning Kit (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan). Subsequently, the recombinant plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α (Accurate Biology, Changsha, China) receptor cells. These cells were incubated overnight on Luria-Bertani (LB) solid medium to allow for colony formation. Positive clones were screened and sequenced for further analysis.

2.5 Construction of eukaryotic expression vector

The target fragment was connected to a linearized pcDNA3.1(+) vector using an OKClon DNA linking kit (Accurate Biology), strictly adhering to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, the recombinant products were transformed and sequenced as previously described. Once the sequencing was confirmed to be accurate, the recombinant plasmid was extracted using an endotoxin-free plasmid extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) and designated as pcDNA3.1-NR1D1.

2.6 Cell culture and transfection

SCs were seeded into T25 culture dishes for expansion. After expansion, the cells were digested with trypsin and passaged into 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well. After the cells grew to 70–80% confluence, they were transfected with NR1D1 overexpression vectors or small interfering RNA (siRNA) and the corresponding control using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (three wells were transfected in both the experimental group and the control group). After culturing in the proliferation medium for 48 h, the cells were collected, and subsequently, RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed. To detect the mRNA expression levels of NR1D1, NR1D1 siRNA, KI-67, CYCLIND1, and CYCLINA, qPCR was performed. Alternatively, after transfection and when the cell density reached 80–90% confluence, the cells were switched to differentiation medium for 72 h. Following this, the cells were collected, RNA was extracted, and reverse transcription was performed. Subsequently, qPCR was used to detect the mRNA expression levels of MYOD, MYOG, and MYF5.

2.7 RNA extraction and quantitative reverse-transcription PCR

Total RNA was extracted from different tissues (approximately 30 mg) or SCs of yaks using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and quality of the extracted RNA were detected by spectrophotometer (NanoDrop One, United States) and agar gel electrophoresis. Reverse transcription and qPCR of the extracted RNA were performed using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara) and TB Green® Premix Ex Taq II (Takara), respectively. To calculate the relative expression levels of mRNA, GraphPad prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States) was used to plot and analyze the significance of the results.

2.8 Specific fluorescence staining

Cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well. When the cells reached 70–80% confluence, the NR1D1 overexpression vector or NR1D1 siRNA along with their respective controls were transfected into the cells using lipofectamine 3,000. After transfection, the cells were cultured in proliferation medium for 48 h, or until they reached 80–90% confluence, at which point the medium was changed to differentiation medium for an additional 72 h of culture, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (BL539A, Biosharp) for a duration of 20 min, followed by three washes with phosphate buffered saline containing Tween-20 (PBST), each lasting 5 min. The membrane was broken with 0.5% Triton X-100, then washed twice with PBST for 5 min each time. The cells were sealed with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Invitrogen) at room temperature for 2 h, then incubated overnight with Ki-67 antibody (PA5-19462, Invitrogen) at 4°C. Then, the cells were washed 3 times with PBST for 15 min each time, and the secondary antibody was added at room temperature and the cells were shielded from light for 2 h. The cells were washed 3 times with PBST for 15 min each time or stained with a microfilament red fluorescent probe (C2203S, Beyotime), then incubated with DAPI (Invitrogen) solution away from light for 5 min, and washed twice with PBST for 5 min each time. An inverted fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to observe and photograph the cells.

2.9 Cell proliferation assay

Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 3 × 103 cells per well and transfected with the NR1D1 overexpression vector, NR1D1 siRNA, or their respective controls. For the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Biosharp) assay, 10 μL of CCK-8 was added to each well at 0 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-transfection, followed by incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2 h. Finally, the absorbance values at 450 nm were measured using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

2.10 Statistical analysis

The GraphPad prism 8.0 software (La Jolla, CA, United States) was used to calculate the relative expression level using the 2−ΔΔCT method, and a one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparison test were performed to determine the statistical significance of each group (p < 0.05) and visualize the data. For KI-67, DAPI-specific fluorescent staining cells and microfilaments, the average fluorescence intensity was statistically analyzed using ImageJ software for quantification, and the results were visualized using GraphPad prism 8.0 software.

3 Results

3.1 NR1D1 is highly expressed in muscle tissue

NR1D1 is distributed in various tissues and organs of many organisms and has many functions. To determine the expression the expression of NR1D1 in yak tissues. To determine the expression of NR1D1 in yak tissues, RNA was extracted from heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, longissimus dorsi muscle, and pectoralis muscle and converted into cDNA as the template. NR1D1 expression levels in the different tissues were obtained by qPCR (Supplementary Figure S2). We found that NR1D1 was expressed in all the yak tissues tested, and that the expression levels were highest in the muscle tissues (see Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Experimental flowchart (by Figdraw).

3.2 Establishment of a complete system of yak skeletal muscle satellite cell isolation

After isolation, we found that most of the primary yak SCs were long fusiform, a few were star, the middle of the cells were raised, and the refractive index was high (Figure 2). Muscle tissue contains various cell types, such as fibroblasts, blood cells, epithelial cells, and endothelial cells (22). Therefore, without purification, the proportion of SCs and the amount of muscle tube fusion are reduced. We determined the cell sieve pore size and purification process of yak SCs by sieve size and differential adhesion times. The cell separation method used in this study found no significant difference in the morphology of SCs obtained by 40-μm and 70-μm cell sieves; however, more cells were isolated by the 70-μm cell sieve (Figure 3). The mRNA expression levels the myogenic genes PAX7, MYF5, MYOD, and MYMK were analyzed by qPCR. The results showed that the expression levels of these genes were elevated in cells isolated using the 70-μm sieve compared to those isolated with the 40-μm sieve. Among them, a significant difference was observed in the MYF5 expression level specifically between cells separated by the 40-μm and 70-μm sieves (Figure 4).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Yak SCs culture. (A–D) Primary culture of yak SCs, P0 generation cells, 1-P0 and 2-P0 are biological replicates. (E) P1 generation (2-P1) cells obtained after 2-P0 subculture and cultured in DMEM + FBS growth medium. (F) Cells cultured in DMEM + HS differentiation medium to induce cell differentiation. DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HS, 2% horse serum.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Screening of isolation conditions of yak SCs by cell separation. Yak SCs were separated by 40-μm and 70-μm cell sieves, and P0 cells were cultured in growth medium and mapped on days 4, 6, and 7. (A–C) Images taken on day 4. (D–F) Images taken on day 6. (G–I) Images taken on day 7.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Screening of isolation conditions of yak SCs by marker gene expression levels. (A) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in yak SCs isolated and cultured by two independent experiments. (B) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in yak SCs filtered by 70-μm and 40-μm cell sieves. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.

After continuous differential adhesion and subculture, the third (P3) and fourth (P4) generation of PP1 and PP2 (yak SCs isolated from the skeletal muscle of yaks were purified by differential adhesion for 1 h; the adherent cells were named PP1 and the unadherent cells were PP2) were obtained. The PP2 subset was purified once more than the PP1 subset. We found that the P0 generation yak SCs were round and had strong refraction. With the increase of adhesion time, the shape changed from round to fusiform and spindle shape, and the density gradually increased, indicating that the isolated and purified SCs had strong proliferation ability (Figures 512; Supplementary Figure S3). Compared to P3 cells, the expression levels of myogenic genes MYF5, MYOD, MRF4, and DES in the P4 cells of PP1were significantly reduced (Figure 13A). In the P3 and P4 cells of PP2, there were no significant differences in the expression of these four genes (Figure 13B). The expression of MYF5 in PP2-P3 cells was significantly higher than its expression in PP1-P3 cells, indicating a significant difference between the two cell types (Figure 13C), and the expression levels of MYF5 and MYOD in PP2-P4 cells were significantly higher than their expression levels in PP1-P4 cells (Figure 13D). The above results indicate that there may be certain differences in the cell types and proportions of SCs contained in PP1 and PP2.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Yak SCs purification. P0 generation yak SCs by differential adhesion for 20 min, the unadherent cells were named PP1-P0, the unadherent cells were further cultured in walling culture for 1 h. The unadherent cells after this time were named PP2-P0. The cells were cultured in the growth medium and photographed on days 6 and 10. (A–D) Images taken on day 6. (E–H) Images taken on day 10.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Yak SCs were purified and subcultured. (A,B) First generation yak SCs PP1-P1 after PP1-P0 subculture. (C,D) First generation yak SCs PP2-P1 after PP2-P0 subculture.

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Yak SCs proliferated and cultured after subculture. PP1-P2-1 and PP2-P2-1 were cultured in growth medium and photographed on days 2, 6, and 10. (A–D) Images taken on day 2. (E–H) Images taken on day 6. (I–L) Images taken on day 10.

Figure 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Isolation and culture of yak SCs subsets. After culture of PP1-P2-0 and PP1-P2-1 for 2 h, unadherent cells were PP1-P2. After culture of PP2-P1-0 and PP2-P2-1 for 2 h, unadherent cells were PP2-P2. Then, the PP1-P2 and PP2-P2 cells were cultured in growth medium and photographed on days 2, 6, 11, and 12. (A–D) Images taken on day 2. (E–H) Images taken on day 6. (I–L) Images taken on day 11. (M–P) Images taken on day 12.

Figure 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. Subculture and culture of yak SCs. After the subculture of PP1-P2-0 and PP2-P2-0, the adherent cells were PP1-P3-0 and PP2-P3-0 after 15 min differential adhesion. The cells were cultured in the growth medium and photographed on days 1 and 5. (A–D) Images taken on day 1. (E–H) Images taken on day 5.

Figure 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. Subculture and culture of yak SCs. After the subculture of PP1-P2-0 and PP2-P2-0, the unadherent cells were PP1-P3-1 and PP2-P3-1. These cells were cultured in the growth medium and photographed on days 1, 5 and 9. (A–D) Images taken on day 1. (E–H) Images taken on day 5. (I–L) Images taken on day 9.

Figure 11
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 11. Proliferation and myogenic differentiation of third generation (P3) yak SCs. Myogenic differentiation of PP1-P3-1 and PP2-P3-1 cells was induced by DMEM + HS differentiation medium. The proliferation cells in DMEM + FBS growth medium were used as a control. The cells were photographed on days 2, 4, and 7 of culture. (A–C,G–I) Images of PP1-P3-1 taken on day 2. (D–F,J–L) Images of PP2-P3-1 taken on day 2. (M,N,Q–S) Images of PP1-P3-1 taken on day 4. (O,P,T–V) Images of PP2-P3-1 taken on day 4. (W,X) Images of PP1-P3-1 taken on day 7. (Y,Z) Images of PP2-P3-1 taken on day 7. DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HS, 2% horse serum.

Figure 12
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 12. Proliferation and myogenic differentiation of forth generation (P4) yak SCs. Myogenic differentiation of PP1-P4-1 and PP2-P4-1 cells was induced by DMEM + HS differentiation medium. The proliferation cells in DMEM + FBS growth medium were used as a control. The cells were photographed on days 2, 4, and 7 of culture. (A–C,G–I) Images of PP1-P4-1 taken on day 2. (D–F,J–L) Images of PP2-P4-1 taken on day 2. (M–O,S–U) Images of PP1-P4-1 taken on day 4. (P–R,V–X) Images of PP2-P4-1 taken on day 4. (Y,Z) Images of PP1-P4-1 taken on day 7. (AA,BB) Images of PP2-P4-1 taken on day 7. DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HS, 2% horse serum.

Figure 13
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 13. Purification and subculture of yak SCs. Yak SCs isolated from the skeletal muscle of yaks were purified by differential adhesion for 1 h; the adherent cells were named PP1 and the unadherent cells were PP2. Third (P3) and the fourth (P4) generation cells were cultured from the PP1 and PP2 cells. (A) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in P3 and P4 cells of PP1. (B) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in P3 and P4 cells of PP2. (C) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in PP1-P3 and PP2-P3 cells. (D) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in PP1-P4 and PP2-P4 cells. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.

After induction of differentiation, the expression of MYF5 in all cells except PP2-P3 decreased significantly, while the expression of DES increased significantly. MYOD expression increased significantly in both PP1-P3 and PP2-P4, and MYOG expression increased significantly in PP2-P3 (Figure 14). The increase in MYOD expression after differentiation indicates that the myogenic gene program is gradually activated.

Figure 14
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 14. Proliferation and differentiation of yak SCs. Third (P3) and forth (P4) generations of yak SCs were multiplied and differentiated in DMEM + FBS growth medium and DMEM + HS differentiation medium. (A) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in PP1-P3 cells. (B) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in PP1-P4 cells. (C) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in PP2-P3 cells. (D) Expression levels of myogenic gene mRNA in PP2-P4 cells. DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HS, 2% horse serum; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.

3.3 NR1D1 inhibits proliferation and differentiation of SCs

We constructed the NR1D1 overexpression vector and achieved good transfection efficiency (Figure 15A). Overexpression of NR1D1 significantly reduced the expression levels of proliferation marker genes (Figure 15B). CCK-8 detection and specific fluorescence staining (We have conducted a semi-quantitative statistical analysis of stained cells or microfilaments, the same below) (Figures 15CE) further confirmed that NR1D1 inhibited the proliferation of satellite cells. Subsequently, the detection of differentiation marker genes and the specific staining of microfilament red fluorescent probes (Figures 15FH) showed that the overexpression of NR1D1 significantly decreased the levels of differentiation marker genes and inhibited the number of microfilaments. Next, we designed a siRNA targeting NR1D1 to reduce its expression (Figure 15I). After knocking down NR1D1, the proliferation marker gene increased significantly (Figure 15J), and specific fluorescence staining and CCK-8 detection (Figures 15KM) also showed that knocking down NR1D1 significantly promoted cell proliferation. The results of differentiation marker gene detection and specific staining with microfilament red fluorescent probes (Figures 15NP) showed that the expression level of differentiation marker genes increased and the number of microfilaments increased. These findings contrast with the results of NR1D1 overexpression, suggesting that NR1D1 plays an important role in inhibiting the proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells.

Figure 15
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 15. Effects of NR1D1 on proliferation and differentiation of yak SCs. (A) Overexpression efficiency of NR1D1. (B) Expression of proliferation marker genes after NR1D1 overexpression. (C) CCK-8 measurement after NR1D1 overexpression. (D) The average optical density value after NR1D1 overexpression. (E) Fluorescence specific staining after NR1D1 overexpression. (F) Expression of differentiation marker genes after overexpression of NR1D1. (G) The average optical density value after NR1D1 overexpression. (H) Fluorescence specific staining after NR1D1 overexpression. (I) Interference efficiency of NR1D1. (J) The expression of proliferation marker genes after NR1D1 interference. (K) Fluorescence specific staining after NR1D1 interference. (L) The average optical density value after NR1D1 interference. (M) CCK-8 measurement after NR1D1 interference. (N) Fluorescence specific staining after NR1D1 interference. (O) The average optical density value after NR1D1 interference. (P) NR1D1 interferes with the expression of differentiation marker genes. Control indicates the respective controls, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.

4 Discussions

4.1 Complete system of yak SCs isolation and culture was established

PAX7 is a unique marker gene for satellite cells during both the quiescent and proliferative phases (2325). In the quiescent phase, PAX7 is expressed in satellite cells (26); during proliferation, the most prominent myogenic factors expressed are MYF5 and MYOD. After proliferation, most cells begin to downregulate their PAX7 expression and maintain MYOD for differentiation, while the remaining cells maintain PAX7 expression and suppress MYOD to return to a quiescent state. When satellite cells commence differentiation and fuse into myotubes, MYOG expression increases (27). In this study, we examined the mRNA expression levels of specific marker genes in satellite cells at different stages and found that the gene expression trends were largely consistent with the above descriptions. Since muscle tissue comprises multiple cell types, purification steps are crucial. We determined the yak satellite cell purification process through differential adhesion times. From the cell images, it can be observed that there are significant differences in the proliferation levels of PP1 and PP2 cells and their respective passaged cells, as well as in the fusion levels of differentiated cells. In terms of relative gene expression, the decline in skeletal muscle-derived genes among passaged PP2 cells is not significant, while the expression levels of MYF5 and MYOD are significantly higher than those in PP1 cells, which is consistent with the above statement and in sharp contrast to the significant decrease in MYF5, MYOD, MRF4, and DES expression after passaging in PP1 cells. This indicates that there are differences in the types and proportions of purified cells. At the level of myogenic regulatory factors, the gradual downregulation of PAX7 expression and enhanced MYOD expression serve as markers for the transition of satellite cells from proliferation to differentiation (28). If stem cells maintain PAX7 expression and suppress MYOD levels, the differentiation process is hindered. However, once muscle satellite cells express MYOG, PAX7 expression in these cells is inhibited, and differentiation subsequently occurs, suggesting an inter-inhibitory mechanism between MRFs and PAX7. In this study, after inducing satellite cell differentiation, we found that MYF5 expression showed a significant downward trend, while MYOD expression gradually increased after differentiation culture, indicating the gradual activation of the myogenic gene program. MYOG and DES are indicators of terminal muscle differentiation, with MYOG being an essential protein for the formation of new muscle fibers. Similarly, we also found that MYOG and DES expression significantly increased after satellite cell differentiation. With the proficiency of separation technology, we conducted another independent replication experiment-2. qPCR verification (Figure 4A) showed that the purity and accuracy of the isolated cells had been improved compared to previous results. In summary, these findings demonstrate that we have successfully established a relatively complete system for the isolation and culture of yak satellite cells.

4.2 NR1D1 inhibits proliferation and differentiation of SCs to a certain extent

Yak meat is characterized by low fat and high protein, is rich in nutrients such as essential amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals (29), and is the main source of animal protein for residents in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Because of the adverse environment in the high altitude area, yaks grow slowly and have problems such as muscle retardation, poor fat deposition efficiency, and poor tenderness of muscle tissue, which limits the market development of yaks (30). Skeletal muscle is the most economically valuable tissue of meat-producing animals, and its yield and quality directly determine the productivity benefit of animals. SCs contribute to skeletal muscle fiber hypertrophy and the mutual transformation of skeletal muscle fiber types by proliferating, differentiating, and fusing with muscle fibers to form new myonuclei, thereby influencing meat quality (31).

During skeletal muscle growth and development, a series of regulatory changes occur in gene expression (3235), and deciphering these changes is crucial for the production of high-quality meat products (36). There is increasing evidence that the biological clock is crucial for maintaining skeletal muscle mass and growth (37). The circadian clock circuit, consisting of an interlocking molecular network of transcriptional and translational regulatory factors, is involved in various aspects of skeletal muscle function (38, 39), ranging from oxidative metabolism, sarcomere structure, contractile properties to muscle mass maintenance. As a ligand-dependent nuclear receptor (21, 4042). NR1D1 is a key inhibitor in the molecular clock transcriptional network (43). NR1D1 was found to be involved in many aspects of metabolism shortly after its discovery, including adipocyte differentiation (44) and muscle formation (45). In adult mice, NR1D1 mRNA is universally expressed with the most abundant levels found in brown fat, skeletal muscle, and brain (10, 46). Pircher et al. (47) studied NR1D1 in native skeletal muscle and found that in mice lacking NR1D1, specific fiber types were preferentially expressed and there were differences in the composition of muscle fiber types. Chatterjee et al. (43) also found that the loss of NR1D1 accelerated the morphological transformation of primary myoblasts into organized muscle tubes, the number of myosin heavy chain muscle fibers increased, and the percentage of fused muscle fibers containing multiple nuclei was high. In this study, we examined the expression abundance of NR1D1 in different tissues through qPCR and found that NR1D1 was most highly expressed in muscle tissue. In addition, based on the results of qPCR, CCK8, and specific fluorescence staining, as well as semi-quantitative analysis of KI-67, DAPI-stained cells and microfilaments, we found that NR1D1 inhibited the proliferation and differentiation of yak satellite muscle cells to a certain extent. Chatterjee et al. (43) also found that NR1D1 inhibited of myogenic precursor cell proliferation and myogenic properties, which inhibited skeletal muscle regeneration in vivo. Notably, the myogenic regulatory factors gene family includes MYOD, MYF5, MYOG, and MRF4, all of which are important factors in the process of myocytogenesis with roles in the development and genesis of muscle, as well as in guiding the specialization of muscle satellite cells and skeletal muscle regeneration. MYOD and MYOG in particular contribute greatly to the regulation of skeletal muscle development. They have been shown to control muscle development by regulating myoblast proliferation and phagocytosis, and to influence skeletal muscle formation by promoting multinuclear muscle tube formation and muscle fiber maintenance. Interestingly, MYOD was better than MYF5 in inducing myoblast differentiation and expression, whereas MYF5 was more efficient than MYOD in promoting myoblast proliferation. Maintaining proper myogenic precursor cell proliferation and differentiation function is essential for skeletal muscle growth and repair (48, 49).

To explore how NR1D1 regulates skeletal muscle, we have mapped out the regulatory pathway of NR1D1’s influence on muscle development (Supplementary Figure S4). NR1D1 may potentially modulate the proliferation, differentiation, and growth of skeletal muscle satellite cells through this mechanism. The Wnt pathway serves as a primary developmental signal driving muscle development and repair. β-catenin, a key signal transducer in the classical Wnt signaling pathway, responds to Wnt ligands and accumulates in the cytoplasm, ultimately leading to its nuclear translocation and activation of Wnt target genes, which in turn regulate cell cycle progression. Bmal1, an essential transcriptional regulator in the circadian transcriptional feedback loop, can dimerize with Clock to activate downstream target genes such as Period genes (Per1, Per2, and Per3) and Cryptochrome genes (Cry1 and Cry2), which subsequently inhibit the activity of Bmal1/Clock. Within myoblasts, Bmal1 acts as a regulator in the classical Wnt signaling pathway, controlling components including the ligand Wnt10a, the signal transduction mediator Dishevelled 2 (Dvl2), β-catenin, the transcription factor T-cell factor 3 (TCF3), and the Wnt pathway target gene Axin2. As a crucial inhibitory factor in the molecular clock transcriptional network, NR1D1 inhibits Bmal1 transcription by binding to Rore, while Rore can activate Bmal1 gene transcription. This antagonistic regulation gives rise to Bmal1’s circadian oscillations. Furthermore, NR1D1 may also regulate different steps within the Wnt pathway.

4.3 NR1D1 affects low temperature adaptation

Studies on an adipogenic cell line showed that NR1D1 was essential for adipocyte differentiation (4951). Recently, NR1D1 was found to be active in brown adipose tissue (BAT) (52), which is the main site of heat production in the body (53). Mice lacking NR1D1 reduced the lowest point of temperature oscillation by disinhibition of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1), which is the direct target of NR1D1 in brown adipose tissue (52). NR1D1 has also been shown to play a key role in protecting body temperature from cold challenges, so mice that are genetically deficient in NR1D1 or at the low of NR1D1 expression are protected from extreme cold. The environment in which yaks live has a long cold season and a short warm season, so understanding and applying the relevant regulatory mechanism of NR1D1 may affect the degree of adaptability of yaks to cold environment.

4.4 Trend of NR1D1 targeted therapy for cancer

The circadian clock imposes daily rhythms in cell proliferation, metabolism, inflammation, and DNA damage responses, and perturbations of these processes are hallmarks of cancer, Furthermore, chronic circadian disturbance predisposes individuals to tumors. Therefore, the hypothesis that pharmacological regulation of circadian mechanisms could be an effective therapeutic strategy against cancer seems reasonable. In recent years, various cancer targeting strategies related to NR1D1 have been introduced. For example, Ka et al. (54) found that cancer cells showed elevated levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to accelerated metabolism, mitochondrial dysfunction, and antioxidant deficiency. NR1D1 inhibits the DNA repair of ROS-induced DNA damage in breast cancer cells and enhances the accumulation of DNA damage, thereby increasing the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to oxidative stress. Thus, NR1D1 may be a therapeutic target for breast cancer treatment, especially in patients treated with ROS-inducing chemotherapy drugs. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and the leading cause of cancer death. Current triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treatment is based on chemotherapy and radiation, which are associated with serious side effects. Therefore, identifying new targets may be beneficial for treating women with TNBC by minimizing side effects. Na et al. (55) showed that high NR1D1 expression levels had favorable effects on overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with TNBC who were receiving chemotherapy. NR1D1 should be further investigated as a possible prognostic marker for patients with TNBC receiving chemotherapy and as a target for the development of chemotherapy approaches to treat TNBC. Yang et al. (56) showed that patients with bladder cancer with positive NR1D1 expression had longer disease-free survival than those with negative NR1D1 expression. Cell viability, migration, and colony formation of bladder cancer cells were significantly inhibited after treatment with NR1D1 agonist SR9009. Thus, the overexpression of NR1D1 inhibited the tumorigenicity of bladder cancer cells, and NR1D1 played a role in cancer inhibition, implying it may be a new target for the treatment of bladder cancer. Kim et al. (57) showed that NR1D1 acted as a tumor suppressor in a tumor microenvironment by negatively regulating the PYD domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, suggesting that blocking the NLRP3 inflammasome by NR1D1 activation may be a therapeutic strategy to treat lung cancer. Together, NR1D1 is a high-function transcriptional suppressor that has therapeutic potential in cancer therapy. The role of NR1D1 in other biological functions needs to be further explored.

5 Conclusion

We isolated and identified yak SCs, established a comprehensive system for the isolation and culturing of yak muscle satellite cells, and investigated the effects of NR1D1 on proliferation and differentiation of SCs. We found that NR1D1 inhibited the proliferation and differentiation of SCs to some extent. Yak meat has rich nutritional value and is a green food that meets the demand of modern markets. The growth and development rate of skeletal muscle determines the meat production performance of livestock and poultry, and the composition of muscle fiber types is closely related to the quality of muscle. Our results have reference value for studying the growth and development of skeletal muscle and muscle fiber type composition of livestock and poultry, and have positive social and economic significance for increasing meat production performance and improving meat quality of livestock and poultry. Currently, there is a need for more in-depth research on the regulation of satellite cells by NR1D1 in controlling muscle fiber characteristics, which in turn affects the meat quality of livestock and poultry. The aim is to improve meat quality to a certain extent and play a role in enhancing meat production yield and quality, thereby contributing to social and economic significance.

Data availability statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the NCBI repository, accession number SRR29014858.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Southwest Minzu University Animal Care and Use Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

YZ: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft. ZW: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. HJ: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. MZ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. ZC: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. JX: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Major Special Projects of Tibet Autonomous Region (Grant No. XZ202101ZD0002N-01), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 2024NSFSC0391), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Southwest Minzu University (Grant No. ZYN2023101), the Institute of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in Southwest Minzu University (Grant No. 2024CXTD13).

Acknowledgments

All the authors thank the Key Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Animal Genetic Resource Reservation and Utilization (Sichuan Province and Ministry of Education) of Southwest Minzu University for providing the experimental platform and conditions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1428117/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Rattray, B, Thompson, M, Ruell, P, and Caillaud, C. Specific training improves skeletal muscle mitochondrial calcium homeostasis after eccentric exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2013) 113:427–36. doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2446-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Giordani, L, He, GJ, Negroni, E, Sakai, H, Law, JYC, Siu, MM, et al. High-dimensional single-cell cartography reveals novel skeletal muscle-resident cell populations. Mol Cell. (2019) 74:609–621.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.026

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Pećina, M, and Ivanković, A. Candidate genes and fatty acids in beef meat, a review. Ital J Anim Sci. (2021) 20:1716–29. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2021.1991240

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bareja, A, Holt, JA, Luo, G, Chang, C, Lin, J, Hinken, AC, et al. Human and mouse skeletal muscle stem cells: convergent and divergent mechanisms of myogenesis. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e90398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090398

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kadi, F, Charifi, N, Denis, C, Lexell, J, Andersen, JL, Schjerling, P, et al. The behaviour of satellite cells in response to exercise: what have we learned from human studies? Pflugers Arch. (2005) 451:319–27. doi: 10.1007/s00424-005-1406-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Xia, X, Zhao, Y, Fu, M, Zhang, L, Li, X, Guo, H, et al. Effects of miR-16α on proliferation and differentiation of bovine muscle satellite cells. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med. (2024):54–9. doi: 10.13881/j.cnki.hljxmsy.2023.04.0041

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Zeng, Y . Effects and mechanism of Vcp and Cul5 proteins on proliferation and differentiation of bovine muscle. Tianjin: Tianjin Agricultural University (2022).

Google Scholar

8. Ren, Z, Gu, H, Hu, K, and Bi, Y. Effect of m6A demethylase enzyme FTO on differentiation of porcine muscle satellite cells. China Anim Husb Vet Med. (2023) 50:2777–88. doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2023.07.018

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ma, J . Expression of Akirin gene in goat muscle tissue and its regulation of proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Chengdu: Sichuan Agriculture University (2019).

Google Scholar

10. Lazar, MA, Hodin, RA, Darling, DS, and Chin, WW. A novel member of the thyroid/steroid hormone receptor family is encoded by the opposite strand of the rat c-erbA alpha transcriptional unit. Mol Cell Biol. (1989) 9:1128–36. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.3.1128-1136.1989

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zhang, T, Yu, F, Xu, H, Chen, M, Chen, X, Guo, L, et al. Dysregulation of REV-ERBα impairs GABAergic function and promotes epileptic seizures in preclinical models. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:1216. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21477-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ou, J, Li, H, Qiu, P, Li, Q, Chang, HC, and Tang, YC. CDK9 modulates circadian clock by attenuating REV-ERBα activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2019) 513:967–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.04.043

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Galmozzi, A, Kok, BP, Kim, AS, Montenegro-Burke, JR, Lee, JY, Spreafico, R, et al. PGRMC2 is an intracellular haem chaperone critical for adipocyte function. Nature. (2019) 576:138–42. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1774-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Sitaula, S, Zhang, J, Ruiz, F, and Burris, TP. Rev-erb regulation of cholesterologenesis. Biochem Pharmacol. (2017) 131:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.02.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Yuan, X, Dong, D, Li, Z, and Wu, B. Rev-erbα activation down-regulates hepatic Pck1 enzyme to lower plasma glucose in mice. Pharmacol Res. (2019) 141:310–8. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Griffin, P, Dimitry, JM, Sheehan, PW, Lananna, BV, Guo, C, Robinette, ML, et al. Circadian clock protein Rev-erbα regulates neuroinflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2019) 116:5102–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812405116

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Shen, W, Zhang, W, Ye, W, Wang, H, Zhang, Q, Shen, J, et al. SR9009 induces a REV-ERB dependent anti-small-cell lung cancer effect through inhibition of autophagy. Theranostics. (2020) 10:4466–80. doi: 10.7150/thno.42478

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mayeuf-Louchart, A, Thorel, Q, Delhaye, S, Beauchamp, J, Duhem, C, Danckaert, A, et al. Rev-erb-α regulates atrophy-related genes to control skeletal muscle mass. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:14383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14596-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Welch, RD, Guo, C, Sengupta, M, Carpenter, KJ, Stephens, NA, Arnett, SA, et al. Rev-Erb co-regulates muscle regeneration via tethered interaction with the NF-Y cistrome. Mol Metab. (2017) 6:703–14. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.05.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Boulinguiez, A, Duhem, C, Mayeuf-Louchart, A, Pourcet, B, Sebti, Y, Kondratska, K, et al. NR1D1 controls skeletal muscle calcium homeostasis through myoregulin repression. JCI Insight. (2022) 7:e153584. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.153584

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Woldt, E, Sebti, Y, Solt, LA, Duhem, C, Lancel, S, Eeckhoute, J, et al. Rev-erb-α modulates skeletal muscle oxidative capacity by regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and autophagy. Nat Med. (2013) 19:1039–46. doi: 10.1038/nm.3213

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Simsa, R, Yuen, J, Stout, A, Rubio, N, Fogelstrand, P, and Kaplan, DL. Extracellular Heme proteins influence bovine myosatellite cell proliferation and the color of cell-based meat. Foods. (2019) 8:521. doi: 10.3390/foods8100521

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Zammit, PS, Relaix, F, Nagata, Y, Ruiz, AP, Collins, CA, Partridge, TA, et al. Pax7 and myogenic progression in skeletal muscle satellite cells. J Cell Sci. (2006) 119:1824–32. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02908

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Sousa-Victor, P, García-Prat, L, and Muñoz-Cánoves, P. Control of satellite cell function in muscle regeneration and its disruption in ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2022) 23:204–26. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00421-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Gonzalez, ML, Busse, NI, Waits, CM, and Johnson, SE. Satellite cells and their regulation in livestock. J Anim Sci. (2020) 98:skaa081. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa081

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Hernández-Hernández, JM, García-González, EG, Brun, CE, and Rudnicki, MA. The myogenic regulatory factors, determinants of muscle development, cell identity and regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol. (2017) 72:10–8. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zhang, L, Xu, J, Huang, J, Xu, Z, Lei, X, Lu, H, et al. Isolation, culture, and identification of skeletal muscle satellite cells in goose. Acta Vet Zootech Sin. (2023) 54:4186–95. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2023.10.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Xu, Q, Wang, F, Zhang, Q, and Zhou, Y. The role of myogenic regulatory factors in muscle development, genesis and regeneration. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil. (2021) 43:571–6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2021.06.024

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Cao, X, Cheng, J, Huang, Y, Wang, X, Ma, Y, Peng, S, et al. Growth performance and meat quality evaluations in three-way cross cattle developed for the Tibetan Plateau and their molecular understanding by integrative omics analysis. J Agric Food Chem. (2019) 67:541–50. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05477

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Wan, H, Luo, L, and Wu, J. Research advances in yak meat quality characteristics. J Anim Sci Vet Med (2012) 31:36–40. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2012&filename=XMSZ201201015. (Accessed May 11, 2024)

Google Scholar

31. Shen, L, Zhang, S, Wu, Z, Zheng, M, Li, X, and Zhu, L. The influence of satellite cells on meat quality and its differential regulation. Yi Chuan. (2013) 35:1081–6. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2013.01081

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Weintraub, H . The MyoD family and myogenesis: redundancy, networks, and thresholds. Cell. (1993) 75:1241–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90610-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Sabourin, LA, and Rudnicki, MA. The molecular regulation of myogenesis. Clin Genet. (2000) 57:16–25. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.570103.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Pownall, ME, Gustafsson, MK, and Emerson, CP. Myogenic regulatory factors and the specification of muscle progenitors in vertebrate embryos. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. (2002) 18:747–83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.012502.105758

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Song, S, Huo, J, Li, D, Yuan, Y, Yuan, F, and Miao, Y. Molecular cloning, sequence characterization, and gene expression profiling of a novel water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) gene, AGPAT6. Genet Mol Res. (2013) 12:4116–26. doi: 10.4238/2013.October.1.2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Muroya, S, Taniguchi, M, Shibata, M, Oe, M, Ojima, K, Nakajima, I, et al. Profiling of differentially expressed microRNA and the bioinformatic target gene analyses in bovine fast- and slow-type muscles by massively parallel sequencing. J Anim Sci. (2013) 91:90–103. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5371

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Chatterjee, S, and Ma, K. Circadian clock regulation of skeletal muscle growth and repair. F1000Res. (2016) 5:1549. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9076.1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Takahashi, JS . Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat Rev Genet. (2017) 18:164–79. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.150

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Dibner, C, Schibler, U, and Albrecht, U. The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks. Annu Rev Physiol. (2010) 72:517–49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135821

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lucassen, EA, Coomans, CP, van Putten, M, de Kreij, SR, van Genugten, JHLT, Sutorius, RPM, et al. Environmental 24-hr cycles are essential for health. Curr Biol. (2016) 26:1843–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.038

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Andrews, JL, Zhang, X, McCarthy, JJ, McDearmon, EL, Hornberger, TA, Russell, B, et al. CLOCK and BMAL1 regulate MyoD and are necessary for maintenance of skeletal muscle phenotype and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2010) 107:19090–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014523107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. McDearmon, EL, Patel, KN, Ko, CH, Walisser, JA, Schook, AC, Chong, JL, et al. Dissecting the functions of the mammalian clock protein BMAL1 by tissue-specific rescue in mice. Science. (2006) 314:1304–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1132430

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Chatterjee, S, Yin, H, Li, W, Lee, J, Yechoor, VK, and Ma, K. The nuclear receptor and clock repressor Rev-erbα suppresses myogenesis. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:4585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41059-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Chawla, A, and Lazar, MA. Induction of Rev-ErbA alpha, an orphan receptor encoded on the opposite strand of the alpha-thyroid hormone receptor gene, during adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem. (1993) 268:16265–9. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)85415-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Downes, M, Carozzi, AJ, and Muscat, GE. Constitutive expression of the orphan receptor, Rev-erbA alpha, inhibits muscle differentiation and abrogates the expression of the myoD gene family. Mol Endocrinol. (1995) 9:1666–78. doi: 10.1210/mend.9.12.8614403

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Chomez, P, Neveu, I, Mansén, A, Kiesler, E, Larsson, L, Vennström, B, et al. Increased cell death and delayed development in the cerebellum of mice lacking the rev-erbA(alpha) orphan receptor. Development. (2000) 127:1489–98. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.7.1489

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Pircher, P, Chomez, P, Yu, F, Vennström, B, and Larsson, L. Aberrant expression of myosin isoforms in skeletal muscles from mice lacking the rev-erbAalpha orphan receptor gene. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. (2005) 288:R482–90. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00690.2003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Le Grand, F, and Rudnicki, MA. Skeletal muscle satellite cells and adult myogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2007) 19:628–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.09.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Chargé, SBP, and Rudnicki, MA. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol Rev. (2004) 84:209–38. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00019.2003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Fontaine, C, Dubois, G, Duguay, Y, Helledie, T, Vu-Dac, N, Gervois, P, et al. The orphan nuclear receptor Rev-Erbalpha is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma target gene and promotes PPARgamma-induced adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:37672–80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304664200

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wang, J, and Lazar, MA. Bifunctional role of Rev-erbalpha in adipocyte differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. (2008) 28:2213–20. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01608-07

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Gerhart-Hines, Z, Feng, D, Emmett, MJ, Everett, LJ, Loro, E, Briggs, ER, et al. The nuclear receptor Rev-erbα controls circadian thermogenic plasticity. Nature. (2013) 503:410–3. doi: 10.1038/nature12642

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Cannon, B, and Nedergaard, J. Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev. (2004) 84:277–359. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Ka, NL, Na, TY, and Lee, MO. NR1D1 enhances oxidative DNA damage by inhibiting PARP1 activity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2017) 454:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.06.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Na, H, Han, J, Ka, NL, Lee, MH, Choi, YL, Shin, YK, et al. High expression of NR1D1 is associated with good prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. (2019) 21:127. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1197-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Yang, Y, Bai, Y, Wang, X, Guo, Y, Yu, Z, Feng, D, et al. Clock gene NR1D1 might be a novel target for the treatment of bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. (2023) 41:327.e9–327.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.04.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Kim, SM, Jeon, Y, Jang, JY, and Lee, H. NR1D1 deficiency in the tumor microenvironment promotes lung tumor development by activating the NLRP3 inflammasome. Cell Death Discov. (2023) 9:278. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01554-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: NR1D1, yak, skeletal muscle satellite cells, proliferation, differentiation

Citation: Zhe Y, Wu Z, Yasenjian S, Zhong J, Jiang H, Zhang M, Chai Z and Xin J (2024) Effect of NR1D1 on the proliferation and differentiation of yak skeletal muscle satellite cells. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1428117. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1428117

Received: 05 May 2024; Accepted: 15 October 2024;
Published: 04 November 2024.

Edited by:

Hamayun Khan, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan

Reviewed by:

Gan Shangquan, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences (XAARS), China
Ramy K. A. Sayed, Sohag University, Egypt

Copyright © 2024 Zhe, Wu, Yasenjian, Zhong, Jiang, Zhang, Chai and Xin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhixin Chai, chaizhixin2525@163.com; Jinwei Xin, xinjinwei80@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.