AUTHOR=Garcia-Sanchez Paula , Romero-Trancón David , Falces-Romero Iker , Navarro Carrera Paula , Ruiz-Carrascoso Guillermo , Carmena David , Casares Jiménez María , Rivero-Juárez Antonio , Moya Laura , Rodón Jaume , Esperón Fernando , Pérez-Hernando Belén , Sánchez-León Rocío , Hurtado-Gallego Jara , Alcolea Sonia , Sainz Talía , Calvo Cristina , Méndez-Echevarría Ana
TITLE=Zoonosis screening in Spanish immunocompromised children and their pets
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Veterinary Science
VOLUME=11
YEAR=2024
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1425870
DOI=10.3389/fvets.2024.1425870
ISSN=2297-1769
ABSTRACT=IntroductionAlthough pets provide several social–emotional benefits for children, the risk of zoonosis must be considered among immunocompromised individuals.
MethodsA prospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital including immunocompromised patients younger than 20 years owning dogs and/or cats. Colonization and/or infection was evaluated by stool studies, bacterial swabs, blood polymerase chain reaction and serological studies in both patients and their pets, to evaluate potential zoonotic transmission occurrence.
ResultsWe included 74 patients and their 92 pets (63 dogs, 29 cats). Up to 44.6% of the patients and 31.5% of the pets had at least 1 positive result. Up to 18.4% of pets’ fecal samples were positive (bacteria, parasites or hepatitis E virus). No helminths were observed despite the high frequency of incorrect intestinal deworming practices. Among children, gastrointestinal microorganisms were found in 37.3% (primarily Clostridium difficile). Colonization by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius was common among pets (8.0%) but not among children (0.0%). No shared colonization between owners and pets was observed, except in one case (Blastocystis in both patient and pet feces). Among patients, serologies were positive for Strongyloides stercoralis (14.8%), Toxocara canis (3.2%), Bartonella henselae (19.1%) and hepatitis E (5.6%). Serology was positive for Rickettsia spp. (22.6%) and Babesia spp. (6.5%) in dogs and for Leishmania spp. (14.3%) and Toxoplasma spp. (14.3%) in cats.
ConclusionExposure to zoonotic agents was detected in both patients and pets; however, shared colonization events were almost nonexistent. In our cohort, dogs and cats do not appear to entail high zoonosis transmission risk for immunocompromised patients.