ERRATUM article

Front. Vet. Sci., 11 April 2024

Sec. Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Medicine

Volume 11 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1408432

Erratum: The Rat Thoracic Ultrasound protocol: scanning technique and normal findings

This article is an erratum on:

  1. The Rat Thoracic Ultrasound protocol: scanning technique and normal findings

    1. Read original article
Frontiers Production Office Frontiers Production Office*
  • Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland

An Erratum on
The Rat Thoracic Ultrasound protocol: scanning technique and normal findings

by Piskovská, A., Kraszewska, K., Hauptman, K., and Jekl, V. (2024). Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1286614. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1286614

Due to a production error, the link for Supplementary Video 1 was incorrectly formatted in the article. It has been updated to “https://1drv.ms/v/s!AglSmr1cGU9agRcvHFeUBQ7BLkVW.”

The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: pleura, ultrasonography, rat, RATTUS, lung, respiratory disease, thorax

Citation: Frontiers Production Office (2024) Erratum: The Rat Thoracic Ultrasound protocol: scanning technique and normal findings. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1408432. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1408432

Received: 28 March 2024; Accepted: 28 March 2024;
Published: 11 April 2024.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2024 Frontiers Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, cHJvZHVjdGlvbi5vZmZpY2VAZnJvbnRpZXJzaW4ub3Jn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more