Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Vet. Sci., 08 March 2024
Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases
This article is part of the Research Topic Zoonotic Bacteria: Genomic Evolution, Antimicrobial Resistance, Pathogenicity, and Prevention Strategies View all 6 articles

Editorial: Zoonotic bacteria: genomic evolution, antimicrobial resistance, pathogenicity, and prevention strategies

  • 1Laboratory of Engineering and Applied Technologies, Higher School of Technology, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal, Morocco
  • 2Department of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, Polo Universitario dell'Annunziata, Messina, Italy
  • 3Riconnexia srls, Spin-off of the University of Messina, Polo Universitario dell'Annunziata, Messina, Italy
  • 4Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization (VIDO), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • 5Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • 6Department of Veterinary Medicine, Zhejiang University College of Animal Sciences, Hangzhou, China
  • 7State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 8School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China

Zoonotic bacteria pose a significant concern due to their ability to naturally transmit infections from animals to humans. Despite global efforts to improve lifestyle and healthcare accessibility, these bacteria persistently adapt to new challenges, posing an ongoing threat to established health programs and human wellbeing (1). This situation is exacerbated by the emergence of multi-drug resistant strains, which diminish or evade various antimicrobial treatments, highlighting the urgent need for developing new effective and sustainable alternatives (2, 3). Currently, the use of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) has revolutionized the surveillance and epidemiologic analysis of zoonotic bacteria, offering unprecedented insights into their genetic makeup and transmission dynamics. WGS allows for the comprehensive examination of an organism's entire DNA, enabling researchers to identify specific genetic markers, trace the outbreak origins, and understand the evolutionary patterns of zoonotic bacteria (46).

Animal farms are considered the primary reservoir for developing and spreading harmful zoonotic bacteria. In fact, bacteria that grow in animal farms can cause disease in animals, or be transmitted to humans via direct contact, inhalation of aerosol, or consumption of contaminated animal-derived food products. In this regard, Anjos et al. have used WGS to characterize Mycobacterium tuberculosis variant bovis (a leading cause of bovine tuberculosis) isolated from cattle circulating in the state of Mato Grosso in Brazil. The WGS analysis showed that the sequenced strains belonged to lineage BOV AFRI and the spoligotype BOV 1; BOV 2, presenting high genetic diversity compared to other Brazilian M. tuberculosis var. bovis strains, suggesting different transmission routes in the production chain. Additionally, the authors showed that the Brazilian M. tuberculosis var. bovis harbor genes encoding resistance to different drugs, including pyrazinamide, isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin, ethambutol, ethionamide, florquinolones, kanamycin/amikacin, capreomycin, paraminosalicylic acid, cycloserine, bedaquiline, linezolid, and delamanid, with different mutations in the drug resistance encoding genes.

On the other hand, El-Adawy et al. have used WGS to analyze the genetic diversity, resistome, plasmidome, and virulome profiles of 66 Campylobacter jejuni isolated between 2010 and 2011 from German turkey flocks. The studied isolates showed high genetic diversity, which were grouped into 28 different sequence types and 11 clonal complexes, with an average pairwise cgSNP distance of 14,585. Additionally, the prediction of virulence genes showed the detection of 30 genes related to motility, chemotaxis, adhesion, and invasion, with the abundance of flaA (83.3%) and flaB (78.8%) genes encoding for flagellin protein A and B, respectively. The prediction of antimicrobial resistance genes showed the detection of genes encoding resistance toward ampicillin (blaOXA), tetracycline [tet(O)], neomycin [aph(3)-IIIa], streptomycin (aadE), and streptothricin (sat4), in addition to a single mutation T86I in the housekeeping gene gyrA conferring resistance to quinolones. The virulence and resistance genes are often carried out by mobile genetic elements, particularly, plasmids in this regard, the authors evidenced the detection of 28 plasmid-borne contigs among the 66 C. jejuni isolates. On the other hand, authors showed high resistance to metronidazole (49/66; 74.2%), followed by ciprofloxacin (47/66; 712%), and nalidixic acid (44/66; 66.7%), while all isolates were susceptible to gentamicin, erythromycin, and chloramphenicol.

The main route of transmitting zoonotic bacteria is through the consumption of contaminated animal-derived foods, especially meat products and eggs. Bacteria that belong to the normal flora of many animals can contaminate carcasses during the slaughtering process (7). Rodarte et al. conducted a scoping review on zoonotic parasites and pathogens in Eastern African abattoirs, identifying 42 species affecting workers and slaughtered livestock, notably Mycobacterium bovis. In fact, abattoirs are considered a crucial “One Health” interface with frequent interactions between humans, animals, and the environment, requiring improved infrastructure and biosecurity measures. Hence, efforts should address varying hygienic practices across abattoir types, emphasizing personal protective equipment (PPE), training programs, safe animal handling, and vaccination to mitigate zoonotic risks. However, early detection via robust surveillance systems, including WGS-based methods, is imperative to curb pathogen transmission effectively. This underscores the importance of holistic, collaborative approaches, aligning with the One Health approach, to mitigate the spread of zoonotic disease in abattoir settings.

In the absence of effective treatment for zoonotic diseases, early detection is essential to prevent the spread of zoonotic pathogens. Charron et al. have used an integrative genomic and transcriptomic approach to assess the effect of variation in gene content and their expression among Burkholderia mallei strains, to evaluate serodiagnostic biomarkers glanders. For this, the authors have analyzed and compared the genomes of B. mallei retrieved from both NCBI's RefSeq database and in-house samples with the reference strain B. mallei ATCC 23344. The pan-genome analysis identified gene content differences ranging from 31 to 715 (an average of 334 gene presence-absence), with notable losses of genes encoding serodiagnostic antigens due to structural variations. Additionally, the transcriptomic analysis identified 388 differentially expressed genes, including those related to pathogenesis and virulence, influenced by genomic variations. These variations significantly impact host innate and adaptive immunity, particularly antibody production. The study underscores the importance of early detection in zoonotic disease management and highlights the potential for improved glanders serodiagnosis and molecular typing using genomic approaches.

Vaccines have been used for a long time in the veterinary field to prevent disease spread, enhance welfare, reduce treatment costs, and curb zoonotic disease transmission. Pasteurella multocida is a zoonotic pathogen that causes pneumonia in a wide range of animals, particularly in pigs, leading to significant economic losses worldwide. Vaccines have been used for over 50 years to prevent and control swine pasteurellosis in China, however, recent studies showed that traditional vaccines had no protective effect against the epidemic serogroup A and D strains. In this regard, Guan et al. assessed the immunogenicity and efficacy of serogroup A and D bacterins against P. multocida. For this, 26 inactivated P. multocida vaccines were used to target the prevalent serogroups A and D. Immunized mice showed limited homologous protection for genotype A:L6 strains, while some provided heterologous protection against genotype A:L3. Conversely, genotype D:L6 strains offered both homologous and heterologous protection. These findings provided insights into the effectiveness of bacterins as vaccinations against P. multocida and provided some baseline references for the development of efficacious bivalent vaccines.

In summary, this Research Topic advances our knowledge of monitoring, diagnosing, controlling, and preventing the emergence of zoonotic bacteria. WGS has proven efficacy as an effective method to enhance the surveillance and diagnosis/detection of virulent and antimicrobial-resistant genotypes, in addition, the development of new vaccines can be considered a key Research Topic for controlling and preventing the development and spread of zoonotic bacteria, especially in the era and antimicrobial resistance.

Author contributions

AE-D: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FG: Writing – review & editing. AW: Writing – review & editing. MY: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

FG was employed by Riconnexia srls.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Li Y, Ed-Dra A, Tang B, Kang X, Müller A, Kehrenberg C, et al. Higher tolerance of predominant Salmonella serovars circulating in the antibiotic-free feed farms to environmental stresses. J Hazard Mater. (2022) 468:129476. doi: 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2022.129476

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ed-Dra A, Filali FR, Khayi S, Oulghazi S, Bouchrif B, El Allaoui A, et al. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, and genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica isolated from sausages. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. (2019) 9:56–61. doi: 10.1556/1886.2018.00035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Jia C, Wang Z, Huang C, Teng L, Zhou H, An H, et al. Mobilome-driven partitions of the resistome in Salmonella. mSystems. (2023) 8:23. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00883-23

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhou X, Kang X, Chen J, Song Y, Jia C, Teng L, et al. Genome degradation promotes Salmonella pathoadaptation by remodeling fimbriae-mediated proinflammatory response. Natl Sci Rev. (2023) 10:228. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad228

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Feng Y, Pan H, Zheng B, Li F, Teng L, Jiang Z, et al. An integrated nationwide genomics study reveals transmission modes of typhoid fever in China. mBio. (2023) 14:23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01333-23

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Li Y, Teng L, Xu X, Li X, Peng X, Zhou X, et al. A nontyphoidal Salmonella serovar domestication accompanying enhanced niche adaptation. EMBO Mol Med. (2022) 14:e16366. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202216366

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wu B, Ed-Dra A, Pan H, Dong C, Jia C, Yue M. Genomic investigation of Salmonella isolates recovered from pigs slaughtering process in Hangzhou, China. Front Microbiol. (2021) 12:704636. doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2021.704636

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: zoonoses, genomic epidemiology, virulence, pathogenicity, whole genome sequencing, genomic evolution, vaccine development

Citation: Ed-Dra A, Giarratana F, White AP and Yue M (2024) Editorial: Zoonotic bacteria: genomic evolution, antimicrobial resistance, pathogenicity, and prevention strategies. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1390732. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1390732

Received: 23 February 2024; Accepted: 27 February 2024;
Published: 08 March 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Michael Kogut, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, United States

Copyright © 2024 Ed-Dra, Giarratana, White and Yue. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Abdelaziz Ed-Dra, abdelaziz_iaa@yahoo.fr; a.eddra@usms.ma; Min Yue, myue@zju.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.