Yi Yang
Jilei Zhang
Heba Sayed El-Mahallawy- 1Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- 2International Corporation Laboratory of Agriculture and Agricultural Products Safety, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- 3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
- 4Department of Zoonoses, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
Editorial on the Research Topic
Pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria in ruminants: antimicrobial resistance and microbial homeostasis
Ruminants share a profound connection with human beings. They have the remarkable ability to harness rumen microorganisms, facilitating the fermentation process and converting plant proteins into high-quality animal proteins. This process yields a significant supply of meat and dairy products indispensable to our lives. The diversity and abundance of rumen microorganisms indicate not only the host's digestive and metabolic capacity but also its health status. During the long process of evolution, ruminants have adapted to environmental changes by modifying the types and abundance of microorganisms in their rumen, thereby optimizing energy utilization (Yang et al.).
Nonetheless, alongside the beneficial symbiotic bacteria in the rumen, numerous pathogenic bacteria pose a grave threat to the wellbeing of ruminant animals. Brucellosis is a zoonosis of significant public health and economic importance that is endemic in ruminants worldwide. Compared with large farmed ruminants (cattle, zebu, and buffalo), small farmed ruminants (goats and sheep) infected with Brucella melitensis or B. ovis pose a greater threat to humans, especially in African countries (Hussen et al.).
The dairy market primarily comprises milk from cows, goats, water buffaloes, and camels, with cow's milk taking the lead in consumption. However, goat, water buffalo, and camel milk stand out due to their distinctive nutritional components, making them particularly suitable for specific demographic groups. Mastitis is the most common, costly, and important disease in the dairy industry. Up to now, more than 150 species of pathogenic bacteria have been identified in the raw milk of animals with mastitis. Staphylococcus aureus is frequently isolated in many countries (1). For example, Wang K. et al. have identified a high pooled prevalence of S. aureus (36.23%) in China from 2000 to 2020. Although S. aureus has been well documented and recognized as a significant mastitis-causing organism in cows, its molecular characteristics and pathogenicity in water buffaloes are largely unknown. A recent epidemiological study conducted in Guangdong province, China, revealed that S. aureus is the third most prevalent pathogenic bacteria in water buffaloes with subclinical mastitis, and its isolation frequency is lower than Escherichia coli and coagulase-negative staphylococci (Zhang et al.).
Due to the frequent occurrence of mastitis and repeated use of antibiotics (administered during the lactation, or at dry-off) (Okello et al.), bacteria isolated from raw milk are gradually developing antimicrobial resistance. In recent years, the antibiotic resistance phenotypes and genotypes of mastitis pathogens, as well as the development of new antibiotic replacement therapies, have become prominent areas of study. For example, Toquet et al. has reported the in vivo antimicrobial potential of lactic acid bacteria (a kind of probiotics) in the treatment of contagious agalactia caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae. Although hundreds of pathogenic bacteria are associated with mastitis, studies on antibiotic resistance are mainly focused on S. aureus, Escherichia coli and Streptococcus. A high prevalence of S. aureus has been reported to be resistant to penicillin G, ampicillin, or amoxicillin. In contrast, a low prevalence of isolates was resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or gentamycin (2). E. coli and Streptococcus are also major mastitis-causing pathogens in dairy cows. Multidrug-resistant (acquired resistance to ≥ three classes of antimicrobials) Streptococcus can be frequently isolated from raw milk of cows with mastitis, with the presence of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence genes (3, 4).
In addition to mastitis, veterinarians should pay much attention to respiratory and digestive diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria infection. Diarrhea can be caused by different kinds of pathogens, including bacteria (E. coli K99/ O157 and Salmonella enteritidis), viruses (bovine viral diarrhea virus, bovine and ovine rotavirus), and parasites (Cryptosporidium sp. and Coccidium sp.) (Wang D. et al.). Respiratory disease can result in slow weight gain in beef cattle and sheep, causing considerable financial losses for beef and lamb producers. Airway microbiotas enriched with probiotics (such as Lactobacillus) are associated with good respiratory health. On the contrary, microbiotas enriched with recognized pathogenic bacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida) are related to respiratory diseases (5). The threat of respiratory and digestive disease for cattle, sheep and goat operations is exacerbated by increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic bacteria (Carter et al.).
Anaplasma, a kind of tickborne pathogen, can cause anaplasmosis in ruminants. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of A. marginale, A. ovis, A. platys, and A. phagocytophilum in ruminants, and A. marginale (Mahmoud et al.) and A. phagocytophilum can be frequently detected (6, 7). It is worth noting that A. phagocytophilum is a zoonotic pathogen that can cause human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA). HGA is characterized by sustained high fever and a decrease in white blood cells and platelets. Its clinical manifestations primarily include overall discomfort, fatigue, headache, muscle soreness, and symptoms like nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, and diarrhea. Misdiagnosis is common due to the similarity of its symptoms to certain viral infectious diseases. In severe cases, it can lead to multiple organ dysfunction, including the heart, liver, and kidneys, potentially resulting in fatal outcomes.
In conclusion, the contributions to this Research Topic expand our understanding of the distributions and characteristics of pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria in ruminants, providing valuable insights to improve our ability to safeguard the health of these animals.
Author contributions
YY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Writing – review & editing. HE-M: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32373009 and 32002263 to YY), Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province (BK20230071 to YY), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2022QNRC001 to YY), Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (2019M650126 to YY), Seed Industry Vitalization Program of Jiangsu Province [JBGS(2021)117 to YY], Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program of Jiangsu Province (TJ-2022-031), the 111 Project D18007, and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (NA to YY). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We are sincerely grateful to all contributors of this Research Topic. We also want to thank the administrative staff of Frontiers in Veterinary Science for their continuous support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Leijon M, Atkins E, Persson Waller K, Artursson K. Longitudinal study of Staphylococcus aureus genotypes isolated from bovine clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci. (2021) 104:11945–54. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20562
2. Sharifi A, Sobhani K, Mahmoudi P. A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a high-level antibiotic resistance of bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus in Iran. Res Vet Sci. (2023) 161:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.05.016
3. Tian XY, Zheng N, Han RW, Ho H, Wang J, Wang YT, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of Streptococcus isolated from dairy cows with mastitis in China. Microb Pathog. (2019) 131:33–9. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.03.035
4. Crippa BL, Rodrigues MX, Tomazi T, Yang Y, de Oliveira Rocha L, Bicalho RC. Virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance and phylogeny of bovine mastitis-associated Streptococcus dysgalactiae. J Dairy Res. (2023) 90:152–7. doi: 10.1017/S0022029923000195
5. Timsit E, McMullen C, Amat S, Alexander TW. Respiratory bacterial microbiota in cattle: from development to modulation to enhance respiratory health. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. (2020) 36:297–320. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.001
6. Qiu H, Kelly PJ, Zhang J, Luo Q, Yang Y, Mao Y, et al. Molecular detection of Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp in ruminants from twelve provinces of China. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. (2016) 2016:9183861. doi: 10.1155/2016/9183861
Keywords: ruminant, pathogenic bacteria, symbiotic bacteria, antimicrobial resistance, microbial homeostasis, microbiome, dysbiosis
Citation: Yang Y, Zhang J and El-Mahallawy HS (2024) Editorial: Pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria in ruminants: antimicrobial resistance and microbial homeostasis. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1355704. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1355704
Received: 14 December 2023; Accepted: 15 December 2023;
Published: 08 January 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Michael Kogut, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, United States
Copyright © 2024 Yang, Zhang and El-Mahallawy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yi Yang, eWFuZ3lpJiN4MDAwNDA7eXp1LmVkdS5jbg==