Corrigendum: Analysis of the approach angle to medial orbitotomy that avoids accidental neurotrauma in the mesaticephalic dog skull utilizing 3D computer models and virtual surgical planning

Congiusta, Michael C.; Soukup, Jason W.

doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1271656

CORRECTION article

Front. Vet. Sci., 29 September 2023

Sec. Veterinary Dentistry and Oromaxillofacial Surgery

Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1271656

Corrigendum: Analysis of the approach angle to medial orbitotomy that avoids accidental neurotrauma in the mesaticephalic dog skull utilizing 3D computer models and virtual surgical planning

This article is a correction to:

Analysis of the approach angle to medial orbitotomy that avoids accidental neurotrauma in the mesaticephalic dog skull utilizing 3D computer models and virtual surgical planning
1. Read original article

$\r\nMichael C. Congiusta$ Michael C. Congiusta

Jason W. Soukup^*

Dentistry and Oromaxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States

A corrigendum on
Analysis of the approach angle to medial orbitotomy that avoids accidental neurotrauma in the mesaticephalic dog skull utilizing 3D computer models and virtual surgical planning

by Congiusta, M. C., and Soukup, J. W. (2023). Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1185454. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1185454

In the published article, the reference for Pollard and Verstraete (2008) was incorrectly written as:

“Pollard RE, Verstraete FJM. The diagnostic yield of conventional radiographs and computed tomography in dogs and cats with maxillofacial trauma. Vet Surg. (2008) 37:294–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00380.x”

It should be:

“Bar-am Y, Pollard RE, Verstraete FJM. The diagnostic yield of conventional radiographs and computed tomography in dogs and cats with maxillofacial trauma. Vet Surg. (2008) 37:294–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00380.x”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: medial orbitotomy, CT, 3D computer model, virtual surgical planning, approach angle

Citation: Congiusta MC and Soukup JW (2023) Corrigendum: Analysis of the approach angle to medial orbitotomy that avoids accidental neurotrauma in the mesaticephalic dog skull utilizing 3D computer models and virtual surgical planning. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1271656. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1271656

Received: 02 August 2023; Accepted: 07 August 2023;
Published: 29 September 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Boaz Arzi, University of California, Davis, United States

Copyright © 2023 Congiusta and Soukup. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jason W. Soukup, amFzb24uc291a3VwQHdpc2MuZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.