AUTHOR=Coelho Yasmin Nascimento Bernardes , Soldi Luiz Ricardo , Silva Paulo Henrique Rosa da , Mesquita Caio Melo , Paranhos Luiz Renato , Santos Thaísa Reis dos , Silva Marcelo José Barbosa 

TITLE=Tyrosine kinase inhibitors as an alternative treatment in canine mast cell tumor

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Veterinary Science

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1188795

DOI=10.3389/fvets.2023.1188795

ISSN=2297-1769

ABSTRACT=<p>The current gold standard treatment for canine mast cell tumors (MCT) uses vinblastine sulfate (VBL) as chemotherapy, although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have recently been shown to be worthy candidates for treatment. This systematic review aimed to analyze the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and complete (CR) or partial response (PR) in dogs with MCT treated with TKI compared to standard VBL treatment. The systematic review was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) database under the identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/WYPN4 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://osf.io/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://osf.io/</ext-link>). An electronic search was performed in nine databases. References from eligible studies were also selected to find more registers. A total of 28 studies met the eligibility criteria, and one more was recovered from the references of eligible studies, totaling 29 selected studies. The overall response rate, complete response, and partial response were higher in dogs treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors than in dogs treated with vinblastine. The overall survival and progression-free survival of vinblastine-treated dogs were higher compared to tyrosine kinase inhibitors-treated dogs. Dogs with mutated KIT treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors have longer overall survival and progression-free survival compared to those treated with vinblastine. It is important to consider the limitation of the study which should temper the interpretation of the results, videlicet, the extracted data lacked sample standardization and included variables such as animal characteristics, mutation detection methods, tumor characteristics, and treatment types which may have influenced the outcome of the study.</p><sec><title>Systematic review registration</title><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://osf.io/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://osf.io/</ext-link>, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WYPN4.</p></sec>