Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci., 09 March 2023
Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases

Infectious abortions in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula: Optimization of sampling procedures for molecular diagnostics

\nOihane Alzuguren&#x;Oihane AlzugurenLara Domínguez&#x;Lara DomínguezGema ChacnGema ChacónAlfredo A. BenitoAlfredo A. BenitoOscar Mencía-Ares
Oscar Mencía-Ares*
  • EXOPOL S.L., Zaragoza, Spain

Introduction: Infectious abortions have a major impact on small domestic ruminant farms, i.e., sheep and goats, both in terms of profitability and health status. Therefore, rapid and sensitive diagnosis is essential to minimize losses. Currently, molecular techniques, such as qPCR, are routinely used for their diagnosis, which imply the need to manipulate all abortive material, with consequent biosafety risks. Here, we evaluate the frequency of the main abortifacient pathogens in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula and also assess an alternative approach for the optimization of sampling for molecular diagnosis.

Results: A total of 392 clinical cases were analyzed from April 2020 to May 2021, evidencing that the main causative agents of abortion detected were Coxiella burnetii (49.0%), Chlamydia abortus (38.3%) and, to a lesser extent, Toxoplasma gondii (10.2%), Salmonella enterica (7.1%) and Campylobacter spp. (6.1%). An uneven distribution of these pathogens was observed between ruminant species, with a higher frequency (p < 0.05) of T. gondii, S. enterica and Campylobacter spp. in sheep than goat abortions, and among geographic areas, highlighting the higher frequency (p < 0.05) of T. gondii and Campylobacter spp. in the north compared to southeastern Spain. The alternative sampling method, consisting on the use of fetal tongues and placental swabs in replacement of the whole fetus and placental tissue, offered a very good agreement with the classical method for all pathogens, except for low concentrations of C. burnetii, which seems to have a doubtful role in abortion when its concentration in the abortifacient material is low.

Conclusions: This study reveals a high frequency of infectious etiology in abortions of small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula and validates for the first time an alternative sampling method for molecular diagnosis that will help to provide rapid and accurate results while minimizing biosafety risks.

Introduction

Abortions have a strong impact on the health status and profitability of sheep and goats production (1, 2). These clinical processes also have important implications for public health, since most of the abortifacient pathogens are considered potentially zoonotic, with a particular risk for veterinary practitioners, farmers and laboratory staff (3). Indeed, these agents can cause both abortions in women and epidemic outbreaks (4), such as the Q Fever epidemic in The Netherlands in the period 2007–2010, which was associated with abortion storms in goats caused by Coxiella burnetii (5).

The main infectious agents causing abortions in small ruminants are Chlamydia abortus, C. burnetii, Toxoplasma gondii, Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter spp., Brucella spp. and Pestivirus (610). The distribution of these abortifacient pathogens may vary among regions and flocks worldwide attending to several factors, such as management practices, flock size, climatic conditions, vaccination, eradication strategies or nutritional factors (1114).

Detection of the causative agents of abortions in small ruminants should be performed in a systematic investigative approach of fetal organs and placental samples due to the differential tissue tropism of each pathogen (8). This makes it difficult to standardize laboratory techniques for the detection of multiple causative agents, requiring the whole fetus and placenta from the abortion to be sent to the diagnostic laboratory. There, biological samples are manipulated to select the most appropriate tissues for pathogen detection and pools of different tissues are performed to optimize the detection of all causative agents. This not only increases the biosecurity risk, given the zoonotic nature of many of these agents, but also cross-contamination between samples and a reduction in the number of abortions processed in the laboratory. Given these limitations, alternative sampling methods have been developed with partial success, to facilitate the etiologic diagnosis of abortions in small ruminant, such as the fetal oropharyngeal swabbing and puncture of the fetal lung (15).

In this study we aimed to assess the frequency of the main causative agents responsible of abortions in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula from 392 clinical cases referred to a veterinary diagnostics laboratory from April 2020 to May 2021, and also evaluate the suitability of fetal tongues and placental swabs as an alternative, rapid and sensitive sampling procedure for the detection of abortifacient pathogens in a selection of 98 of these clinical cases.

Materials and methods

Clinical cases of abortions referred for molecular diagnosis

Small domestic ruminant abortions (n = 392), i.e., sheep (302) and goats (90), were referred to the veterinary laboratory Exopol S.L. (Zaragoza, Spain) for molecular diagnosis between April 2020 and May 2021. These cases were received from 333 clinically affected farms that had reported abortions. These farms were distributed throughout the Iberian Peninsula, with cases reported from 39 Spanish provinces and 5 Portuguese districts. Based on the geographical location, these regions were divided into five different areas (Figure 1), i.e., northwestern Spain (Area 1; 84 clinical cases), northeastern Spain (Area 2; 88 clinical cases), southwestern Spain (Area 3; 89 clinical cases), southeastern Spain (Area 4; 101 clinical cases) and mainland Portugal (Area 5; 30 clinical cases). Cases from Spanish and Portuguese islands were excluded from this study.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Geographic distribution of the Iberian Peninsula into areas referring 392 clinical cases of abortion in small domestic ruminants to the diagnostics laboratory between April 2020 and May 2021. Area 1: Northwestern Spain; Area 2: Northeastern Spain; Area 3: Southwestern Spain; Area 4: Southeastern Spain; Area 5: Mainland Portugal.

Sample collection and processing

From each clinical case, samples of placenta, fetus or both, when available, were collected by the veterinary practitioner and referred to the laboratory for further analyses. When more than one abortion was referred from a flock at a time, each placenta and fetus was individualized for diagnostic procedures and the results were further provided at the case level for the frequency study, combining the findings of the individual cases.

Samples of liver, lung, brain, abomasal content and tongue tissue were collected from the fetus using sterile forceps, scissors and Pasteur pipettes. From placenta, placental tissue and a placental swab from the cotyledons and inter-cotyledonary area were collected for further analyses. All samples were collected under aseptic conditions to avoid cross-contaminations. These samples were processed in the laboratory differently depending on whether a classical or alternative approach was used.

Classical sampling procedure

The classical sampling procedure consisted of pooling liver, lung, brain, abomasal content and placental tissue using 25 mg of each sample and placing them together in DNAse/RNAse-free microtubes with 1 mm zirconium beads and 400 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 1X and subsequently homogenized using the MagNA Lyser automated tissue homogenizer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) for 2 cycles of 25 s at 6,000 rpm. This procedure was used to assess the frequency of abortifacient pathogens. For the comparative study, placental tissue was individualized from other tissues and processed following this protocol for further comparisons.

Alternative sampling procedure

The alternative sampling procedure consisted of individual processing of fetal tongue tissue and placental swabs. Fetal tongues were processed following the protocol described in the previous section for solid tissues. For placental swabs processing, these were placed in microtubes containing 700 μl of PBS 1X and vigorously homogenized to guarantee cell release. These microtubes were centrifuged at 13,000 g for 5 min for pellet recovery. Pellets were further transferred to a microtube containing 200 μl of PBS 1X and homogenized at 6,000 rpm for 25 s in the MagNA Lyser homogenizer.

DNA/RNA extraction and pathogen identification by quantitative PCR

DNA/RNA extraction was performed following the manufacturer's instructions using the MagMAX™ Pathogen RNA/DNA commercial kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) and the KingFisher Flex automated magnetic particle processor (ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA).

T. gondii, C. abortus, C. burnetii, Campylobacter spp., S. enterica, N. caninum and Pestivirus identification and quantification were performed by qPCR/RT-qPCR in pooled fetal tissues, fetal tongues, placental tissues and placental swabs using commercial qPCR kits (EXOone qPCR Kits, Exopol S.L., Spain) and following manufacturer's instructions. These assays target the repeat region B1, ompA gene, IS111 sequence, gyrB gene, ttrC gene, NC5 gene and 5'UTR region, respectively.

The amplification results of the qPCR/RT-qPCR assays were expressed in a semi-quantitative form with the cycle of quantification (Cq). The threshold for discriminating a positive-negative results was set at Cq 38.

Determination of Coxiella burnetii as presumptive causative agent in the etiologic diagnosis of abortion

The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) states that for abortions caused by C. burnetii the bacterial load is predictive of causality in individual animals. Indeed, a threshold of 104 bacteria per gram of tissue has been proposed for discrimination of C. burnetii as the causative agent of abortion (16, 17). Based on experiments conducted in our laboratory, the threshold of 104 C. burnetii per gram of tissue was set at a Cq value of 33, considering its role as a presumptive causative agent of abortion when Cq value was below 33. The definitive etiologic diagnosis could not be defined in this study, as it should be supported by the combination of detection of the abortifacient agent and demonstration of compatible lesions by histopathology.

Statistical analysis and figures visualization

All data were included into a computerized spreadsheet (Microsoft Office Excel) and analyzed with R v4.1.3 (18).

Frequency analyses based on qPCR results were performed for the entire set of pathogens. The evaluated variables, i.e., small ruminant species (sheep-goat) and geographic area (Areas 1–5), were expressed as the percentage of positives and compared using the Fisher's exact test. For the assessment of the distribution of Cq values from each pathogen a histogram and a Shapiro-Wilk's test were performed. For those pathogens with a prevalence below 5% no statistical analysis was carried out due to lack of variability.

Of the 392 clinical cases referred to the laboratory during the evaluated period, a selection of 98 clinical cases was made to evaluate the usefulness of fetal tongues and placental swabs—alternative method—for the replacement of placental tissues and whole fetus—classical method—for the detection and quantification of the main pathogens causing abortions in small ruminants. For this optimization of the sampling procedure, we included a subset of 82 pairs of fetus-tongue and 72 pairs of placenta-placental swab.

The agreement between results of the sample pairs was performed on a dichotomous—positive/negative—scale. Inter-rater agreement analyses were performed for each pathogen using Cohen's Kappa (κ), including its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Interpretation of Kappa values to assess the strength of agreement between techniques was based on the one proposed by Altman (19), which is as follows: κ ≤ 0.20 = poor, 0.21–0.40 = fair, 0.41–0.60 = moderate, 0.61–0.80 = good and 0.81–1.00 = very good. For C. burnetii, given the importance of the bacterial load in its clinical significance, we performed the agreement analysis for the whole set of cases positive to C. burnetii and split by its concentration into high (Cq ≤ 33) and low (Cq > 33).

Plots were produced using the ggplot2 package v3.3.3 (20), and further modified using the software Inkscape v1.2.1 (https://inkscape.org/). The level of statistical significance was represented with asterisks: four asterisks (****) indicated a p-value < 0.0001; three asterisks (***) indicated a p-value between 0.0001 and 0.001; two asterisks (**) indicated a p-value between 0.001 and 0.01; one asterisk (*) indicated a p-value between 0.01 and 0.05.

Results

Frequency of infectious agents detected in abortions in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula

When evaluating the frequency of pathogens causing abortions in small ruminants during the evaluated period, C. burnetii and C. abortus were the most frequently detected pathogens in the 392 clinical cases referred to the laboratory, with a frequency of 49.0 and 38.3%, respectively (Figure 2A). To a lesser extent, T. gondii (10.2%), S. enterica (7.1%) and Campylobacter spp. (6.1%) were also detected in these clinical cases. N. caninum was involved in only ten cases (2.6%), while barely six cases were associated with Pestivirus infection (1.5%). None of the pathogens evaluated was detected in 24.0% of the clinical cases during this period.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Distribution of 392 clinical cases of abortions in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula referred to the diagnostics laboratory between April 2020 and May 2021 by (A) pathogen; and, within each pathogen by (B) small ruminant species, i.e., sheep (302) and goats (90); and (C) geographic area (Areas 1–5). The differences between sheep and goats and among geographic areas were evaluated by the Fisher's exact test. The level of statistical significance was represented with asterisks: two asterisks (**) indicated a p-value between 0.001 and 0.01; one asterisk (*) indicated a p-value between 0.01 and 0.05.

Regarding to the detection of multiple microorganisms in the same clinical case, we appreciated that in 32.7% of abortion cases at least two different pathogens were detected, reducing this percentage to 6.1% for three agents. The most frequent combination of pathogens was the simultaneous detection of C. burnetii and C. abortus, reporting this finding in 20.9% of the cases, alone or in combination with other pathogens. Interestingly, the presence of C. burnetii and C. abortus alone accounted for 17.6 and 16.6% of all clinical cases, respectively. A summary of the 27 combinations of abortifacient pathogens detected in the clinical cases referred to the diagnostics laboratory during the evaluated period is available in Supplementary Table S1.

Frequency of abortifacient pathogens in small domestic ruminants according to the ruminant species and the geographic area

Of the 392 clinical cases referred to the diagnostic laboratory, 302 cases were sheep abortions, while only 90 cases belonged to goats. We observed a significantly higher (p < 0.05) frequency of T. gondii, S. enterica and Campylobacter spp. in sheep abortions compared to goats. In contrast, we observed that the prevalence of C. burnetii was higher in goats (53.3%) than sheep (47.7%) abortions, but without significant differences. A detailed distribution of the differential frequency of abortifacient pathogens in sheep and goats and their statistical significance is available in Figure 2B.

According to the geographic area from which the clinical cases were referred (Figure 2C), we observed that cases from northern Spain (Areas 1 and 2) exhibited a significantly higher frequency of Campylobacter spp. and T. gondii (p < 0.05) than abortions from southeastern Spain (Area 4). The frequency of C. abortus was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in Portugal (Area 5) than in southwestern Spain (Area 3). For clinical cases positive to S. enterica, its presence was lower (p < 0.05) in southwestern Spain (Area 3) than in the other Spanish regions (Areas 1, 2, and 4). No significant differences were observed for C. burnetii.

Differential distribution in the cycle of quantification for each abortifacient pathogen

When evaluating the Cq distribution of each abortifacient pathogen in the clinical cases referred to the laboratory, we observed that the distributions varied depending on the microorganism evaluated (Figure 3). The most interesting finding was that, for C. burnetii, we observed a left-skewed histogram, with 60.4% of clinical cases in which its concentration was above the established threshold, i.e., Cq 33, for discriminating its presumptive role as causative agent of abortion.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Histogram and density plot representing the distribution of cycle of quantification (Cq) values in clinical cases of abortion in small ruminants positive to (A) Campylobacter spp.; (B) Chlamydia abortus; (C) Coxiella burnetii; (D) Salmonella enterica; and (E) Toxoplasma gondii.

A normal distribution for Cq values (p > 0.05) was only observed for T. gondii. In clinical cases positive for C. abortus, although we did not observe a normal distribution (p < 0.0001), in the histogram we could observe that most cases were normally distributed in a Cq range of 15–33, with a slight upturn of cases with Cq values higher than 33. Likewise, we appreciated a bimodal distribution for Cq values in Campylobacter spp. (p < 0.01) and S. enterica (p < 0.05), which was particularly evident in the former. N. caninum and Pestivirus were excluded from the comparison due to the reduced number of positive cases. A detailed information of Cq values for each pathogen and clinical case is available in Supplementary Table S2.

Evaluation of the use of fetal tongues and placental swabs as an alternative sampling method for molecular diagnosis of abortion

Good to very good concordance in the Cohen's Kappa coefficient was observed for all pathogens when assessing the positive/negative concordance between the pathogens detected in the pairs of samples evaluated, i.e., fetus—tongue tissue and placenta—placenta swab, as reflected in Table 1, with the exception of C. burnetii. In the latter, although significant (p < 0.01), a fair concordance was revealed in the sample pair fetus—tongue, while it was moderate in the placenta—placenta swab pair.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Two-way contingency table for the comparison of the classical (fetus and placenta) and the alternative method (fetal tongue tissue and placental swab) for etiologic diagnosis of abortions in small domestic ruminants.

Interestingly, the categorization of clinical cases positive for C. burnetii into high-low concentration based on Cq values (Table 2), evidenced that the discrepancies observed within sample pairs was determined by cases in which C. burnetii was present in low concentrations. Indeed, a very good concordance was observed for cases with Cq ≤ 33, while a no significant Cohen's Kappa coefficient was observed for clinical cases with Cq > 33.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Two-way contingency table for the comparison of the classical (fetus and placenta) and the alternative method (fetal tongue tissue and placental swab) for etiologic diagnosis of C. burnetii.

We further analyzed the differential distribution of the pathogens included in the study among the samples evaluated, i.e., pooled fetus, fetal tongue, placental tissue and placental swab, shown in Figure 4. Of note here is the significantly higher presence of C. burnetii in placental tissue compared to the fetus (p < 0.01), with no further differences for any other sample pair in any other microorganism evaluated.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Frequency of abortifacient pathogens in small domestic ruminants in a selection of 98 clinical cases referred to the diagnostics laboratory from April 2020 to May 2021 for the comparison of the classical (fetus and placenta) and the alternative sampling method (fetal tongue tissue and placental swab) for molecular diagnosis. The level of statistical significance was represented with asterisks: two asterisks (**) indicated a p-value between 0.001 and 0.01; one asterisk (*) indicated a p-value between 0.01 and 0.05.

Discussion

Infectious abortions have an important impact on small domestic ruminant farms, i.e., sheep and goats, both in terms of profitability and health status (21, 22). This study evidenced that bacterial pathogens are mainly involved in abortions in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula, with C. burnetii and C. abortus as the most frequent abortifacient agents. Here, we also demonstrated that the combination of fetal tongue tissue and placental swabs as an alternative sampling method for pathogen detection by qPCR presents results similar to those of whole fetus and placenta, revealing its usefulness as a rapid and sensitive sampling approach for the molecular diagnosis of abortions in small ruminants.

The selection performed in this study of the most frequent abortifacient pathogens associated with small domestic ruminants in Europe allowed us to detect pathogens involved in abortions in around 75% of cases, higher rates than most of previous case studies (2325). In contrast, no agent could be detected in about a quarter of the cases, which may either be associated with non-infectious agents, such as toxics, nutritional disorders, genetic diseases, stress or extreme climatic conditions (26, 27) or, to a lesser extent, less frequent pathogens that may cause abortions secondarily (8, 13). The high detection rate of abortifacient pathogens may be explained by the high sensitivity provided by the quantitative molecular approach of this study, which can detect almost 100 copies of the pathogen per reaction. However, despite it is desirable to achieve this diagnostic depth, the detection of microorganisms at such low concentration should be carefully considered, since their role in abortion may not be clear, just as it has been previously proposed for C. burnetii (16, 17).

C. burnetii, C. abortus and, to a lesser extent, T. gondii were the most frequent abortifacient pathogens in the Iberian Peninsula in the evaluated period. Previous studies carried out in Spain (14, 28, 29) and Europe (13, 30) showed widely different prevalence rates among regions and countries for abortifacient pathogens, but all of them pointing out to these three agents as the most important microorganisms involved in small ruminant abortions in the continent. Prevalence differences among studies and absolute values should be considered carefully, given that different epidemiological contexts, study designs or diagnostic approaches are used (28). Indeed, most of the studies determine the seroprevalence of the abortifacient pathogens in the flock, but not its molecular identification in the fetus or the placenta, as performed in this study. This approach allowed us to provide a more accurate result, since serology only reveals prior exposure to the agent and does not necessarily imply that the pathogen detected in serology is the causative agent of the abortion.

A higher frequency of T. gondii, S. enterica, and Campylobacter spp. was observed in sheep abortions compared to goats, in contrast to previous studies, which point out a higher infection rate and susceptibility to abortions in goats (22, 31). Several studies have also described a higher susceptibility to C. burnetii in this species (4, 32) and, although non-significant, we appreciated a higher percentage of C. burnetii in goat abortions. The lack of concordance of our results with previous studies between small ruminant species may be explained by the limited number of goat abortions included in this study, which may be related to the reduced census of this species in Spain and Portugal when compared to sheep (33).

Regarding the geographic distribution of abortifacient pathogens in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula, it is noteworthy the higher frequency of Campylobacter spp. and T. gondii in abortions in northern Spain. Several studies have pointed out that nutritional, climatic or management factors may influence the differential distribution of these pathogens among regions (12, 14, 32, 34). In this sense, for instance, a more frequent presence of T. gondii in this region may be determined by climatic conditions, since it has been described that a humid climate, as the one existing in the northern region of the Iberian Peninsula, is associated with greater oocyst survival in the environment (35, 36). Meanwhile, the distribution of Campylobacter spp. abortions in the Iberian Peninsula could be associated with a dissimilar frequency of abortive genetic clones among regions, as it has been observed between the United States and the United Kingdom for C. jejuni abortions in sheep (37). This genetic diversity could not be evaluated in the current study, as bacterial isolation was not performed. Therefore, further investigations need to be performed to evaluate factors that may be involved in the uneven distribution of abortion pathogens in the Iberian Peninsula.

This study evidences that co-infections in clinical cases of abortion are relatively frequent in small ruminants, as it has been demonstrated in recent studies (21, 38). However, based on the semiquantitative results provided by Cq values, we observed that in most cases a single microorganism was detected in a sufficiently high concentration to be considered as potential causative agent of the abortion by itself, unlike in digestive or respiratory processes, in which more than one pathogen are frequently involved (3941). This finding may be due to the ubiquitous nature of some pathogens involved in abortions. Thus, for instance, for S. enterica and Campylobacter spp., although certain serotypes and species are considered abortifacient, such as S. Abortusovis or C. fetus, there are others which not only produce abortions, but can also be present in the intestinal microbiota in small ruminants, e.g., S. Typhymurium or C. jejuni (4, 42) and, consequently, be detected in the abortion in low concentrations as a consequence of a fecal contamination. Nonetheless, given the complexity of interactions among abortifacient pathogens and the uneven distribution of these agents in the fetus and placenta (8), which may lead to their underdetection, the identification of a pathogen as a causative agent of abortion should be carefully considered. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of low pathogen concentrations and co-infections in small ruminant abortions.

The sample selection made in this study for the development of an alternative sampling method, i.e., tongue tissue and placental swabs, for the detection of the main abortifacient pathogens in small domestic ruminants via qPCR, was determined by the differential tropism of these pathogens in the abortions, as demonstrated, for instance, for C. burnetii, with a higher tropism in placental samples (43). The replacement of pooled fetal organs by fetal tongues analysis was based on (i) the highly vascularized nature of this muscle (44), which allows the detection of any abortifacient pathogen that may have hematogenous dissemination and fetal tropism, and (ii) its intimate contact with the amniotic fluid, in which pathogens with placental tropism, such as C. abortus, are present (45). Meanwhile, the use of placental swabs recovered from the cotyledons and the inter-cotyledonary area of the placenta proved to be sufficiently representative to avoid manipulating the entire placenta. Indeed, good to very good agreement was demonstrated for the pairs of samples evaluated for each pathogen, except for C. burnetii.

C. burnetii is a very ubiquitous and highly resistant pathogen in the farm environment whose detection does not necessarily imply its causative role in abortion (14). In this study, we demonstrated that in more than half of the clinical cases in which C. burnetii was detected, its concentration was low enough to consider that its role in the abortion may not be determinant, in accordance with previous studies (21, 30). Interestingly, for this agent, a high concordance between the alternative and classical sampling methods was observed when its concentration was within the threshold to be considered as likely causative agent of abortion, but with not good agreement when its concentration was close to the detection limit of the technique. These facts demonstrate that the use of fetal tongue tissue and placental swabs in replacement of the whole fetus and placenta can be used as a rapid sampling approach for the molecular detection of the main pathogens involved in small ruminant abortions and, thus, minimizing biosafety risks for veterinarians, farmers and laboratory staff.

Conclusions

This study reveals a high frequency of infectious abortions in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula, with a particularly high presence of C. abortus and C. burnetii and an uneven distribution of pathogens between sheep and goats and among geographic areas. C. burnetii seems to have a controversial role in the etiology of the abortion, since in most of the cases its Cq value was upper the threshold set to be considered as a presumptive determinant of abortion. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time that the use of fetal tongue tissue and placental swabs as an alternative sampling method for the molecular diagnosis of abortions in small ruminants offers similar results to those provided by the use of the whole fetus and placenta. This new sampling approach will optimize diagnostic procedures, helping to provide rapid and sensitive results while minimizing biosafety risks.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on animals in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study was not required in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

Study design was performed by GC and AB. Sample manipulation and laboratory analyses were performed by OA. Data analyses were performed by LD with contribution from OM-A. GC, AB, and OM-A provided technical and scientific support on the analysis. All authors participated in the manuscript writing or contributed to its revision and approving this final version.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the excellent technical assistance provided by all Exopol S.L. veterinary specialists and laboratory technicians and also all veterinary practitioners and farmers that have referred clinical samples to the diagnostics laboratory.

Conflict of interest

OA, LD, GC, AB, and OM-A were employed by EXOPOL S.L.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1152289/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Haif A, Khelifi-Ouchene NA, Khelifi M, Ouchetati I, Zeroual F, Ouchene N. Abortive diseases and their various associated risk factors in small ruminants in Algeria: a systematic review. Trop Anim Health Prod. (2021) 53:520. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02926-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Kardjadj M, Kouidri B, Metref D, Luka PD, Ben-Mahdi MH. Abortion and various associated risk factors in small ruminants in Algeria. Prev Vet Med. (2016) 123:97–101. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ganter M. Zoonotic risks from small ruminants. Vet Microbiol. (2015) 181:53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Menzies PI. Control of important causes of infectious abortion in sheep and goats. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. (2011) 27:81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Roest HIJ, Tilburg JJHC, Van Der Hoek W, Vellema P, Van Zijderveld FG, Klaassen CHW, et al. The Q fever epidemic in The Netherlands: history, onset, response and reflection. Epidemiol Infect. (2011) 139:1–12. doi: 10.1017/S0950268810002268

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Amagliani G, La Guardia ME, Dominici S, Brandi G, Omiccioli E. Salmonella Abortusovis: an epidemiologically relevant pathogen. Curr Microbiol. (2022) 79:3. doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02689-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Berri M, Rekiki A, Boumedine KS, Rodolakis A. Simultaneous differential detection of Chlamydophila abortus, Chlamydophila pecorum and Coxiella burnetii from aborted ruminant's clinical samples using multiplex PCR. BMC Microbiol. (2009) 9:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Borel N, Frey CF, Gottstein B, Hilbe M, Pospischil A, Franzoso FD, et al. Laboratory diagnosis of ruminant abortion in Europe. Vet J. (2014) 200:218–29. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Fernández-Escobar M, Calero-Bernal R, Benavides J, Regidor-Cerrillo J, Guerrero-Molina MC, Gutiérrez-Expósito D, et al. Isolation and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in Spanish sheep flocks. Parasites Vectors. (2020) 13:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04275-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Rossetti CA, Maurizio E, Rossi UA. Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:607. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.887671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Esmaeili H, Bolourchi M, Mokhber-Dezfouli MR, khaltabadi farahani R, Teimourpour A. Detection of Chlamydia abortus and risk factors for infection in small ruminants in Iran. Small Rumin Res. (2021) 197:106339. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106339

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Nayeri T, Sarvi S, Moosazadeh M, Daryani A. Global prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in the aborted fetuses and ruminants that had an abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vet Parasitol. (2021) 290:109370. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109370

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Van Engelen E, Luttikholt S, Peperkamp K, Vellema P, Van Den Brom R. Small ruminant abortions in The Netherlands during lambing season 2012–2013. Vet Rec. (2014) 174:506. doi: 10.1136/vr.102244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zendoia II, Barandika JF, Hurtado A, López CM, Alonso E, Beraza X, et al. Analysis of environmental dust in goat and sheep farms to assess Coxiella burnetii infection in a Q fever endemic area: geographical distribution, relationship with human cases and genotypes. Zoonoses Public Health. (2021) 68:666–76. doi: 10.1111/zph.12871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. van den Brom R, Santman-Berends I, Dijkman R, Vellema P, Dijkman R, van Engelen E. An accessible diagnostic toolbox to detect bacterial causes of ovine and caprine abortion. Pathog. (2021) 10:1147. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Rodolakis A. Q fever, state of art: epidemiology, diagnosis and prophylaxis. Small Rumin Res. (2006) 62:121–4. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.038

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). Q Fever. OIE Terrestrial Manual. (2018). p. 1–19. Available online at: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.01.17_Q_FEVER.pdf (accessed October 23, 2022).

18. R Core Team. R: A Language Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (2022). Available online at: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed September 15, 2022).

Google Scholar

19. Altman D. G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC (1991). p. 1–589. Available online at: https://books.google.es/books?hl=en&lr=&id=v-walRnRxWQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&ots=SyXUziwm-g&sig=c4cXK-iraUVXBf4egewAqEsjTy8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed September 8, 2021).

Google Scholar

20. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. (2016). Available online at: https://ggplot2.digyverse.org (accessed September 12, 2022).

Google Scholar

21. Thomas KM, Kibona T, Claxton JR, de Glanville WA, Lankester F, Amani N, et al. Prospective cohort study reveals unexpected aetiologies of livestock abortion in northern Tanzania. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:11669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15517-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ali S, Zhao Z, Zhen G, Kang JZ, Yi PZ. Reproductive problems in small ruminants (Sheep and goats): a substantial economic loss in the world. Large Anim Rev. (2019) 25:215–23.

Google Scholar

23. Dorsch MA, Francia ME, Tana LR, González FC, Cabrera A, Calleros L, et al. Diagnostic investigation of 100 cases of abortion in sheep in Uruguay: 2015–2021. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:580. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.904786

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Szeredi L, Jánosi S, Tenk M, Tekes L, Bozsó M, Deim Z, et al. Epidemiological and pathological study on the causes of abortion in sheep and goats in Hungary (1998-2005). Acta Vet Hung. (2006) 54:503–15. doi: 10.1556/AVet.54.2006.4.8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Schnydrig P, Vidal S, Brodard I, Frey CF, Posthaus H, Perreten V, et al. Bacterial, fungal, parasitological and pathological analyses of abortions in small ruminants from 2012-2016. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. (2017) 159:647–56. doi: 10.17236/sat00136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Moeller RB. Disorders of sheep and goats. In:Njaa BL, , editor. Kirkbride's Diagnosis of Abortion and Neonatal Loss in Animals. Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell (2012). p. 49–87.

Google Scholar

27. Chanton-Greutmann H, Thoma R, Corboz L, Borel N, Pospischil A. Abortion in small ruminants in Switzerland: investigations during two lambing seasons (1996-1998) with special regard to chlamydial abortions. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. (2002) 144:483–92. doi: 10.1024/0036-7281.144.9.483

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Jiménez-Martín D, García-Bocanegra I, Almería S, Castro-Scholten S, Dubey JP, Amaro-López MA, et al. Epidemiological surveillance of Toxoplasma gondii in small ruminants in southern Spain. Prev Vet Med. (2020) 183:105137. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Tejedor-Junco MT, González-Martín M, Corbera JA, Santana Á, Hernández CN, Gutiérrez C. Preliminary evidence of the seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Chlamydia abortus infection in goats on the Canary Islands, Spain. Trop Anim Health Prod. (2019) 51:257–60. doi: 10.1007/s11250-018-1654-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Magouras I, Hunninghaus J, Scherrer S, Wittenbrink MM, Hamburger A, Stärk KDC, et al. Coxiella burnetii infections in small ruminants and humans in Switzerland. Transbound Emerg Dis. (2017) 64:204–12. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Alemayehu G, Mamo G, Alemu B, Desta H, Tadesse B, Benti T, et al. Causes and flock level risk factors of sheep and goat abortion in three agroecology zones in Ethiopia. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:27. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.615310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Espí A, Del Cerro A, Oleaga Á, Rodríguez-Pérez M, López CM, Hurtado A, et al. One health approach: an overview of Q fever in livestock, wildlife and humans in Asturias (Northwestern Spain). Animals. (2021) 11:1395. doi: 10.3390/ani11051395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Subdirección General de Producciones Ganaderas y Cinegéticas. El sector ovino y caprino de leche en cifras - Principales Indicadores Económicos. Madrid (2022). Available online at: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ganaderia/temas/produccion-y-mercados-ganaderos/indicadoreseconomicosdelsectorovinoycaprinodeleche2022_tcm30-553590.pdf (accessed October 24, 2022).

Google Scholar

34. Mendoza-Morales LF, Lagorio V, Corigliano MG, Sánchez-López E, Ramos-Duarte VA, Clemente M, et al. Neosporosis in sheep: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global seroprevalence and related risk factors. Acta Trop. (2022) 233:106569. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Gebretensay A, Alemayehu G, Rekik M, Alemu B, Haile A, Rischkowsky B, et al. Risk factors for reproductive disorders and major infectious causes of abortion in sheep in the highlands of Ethiopia. Small Rumin Res. (2019) 177:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Havakhah Y, Reza A, Rastaghi E, Amiri S, Babaie J, Aghighi Z, et al. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in sheep and goats in three counties of Gilan Province, North of Iran the more humid climate the higher prevalence. J Med Microbiol Infect Dis. (2014) 2:80–3.

Google Scholar

37. Wu Z, Sippy R, Sahin O, Plummer P, Vidal A, Newell D, et al. Genetic diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni isolates associated with sheep abortion in the United States and Great Britain. J Clin Microbiol. (2014) 52:1853–61. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00355-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Santos S, Azenha D, Oliveira C, Almeida A. Coxiella burnetii and Chlamydia spp. coinfection in small ruminant abortion in Portugal. Small Rumin Res. (2022) 207:106616. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2022.106616

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Smith D, Price DRG, Burrells A, Faber MN, Hildersley KA, Chintoan-Uta C, et al. The development of ovine gastric and intestinal organoids for studying ruminant host-pathogen interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:821. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.733811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Paz EA, Chua EG, Hassan SU, Greeff JC, Palmer DG, Liu S, et al. Bacterial communities in the gastrointestinal tract segments of helminth-resistant and helminth-susceptible sheep. Anim Microbiome. (2022) 4:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00172-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lacasta D, González JM, Navarro T, Saura F, Acín C, Vasileiou NGC. Significance of respiratory diseases in the health management of sheep. Small Rumin Res. (2019) 181:99–102. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.03.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Thomas KM, de Glanville WA, Barker GC, Benschop J, Buza JJ, Cleaveland S, et al. Prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in African food animals and meat: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Food Microbiol. (2020) 315:108382. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Sánchez J, Souriau A, Buendía AJ, Arricau-Bouvery N, Martínez CM, Salinas J, et al. Experimental Coxiella burnetii infection in pregnant goats: a histopathological and immunohistochemical study. J Comp Pathol. (2006) 135:108–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2006.06.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Ferreira JR, Nogueira DJ, Rodrigues BF, Alvarenga BF. Blood supply in the tongue of Nellore Bos indicus (Linnaeus, 1758). Anat Histol Embryol. (2009) 38:103–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2008.00900.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Marques PX, O'Donovan J, Souda P, Gutierrez J, Williams EJ, Worrall S, et al. Amniotic and allantoic fluids from experimentally infected sheep contain immunoglobulin specific for Chlamydophila abortus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. (2011) 140:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: abortifacient pathogen, Chlamydia abortus, Coxiella burnetii, fetal tongue, goat, placental swab, qPCR, sheep

Citation: Alzuguren O, Domínguez L, Chacón G, Benito AA and Mencía-Ares O (2023) Infectious abortions in small domestic ruminants in the Iberian Peninsula: Optimization of sampling procedures for molecular diagnostics. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1152289. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1152289

Received: 27 January 2023; Accepted: 20 February 2023;
Published: 09 March 2023.

Edited by:

Faham Khamesipour, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Reviewed by:

Aspinas Chapwanya, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Saint Kitts and Nevis
Mara Silvia Laura Rocchi, Moredun Research Institute, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2023 Alzuguren, Domínguez, Chacón, Benito and Mencía-Ares. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Oscar Mencía-Ares, b21lbmNpYSYjeDAwMDQwO2V4b3BvbC5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.