Cameron A. D. Morris
Rebekah E. Donaldson- Critical Care Department, Queensland Veterinary Specialists, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Envenomation by snakes in Elapidae and Viperidae families have been associated with respiratory failure in dogs and cats. Mechanical ventilation may be required for hypoventilation due to neuromuscular paralysis or hypoxemia due to pulmonary hemorrhage or aspiration pneumonia. Median incidence of dogs and cats with snake envenomation that require mechanical ventilation is 13% (0.06–40%). Standard treatment of snake envenomation in dogs and cats includes prompt administration of appropriate antivenom and management of envenomation complications such as coagulopathy, rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury. When mechanical ventilation is required, overall prognosis is good with appropriate treatment. Standard anesthetic protocols and mechanical ventilator settings are generally appropriate, with lung protective ventilation strategies typically reserved for patients with pulmonary disease. Median survival to discharge for cats and dogs with elapid envenomation is 72% (76–84%) with 33 h (19.5–58 h) median duration of mechanical ventilation and 140 h (84–196 h) median hospitalization. This article reviews indications for mechanical ventilation in cats and dogs with snake envenomation, and discusses ventilator settings, anesthetic and nursing considerations, complications and outcomes specific to this disease.
1. Introduction
A variety of venomous snake species exist globally, with envenomation leading to neuromuscular and hemostatic disorders (1). The mainstay of therapy in these patients includes antivenom (appropriate type and time frame) and supportive treatment including intravenous fluid therapy, analgesia, nutrition, and management of complications.
Ventilatory support is required for those with severe neuromuscular disease resulting in respiratory compromise. There is a paucity of evidence in the veterinary literature on the ideal use of mechanical ventilation (MV) for cats and dogs undergoing treatment for snake envenomation. The median incidence of dogs and cats with snake envenomation that require MV is 13% (0.06–40%) (2–10).
This review aims to discuss existing literature regarding mechanical ventilation in envenomated dogs and cats, including patient management and prognosis, and identify areas for future research.
2. Pathophysiology
2.1. Snake species
While envenomation by numerous snake species has been associated with respiratory failure in cats and dogs, only snakes in the Elapidae and Viperidae families have caused documented respiratory paralysis (11).
Elapid snakes, belonging to the Elapidae family, are characterized by a pair of rostrally positioned fangs (1, 12). Venom constituents and effects vary between species (12). Neurotoxin induced respiratory paralysis results in hypoventilation requiring mechanical ventilation in severe cases. Envenomation can pose a significant threat to life should treatment be delayed (13).
Elapids are distributed globally but the majority of species are located within North America, South-eastern Asia and Australia. Australian elapids have been reported as some of the most venomous species on earth (14). Those of significance include the Brown snakes (Pseudonaja spp.), Tiger snakes (Notechis spp., Austrelaps spp.), Black snakes (Pseudechis spp.), Taipans (Oxyuranus spp.), and the death adder (Acanthophis spp.) (15). Mechanical ventilation was most commonly required for hypoventilation in Australian dogs and cats envenomated by brown snake (19%, 14/59), tiger snake (11%, 5/46), and black snake (11%, 1/9) immunotypes in a retrospective multicenter study (7). Hypoventilation requiring MV has been documented in one case of Pseudechis prophyriacus envenomation (16). Hypoxemia secondary to pulmonary hemorrhage is a more common indication for MV in envenomation by this species (4, 7).
Kraits (Bungarus spp.), Cobras (Naja spp.), and the King Cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) are Elapidae that inhabit Asia. No studies in the veterinary literature describe the use of MV for envenomation by these species. One case report exists of two children suffering Bungarus caeruleus and Naja naja envenomation, requiring 10 and 11 days of invasive MV, respectively (17). Another human study reported 51% (17/33) of patients required MV for B. caeruleus envenomation, with all patients alive at the 9 month follow up after a median of 96 h of ventilation (18).
Eastern coral snakes (Micrurus fulvius) are Elapidae found in North America. Envenomation by Micrurus sp. has been documented to cause respiratory paralysis in cats and dogs necessitating mechanical ventilation, with a median duration of MV 58 h (25–84 h), median duration of hospitalization of 8.2 days (6–11 days) and survival rate of 87.5% (7/8) (19).
Within North America, envenomation is more commonly reported from members of the Viperidae family—Rattlesnakes (Crotalus spp.), and the Copperheads (Agkistrodon spp.) (20). Rattlesnakes account for most mortalities in this area but the severity of neurological signs varies between species (6). Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) was indicated or provided in between 1 and 11.8% (1/82 and 4/34) rattlesnake envenomation's in reviews of dogs with Crotalus spp. envenomation (6, 21). MV for Agkistrodon contortrix envenomation has not been documented in dogs or cats (22).
2.2. Toxin classification
There are several recognized toxin types, which can be divided into neurotoxins, coagulants (both pro- and anti-coagulant), myotoxins, hemolysins, and cytotoxins (23, 24). As neurotoxins are the primary cause for respiratory paralysis, they shall be the focus of this article. Additional consideration should, however, be given to coagulants and myotoxins for their potential contributory role in the need for MV, as well as their influence in disease progression and outcome.
Two main types of neurotoxins inhibit synaptic transmission at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), phospholipase A2 (PLA2) enzymes and three-finger alpha-neurotoxins. PLA2 enzymes irreversibly bind and hydrolyze the membrane phospholipids at the motor nerve terminal. This results in a calcium influx and subsequent release and depletion of acetylcholine, leading to degeneration of the nerve terminal (25). These include ammodytoxin A (Vipera ammodytes), β-bungarotoxin (Bungarus multicinctus), taipoxin (Oxyuranus scutellatus), and textilotoxin (Pseudonaja textilis) (26). Eastern coral snake venom contains PLA2 enzymes and a type of alpha-neurotoxin, a post-synaptic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, resulting in generalized muscle weakness and respiratory paralysis (2, 19). Alpha-neurotoxins, such as α-Bungarotoxin, bind and inhibit post-synaptic acetylcholine receptors at the NMJ (25, 27).
PLA2 enzymes also play a role in myotoxicity, causing either local swelling at the bite site, rhabdomyolysis, or both (28). Enzymes such as notexin, found in Notechis scutatus venom, cause extensive skeletal muscle damage, including muscles responsible for respiration (26). Regeneration of peripheral nerves begins 3–4 days following envenomation, with almost complete resolution of damage by 10–14 days (25). Rhabdomyolysis has been associated with the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) which may alter the patient's management and prognosis (25, 27, 29).
Coagulation disorders may cause respiratory failure by pulmonary thromboembolism or pulmonary hemorrhage (5). Elapids with procoagulant toxin resulting in consumption of clotting factors (known as venom-induced consumptive coagulopathy) include Pseudonaja spp., N. scutatus, and Oxyuranus spp. (30). Anticoagulant toxin present in Pseudechis spp., O. hannah, and Naja spp. inhibits factors X, II and platelet function (30–32).
2.3. Clinical signs
Interference at the NMJ leads to progressive lower motor neuron signs. Clinical signs can range from generalized paresis to paralysis and death from respiratory failure (19). Localized swelling of the bite site can occur with certain snake species, and hemorrhage may be witnessed if the venom contains hemolytic toxins (16, 33). In Australian elapids, bite sites are often not found due to small sized fangs and minimal localized swelling in combination with thick hair coats of cats and dogs (34). Other common clinical signs include vomiting, hypersalivation, diarrhea, tachypnea, collapse, mydriasis, ataxia, and pigmenturia (4, 19, 33, 35).
Clinical signs typically are acute in onset (often within 1 h) but can be biphasic or delayed. Retrospective studies report the majority of envenomated patients are presented for veterinary assessment within 6 h (dogs) to 3 days (cats) (33, 36). The incidence of dogs and cats that are asymptomatic on presentation is unknown. Humans asymptomatic for known snakebites are monitored for 12–24 h in hospital, should testing be inconclusive (37, 38). One study reported development of clinical signs up to 14 h after Micrurus fulvius envenomation and a previous controlled experimental study showed development of paralysis within 24 h following subcutaneous administration of Pseudonaja sp. venom in cats (35, 39).
3. Patient management
3.1. Antivenom
Antivenom is a crucial part of treatment for any patient with clinical evidence of snake envenomation. Antivenom is produced by injecting venom or components into a host (most commonly horses) and extracting the newly formed IgG antibodies from the plasma (40, 41). IgG antibodies bind to the active unbound venom antigen, forming masses of immune complexes that are readily phagocytized, inhibiting attachment to receptor sites (42). Commercially available antivenom products are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Commercially available antivenom therapies.
Antivenom varies by geographical location. Correct identification of individual snake species can be difficult, yet fortunately is less crucial with the development of polyvalent antivenoms. In Australia, snake venom detection kits are utilized to aid in selection of the most appropriate antivenom therapy.1 Specificity of this ELISA (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) has been reported as 100%, however false negatives from acute envenomation, absence of circulating venom and the “hook effect,” whereby binding of antibodies in the presence of a high venom concentration inhibits sandwich formation, should be considered (33, 43, 44). This immunoassay can be performed patient side with a rapid result (5).
The ideal dose of antivenom is unknown. Research into Pseudonaja textilis envenomation identified neutralization of venom levels following administration of 4,000 units each of an experimental IgG tiger—brown snake antivenom (5). A previous study used between 3,000 and 6,000 units for N. scutatis envenomation in cats and dogs (13). A study of cats undergoing MV for elapid envenomation in Australia reported ~42% (5/12) of cats received one vial, 42% (5/12) received two vials and 16% (2/12) of cats received 3 vials of antivenom, containing 3,000 units of N. scutatis antivenom with 1,000 units of P. textilis antivenom or 3,000 units of N. scutatis with 4,000 units of P. textilis antivenom (45). This study did not evaluate outcomes between the two different antivenom treatment groups, however 11 of the 12 patients survived to discharge. Another study investigating elapid envenomation in Melbourne, Australia administered a median of 8,100 units of tiger/brown polyvalent antivenom to dogs and a median of 4,050 units to cats (9). Most cats and dogs with Micrurus sp. snakebite receive 5–10 mg of IgG equine-derived antivenom (2, 19). A mean of five vials of a polyvalent antivenom was reported in one canine study in Sri Lanka, with each vial capable of neutralizing 6 mg N. naja, 4.5 mg B. caeruleus, 6 mg D. russelii, and 4.5 mg E. carinatus venom (46). In humans, current guidelines support giving one vial (1,000 units) in both children and adults for most elapid species (37).
There is no evidence to suggest additional vials are of benefit to justify the increased risk associated with repeated antivenom administration (37). For all other elapid species, following human guidelines, one vial of appropriate antivenom should be provided with additional vials given if clinical deterioration is observed or if a repeated snake venom detection kit is positive (9, 37). Additional antivenom may be required in the event of multiple bites, however the number of bites may be irrelevant as dry bites can occur without release of venom (47). A maximum number of antivenom vials cannot be suggested based on available evidence, with further investigation into antivenom dosages required.
In a study of dogs and cats envenomated by P. porphyriacus, ventilated patients did not require more antivenom compared to non-ventilated patients (4). There was no significant difference between number of vials of antivenom and length of hospitalization or survival in another study of dogs and cats undergoing MV for rattlesnake envenomation (6). Antivenom is most effective when administered as soon as possible to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation given its inability to neutralize bound pre-synaptic toxin (48). Post-synaptic neurotoxins will be neutralized following antivenom administration, therefore a cat or dog presenting with snake envenomation in which mechanical ventilation is indicated will not be expected to immediately improve with antivenom administration and mechanical ventilation should proceed (45).
Antivenom should be diluted prior to administration (49). The rate of administration in humans is not associated with an increase in adverse effects (50). With any blood product, initial administration should be commenced slowly with the rate titrated, however in the face of lethal envenomation, antivenom has been reported to be given in as little as 5 min (10). Multiple studies report administration either rapidly (administered as a bolus) or over a 20 min period (5, 6, 10, 19). Rapid administration is anecdotally tolerated at the authors' institution, but no veterinary literature exists evaluating the incidence of transfusion reactions. There is no evidence to support premedication of patients with antihistamines or glucocorticoids prior to administration of antivenom (3, 51, 52).
3.2. Indications for mechanical ventilation
There are currently four recognized indications for mechanical ventilation: (1) severe hypoxemia defined as partial pressure arterial oxygen (PaO2) <60 mmHg despite oxygen therapy (fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) >50%); (2) severe hypoventilation defined as partial pressure arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) >60 mmHg; (3) unsustainable respiratory effort, and (4) hemodynamic compromise unresponsive to traditional therapy (53–55).
Hypoventilation and respiratory fatigue are the more common indications for MV in the envenomated patient. Hypoxemia is less frequently reported but can occur due to severe pulmonary hemorrhage or aspiration pneumonia (10, 45, 56–58).
4. Ventilator settings
The aim of MV in envenomated cats and dogs is to provide ventilatory support whilst the patient processes the bound neurotoxins, targeting appropriate oxygen and carbon dioxide levels using minimally aggressive ventilator settings (53).
4.1. Mode of ventilation
Of the studies published describing MV in elapid envenomation, few outline the ventilator settings used. Compared to other patients with lower motor neuron diseases requiring MV, cats and dogs with elapid envenomation generally lack primary pulmonary disease and require short ventilation periods and minimally aggressive settings (45, 58).
One retrospective study of eight cats and dogs with M. fulvius envenomation performed volume-controlled positive pressure ventilation using synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), with initial pressure support of 8 cm H2O and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 3 cm H2O. This study reported a median duration of reliance on mandatory breaths of 15 h (8–24 h), with a median duration of ventilation of 58 h (25–84 h) and 7/8 patients were successfully weaned (19). In a study of 12 cats, the authors followed a pre-established protocol using volume-controlled positive pressure ventilation with a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min, tidal volume of 10 ml/kg, PEEP of 3–5 cm H2O and a spontaneous breathing trial performed every 12 h (45). Eleven of the 12 cats were successfully weaned, with a median duration on MV of 19.5 h (7–37 h). In a case report, one dog with P. porphyriacus envenomation was managed using pressure-controlled ventilation and was weaned after 18 h, however the breath pattern was not reported (16).
Invasive ventilation facilitates airway protection so is preferred to non-invasive ventilation in cats and dogs with generalized neuromuscular disease. Dynamic positive airway pressure systems such as high flow nasal oxygen therapy are currently not considered appropriate if the patient's primary cause of respiratory failure is hypoventilation (59).
No veterinary literature compares pressure vs. volume controlled mandatory modes of ventilation. It has been suggested that pressure-controlled ventilation may reduce the work of breathing and therefore improve patient comfort and patient-ventilator synchrony (60). Mode of MV is uncommonly documented in the human literature with specific reference to snake envenomation. Successful ventilation with survival to discharge is documented in case reports using SIMV and mandatory pressure-controlled ventilation for Bungarus sp. envenomation (61, 62). Volume-controlled mandatory ventilation was compared to adaptive support ventilation in a prospective randomized trial of 48 adults with neuroparalytic snake envenomation; mode did not appear to significantly affect outcome with respect to time to weaning, incidence of VAP or length of hospital stay (63). Median duration of MV was 17 h in a prospective study of adult envenomated humans (64). Of these, 60% (8/14) patients required MV for <24 h and 13/14 (93%) survived to discharge (64). Mode of MV was not specified in this study. Further research is required in both human and veterinary medicine. At the authors' institution, invasive ventilation is most commonly performed in mandatory pressure-controlled mode with anecdotal success.
4.2. Oxygen concentration
Patients should be initially commenced on FiO2 100% at the start of MV. Oxygen concentration is titrated down incrementally if adequate arterial oxygenation can be maintained, as assessed by pulse oximetry or preferably arterial blood gas analysis (65). To reduce the risk of oxygen toxicity and minimize absorption atelectasis, this process should commence as soon as the patient is stable on the ventilator. Targeting the lowest possible FiO2 concentration to maintain an SpO2 or SaO2 at >95% (66).
4.3. Pressure, volume, and frequency
Lung protective ventilation involving reduced inspiratory pressures (<30 cmH2O), lower tidal volumes (6–8 ml/kg), higher PEEP and presence of permissive hypercapnia have been associated with reduced mortality in people with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (67, 68). This approach should be considered for envenomated cats and dogs with pulmonary disease such as hemorrhage or pneumonia (69). For cats and dogs without pulmonary disease, initial recommended setting includes tidal volume 8–12 ml/kg, respiratory rate 10–20 breaths per minute, inspiratory pressures of 10–20 cm H2O and inspiratory to expiratory ratio 1:2 s. Low levels of PEEP (3–5 cm H2O) are described to avoid atelectasis (70). In all cats and dogs receiving MV, ventilator settings should be adjusted to the least aggressive settings required to achieve normotension and normoxemia (69).
5. Anesthetic considerations
Total intravenous anesthesia is typically used to facilitate MV. Injectable anesthetics and sedatives should be selected based on the patient's underlying comorbidities, hemodynamic stability and ventilator tolerance (71). Reversible and short-acting injectable agents are preferred for patient safety.
To the author's knowledge, no specific anesthetic protocol exists for veterinary patients undergoing ventilation for snake envenomation. However, in the literature available, the more commonly used protocols for envenomated cats and dogs undergoing MV include a combination of a mu-agonist opioid, a benzodiazepine and propofol titrated by constant rate infusion (CRI) (8, 16, 19, 45). This combination is effective in the envenomated cat or dog given the short duration of action and minimal effect on neuromuscular transmission (72). Multi-drug protocols allow a reduction in the side effect profile of each agent and may reduce recovery time (73).
Propofol may be considered at 4–6 mg/kg IV for induction followed by 0.1–0.6 mg/kg/min CRI given its fast onset and short duration (74). Lower doses may be sufficient given the severity of paralysis experienced by patients with elapid envenomation (5, 75). Recognized adverse effects include hypotension and Heinz body anemia in cats receiving multi-dosing or CRIs (76, 77).
Pure-mu opioid agonists (e.g., fentanyl) provide analgesia and sedation with the benefit of being short acting and reversible, which may facilitate spontaneous breathing trials during weaning. Dose dependent respiratory and cardiovascular depression can occur. Reported fentanyl doses are 2–5 mcg/kg IV bolus prior to 1–10 mcg/kg/h CRI (73, 74). Butorphanol, a pure mu-opioid antagonist and kappa agonist, can also be used to mechanically ventilate dogs and cats with neuromuscular disease (5, 19, 74). From an analgesic perspective, use of pure mu-agonists is recommended in cats and dogs experiencing rhabdomyolysis secondary to envenomation (33).
Benzodiazepines (e.g., midazolam and diazepam) provide sedation and muscle relaxation and have been shown to be safe and effective in combination with fentanyl and propofol in dogs (78). Midazolam has a lower thrombophlebitis risk than diazepam (71, 78). Respiratory depression can occur and hyperexcitability has been reported in cats (74). Benzodiazepine withdrawal leading to seizure activity has been reported in humans and more recently in young dogs following MV at doses of 0.2–1.5 mg/kg/h (79, 80). These dogs developed generalized seizure activity within 36 h of weaning from MV, and were treated with tapering doses of midazolam, as well as levetiracetam in one dog. No ongoing abnormal neurological activity was reported (79). Recommended dose ranges from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg/h CRI (19, 73).
Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (e.g., medetomidine and dexmedetomidine) are sedating with minimal respiratory depression (81). Alpha-2 agonists can reduce anesthetic drug requirements by up to 80% in cats and dogs (81, 82). Adverse effects in cats and dogs include cardiovascular depression and atrioventricular block, as well as vomiting in cats (74). Dexmedetomidine CRI was included in the anesthetic protocol for a puppy that was successfully ventilated for respiratory paralysis due to polyradiculoneuritis and has been reported as an appropriate agent for dogs and cats mechanically ventilated with M. fulvius envenomation (19, 75). This paper did not specify if dogs only or both dogs and cats received dexmedetomidine as part of their TIVA protocol. Recommended dose rates as an adjunct for MV include 0.5–3 mcg/kg/h CRI (83).
As almost all cats and dogs requiring MV due to snake envenomation will have neuromuscular paresis or paralysis, the administration of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) is not necessary (16, 45, 84). Rocuronium use to facilitate intubation in humans with Naja kaouthia envenomation was described in a case series, which more likely reflects species differences in airway management rather than ongoing concern for patient-ventilator dyssynchrony (85). Another clinical trial evaluating 14 envenomated humans did not use NMBA during MV (64).
All patients undergoing MV should have continuous monitoring, including invasive or non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, arterial or venous blood gas sampling, electrocardiography, capnography and pulse oximetry (53).
No standardized anesthesia protocol exists for envenomated humans undergoing MV. A variety of drug protocols have been described, commonly including midazolam and fentanyl (63, 85). Additional therapies have been described in humans to improve neuromuscular function. Cholinesterase inhibitors (such as neostigmine, edrophonium) have been used in numerous cases of envenomated humans. Their use may reduce the effect of post-synaptic toxins by increasing acetylcholine concentrations but would have no effect on post-synaptic toxins or delayed presentations (64, 85–87). Two dogs treated with neostigmine in a case series of dogs with neuroparalytic snake envenomation showed no improvement or mild neurological improvement insufficient to change clinical treatment (88). Calcium gluconate has been used for its role as a neurotransmitter and was described in three cases of humans with Bungarus caeruleus envenomation to anecdotal success (17, 89). The patients described received standard care including antivenom and cholinesterase inhibitors and treatment response was not objectively quantified. The clinical utility of this therapy in veterinary patients is unclear.
6. Ancillary considerations
6.1. Nutrition
Provision of a balanced diet at an appropriate proportion of RER based on individual nutritional assessment is beneficial for patients undergoing MV and should be considered for snake envenomated cats and dogs after 72 h of hospitalization (90).
There are no published guidelines on re-alimentation in mechanically ventilated veterinary patients (91–96), and the frequency of nutrition provision in mechanically ventilated cats and dogs remains poor (90). Veterinary patients without appropriate nutritional support are at risk of starvation. Starvation may prolong mechanical ventilation in the envenomated patient due to impaired respiratory muscle function from respiratory muscle catabolism, reduced surfactant production, decreased immune response and hypoalbuminemia that may exacerbate pulmonary edema (55, 91). Excessive caloric intake increases carbon dioxide production which may affect MV settings (91).
Enteral nutrition (EN) is preferred as it is associated with decreased mortality and duration of hospitalization and more ventilator-free days in humans (92, 97). Physiological benefits include maintenance of gastrointestinal integrity as well as modulation of stress and the immune response (92–95, 98). Nasogastric/nasoesophageal feeding tubes are appropriate as envenomated patients generally have a short disease course without ongoing gastrointestinal dysfunction.
Trophic feeding is preferred to total caloric provision, with one study in humans reporting a reduced incidence of gastrointestinal intolerance to EN but no overall difference in ventilator free days or mortality (92, 96). Patients who are likely to tolerate EN should be given a balanced, digestible commercially available veterinary diet (99). One study in hospitalized dogs requiring nasogastric or nasoesophageal feeding described the use of veterinary (Clinicare2 and Clinicare RF3) and human (Ensure4) liquid enteral diets with no significant difference in outcome (90, 92, 100, 101). Other diets have been described in two dogs receiving EN at 25% RER (Royal Canin Convalescence Support Instant Diet5 and Enteral Care KC6) (90). At the authors' institution, patients undergoing MV are initially fed at 25% RER and increased in 25% increments according to the patients' tolerance to feeding.
Parenteral nutrition (PN) can be provided as adjunctive nutrition for patients that may not tolerate EN (such as those with severe ileus) or require supplementation to an EN feeding plan (100). Administration requires strict aseptic technique, intensive monitoring, and a specific catheter to reduce the risk of complications (100, 101). PN has not been evaluated in mechanically ventilated veterinary patients but based on human literature, it should not be used before or in preference to EN (90, 92, 93).
6.2. Gastrointestinal considerations
Gastrointestinal dysmotility is a reported side effect of snake envenomation, which may be worsened by shock or mechanical ventilation (102). Megaesophagus has been documented in a case report of four dogs with tiger snake (Notechis scutatus) envenomation (56).
MV can cause relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and the development of gastroesophageal reflux as a consequence of intrathoracic pressure changes and anesthetic agents used (103). Prokinetic therapy is indicated if gastric ileus is identified ultrasonographically or if gastric residual volumes exceed 10 ml/kg (93, 103). Metoclopramide 2 mg/kg/d CRI is an appropriate first line prokinetic in dogs (103). Proton pump inhibitors are indicated only when there is evidence of gastrointestinal ulceration or esophagitis to reduce the risk of VAP development, given gastrointestinal signs are generally brief and resolve with antivenom and anti-emetics (33, 104).
6.3. Nursing care
Mechanically ventilated cats and dogs require continuous care and are at risk of complications including ocular and oral ulceration, decubital ulcers and aspiration of gastric fluid (71). Suboptimal patient care is associated with increased mortality in humans (105, 106).
Envenomated cats and dogs may be at greater risk of ocular ulceration due to tear desiccation, the inability to blink and reduced tear production in the critically ill (107). One study describing MV in Australia reported corneal ulceration in 58% (7/12) of envenomated cats, and a study of M. fulvius envenomation in dogs and a cat reported corneal ulceration in 25% (2/8) (19, 45). Other studies in dogs and cats describing MV for mixed causes report the incidence of corneal ulceration between 5 and 10% (69, 108). Regular sterile saline lavage, daily fluorescein stains, and administration of lubricating ointment every 2 h is recommended to reduce and prevent the risk of exposure keratitis (71). Polyethylene eye covers are utilized in human ICU settings, with one veterinary study reporting use of lenses in envenomated cats and dogs undergoing MV (5, 109). Further investigation of protective ocular equipment and their use in veterinary patients is required (110, 111). Development of blepharospasm, conjunctival hyperemia, mucoid discharge and episcleral congestion should prompt clinicians to investigate and escalate ocular care. Superficial corneal ulcers require treatment with a broad-spectrum antimicrobial ointment with close monitoring for progression.
Frequent oral care and airway management can reduce the likelihood of oral ulceration, lingual oedema, aspiration of gastric contents and bacterial colonization to lower risks of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). Complete oral care protocols are described elsewhere (71), but should be performed every 4 h, incorporating appropriate hand hygiene and use of sterile gloves, cleaning of the oral cavity and attachments with a 0.05% chlorhexidine solution and regular suctioning. Frequent deflation and repositioning of the endotracheal tube cuff has been recommended after suctioning to reduce the risk of pressure necrosis in cats and dogs, however is associated with increased risk of VAP in humans (112, 113). Ensuring cuff pressure is maintained at 25 cm H2O through the use of a commercial endotracheal tube cuff inflation device is recommended to reduce the development of VAP and pressure necrosis (71, 112, 114). If a monitoring device is unavailable, the cuff should be deflated and repositioned to reduce the risk of tracheal necrosis (114).
Indwelling urinary catheterization allows close monitoring of urine production and increases patient comfort, reducing the potential for patient-ventilator asynchrony. Aseptic technique and a closed collection system facilitates gross assessment of urine, sampling for urinalysis and accurate urine output measurement. Appropriate catheter care is required to minimize urinary tract infection risk. Acute kidney injury secondary to envenomation is documented in several studies, thought to be a consequence of venom-induced hemolysis or rhabdomyolysis leading to pigmenturia (8, 19, 115, 116).
Prolonged patient recumbency can result in decubital ulcers, generalized muscle weakness and edema development, with ulcer severity associated with increased mortality in humans (114, 117). Patients undergoing long term ventilation (>48 h) are at a higher risk. Passive range of motion exercises and regular recumbency changes are recommended every 4 h, with padded bedding provided to maximize patient comfort.
6.4. Fluid therapy
Veterinary literature reports the use of isotonic crystalloids as fluid therapy for snake envenomated cats and dogs (8, 16, 19, 118), although many did not specify the type of fluid and the optimal rate is unclear. Intravenous fluid therapy should aim for neutral fluid balance, providing maintenance fluid requirements in combination with correcting dehydration, shock or ongoing losses where required. Human literature suggests a positive fluid balance significantly increases the risk of ventilator-associated adverse events (119).
6.5. Blood products
Red blood cell containing products such as packed red blood cells (pRBC) or fresh whole blood (FWB) may be required in cases of severe hemolysis or hemorrhage. Packed red blood cell therapy was administered in 14/88 patients with P. porphyriacus envenomation that developed severe anemia with 57% survival (8/14) (4).
Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) therapy is controversial in snake envenomation. Snake envenomation causes hemorrhage due to venom induced consumptive coagulopathy (VICC) (120). Procoagulant toxins causing VICC can be neutralized by snake antivenom in in-vitro models (5, 10). However, VICC still occurs despite prompt antivenom treatment due to the rapid effects of these toxins. Human literature recommends prioritization of antivenom administration, with administration of FFP only in instances of ongoing bleeding (121). A small randomized clinical trial of humans administered FFP within 4 h of antivenom treatment failed to demonstrate improvement in clinical outcomes or time to resolution of clinical coagulopathy, although clotting factor dysfunction resolved more rapidly (121).
Veterinary literature has documented the administration of FFP for severe hemorrhage following antivenom administration. In 10 dogs with severe pulmonary hemorrhage secondary to P. textilis envenomation, 70% (7/10) were administered FFP. Of these, 43% (3/7) survived to discharge (10).
7. Complications
Mechanical ventilation risks complications that should be considered and discussed with clients prior to commencement. Commonly reported complications include VAP, pneumothorax, ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and cardiovascular compromise (53, 69). The potential for development of aspiration pneumonia is an additional consideration, however, this was not a complication identified in some of the larger study populations of cats and dogs ventilated for elapid envenomation (45, 58). Aspiration pneumonia is reported as a secondary complication of envenomated patients with transient megaesophagus (56, 57). VAP is defined as pneumonia that arises 48 h after endotracheal intubation (122). Prolonged duration of MV has been associated with a higher likelihood of VAP, and reduced survival (45, 108, 122).
None of the 12 cats in one study ventilated for elapid envenomation developed VAP or a pneumothorax, likely due to the short duration of MV and minimally aggressive ventilator settings (45). In another study of seven dogs and one cat managed for eastern coral snake envenomation, ventilator associated complications were noted in all patients with pneumonia in 62% (5/8) (19). Pneumonia was diagnosed radiographically in all patients, with positive bacterial cultures obtained in 4/8 patients. It is unclear if these patients had VAP or pre-existing pneumonia as thoracic radiographs were not obtained when MV was initiated, and airway sampling was not performed in all animals (19).
Pneumothorax is a rarely reported complication in the veterinary literature (2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 16, 19, 45). One study of 302 cats and dogs undergoing MV for all causes reported a lower prevalence of pneumothorax compared to previous literature (58). It did not, however, specify the number of pneumothoraces identified or whether any were present in the snake envenomation subgroup (58). The low incidence of pneumothorax in this cohort is likely a reflection of the lack of pulmonary disease in this patient group as well as the conservative ventilator settings required to effectively ventilate patients experiencing respiratory failure due to hypoventilation. Thoracostomy tubes are required should a pneumothorax develop during the ventilation period (70).
ARDS is an uncommonly described complication of envenomated cats and dogs undergoing MV. Three studies reported a single case each (4, 19, 123). The low incidence of ARDS is likely because these animals generally lack lung pathology and are ventilated for relatively short durations.
AKI is defined as an increase in creatinine by 26.5 umol/L (0.3 mg/dL) from baseline (124). In this patient population, AKI can occur secondary to rhabdomyolysis, hemolysis, reduced renal perfusion consequent to increased intrathoracic pressures from MV or hemorrhagic shock (4, 19, 125, 126). AKI was reported in 5.7% (5/88) of dogs and cats in one study assessing P. porphyriacus envenomation, with 80% (4/5) animals being euthanized due to development of anuria or overall deterioration (4). Two of eight (25%) cats and dogs with M. fulvius envenomation in another study were found to develop an AKI, of which only one survived (19).
AKI is reported in envenomated dogs independent of MV, with a retrospective study identifying AKI in 29% (16/56) of dogs with pit viper envenomation within 48 h of presentation (127). Dogs with an AKI had an increased risk of mortality associated with the severity of shock and increased doses of antivenom (127). AKI is reported in 30–57.8% of human patients suffering from neurotoxic elapid and vasculotoxic viper envenomation (128, 129). Prolonged bite-to-hospitalization period is associated with increased risk of AKI and has been associated with worse outcomes (including mortality, need for MV, and renal replacement therapy) (128, 129). Management of AKI in these patients should be focused on maintaining an appropriate fluid balance and increasing renal perfusion by limiting intrathoracic pressures (130).
Coagulopathy is a feature of envenomation by specific elapid species (33). Hemotoxins may lead to pulmonary hemorrhage and complicate patient recovery as MV is then required to address both hypoxemia and hypoventilation. Venom-induced consumptive coagulopathy was the most common reported disorder (73%, 611/835) for humans in the most recent Australian Snakebite Project (131).
No significant complications including AKI, cardiac arrhythmias, SIRS, MODS or hemorrhage were reported in any patient receiving antivenom within 6 h of being bitten by P. porphyriacus (4). Early administration of antivenom in envenomated patients has been shown to reduce the incidence of complications (132).
8. Weaning from mechanical ventilation
Ventilated cats and dogs must meet specific criteria prior to attempting weaning from MV (133). Long term ventilation leads to respiratory muscle weakness which increases with the duration of time on the ventilator (133). Those with improvement in their primary disease, a PaO2:FiO2 ratio > 150–200 on an FiO2 < 0.5, minimal PEEP requirements, hemodynamic stability and an appropriate respiratory drive can be considered candidates for a weaning trial (133).
The most commonly used weaning modes are synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), or spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) using either pressure support ventilation (PSV) or disconnection from the machine. SBT's are commonly performed in human medicine as they allow the patient to increase respiratory muscle strength over short, regular intervals (134). One case report of a dog ventilated for P. porphyriacus envenomation was successfully weaned with a SBT and extubated after 4 h, but it did not specify how this was performed (16). None of the larger retrospective ventilation studies described the method of weaning used or duration of the process (19, 45, 58). As nerve terminal regeneration is reported to occur from 3 to 4 days following exposure to PLA2 enzymes, the duration of MV or weaning in severely affected patients may be prolonged (25, 26). Prompt antivenom administration is attributed to rapid neutralization of PLA2 enzymes resulting in improvement of clinical signs and may aid in the weaning process (45, 58).
Pressure support ventilation provides a set inspiratory pressure support to the patient's spontaneous breaths, which is gradually reduced until the patient demonstrates they can generate adequate tidal volumes with a low level of support (133). PSV has been shown in human medicine to have significantly fewer weaning failures compared to other methods (135, 136). The addition of automated tube compensation (ATC) to overcome endotracheal tube flow-resistance within PSV mode decreased time to weaning compared to PSV alone (137). ATC did not significantly affect other outcome measures, including occurrence of pneumonia, need for reintubation and mortality (137). PSV was successfully used in a single puppy with lower motor neuron disease but has not been specifically reported in snake envenomation (75).
In SIMV the patient is delivered a combination of spontaneous, supported breaths and mandatory breaths (133). Weaning is achieved by reducing the frequency of mandatory breaths delivered. There is evidence to suggest SIMV can worsen respiratory muscle fatigue and is reported to be a less successful method for weaning in the human literature (134, 138–140).
Tracheostomy tube placement may be considered in brachycephalic breeds or those with laryngeal paralysis, which is a possible consequence that has not yet been reported in snake envenomation (141). Tracheostomy placement can reduce the patient's sedation requirements which may be beneficial in the weaning period (142). A systematic review in humans found early tracheostomy tube placement in patients undergoing MV reduces sedative requirements but does not significantly affect incidence of VAP, duration of MV or mortality (143). A 1964 study of elapid envenomation described tracheostomy tube placement in 30% (16/52) of affected patients with common complications including minor tracheostomy site hemorrhage (11%, 6/52) tube obstruction and displacement (144), More recent literature does not report tracheostomy for snake envenomation, so the utility of this procedure in this context is unclear (61, 63, 64, 85, 87, 89, 129, 137, 144–147). Emergency cricothyroidotomy has been described in a person with crotalid envenomation when severe facial and oral oedema prevented successful orotracheal intubation (148). The patient was weaned from MV after 36 h without complication. Patients with temporary tracheostomies must remain closely monitored due to the risk of acute airway occlusion (69).
9. Outcomes
The overall prognosis for snake envenomated patients is good provided appropriate therapy is administered in the acute setting and there are minimal complications. Median survival to discharge for cats and dogs with elapid envenomation is 72% (76–84%) with 33 h (19.5–58 h) median duration of mechanical ventilation and 140 h (84–196 h) median hospitalization. To the authors' knowledge, no large-scale studies exist regarding envenomated patients receiving MV exist. Despite small population groups in the existing literature, patients requiring MV for elapid envenomation have a good prognosis, likely because they are primarily ventilated for hypoventilation due to a reversible underlying disease process.
The largest study of 42 dogs and cats treated in Australia reported a survival rate of 76% (32/42), which increased to 82% (32/39) with exclusion of cost-based euthanasia (58). Forty of these patients were ventilated for hypoventilation or unsustainable respiratory effort only, of which 84% (31/37) of patients survived following cost-based euthanasia exclusion (58). An Australian study on cats ventilated for elapid envenomation reported survival to discharge of 91.7% (11/12) (45). Seven dogs and one cat ventilated for M. fulvius envenomation had a survival rate of 87.5% (7/8) (19). Another study investigated 20 dogs and cats with coral snake envenomation, of which 4 dogs required MV (2). Two of these dogs were ventilated, with the survivor ventilated for 48 h, and the other dog euthanized after 24 h due to ARDS and AKI (2). A study of cats and dogs with P. textilis envenomation reported 25% (4/16) of affected patients required MV, of which 75% (3/4) of these patients survived to discharge, with the other euthanized due to unspecified hemorrhage (5). In a study of 91 cats and dogs with P.porphyriacus envenomation, 6.8% (6/88) dogs required mechanical ventilation, of which 66% (4/6) survived to discharge (4). Another dog was ventilated for 18 h following P. porphyriacus envenomation and made a full recovery (16). All studies described are retrospective and of a referral population. Survival in cats is much better than those of cats ventilated for other causes (45, 69, 149, 150). It is unclear why envenomated cats have a better prognosis, but it may be multifactorial including the reversibility of snake envenomation compared to other non-curable disease processes.
The reported duration of hospitalization of cats and dogs varied with medians of 84 and 196 h (45, 58). In the larger study, the patient population was ventilated primarily for P. textilis envenomation (24/42) and one each for N. scutatis, A. antarcticus, and P. porphyriqcus envenomation, however in 15/42 cats and dogs, the snake species was not identified (58). Duration of hospitalization for M. fulvius envenomation was 120 h (19).
Median duration of MV in survivors of Australian elapids has been reported as 19.5 and 20 h (45, 58). Another study reported median duration of MV in cats and dogs with M. fulvius envenomation as 58 h, however it is unclear if this was for survivors or all patients (19). The median time of MV in six dogs and cats with P. porphyriacus envenomation was 13.5 h, but included non-survivors (4). Another two dogs were ventilated for P. porphyriacus envenomation for 18 and 36 h respectively, but the latter was euthanized due to hemorrhage (8). One dog with Oxyuranus spp. envenomation was ventilated for 99 h before recovery, and two dogs with Acanthophis spp. envenomation were ventilated for 13 and 37 h before they were successfully weaned and discharged from hospital (88, 118). One dog with Crotalus spp. envenomation was ventilated for 76 h and was weaned from MV but suffered respiratory arrest after development of ARDS (123).
10. Areas of future research
The current veterinary literature examining mechanical ventilation in dogs and cats suffering from snake envenomation is limited to studies with small population sizes. Most studies focus on the management of envenomation as whole, rather than specifically on MV. Further research is warranted, particularly prospective studies addressing ventilator modes, weaning protocols and anesthetic practices. Investigation into the incidence of AKI would be of additional benefit given the potential for its development secondary to envenomation itself or as a complication of MV. Much of the available literature focuses on envenomation in dogs, with only one retrospective cat specific study identified. This study reported an excellent prognosis (45) in contrast to existing literature in ventilated cats (58, 69, 142, 149–151). Prospective studies investigating MV in snake envenomated cats are needed to validate these outcomes, which may improve owner willingness to pursue treatment.
11. Conclusion
Mechanical ventilation plays an important role in the management of patients suffering from the neurotoxic effects of snake envenomation. Despite available literature, no large cohort or prospective studies have been published at this time. Additional research in this area is needed.
From the limited data that is available, overall outcomes are favorable and severe complications are infrequent. Cats and dogs with snake envenomation that are successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation are likely to survive to discharge. Mechanical ventilation is an intensive care procedure and clinicians should discuss the risks, costs and prognosis with owners prior to commencement.
Author contributions
CM and RD performed research, manuscript preparation, and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1. ^Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Seqirus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
2. ^Clinicare, Zoetis Inc, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
3. ^CliniCare RF, Zoetis Inc, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
4. ^Ensure, Abbott Australasia Pty Ltd., Macquarie Park, Australia.
5. ^Convalescence Support Instant Diet, Royal Canin SAS, Gard, France.
6. ^EnteralCare KC Canine, PetAg Inc., Hampshire, IL, USA.
References
1. Meier J, Stocker K. Biology and distribution of venomous snakes of medical importance and the composition of snake venoms. In:J White, J Meier, , editors, Handbook of Clinical Toxicology of Animal Venoms and Poisons. Boca Raton, FL: CRC PR Inc (1995). p. 367–412.
2. Pérez ML, Fox K, Schaer M. Retrospective evaluation of coral snake envenomation in dogs and cats: 20 cases (1996-2011). J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2012) 22:682–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00806.x
3. Wright M, Ngo S. Management of eastern brown and tiger snake envenomation in domestic animals in South Australia. Annu Res Rev Biol. (2018) 25:1–12. doi: 10.9734/ARRB/2018/40513
4. Wun M, Padula A, Greer R, Leister E. A review of 91 canine and feline red-bellied black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) envenomation cases and lessons for improved management. Aust Vet J. (2022) 100:318–28. doi: 10.1111/avj.13159
5. Padula AM, Leister E. Eastern brown snake (Pseudonaja textilis) envenomation in dogs and cats: Clinical signs, coagulation changes, brown snake venom antigen levels and treatment with a novel caprylic acid fractionated bivalent whole IgG equine antivenom. Toxicon. (2017) 138:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.08.015
6. Julius TM, Kaelble MK, Leech EB, Boyle KL, Strandberg EJ, Clare MC. Retrospective evaluation of neurotoxic rattlesnake envenomation in dogs and cats: 34 cases (2005-2010). J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2012) 22:460–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00775.x
7. Boller M, Kelers K, Stevenson M, Winkel K, Hardjo S, Heller J, et al. SnakeMap: Four years of experience with a national small animal snake envenomation registry. Aust Vet J. (2020) 98:442–8. doi: 10.1111/avj.12993
8. Finney E, Padula A, Leister E. Red-bellied black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) envenomation in 17 dogs: Clinical signs, coagulation changes, haematological abnormalities, venom antigen levels and outcomes following treatment with a tiger-brown snake antivenom. Aust Vet J. (2020) 98:319–25. doi: 10.1111/avj.12953
9. Indrawirawan YH, Sheridan GI, McAlees TJ. Clinical features of Mainland tiger and Eastern brown snake envenomation in dogs and cats in Melbourne. Austral Vet Practitioner. (2014) 44:704–12.
10. Leong OS, Padula AM, Leister E. Severe acute pulmonary haemorrhage and haemoptysis in ten dogs following eastern brown snake (Pseudonaja textilis) envenomation: Clinical signs, treatment and outcomes. Toxicon. (2018) 150:188–94. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.05.020
11. Bolon I, Finat M, Herrera M, Nickerson A, Grace D, Schütte S, et al. Snakebite in domestic animals: First global scoping review. Prev Vet Med. (2019) 170:104729. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104729
12. Hodgson E. Toxins and venoms. In:D Teplow, , editor, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. Oxford: Academic Press (2012). p. 373–415.
13. Barr SC. Clinical features therapy and epidemiology of tiger snake bite in dogs and cats. Aust Vet J. (1984) 61:201–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1984.tb05990.x
14. Broad AJ, Sutherland SK, Coulter AR. The lethality in mice of dangerous Australian and other snake venom. Toxicon. (1979) 17:661–4. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(79)90245-9
15. White J. Clinical toxicology of snakebite in Australia and New Guinea. In:J Meier, J White, , editors, Handbook of: Clinical Toxicology of Animal Venoms and Poisons. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (1995). p. 596–600.
16. Padula AM, Leister EM. Severe neurotoxicity requiring mechanical ventilation in a dog envenomed by a red-bellied black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) and successful treatment with an experimental bivalent whole equine IgG antivenom. Toxicon. (2017) 138:159–64. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.09.001
17. Gupta A, Smilie C, Bhaskar V, Batra P. Unusually prolonged neuromuscular weakness caused by krait (Bungarus caeruleus) bite: Two case reports. Toxicon. (2021) 193:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.01.011
18. Silva A, Maduwage K, Sedgwick M, Pilapitiya S, Weerawansa P, Dahanayaka NJ, et al. Neuromuscular effects of common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) envenoming in Sri Lanka. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2016) 10:e0004368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004368
19. Campos S, Allen-Durrance AE, Schaer M, Lynch A. Retrospective evaluation of Micrurus fulvius (Eastern coral snake) envenomation and the use of mechanical ventilation in dogs and a cat (2011–2016): 8 cases. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2019) 29:662–7. doi: 10.1111/vec.12892
20. Gomez HF, Dart RC. Clinical toxicology of snakebite in North America. In:J Meier, J White, , editors, Handbook of: Clinical Toxicology of Animal Venoms and Poisons. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (2008). p. 619–642.
21. Leonard M, Bresee C, Cruikshank A. Effects of the canine rattlesnake vaccine in moderate to severe cases of canine crotalid envenomation. Vet Med. (2014) 2014:153. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S69216
22. Pritchard JC, Birkenheuer AJ, Hanel RM, Wood MW. Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix) envenomation of dogs: 52 cases (2004–2011). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2014) 50:338–44. doi: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6131
23. Ferraz CR, Arrahman A, Xie C, Casewell NR, Lewis RJ, Kool J, et al. Multifunctional toxins in snake venoms and therapeutic implications: From pain to hemorrhage and necrosis. Front Ecol Evol. (2019) 7:218. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00218
24. Acott CJ. Acute renal failure after envenomation by the common brown snake. Med J Austr. (1988) 149:709–10. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb120833.x
25. Harris J, Scott-Davey T. Secreted phospholipases A2 of snake venoms: Effects on the peripheral neuromuscular system with comments on the role of phospholipases A2 in disorders of the CNS and their uses in industry. Toxins. (2013) 5:2533–71. doi: 10.3390/toxins5122533
26. Montecucco C, Gutiérrez JM, Lomonte B. Cellular pathology induced by snake venom phospholipase A2 myotoxins and neurotoxins: Common aspects of their mechanisms of action. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2008) 65:2897–912. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8113-3
27. Nys M, Zarkadas E, Brams M, Mehregan A, Kambara K, Kool J, et al. The molecular mechanism of snake short-chain α-neurotoxin binding to muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:4543. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32174-7
28. Hart AJ, Hodgson WC, O'Leary M, Isbister GK. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the myotoxic venom of Pseudechis australis (mulga snake) in the anesthetised rat. Clin Toxicol. (2014) 52:604–10. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.914526
29. Isbister GK, Mirajkar N, Fakes K, Brown SGA, Veerati PC. Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) as an early indicator of envenomation in Australian elapid snakebites (ASP-27). Biomedicines. (2020) 8:459. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8110459
30. Bittenbinder MA, Zdenek CN, op den Brouw B, Youngman NJ, Dobson JS, Naude A, et al. Coagulotoxic cobras: Clinical implications of strong anticoagulant actions of african spitting naja venoms that are not neutralised by antivenom but are by LY315920 (Varespladib). Toxins. (2018) 10:516. doi: 10.3390/toxins10120516
31. Berling I, Isbister GK. Hematologic effects and complications of snake envenoming. Transfus Med Rev. (2015) 29:82–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.09.005
32. Gowtham YJ, Kumar MS, Girish KS, Kemparaju K. Hemostatic interference of Indian king cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) venom. Comparison with three other snake venoms of the subcontinent. Biochemistry. (2012) 77:639–47. doi: 10.1134/S0006297912060119
33. Mcalees TJ, Abraham LA. Australian elapid snake envenomation in cats: Clinical priorities and approach. J Feline Med Surg. (2017) 19:1131–47. doi: 10.1177/1098612X17735761
34. Shea G. The distribution and identification of dangerously venomous Australian terrestrial snakes. Aust Vet J. (1999) 77:791–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1999.tb12947.x
35. Kremer KA, Schaer M. Coral snake (Micrurus fulvius fulvius) envenomation in five dogs: Present and earlier findings. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (1995) 5:9–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.1995.tb00022.x
36. Valenza L, Allavena R, Haworth M, Cochrane J, Henning J. Diagnosis and treatment of snake envenomation in dogs in Queensland, Australia. Vet Sci. (2021) 8:14. doi: 10.3390/vetsci8020014
37. Isbister GK, Brown SGA, Page CB, McCoubrie DL, Greene SL, Buckley NA. Snakebite in Australia: A practical approach to diagnosis and treatment. Med J Austr. (2013) 199:763–8. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11172
38. Knudsen C, Jürgensen JA, Føns S, Haack AM, Friis RUW, Dam SH, et al. Snakebite envenoming diagnosis and diagnostics. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:661457. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.661457
39. Moisidis A, James T, Smith H, Cox J. Snake envenomation in cats and its detection by rapid immunoassay. Aust Vet J. (1996) 74:143–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb14817.x
40. Dias da Silva W, de Andrade SA, Megale ÂAA, de Souza DA, Sant'Anna OA, Magnoli FC, et al. Antibodies as snakebite antivenoms: Past and future. Toxins. (2022) 14:606. doi: 10.3390/toxins14090606
41. Carotenuto SE, Bergman PJ, Ray JR, McKee T. Retrospective comparison of three antivenoms for the treatment of dogs with crotalid envenomation. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2021) 259:503–9. doi: 10.2460/javma.259.5.503
42. Sani I, Hassan S, Faruq U. Antisnake venoms and their mechanisms of action: A review. Saudi J Med Pharm Sci. (2018) 2018:512–20. doi: 10.36348/sjmps.2018.v04i05.004
43. Ong R, Swindells K, Mansfield C. Prospective determination of the specificity of a commercial snake venom detection kit in urine samples from dogs and cats. Aust Vet J. (2010) 88:222–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00584.x
44. Steuten J, Winkel K, Carroll T, Williamson NA, Ignjatovic V, Fung K, et al. The molecular basis of cross-reactivity in the Australian Snake Venom Detection Kit (SVDK). Toxicon. (2007) 50:1041–52. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2007.07.023
45. Ong HM, Kelers K, Hughes D, Boller M. Retrospective evaluation of cats with elapid snake envenomation associated neurotoxicity requiring mechanical ventilation: 12 cases (2005-2014). J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2017) 27:579–85. doi: 10.1111/vec.12632
46. Adhikari RB, Dangolla A, Gawarammana IB, de Silva DDN, Premarathna AD, Silva ID. Epidemiology of snakebite in dogs in Sri Lanka. Toxicol Commun. (2018) 2:107–12. doi: 10.1080/24734306.2018.1549804
47. Pucca MB, Knudsen CS, Oliveira I, Rimbault C, Cerni AF, Wen FH, et al. Current knowledge on snake dry bites. Toxins. (2020) 12:668. doi: 10.3390/toxins12110668
48. Isbister GK. Snake bite: A current approach to management. Aust Prescr. (2006) 29:125–9. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2006.078
49. Heller J, Mellor D, Hodgson J, Reid S, Hodgson D, Bosward K. Elapid snake envenomation in dogs in New South Wales: A review. Aust Vet J. (2007) 85:469–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00194.x
50. Isbister GK, Shahmy S, Mohamed F, Abeysinghe C, Karunathilake H, Ariaratnam A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of two infusion rates to decrease reactions to antivenom. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e38739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038739
51. Isbister GK, Brown SG, MacDonald E, White J, Currie BJ. Current use of Australian snake antivenoms and frequency of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis. Med J Austr. (2008) 188:473–6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01721.x
52. Herndon AM, Thompson AT, Mack C. Diagnosis and treatment of lower motor neuron disease in Australian dogs and cats. J Vet Med. (2018) 2018:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2018/1018230
53. Hopper K. Basic mechanical ventilation. In:D. Silverstein, K Hopper, , editors, Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. St. Louis: Saunders (2015). p. 161–5.
54. Hopper K, Powell LL. Basics of mechanical ventilation for dogs and cats. Vet Clin North America. (2013) 43:955–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2013.03.009
55. Hess D, Kacmarek R. Essentials of Mechanical Ventilation. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill (2014).
56. Hopper K, Beck C, Slocombe R. Megaoesophagus in adult dogs secondary to Australian tiger snake envenomation. Aust Vet J. (2001) 79:672–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10667.x
57. Heinz JA, Mankin J, Pashmakova M. Transient megaesophagus following coral snake envenomation in three dogs (2013–2018). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2020) 56:320. doi: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6915
58. Trigg NL, Leister E, Whitney J. Outcomes of mechanical ventilation in 302 dogs and cats in Australia (2005–2013). Austral Vet Practitioner. (2014) 2014:698–703.
59. Jagodich TA, Bersenas AME, Bateman SW, Kerr CL. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in 22 dogs requiring oxygen support escalation. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2020) 30:364–75. doi: 10.1111/vec.12970
60. Campbell RS, Davis BR. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: Does it matter? Respir Care. (2002) 47:416–24.
61. Sawhney S, Vagha K, Lohiya S, Mishra N, Vagha JD, Varma A. Delayed neurological manifestation in krait bites despite anti-snake venom therapy. Cureus. (2022) 2022:29849. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29849
62. Shukla Y, Lazarus M. Krait snakebite mimicking brain death: A case report from central India. Int J Med Sci Public Health. (2015) 4:1310. doi: 10.5455/ijmsph.2015.31032015250
63. Sehgal IS, Gandra RR, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Prasad KT, Muthu V, et al. Randomised trial of adaptive support ventilation in patients with neuroparalytic snake envenomation. Br J Anaesth. (2022) 128:e232–4. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.015
64. Agrawal PN, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Behera D, Prabhakar S, Jindal SK. Management of respiratory failure in severe neuroparalytic snake envenomation. Neurol India. (2001) 49:25–8.
65. Farrell KS, Hopper K, Cagle LA, Epstein SE. Evaluation of pulse oximetry as a surrogate for PaO2 in awake dogs breathing room air and anesthetized dogs on mechanical ventilation. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2019) 29:622–9. doi: 10.1111/vec.12898
66. Haskins C. Hypoxemia. In:D Silverstein, K Hopper, , editors, Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. St. Louis: Saunders (2015). p. 81–5.
67. Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Schettino G de P, Lorenzi Filho G, Kairalla RA, et al. Beneficial effects of the “open lung approach” with low distending pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A prospective randomized study on mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (1995) 152:1835–46. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520744
68. Camporota L, Hart N. Lung protective ventilation. Br Med J. (2012) 344:e2491–e2491. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2491
69. Hopper K, Haskins SC, Kass PH, Rezende ML, Aldrich J. Indications, management, and outcome of long-term positive-pressure ventilation in dogs and cats: 148 cases (1990–2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2007) 230:64–75. doi: 10.2460/javma.230.1.64
70. Hopper K. Mechanical ventilation—Core concepts. In:D Silverstein, K Hopper, , editors, Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. St. Louis: Elsevier (2022). p. 185–92.
71. Epstein S. Care of the ventilator patient. In:D Silverstein, K Hopper, , editors, Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. St. Louis: Saunders (2015). p. 185–9.
72. Abel M, Eisenkraft JB. Anesthetic implications of myasthenia gravis. Mt Sinai J Med. (2002) 69:31–7.
73. Boudreau AE, Bersenas AME, Kerr CL, Holowaychuk MK, Johnson RJ. A comparison of 3 anesthetic protocols for 24 hours of mechanical ventilation in cats. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2012) 22:239–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00722.x
74. Plumb D. Plumbs. (2022). Available online at: https://app.plumbs.com/ (accessed September 16, 2022).
75. Calero Rodriguez A, van Oostrom H, de Grauw J. Long-term mechanical ventilation of an 8-week-old dog with idiopathic polyradiculoneuritis. Vet Rec Case Rep. (2022) 10:292. doi: 10.1002/vrc2.292
76. Baetge CL, Smith LC, Azevedo CP. Clinical Heinz body anemia in a cat after repeat propofol administration case report. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7:591556. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.591556
77. Andress JL, Day TK, Day DG. The effects of consecutive day propofol anesthesia on feline red blood cells. Vet Surg. (1995) 24:277–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1995.tb01331.x
78. Ethier MR, Mathews KA, Valverde A, Kerr C, Bersenas AM, Nykamp SG, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety for use of two sedation and analgesia protocols to facilitate assisted ventilation of healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res. (2008) 69:1351–9. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.10.1351
79. Walton RAL, Enders BD. Suspected benzodiazepine withdrawal-associated seizures in 3 young dogs undergoing mechanical ventilation. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2022) 2022:13221. doi: 10.1111/vec.13221
80. Sneyers B, Duceppe M-A, Frenette AJ, Burry LD, Rico P, Lavoie A, et al. Strategies for the prevention and treatment of iatrogenic withdrawal from opioids and benzodiazepines in critically ill neonates, children and adults: A systematic review of clinical studies. Drugs. (2020) 80:1211–33. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01338-4
81. Pypendop B. α2 agonists and antagonists. In:D Silverstein, K Hopper, , editors, Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. St. Louis: Saunders (2015). p.
82. Vickery RG, Sheridan BC, Segal IS, Maze M. Anesthetic and hemodynamic effects of the stereoisomers of medetomidine, an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, in halothane-anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg. (1988) 67:611–5. doi: 10.1213/00000539-198807000-00001
83. Quandt J, Lee J. Analgesia and constant rate infusions. In:D Silverstein, K Hopper, , editors, Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. St. Louis: Saunders (2015). p. 767–72.
84. Hubbell JAE. Disadvantages of neuromuscular blocking agents. Vet Clin North America. (1992) 22:351–2. doi: 10.1016/S0195-5616(92)50631-3
85. Greene SC, Osborn L, Bower R, Harding SA, Takenaka K. Monocled cobra (Naja kaouthia) envenomations requiring mechanical ventilation. J Emerg Med. (2021) 60:197–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.10.014
86. Ahmed S, Ahmed M, Nadeem A, Mahajan J, Choudhary A, Pal J. Emergency treatment of a snake bite: Pearls from literature. J Emerg Trauma Shock. (2008) 1:97. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.43190
87. Bucaretchi F, De Capitani EM, Vieira RJ, Rodrigues CK, Zannin M, Da Silva NJ, et al. Coral snake bites (Micrurus spp) in Brazil: A review of literature reports. Clin Toxicol. (2016) 54:222–34. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1135337
88. Swindells K, Russell N, Angles J, Foster S. Four cases of snake envenomation responsive to death adder antivenom. Aust Vet J. (2006) 84:22–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2006.tb13118.x
89. Sreedevi DB. A case of krait snake bite responding to calcium gluconate therapy. J Med Sci Clin Res. (2019) 7:90. doi: 10.18535/jmscr/v7i12.90
90. Greensmith TD, Chan DL. Audit of the provision of nutritional support to mechanically ventilated dogs and cats. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2021) 31:387–95. doi: 10.1111/vec.13060
91. Christman JW, McCain RW. A sensible approach to the nutritional support of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. (1993) 19:129–36. doi: 10.1007/BF01720527
92. Allen K, Hoffman L. Enteral nutrition in the mechanically ventilated patient. Nutr Clin Practice. (2019) 34:540–57. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10242
93. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient. J Parent Enteral Nutr. (2016) 40:159–211. doi: 10.1177/0148607115621863
94. Artinian V, Krayem H, DiGiovine B. Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients. Chest. (2006) 129:960–7. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.960
95. Patel JJ, Kozeniecki M, Biesboer A, Peppard W, Ray AS, Thomas S, et al. Early trophic enteral nutrition is associated with improved outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock. J Intensive Care Med. (2016) 31:471–7. doi: 10.1177/0885066614554887
96. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, et al. Initial trophic vs. full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: The EDEN randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. (2012) 307:795–803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.137
97. Larsen JA. Enteral nutrition and tube feeding. In:A Fascetti, S Delaney, , editors, Applied Veterinary Clinical Nutrition. Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2013). p. 329–52.
98. Chan DL, Freeman LM. Nutrition in critical illness. Vet Clin North America. (2006) 36:1225–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.08.009
99. Becvarova I. Tube feeding in small animals: Diet selection and preparation. In:D Chan, , editor, Nutritional Management of Hospitalized Small Animals. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons (2015). p. 80–91.
100. Chan DL, Freeman LM. Parenteral nutrition in small animals. In:D Chan, , editor, Nutritional Management of Hospitalized Small Animals. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons (2015). p. 100–16.
101. Doig GS. Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition. J Am Med Assoc. (2013) 309:2130. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5124
102. Padula AM, Ong HM, Kelers K. Snake envenomation in domestic animal species in Australia. In: Clinical Toxinology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands (2016). p. 1–27.
103. Whitehead K, Cortes Y, Eirmann L. Gastrointestinal dysmotility disorders in critically ill dogs and cats. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2016) 26:234–53. doi: 10.1111/vec.12449
104. Bashar FR, Manuchehrian N, Mahmoudabadi M, Hajiesmaeili MR, Torabian S. Effects of ranitidine and pantoprazole on ventilator-associated pneumonia: A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Tanaffos. (2013) 12:16–21.
105. Jung M, Park H, Kang D, Park E, Jeon K, Chung CR, et al. The effect of bed-to-nurse ratio on hospital mortality of critically ill children on mechanical ventilation: A nationwide population-based study. Ann Intensive Care. (2020) 10:159. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00780-7
106. Wong W-T, Lee A, Gomersall CD, Shek L, Chan A, So S, et al. Survival of mechanically ventilated ward patients and association with organisational factors: A multicentre prospective study. Br Med J Open. (2021) 11:e052462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052462
107. Chandler JA, van der Woerdt A, Prittie JE, Chang L. Preliminary evaluation of tear production in dogs hospitalized in an intensive care unit. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2013) 23:274–9. doi: 10.1111/vec.12055
108. Bruchim Y, Aroch I, Sisso A, Kushnir Y, Epstein A, Kelmer E, et al. Retrospective study of positive pressure ventilation in 58 dogs: Indications, prognostic factors and outcome. J Small Anim Practice. (2014) 55:314–9. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12211
109. Khatiban M, Moradi Amin H, Falahinia G, Moghimbeigi A, Yadollahi M. Polyethylene eye-cover versus artificial teardrops in the prevention of ocular surface diseases in comatose patients: A prospective multicenter randomized triple-blinded three-arm clinical trial. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0248830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248830
110. Ioannides J, Parker J, Kumaratunga V, Preston J, Donaldson D, MacFarlane P, et al. Prospective, masked, randomized, controlled superiority study comparing the incidence of corneal injury following general anesthesia in dogs with two methods of corneal protection. Vet Ophthalmol. (2022) 25:291–6. doi: 10.1111/vop.12991
111. Diehl KA, Bowden AC, Knudsen D. Bandage contact lens retention in dogs—A pilot study. Vet Ophthalmol. (2019) 22:584–90. doi: 10.1111/vop.12626
112. Hung W-C, Ko JC, Weil AB, Weng H-Y. Evaluation of endotracheal tube cuff pressure and the use of three cuff inflation syringe devices in dogs. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7:39. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00039
113. Rello J, Soñora R, Jubert P, Artigas A, Rué M, Vallés J. Pneumonia in intubated patients: Role of respiratory airway care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (1996) 154:111–5. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680665
114. Haskins SC, King LG. Positive pressure ventilation. In:LG King, , editor, Textbook of Respiratory Disease in Dogs and Cats. St Louis: Saunders (2004). p. 217–29.
115. Heller J, Bosward K, Hodgson D, Pottie R. Anuric renal failure in a dog after Red-bellied Black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) envenomation. Aust Vet J. (2006) 84:158–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2006.tb12769.x
116. Padula AM, Winkel KD. Red-bellied black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) envenomation in the dog: Diagnosis and treatment of nine cases. Toxicon. (2016) 117:69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.03.022
117. Labeau SO, Afonso E, Benbenishty J, Blackwood B, Boulanger C, Brett SJ, et al. Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: The DecubICUs study. Intensive Care Med. (2021) 47:160–9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9
118. Judge P. Coastal taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus) envenomation of a dog. Aust Vet J. (2015) 93:412–6. doi: 10.1111/avj.12375
119. Wang W, Zhu S, He Q, Wang M, Kang Y, Zhang R, et al. Fluid balance and ventilator-associated events among patients admitted to ICUs in China: A nested case-control study. Crit Care Med. (2022) 50:307–16. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005227
120. Isbister GK, Scorgie FE, O'Leary MA, Seldon M, Brown SGA, Lincz LF. Factor deficiencies in venom-induced consumption coagulopathy resulting from Australian elapid envenomation: Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-10). J Thrombosis Haemostasis. (2010) 8:2504–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04050.x
121. Isbister GK, Buckley NA, Page CB, Scorgie FE, Lincz LF, Seldon M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of fresh frozen plasma for treating venom-induced consumption coagulopathy in cases of Australian snakebite (ASP-18). J Thrombosis Haemostasis. (2013) 11:1310–8. doi: 10.1111/jth.12218
122. American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2005) 171:388–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200405-644ST
123. Hoggan SR, Carr A, Sausman KA. Mojave toxin-type ascending flaccid paralysis after an envenomation by a Southern Pacific Rattlesnake in a dog. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2011) 2011:668. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2011.00668.x
124. Thoen ME, Kerl ME. Characterization of acute kidney injury in hospitalized dogs and evaluation of a veterinary acute kidney injury staging system. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2011) 2011:689. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2011.00689.x
125. Drury DR, Henry JP, Goodman J. The effects of continuous pressure breathing on kidney function 1. J Clin Invest. (1947) 26:945–51. doi: 10.1172/JCI101889
126. Nelimarkka O. Renal oxygen and lactate metabolism in hemorrhagic shock. An experimental study. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. (1984) 518:1–44.
127. Martinez J, Londoño LA, Schaer M. Retrospective evaluation of acute kidney injury in dogs with pit viper envenomation (2008–2017): 56 cases. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2020) 30:698–705. doi: 10.1111/vec.13007
128. Dharod MV, Patil TB, Deshpande AS, Gulhane RV, Patil MB, Bansod YV. Clinical predictors of acute kidney injury following snake bite envenomation. N Am J Med Sci. (2013) 5:594–9. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.120795
129. Suryanarayana G, Rameshkumar R, Mahadevan S. Retrospective hospital-based cohort study on risk factors of poor outcome in pediatric snake envenomation. J Trop Pediatr. (2021) 67:fmaa078. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa078
130. Marchiset A, Jamme M. When the renal (function) begins to fall: A mini-review of acute kidney injury related to acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients. Front Nephrol. (2022) 2:877529 doi: 10.3389/fneph.2022.877529
131. Johnston CI, Ryan NM, Page CB, Buckley NA, Brown SG, O'Leary MA, et al. The Australian snakebite project, 2005–2015 (ASP-20). Med J Austr. (2017) 207:119–25. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00094
132. Lee J-M, Song J-H, Song K-H. A retrospective evaluation of snake envenomation in dogs in South Korea (2004–2021). Toxins. (2022) 14:565. doi: 10.3390/toxins14080565
133. Hopper K. Discontinuing mechanical ventilation. In:D Silverstein, K Hopper, , editors, Small Animal Critical Care Medicine. St. Louis: Saunders (2015). p. 190–3.
134. Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, Alía I, Solsona JF, Valverdu V, et al. A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. (1995) 332:345–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502093320601
135. Brochard L, Rauss A, Benito S, Conti G, Mancebo J, Rekik N, et al. Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (1994) 150:896–903. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.4.7921460
136. Burns KEA, Soliman I, Adhikari NKJ, Zwein A, Wong JTY, Gomez-Builes C, et al. Trials directly comparing alternative spontaneous breathing trial techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. (2017) 21:127. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1698-x
137. Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R, Gupta D. Automatic tube compensation as an adjunct for weaning in patients with severe neuroparalytic snake envenomation requiring mechanical ventilation: A pilot randomized study. Respir Care. (2009) 54:1697–702.
138. Hess D. Ventilator modes used in weaning. Chest. (2001) 120:474S−6S. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.6_suppl.474S
139. Tanaka R. Strategy of mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Masui. (2013) 62:532–40.
140. Liu W-Q, Xu Y, Han A-M, Meng L-J, Wang J. A comparative study of two ventilation modes in the weaning phase of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Chin J Contemp Pediatr. (2018) 20:729–33. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.09.007
141. Hoareau GL, Mellema MS, Silverstein DC. Indication, management, and outcome of brachycephalic dogs requiring mechanical ventilation. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2011) 21:226–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2011.00635.x
142. Cagle LA, Hopper K, Epstein SE. Indications and outcome associated with positive-pressure ventilation in dogs and cats: 127 cases. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. (2022) 32:365–75. doi: 10.1111/vec.13176
143. Meng L, Wang C, Li J, Zhang J. Early vs. late tracheostomy in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Respir J. (2016) 10:684–92. doi: 10.1111/crj.12286
144. Campbell CH. Venomous snake bite in papua and its treatment with tracheotomy, artificial respiration and antivenene. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. (1964) 58:263–73. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(64)90040-9
145. Sambyal V, Bharti D, Mahajan A. Clinical profile of snake bite at a tertiary care centre—One year study. J Med Educ Res. (2017) 19:206–9.
146. Khimani A, Mcnierney A, Surani S, Surani S. Snake envenomation causing distant tracheal myonecrosis. Case Rep Pulmonol. (2013) 2013:1–3. doi: 10.1155/2013/364195
147. Singh G, Pannu HS, Chawla PS, Malhotra S. Neuromuscular transmission failure due to common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) envenomation. Muscle Nerve. (1999) 22:1637–43. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199912)22:12<1637::AID-MUS4>3.0.CO;2-A
148. Hinze JD, Barker JA, Jones TR, Winn RE. Life-threatening upper airway edema caused by a distal rattlesnake bite. Ann Emerg Med. (2001) 38:79–82. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114321
149. Lee JA, Drobatz KJ, Koch MW, King LG. Indications for and outcome of positive-pressure ventilation in cats: 53 cases (1993–2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2005) 226:924–31. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.924
150. King LG, Hendricks JC. Use of positive-pressure ventilation in dogs and cats: 41 cases (1990-1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1994) 204:1045–52.
Keywords: Elapidae, positive pressure ventilation, neuromuscular disease, neurotoxicity, Micrurus fulvius, Pseudonaja, Notechis, Pseudechis
Citation: Morris CAD and Donaldson RE (2023) Mechanical ventilation in snake envenomation of dogs and cats. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1071257. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1071257
Received: 16 October 2022; Accepted: 14 March 2023;
Published: 29 March 2023.
Edited by:
Liz Guieu, Colorado State University, United StatesReviewed by:
Sarah Purcell, The University of Queensland, AustraliaPatricia Rosenstein, Animal Referral Hospital (ARH), Homebush, Australia
Copyright © 2023 Morris and Donaldson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Cameron A. D. Morris, cameron.morris@qldvetspecialists.com.au