AUTHOR=Talbot Steven R. , Struve Birgitta , Wassermann Laura , Heider Miriam , Weegh Nora , Knape Tilo , Hofmann Martine C. J. , von Knethen Andreas , Jirkof Paulin , Häger Christine , Bleich André TITLE=RELSA—A multidimensional procedure for the comparative assessment of well-being and the quantitative determination of severity in experimental procedures JOURNAL=Frontiers in Veterinary Science VOLUME=9 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.937711 DOI=10.3389/fvets.2022.937711 ISSN=2297-1769 ABSTRACT=
Good science in translational research requires good animal welfare according to the principles of 3Rs. In many countries, determining animal welfare is a mandatory legal requirement, implying a categorization of animal suffering, traditionally dominated by subjective scorings. However, how such methods can be objectified and refined to compare impairments between animals, subgroups, and animal models remained unclear. Therefore, we developed the RELative Severity Assessment (RELSA) procedure to establish an evidence-based method based on quantitative outcome measures such as body weight, burrowing behavior, heart rate, heart rate variability, temperature, and activity to obtain a relative metric for severity comparisons. The RELSA procedure provided the necessary framework to get severity gradings in TM-implanted mice, yielding four distinct RELSA thresholds L1<0.27, L2<0.59, L3<0.79, and L4<3.45. We show further that severity patterns in the contributing variables are time and model-specific and use this information to obtain contextualized