Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci., 31 May 2022
Sec. Animal Nutrition and Metabolism
This article is part of the Research Topic Technological Strategies to Improve Animal Health and Production View all 34 articles

The miR-216/miR-217 Cluster Regulates Lipid Metabolism in Laying Hens With Fatty Liver Syndrome via PPAR/SREBP Signaling Pathway

\nLihui Zhu,&#x;Lihui Zhu1,2Rongrong Liao&#x;Rongrong Liao1Jiwen HuangJiwen Huang3Huaxiang Yan,Huaxiang Yan1,2Changfeng Xiao,Changfeng Xiao1,2Yunzhou YangYunzhou Yang1Huiying Wang
Huiying Wang1*Changsuo Yang,
Changsuo Yang1,2*
  • 1Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
  • 2National Poultry Research Center for Engineering and Technology, Shanghai, China
  • 3College of Animal Science and Technology, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou, China

Fatty liver syndrome (FLS), a common metabolic disease in laying hens, caused by excessive hepatic fat deposition is a bottleneck in the poultry industry. However, no specific therapeutic methods have been developed. Evidence suggests that microRNAs (miRNAs) are essential for liver lipid metabolism and homeostasis, providing strong evidence for targeting miRNAs as a potential treatment option for liver diseases. However, the roles of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of FLS remain unclear. In present study, RNA-sequencing was performed to discern the expression patterns of miRNAs in normal and fatty livers of laying hens. In total, 12 dysregulated miRNAs (2 down-regulated and 10 up-regulated) were detected between the normal and fatty livers. Functional enrichment analysis showed the potential impacts of the dysregulated miRNAs on lipid metabolism. Notably, miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p, which belong to the miR-216/miR-217 cluster, were up-regulated in the sera and livers of FLS chickens, as well as free fatty acid (FFA)-induced LMH cells. Oil-red O staining revealed that up-regulation of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster induced lipid accumulation in FFA-induced LMH cells. Furthermore, the dual luciferase gene reporter assay and RT-qPCR analysis demonstrated that 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 2, F-box protein 8, and transmembrane 9 superfamily member 3 (TM9SF3) were directly targeted by miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p, respectively, and suppressed in the fatty livers of laying hens. Moreover, overexpression of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster or reduction in TM9SF3 levels led to activation of the proliferator-activated receptor/sterol regulatory-element binding protein (PPAR/SREBP) pathway. Overall, these results demonstrate that the miR-216/miR-217 cluster regulates lipid metabolism in laying hens with FLS, which should prove helpful in the development of new interventional strategies.

Introduction

Fatty liver syndrome (FLS), a common metabolic disease and the most frequent non-infectious cause of mortality in laying hens, is characterized by excess deposition of triglycerides (TGs) in hepatocytes due to an imbalance between hepatic lipogenesis and fatty acid (FA) oxidation, resulting in reduced egg production and death (13). However, no specific therapeutic methods have been developed after decades of research. Increasing evidence indicates that miRNAs associated with lipid metabolism are frequently dysregulated in human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (4). For example, inhibition of miR-21 through RNA interference was reported to suppress synthesis of TGs (5). Moreover, inhibition of miR-122 suppresses lipogenesis via targeting Sirtuin 1 (6), while down-regulation of miR-34a increases the expression of proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and several target genes of PPARα, suggesting that miR-34a is involved in regulation of lipid metabolism (7), and hepatocyte-specific inactivation of miR-379 reduced the concentration of plasma TGs in healthy mice (8). These results provide strong evidence for targeting miRNAs as a potential treatment option for NAFLD.

Similar to NAFLD, dysregulation of miRNAs associated with lipid metabolism has been reported in the livers of commercial caged laying hens. For example, miR-122, which targets the lipid metabolism-related gene fatty acid-binding protein 5, and miR-101-2-5p, which targets the lipid transporter apolipoprotein B, are reportedly highly expressed in the chicken liver (9, 10), while miR-33 negatively regulates the lipid oxidation regulator gene carnitine O-octanoyltransferase (11). Moreover, overexpression of miR-34a-5p, which targets acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 1, promotes hepatic TG deposition and increased cholesterol production (12). However, the mechanisms of miRNAs associated with FLS in laying hens remain unclear. Hence, further explorations of these molecular mechanisms will be helpful for treatment of FLS and even provide important data for the future direction of treatments for patients with NAFLD, since chicken fatty liver is considered a good model of human NAFLD (1315).

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the expression profiles of miRNAs associated with FLS in laying hens. The results showed that miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p, which belong to the miR-216/miR-217 cluster, were up-regulated in the sera and liver of a fatty liver chicken model. In addition, miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p, were found to inhibit expression of 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase 2 (HACD2), F-box protein 8 (FBXO8), and transmembrane 9 superfamily member 3 (TM9SF3), respectively. Furthermore, in vitro studies demonstrated that overexpression of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster in LMH cells promoted hepatic steatosis via regulation of the PPAR/sterol regulatory-element binding protein (SREBP) pathway. These findings will help to clarify the roles of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of FLS in laying hens and NAFLD in humans.

Materials and Methods

Ethical Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee of the Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Shanghai, China) and performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as approved by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [Approval No. (2006) 398].

Construction of a Fatty Liver Chicken Model

Hy-line Brown laying hens were raised under standard commercial conditions with ad libitum access to water as described in our previous study (16), and fed a corn-soy diet containing 16.0% crude protein and 2,700 kcal/kg of metabolizable energy. To identify the miRNAs differentially expressed between normal and fatty livers, 15 laying hens were killed at the ages of 25 and 52 weeks, respectively, and liver samples were harvested to assess lipid accumulation and RNA expression levels of selected biomarkers. At the age of 25 weeks, livers that were dark red with no hemorrhaging were considered normal.

Histological Analysis

Livers were embedded in paraffin, cut into sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to assess the extent of lipid accumulation. ImageJ software (version 1.80, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to quantify lipid droplets.

FA Composition

Lipids were extracted for FA analysis with a gas chromatograph (model no. 6890; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to a mass selective detector (model no. 5973; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Subsequently, the target compounds (fatty acid methyl esters, FAMEs) were transesterified with HCl in methanol. FAs were identified based on retention times with reference FA standards (Supelco 37-Component FAME Mix; Supelco Inc. Bellefonte, PA, USA). Individual FAs were calculated from the peak areas relative to the total area (total FAs were set at 100%). Three to five individual livers were pooled for four biological replicates.

Small RNA Sequencing Analysis

Chicken liver RNA was purified using TRIzol® Reagent. Five individual livers were pooled for three biological replicates. Small RNA sequencing was performed as described previously (17). Briefly, total RNA was extracted from livers and qualified on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer System (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Small RNA libraries were constructed and sequenced using a Hiseq 4000 Sequencing System (Illumina, Inc.). After sequencing, the raw date were aligned and mapped to the Gallus reference genome (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-81/fasta/gallus_gallus/dna/) using Langmead and Salzberg (18) and compared to miRBase (Release 21; https://www.mirbase.org/) to identify mature miRNAs. Then, novel miRNAs were predicted by miRDeep2 (19) and RNAfold (20). Differentially expressed miRNAs were obtained using the R DESeq package (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html). The raw sequencing data were deposited to the Sequence Read Archive of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Accession no. PRJNA776040).

Target Gene Prediction

Target genes of the miRNAs were predicted with miRnada (http://www.microrna.org) and TargetScan (https://www.targetscan.org/vert_80/) software as previously described (17). The 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of all known Gallus gallus genes were download from http://asia.ensembl.org/Gallus_gallus/Info/Index. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis was performed with reference to the DAVID 6.8 bioinformatic database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/).

Cell Culture and Cell Transfection

Chicken hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) LMH cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) or HEK 293T cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultivated in DMEM/F12 medium (GIBCO - Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or DMEM (high glucose) medium (GIBCO - Life Technologies) both containing 10% FBS (GIBCO - Life Technologies), 1% penicillin and streptomycin at 37 °C.

LMH cells (1.5 × 105/mL) were seeded in the wells of 6-well-plates. LMH cells were transfected with mimics, inhibitors, scrambled oligonucleotides, siRNA-HACD2, siRNA-FBOX8, siRNA-TM9SF3, and control siRNA (40 nM, 10 pmol/mL) using Lipofectamine® 2000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in Opti-MEM medium. The oligonucleotides used in this study were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and are listed in Supplementary Tables 1, 2. At 24 h post-transfection, the cells were collected for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) or protein analysis. The primers for RT-qPCR analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 3. To establish an in vitro fatty liver cell model, LMH cells were cultured in the presence of 1 mM free fatty acids (FFAs), containing oleic acid and palmitic acid at a 2:1 volume ratio, for 24 h prior to use for the indicated assays.

Oil-Red O Staining

Liver samples were frozen on dry ice, and cut into 8-μm-thick sections, which were stained with an Oil Red O Stain Kit (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. LMH cells were transfected with mimics of miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p or scrambled oligonucleotides (40 nmol/L), as described above. At 24 h post-transfection, the cells were collected, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 30 min, stained with oil red O stain, as described above, and imaged under electron microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Meanwhile, LMH cells cultured with 1 mM FFAs for 24 h were used as a positive control.

TG Contents Assay

The TG contents of culture media of LMH cells transfected with either an miRNA mimic or control for 24 h and liver tissues isolated from FLS chickens were measured using a commercial TG assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions and normalized to the total protein concentration. The TG contents of the culture media and liver tissues are expressed as nmol/mL and mmol/μg protein, respectively. The culture medium of FFA-treated LMH cells was used as a positive control.

Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay

Wild-type and mutated sequences of the 3′ UTR of the target miRNA (miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p) binding sites were synthesized and cloned into the plasmid psiCHECK-2 (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Recombinant plasmids were co-transfected with miRNA mimic or scrambled control miRNA into HEK293T cells as described above. At 30 h post-transfection, luciferase activity was detected using the Dual-Glo® Luciferase Assay System (Promega Corporation) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

RT-qPCR Analysis

Chicken liver, serum, and cell RNA was purified using TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen). Amplification of mRNA for expression analysis was performed with SYBR Premix Ex Taq polymerase (Takara Bio, Inc., Shiga, Japan) using an ABI Q5 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as internal references. The miRNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the miScript II RT Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and amplified by RT-qPCR using a miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (QIAGEN GmbH) with an ABI Q5 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The miScript primers for selected miRNAs are the property of Qiagen. U6 was used as the internal control.

Western Blot Analysis

Total protein was homogenized with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), separated by electrophoresis using 8–10% sodium dodecyl sulfate gels, and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), which were blocked with 10% skim milk for 2 h and then probed with antibodies against HACD2 (bs-4429R; Bioss, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA), FBXO8 (bs-16053R; Bioss, Inc.), TM9SF3 (bs-19944R; Bioss, Inc.), and β-actin (8227; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (WBKLS0050; EMD Millipore Corporation). The bands were imaged using a chemiluminescence imaging system (Syngene, Frederic, MD, USA).

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed with a dependent sample t-test when the data of two groups conformed to a normal distribution, otherwise the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used. The data of three or more groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD comparisons using SPSS 16.0. Results were presented as the mean ± SEM. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Hepatic Lipid Accumulation and FA Composition

Representative images of the pathological changes to the livers of chickens in the experimental and control groups at the ages of 25 and 52 weeks are presented in Figure 1A. At the age of 25 weeks, normal livers were dark red with no hemorrhaging. The livers of laying hens at 52 weeks of age were fragile and yellow in color with some hemorrhagic spots due to high lipid accumulation (Figure 1A) and, thus, were considered as fatty livers. The average weight of the fatty livers was relatively bigger than that of the normal livers (P = 0.08), while the vacuolar area was greater in the fatty livers as compared to the normal livers (P < 0.01) (Figures 1B,C). The amount of saturated FAs (C14:0 and C17:0) was significantly greater in the fatty livers as compared to the normal livers, while the amount of unsaturated FAs (C18:2n6c), especially omega-3 FAs, was relatively decreased in the fatty livers, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.07, Figure 1D). Serum and liver TG contents were markedly increased in the fatty livers (Figure 1E, P < 0.05).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Hepatic lipid accumulation in chicken fatty liver (A) Representative images of H&E staining and Oil-Red O staining (200× magnification). (B) Weight of normal and fatty livers (n = 15). (C) Quantification results of fat vacuoles within the section. (D) FA composition between normal and fatty livers. Three to five individual livers were pooled for four biological replicates. The percentage of individual FAs was calculated according to the peak areas relative to the total area (total FAs were set at 100%). (E) Serum and Liver TG concentrations. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

miRNA Profiles of Normal and Fatty Livers

As shown in Figures 2A,B, there was a >2-fold difference in 12 miRNAs between the normal and fatty livers collected at 25 and 52 weeks of age (Supplementary Table 4). Of these, 10 miRNAs (miR-216a/b, miR-217-5p, miR-375, miR-365-1-5p, novel91_mature, novel78_mature, novel159_mature, novel37_mature, and novel135_mature) were up-regulated and two (miR-10c-5p and miR-130a-5p) were down-regulated. Notably, miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p belong to the miR-216/miR-217 cluster.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Identification of dysregulated miRNAs in chicken fatty liver (A) Volcano plot of miRNAs in normal and fatty livers. Significantly up-regulated miRNAs are shown in red and significantly down-regulated miRNAs in green. (B) Heat map of miRNAs in normal and fatty livers. (C) Function enrichment analysis of biological pathways for target genes of the 12 modulated miRNAs (fold change > 2). (D,E) Expression levels of selected miRNAs in sera and livers. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

The potential targets of the dysregulated miRNAs were predicted using miRnada and TargetScan software. KEGG pathway analysis showed that 31 pathways associated with the predicted miRNA targets were significantly enriched (Figure 2C and Supplementary Figure 1). Specifically, miRNA targets associated with the differentially expressed miRNAs belonged to multiple pathways, including phosphatidylinositol signaling system, cGMP-PKG signaling pathway, inositol phosphate metabolism, and pathways regulating lipid metabolism, such as glycerophospholipid metabolism, thyroid hormone synthesis, and insulin resistance (Figure 2C). In addition, as shown in Table 1, miR-216a was found to target synaptojanin 1 (SYNJ1) and HACD2, while miR-216b was shown to target FBXO8 and ethanolamine kinase 1 (ETNK1), and miR-217-5p was shown to target regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 2 (RIMS2) and TM9SF3.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Potential targets of the miR-216/217 cluster.

Based on fold change and expression abundance, miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p were selected for further RT-qPCR analysis of the expression levels in sera samples and normal and fatty liver tissues specimens. The three miRNAs produced acceptable and consistent signals in the liver and sera samples of obese and normal control chickens. As shown in Figures 2D,E, the expression levels of miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p were relatively increased in obese chickens versus healthy controls with significant differences in miR-216a and miR-217-5p (>4-fold) (Figure 2).

The miR-216/miR-217 Cluster Was Up-Regulated in FFA-Induced Fatty Liver Specimens

Based on the target gene predictions by miRnada and TargetScan software, the mRNA and protein expression levels of potential targets of miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p in the normal and fatty livers at 25 and 52 weeks of age, respectively, were analyzed by RT-qPCR. As shown in Figure 3A, the mRNA and protein expression levels of HACD2 (potential target of miR-216a) and FBXO8 (potential target of miR-216b) were comparatively down-regulated in the fatty livers, while mRNA expression of TM9SF3 (potential target of miR-217-5p) was down-regulated in the fatty livers with no obvious difference in protein levels as compared to the normal liver (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The miR-216/miR-217 cluster was up-regulated in FFA-induced f fatty liver model (A) mRNA levels of potential targets of the in vivo fatty liver model. (B) Protein levels of potential targets of the in vivo fatty liver model. (C) miRNA levels of the miR-216/217 cluster in FFA-induced fatty liver model. (D) mRNA levels of potential targets in FFA-induced fatty liver model. (E) Oil-red O staining (200× magnification). *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

Furthermore, the miRNA levels of miR-216/miR-217 cluster and mRNA levels of the potential targets in FFA-induced fatty livers were analyzed. As shown in Figure 3, FFAs induced up-regulation of miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p in chicken LMH hepatocytes (Figure 3C) and decreased mRNA expression of HACD2, but not FBXO8 and TM9SF3 (Figure 3D). In addition, up-regulation of miR-216a/b or miR-217-5p induced lipid accumulation in LMH cells (Figure 3E), although there was no significant increase in TG content in the culture media of cells treated with the miRNA mimics, PBS, and control miRNAs (Supplementary Figure 2). These findings suggest that miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p may be involved in lipid metabolism.

The miR-216/miR-217 Cluster Directly Targets HACD2, FBXO8, and TM9SF3

To determine whether HACD2, FBXO8, and TM9SF3 are directly regulated by the miR-216/217 cluster, the capability of the miRNA mimics to inhibit luciferase activity was investigated in mammalian cells. The binding sites for HACD2, FBXO8, and TM9SF3 mRNAs of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster were cloned into the 3′UTR of a luciferase reporter vector (Figure 4A). As shown in Figure 4B, transfection with the miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p miRNA mimics resulted in reduced luciferase activity as compared to transfection with the scrambled miRNA mimics. In contrast, the luciferase activity of the mutant-type 3′UTR was similar between the miRNA mimics and control mimics (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Validation of targets of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster (A) Wild-type and mutant sequences of HACD2, FBXO8, and TM9SF3 (B) results of the dual luciferase reporter gene assay. (C) Expression of miR-216/miR-217 cluster members in LMH cells after up-regulation or down-regulation of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster. (D) mRNA levels of targets after up-regulation or down-regulation of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

Furthermore, to determine whether the miR-216/miR-217 cluster could inhibit mRNA expression of HACD2, FBXO8, and TM9SF3 in vitro in chicken liver cells, cultured LMH cells were transfected with mimics of miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p using Lipofectamine® 2000 Transfection Reagent and changes to the mRNA expression levels of HACD2, FBXO8, and TM9SF3 were assessed using RT-qPCR. As shown in Figure 4C, in vivo transfection with the miRNA mimics resulted in increased expression of miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p, while transfection with the miRNA inhibitors significantly inhibited expression of these miRNAs. As compared to the control group, the mRNA levels of HACD2, FBXO8, and TM9SF3 were increased in the inhibitor groups and decreased in the mimic groups (Figure 4D). These results suggest that HACD2 is directly targeted by miR-216a, FBXO8 is a specific downstream target of miR-216b, and TM9SF3 expression is directly regulated by miR-217-5p.

Overexpression of the miR-216/miR-217 Cluster Regulates the PPAR/SREBP Signaling Pathway

To further determine the regulatory role of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster in lipid metabolism, the mRNA expression levels of genes associated with the PPAR/SREBP signaling pathway were investigated. As shown in Figure 5A, overexpression of miR-216a significantly increased the mRNA levels of PPARα and PPARγ in cells transfected with the miR-217-5p mimic. Overexpression of miR-216b or miR-217-5p markedly enhanced the mRNA levels of hepatic CD36 and apolipoprotein AI (APOA1) in LMH cells. The mRNA levels of the fat synthesis-related genes SREBP1 and fatty acid synthase (FASN) were up-regulated in cells transfected with the miR-216a/b or miR-217-5p mimics.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with lipid metabolism (A) relative mRNA levels of genes involved in the PPAR/SREBP signaling pathway in LMH cells transfected with miRNA mimics. (B) Validation of the siRNAs for silencing of HACD2, FBOX8, and TM9SF3 by RT-qPCR analysis. (C) Validation of the siRNAs for silencing of HACD2, FBOX8, and TM9SF3 by immunoblotting analysis. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of genes associated with the PPAR/SREBP signaling pathway in target-inhibited LMH cells. The results are presented as the mean and standard error of at least triplicate experiments. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

To further confirm down-regulation of the PPAR/SREBP signaling pathway, siRNAs were designed and optimized to effectively silence HACD2 (siRNA-509), FBXO8 (siRNA-912), and TM9SF3 (siRNA-456) (Figures 5B,C and Supplementary Figure 3). Treatment of LMH cells with the TM9SF3 siRNA led to up-regulation of genes involved in the PPAR/SREBP signaling pathway, including SREBP1 and FASN, but suppressed expression of PPARα and PPARγ (Figure 5D), which was consistent with miR-217-5p overexpression in LMH cells. Moreover, silencing of HACD2 decreased mRNA expression of PPARα. However, silencing of HACD2 and FBXO8 had no effect on FASN expression (Figure 5D). Overall, these results indicate that miR-217-5p induced downregulation of TM9SF3 influenced the expression of genes involved in the PPAR/SREBP signaling pathway.

Discussion

Although miRNAs have crucial regulatory effects on the pathogenesis of fatty liver disease (47), little is known about the specific molecular mechanisms of miRNAs in the regulation of FLS of laying hens. In this study, miRNA profile analysis identified 12 miRNAs that were significantly dysregulated in chicken fatty livers. Of the identified miRNAs, this study focused on miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p because the expression levels of both were consistently up-regulated in the sera and liver tissues of chickens with fatty livers and all three belong to the miR-216/217 cluster.

As reported in previous studies, miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p functions in obesity-related diseases, such as diabetes and NAFLD. miR-216a expression was increased during diabetes progression and essential for the proliferation of beta cells (21). The obesity-related gene phosphatase and tensin homolog was a direct target of miR-216a, which regulates expression of adiponectin receptor 1, caveolin-1, caveolin-2, and PPARγ (22, 23). Inhibition of miR-216b profoundly decreased the proliferation of HCC SMMC-7721 cells by regulating insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2, while overexpression of miR-216b inhibited replication of hepatitis B virus and proliferation of human hepatoblastoma HepG2.215 cells (24). Enhanced miR-216b-5p inhibited protein expression of uridine diphosphate-glucuronyltransferase 2B, which is an important enzyme in the detoxification of a variety of endogenous and exogenous compounds in both human hepatoma HuH-7 cells and human liver cancer Hep3B cells (25). Up-regulation of miR-217 in alpha mouse liver 12 cells promoted ethanol-mediated impairment of SIRT1 expression and FA oxidation enzymes (26). Here, high levels of miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p were observed in chicken fatty livers and FFA-induced fatty liver cells, suggesting that miR-21a/b and miR-217-5p may be involved in lipid metabolism.

FAs are the main components of lipids. HACD2, also called as protein tyrosine phosphatase-like member B (PTPLB), catalyzes the third step (dehydration) in the conversion of long-chain FAs to very long-chain FAs (27). Disruption of HACD2 significantly reduced elongation of both saturated and unsaturated FAs in the haploid human cell line HAP1 (27). In the present study, HACD2 was down-regulated in chicken fatty livers and the FFA-induced NAFLD model. In addition, the ratio of saturated FAs (C14:0 and C17:0) was dramatically increased, while that of unsaturated FAs (C18:2n6c) was relatively decreased in chicken fatty liver, which might be associated with down-regulation of HACD2. Moreover, miR-216a was found to possess binding sites for HACD2. Transfection with the miR-216a mimic reduced HACD2 expression, while transfection with the miR-216a inhibitor had the opposite effect, suggesting that the diversity of FAs between normal and fatty livers may be regulated by miR-216a via targeting of HACD2. Additionally, miR-216b was found to target FBXO8 and miR-217-5p targeted TM9SF3. Previous studies demonstrated that FBXO8 is lost in several cancers and associated with invasiveness of cancer cells, and decreased expression of FBXO8 was correlated with poor survival of HCC patients, suggesting that FBXO8 is a potential biomarker of HCC progression (28). TM9SF3 is a nine-transmembrane protein that participates in tumor invasion and serves as a prognostic factor (29). TM9SF3 was also associated with insulin secretory granules, which are critical for the storage and secretion of insulin, although the detailed regulatory mechanism remains unclear (30). The down-regulation of HACD2, TM9SF3, and FBXO8 in chicken fatty livers and LMH cells transfected with the miR-216/miR-217 cluster mimics suggests potential roles in the progression of FLS.

Hepatic lipid deposition, which is tightly controlled by key enzymes, including PPARα, PPARγ, CD36, APOA1, SREBP1, and FASN, involves FA synthesis, uptake, oxidation, and secretion (31). In particular, SREBP1 and FASN regulate lipogenesis (31, 32), while CD36 facilitates cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of FAs (33). Enhanced expression of CD36 was reported to promote hepatic FA uptake and lipid deposition both in vivo and in vitro (33). In addition, CD36 is a shared target of PPARγ (34). PPARα and PPARγ are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily involved in hepatic β-oxidation, lipid storage, and glucose homeostasis (35). Here, transfection of LMH cells with miR-216/miR-217 cluster mimics regulated the expression of genes associated with the PPAR/SREBP signaling pathway. Notably, overexpression of miR-217-5p or inhibition of TM9SF3 down-regulated expression of the FA oxidation-related genes PPARα and PPARγ, but up-regulate the lipogenesis-related genes FASN and SREBP1. Taken together, these results suggest that the miR-216/miR-217 cluster can regulate lipid metabolism.

Notably, previous studies showed that miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p were expressed in different disease models. For example, miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p were decreased in HCC (24, 36, 37), while Greco et al. (38) showed that up-regulation of miR-216a was linked to diabetic heart failure. Up-regulation of the miR-216a/217 cluster was observed in HCC tissue samples and cell lines, which were also found to be responsible for early tumor recurrence (39). Higher insulin production was observed in an animal model of type 1 diabetes treated with a nanodrug carrying the miR-216a mimic, as compared to untreated controls (21). Moreover, miR-217 was upregulated in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells and hepatitis B virus-associated HCC (40, 41). Here, the miR-216/miR-217 cluster was up-regulated in chicken fatty livers and FFA-induced LMH cells. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the function of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster varies in different disease models. Thus, further studies are warranted to discern the function of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster in specific diseases. Additionally, hepatic lipid metabolism in laying hens is a relatively complex process. The specific function of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster in different production stages of laying hens still needs further investigation, since the hepatic lipid metabolism is strongly activated in liver of hen with sex maturation, but dysregulated in FLS laying hens (42).

Conclusion

In conclusion, we demonstrated that hepatic miR-216a/b and miR-217-5p levels increased in FLS and that the miR-216/miR-217 cluster is involved in lipid metabolism via targeting HACD2, FBXO8, and TM9SF3. Furthermore, overexpression of the miR-216/miR-217 cluster activated the PPAR/SREBP signaling pathway. These findings provide new insights into the roles of miRNAs in fatty liver diseases and may contribute to the development of novel strategies for the treatment of NAFLD and FLS.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee of the Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Shanghai, China) and performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as approved by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [Approval No. (2006) 398].

Author Contributions

CY and HW supported the funding. RL performed the cell culture, cell transfection, and oil red O staining experiment. JH did the RT-qPCR experiment. HY, CX, and YY collected the samples. LZ designed the experiments, analyzed the data, performed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by China Agriculture Research System under Grant (CARS-40-K03), SAAS Program for Excellent Research Team (Grant Number 2022-021), and Climbing Plan of Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences (PG21171).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the reviewers who participated in the review, as well as International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for English language editing.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.913841/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Wu XL, Zou XY, Zhang M, Hu HQ, Wei XL, Jin ML, et al. Osteocalcin prevents insulin resistance, hepatic inflammation, and activates autophagy associated with high-fat diet-induced fatty liver hemorrhagic syndrome in aged laying hens. Poult Sci. (2021) 100:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Cherian G, Holsonbake TB, Goeger MP, Bildfell R. Dietary CLA alters yolk and tissue FA composition and hepatic histopathology of laying hens. Lipids. (2002) 37:751–7. doi: 10.1007/s11745-002-0957-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Trott KA, Giannitti F, Rimoldi G, Hill A, Woods L, Barr B, et al. Fatty liver hemorrhagic syndrome in the backyard chicken: a retrospective histopathologic case series. Vet Pathol. (2014) 51:787–95. doi: 10.1177/0300985813503569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Fang ZQ, Dou GR, Wang L. MicroRNAs in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Biol Sci. (2021) 17:1851–63. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.59588

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lai CY, Yeh KY, Lin CY, Hsieh YW, Lai HH, Chen JR, et al. MicroRNA-21 plays multiple oncometabolic roles in the process of NAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma via PI3K/AKT, TGF-β, and STAT3 signaling. Cancers. (2021) 13:940. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Long JK Dai W, Zheng YW, Zhao SP. MiR-122 promotes hepatic lipogenesis via inhibiting the lkb1/ampk pathway by targeting sirt1 in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol Med. (2019) 25:26. doi: 10.1186/s10020-019-0085-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ding JX Li M, Wan XY, Jin X, Chen SH Yu CH, et al. Effect of mir-34a in regulating steatosis by targeting PPARα expression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:13729. doi: 10.1038/srep13729

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. de Guia RM, Rose AJ, Sommerfeld A, Seibert O, Strzoda D, Zota A, et al. MicroRNA-379 couples glucocorticoid hormones to dysfunctional lipid homeostasis. EMBO J. (2015) 34:344–60. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wang XG, Shao F, Yu JF, Jiang HL, Gong DQ, Gu ZL. MicroRNA-122 targets genes related to liver metabolism in chickens. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. (2015) 184:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2015.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ma Z, Li H, Zheng H, Jiang KR, Jia LJ, Yan FB, et al. MicroRNA-101-2-5p targets the ApoB gene in the liver of chicken (Gallus Gallus). Genome. (2017) 60:673–8. doi: 10.1139/gen-2017-0020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Shao F, Wang X, Yu J, Shen K, Qi C, Gu Z. Expression of mir-33 from an SREBP2 intron inhibits the expression of the fatty acid oxidation-regulatory genes CROT and HADHB in chicken liver. Br Poult Sci. (2019) 60:115–24. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2018.1564242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tian WH, Wang Z, Yue YX, Li H, Li ZJ, Han RL, et al. MiR-34a-5p increases hepatic triglycerides and total cholesterol levels by regulating ACSL1 protein expression in laying hens. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:4420. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hamid H, Zhang JY, Li WX, Liu C, Li ML, Zhao LH, et al. Interactions between the cecal microbiota and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis using laying hens as the model. Poult Sci. (2019) 98:2509–21. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey596

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Tsai MT, Chen YJ, Chen CY, Tsai MH, Han CL, Chen YJ, et al. Identification of potential plasma biomarkers for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by integrating transcriptomics and proteomics in laying hens. J Nutr. (2017) 147:293–303. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.240358

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Gao XN, Liu SH, Ding CC, Miao YF, Gao ZS, Li MC, et al. Comparative effects of genistein and bisphenol A on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in laying hens. Environ Pollut. (2021) 288:117795. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Zhu LH, Liao RR, Wu N, Zhu GS, Yang CS. Heat stress mediates changes in fecal microbiome and functional pathways of laying hens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. (2019) 103:461–72. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9465-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhu L, Liao R, Wu N, Zhu G, Tu Y, Yang C. Integrating miRNA and mRNA expression profiles in plasma of laying hens associated with heat stress. Mol Biol Rep. (2019) 46:2779–89. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04724-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. (2012) 9:357–9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Mackowiak SD. Identification of novel and known miRNAs in deep-sequencing data with miRDeep2. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. (2011) Chapter 12:Unit 12.10. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1210s36

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Denman RB. Using RNAFOLD to predict the activity of small catalytic RNAs. Biotechniques. (1993) 15:1090–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Wang P, Liu Q, Zhao H, Bishop JO, Zhou G, Olson LK, et al. MiR-216a-targeting theranostic nanoparticles promote proliferation of insulin-secreting cells in type 1 diabetes animal model. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:5302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62269-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Bulger DA, Conley J, Conner SH, Majumdar G, Solomon SS. Role of PTEN in TNFalpha induced insulin resistance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2015) 461:533–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kato M, Putta S, Wang M, Yuan H, Lanting L, Nair I, et al. TGF-beta activates Akt kinase through a microRNA-dependent amplifying circuit targeting PTEN. Nat Cell Biol. (2009) 11:881–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1897

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Liu FY, Zhou SJ, Deng YL, Zhang ZY, Zhang EL, Wu ZB, et al. MiR-216b is involved in pathogenesis and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma through HBx-miR-216b-IGF2BP2 signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. (2015) 6:e1670. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.46

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Dluzen DF, Sutliff AK, Chen G, Watson CJ, Ishmael FT, Lazarus P. Regulation of UGT2B expression and activity by miR-216b-5p in liver cancer cell lines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2016) 359:182–93. doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.235044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yin H, Hu M, Zhang R, Shen Z, Flatow L, You M. MicroRNA-217 promotes ethanol-induced fat accumulation in hepatocytes by down-regulating SIRT1. J Biol Chem. (2012) 287:9817–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.333534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sawai M, Uchida Y, Ohno Y, Miyamoto M, Nishioka C, Itohara S, et al. The 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratases HACD1 and HACD2 exhibit functional redundancy and are active in a wide range of fatty acid elongation pathways. J Biol Chem. (2017) 292:15538–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.803171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wang FF, Qiao YD, Yu J, Ren XL, Wang JN, Ding Y, et al. FBX8 acts as an invasion and metastasis suppressor and correlates with poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e65495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Oo HZ, Sentani K, Sakamoto N, Anami K, Naito Y, Oshima T, et al. Identification of novel transmembrane proteins in scirrhous-type gastric cancer by the escherichia coli ampicillin secretion trap (CAST) method: TM9SF3 participates in tumor invasion and serves as a prognostic factor. Pathobiology. (2014) 81:138–48. doi: 10.1159/000357821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Li M, Du W, Zhou MG, Zheng L, Song EL, Hou JJ. Proteomic analysis of insulin secretory granules in INS-1 cells by protein correlation profiling. Biophys Rep. (2018) 4:329–38. doi: 10.1007/s41048-018-0061-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Jones SF, Infante JR. Molecular pathways: fatty acid synthase. Clin Cancer Res. (2015) 21:5434–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Song ZY, Xiaoli AM, Yang FJ. Regulation and metabolic significance of de novo lipogenesis in adipose tissues. Nutrients. (2018) 10:1383. doi: 10.3390/nu10101383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Rada P, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Garcia-Monzon C, Valverde AM. Understanding lipotoxicity in NAFLD pathogenesis: is CD36 a key driver? Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:802. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03003-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zhang C, Luo XH, Chen JR, Zhou BY, Yang ML, Liu R, et al. Osteoprotegerin promotes liver steatosis by targeting the ERK-PPAR-γ-CD36 pathway. Diabetes. (2019) 68:1902–14. doi: 10.2337/db18-1055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Mirza AZ, Althagafi II, Shamshad H. Role of PPAR receptor in different diseases and their ligands: Physiological importance and clinical implications. Eur J Med Chem. (2019) 166:502–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.01.067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Vonhogen IGC, Mohseni Z, Winkens B, Xiao K, Thum T, Calore M, et al. Circulating miR-216a as a biomarker of metabolic alterations and obesity in women. Noncoding RNA Res. (2020) 5:144–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2020.08.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Gong XM, Zhu ZY. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR contributes to progression in hepatocellular carcinoma by sponging miR-217-5p. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. (2020) 35:387–96. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2019.3070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Greco S, Fasanaro P, Castelvecchio S, D'Alessandra Y, Arcelli D, Di Donato M, et al. MicroRNA dysregulation in diabetic ischemic heart failure patients. Diabetes. (2012) 61:1633–41. doi: 10.2337/db11-0952

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Xia HP, Ooi LL, Hui KM. MicroRNA-216a/217-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition targets PTEN and SMAD7 to promote drug resistance and recurrence of liver cancer. Hepatology. (2013) 58:629–41. doi: 10.1002/hep.26369

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Tang S, Tan G, Jiang X, Han P, Zhai B, Dong X, et al. An artificial lncRNA targeting multiple miRNAs overcomes sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:73257–69. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wang W, Zhao LJ, Tan YX, Ren H, Qi ZT. Identification of deregulated mirnas and their targets in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterology. (2012) 18:5442–53. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5442

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Li H, Wang T, Xu C, Wang D, Ren J, Li Y, et al. Transcriptome profile of liver at different physiological stages reveals potential mode for lipid metabolism in laying hens. BMC Genomics. (2015) 16:763. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1943-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: laying hens, fatty liver, miR-216/miR-217 cluster, lipid metabolism, fat deposition, interventional strategy

Citation: Zhu L, Liao R, Huang J, Yan H, Xiao C, Yang Y, Wang H and Yang C (2022) The miR-216/miR-217 Cluster Regulates Lipid Metabolism in Laying Hens With Fatty Liver Syndrome via PPAR/SREBP Signaling Pathway. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:913841. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.913841

Received: 06 April 2022; Accepted: 27 April 2022;
Published: 31 May 2022.

Edited by:

Guillermo Tellez-Isaias, University of Arkansas, United States

Reviewed by:

Victor Manuel Petrone-García, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico
Benjamín Fuente, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

Copyright © 2022 Zhu, Liao, Huang, Yan, Xiao, Yang, Wang and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Huiying Wang, wanghy2010@189.cn; Changsuo Yang, yangchangsuo@189.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.