Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Vet. Sci., 08 April 2022
Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases

Current Knowledge on Infectious Bronchitis Virus Non-structural Proteins: The Bearer for Achieving Immune Evasion Function

\nShuwei Peng&#x;Shuwei PengYiming Wang&#x;Yiming WangYu Zhang&#x;Yu ZhangXu SongXu SongYuanfeng ZouYuanfeng ZouLixia LiLixia LiXinghong ZhaoXinghong ZhaoZhongqiong Yin
Zhongqiong Yin*
  • Natural Medicine Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is the first coronavirus discovered in the world, which is also the prototype of gamma-coronaviruses. Nowadays, IBV is widespread all over the world and has become one of the causative agent causing severe economic losses in poultry industry. Generally, it is believed that the viral replication and immune evasion functions of IBV were modulated by non-structural and accessory proteins, which were also considered as the causes for its pathogenicity. In this study, we summarized the current knowledge about the immune evasion functions of IBV non-structural and accessory proteins. Some non-structural proteins such as nsp2, nsp3, and nsp15 have been shown to antagonize the host innate immune response. Also, nsp7 and nsp16 can block the antigen presentation to inhibit the adapted immune response. In addition, nsp13, nsp14, and nsp16 are participating in the formation of viral mRNA cap to limit the recognition by innate immune system. In conclusion, it is of vital importance to understand the immune evasion functions of IBV non-structural and accessory proteins, which could help us to further explore the pathogenesis of IBV and provide new horizons for the prevention and treatment of IBV in the future.

Introduction

Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is the prototype of gamma-coronavirus belonging to coronaviridae family, order Nidovirales, which is the first coronavirus discovered in the world as early as 1930s (1, 2). Nowadays, IBV has been currently widespread worldwide. After infected with IBV, in addition to causing respiratory diseases, it also has multiple tissue tropisms such as the kidney, gastrointestinal system, and reproductive system, causing pathological damage to multiple organs in chicken, which seriously endangered the poultry industry and caused huge economic losses (35). Since IBV is a kind of positive-strand RNA virus, its proof-reading activity in replication is not strict as other DNA viruses, which makes IBV prone to mutation (2, 68). It has also resulted that IBV has many genotypes and serotypes in poultry industry, which is difficult for conventional vaccination to achieve a good protective effect (9, 10).

The total length of the IBV genome RNA is about 27.6 Kb (1), which sequentially encodes 5′-UTR, replicase gene 1a, replicase gene 1b, spike, gene 3a/b, envelope, membrane, gene 5a/b, nuclecapsid, and 3′-UTR (8, 11) (shown as Figure 1). Among them, the replicase genes 1a and 1ab occupy two-thirds of the entire genome length, encoding the polyprotein pp1a and pp1ab, which are then cleaved into 15 non-structural proteins (nsp2 to nsp16) under the hydrolysis of papain-like protease and 3C-like protease (9, 12). The non-structural proteins can play important roles in viral replication and regulation of host immune responses, and they are also considered as the main causes of IBV pathogenicity (4). In addition, IBV also encodes two accessory genes, gene 3 and gene 5, which are missing in some IBV strains (2). Accessory proteins were originally thought to be unnecessary during virus replication, but recent studies have found that they may be closely related to the pathogenicity of IBV (4).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The infectious bronchitis virus genome structure from 5′ to 3′ UTR.

After been infected with IBV, the innate immune response will be activated in chicken. First of all, the pathogen pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) of host cells can recognize the viral components, and thereby they can rapidly activate the innate immune response to inhibit the invasion and replication of IBV through a variety of pathways (13). Next, through Toll-like receptors on the cell membrane and MDA5 receptors located in the cytoplasm, NF-kB/IRFs, and MAPK signal pathways can be activated to promote the expression of inflammatory cytokines and interferons downstream of these pathways (1417). However, with a long-term evolution and adaptation of the virus and the host, the virus has evolved a series of mechanisms to evade the host innate immunity, including blocking the host innate immune response or making it insufficient to inhibit the replication and pathological damage (17), and even causing immunosuppression of organs (5), which are conducive to the proliferation of viruses in host cells.

It is precisely because of its rich immune evasion function that IBV can limit the defense mechanisms of host cells, so as to achieve replication in host cells and even cause severe pathological damage. The immune evasion function of IBV is regulated by its non-structural proteins and accessory proteins (2). In view of the current difficulties for controlling IBV in the poultry industry through vaccines, it is necessary to understand the detail function of IBV proteins and the mechanisms involved in immune evasion, which can provide new targets to control IBV. In this review, from the perspective of IBV non-structural proteins, we reviewed the current knowledge of IBV non-structural proteins in recent years, and summarized the research frontiers of IBV immune evasion mechanism, which aimed to explore new horizons for the prevention and treatment of IBV.

Non-Structural Proteins

Nsp2: Antagonize the Activity of PKR

Compared with other coronaviruses encoding both nsp1 and nsp2, the non-structural protein encoded by IBV lacks nsp1 naturally, and therefore nsp2 becomes the first protein expressed in the IBV genome (18, 19). Initially, it is predicted that nsp2 is essential for IBV infection and may be involved in suppressing the host innate immune response (18). The alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF-2α) is a regulatory subunit of eIF-2, which can play a negative regulatory role on protein synthesis (20). Generally, after infected with viruses, the eIF2α kinase 2, also known as PKR, will be activated by viral dsRNA (21). The phosphorylated PKR will regulate the phosphorylation of eIF-2α, resulting in the stagnation of protein synthesis to let cells enter a defense state (22). A study found that after infected with IBV, the phosphorylation level of PKR and eIF-2α were significantly reduced, thereby maintaining the synthesis of proteins in the infected cells (23). Then, the structural and non-structural proteins of IBV were overexpressed, respectively, and it was found that nsp2 has weaker PKR antagonistic activity, which indicated that nsp2 may participate in the regulation of host immune response during IBV infection and promote the replication of IBV (23).

Nsp3: Block the Host Innate Immune Response

Nsp3 is located at nucleotide positions 2548–8865 in the open reading frame (ORF1) of the IBV genome (24), which is also the largest non-structural protein encoded in the IBV genome. Among them, the papain-like protease domain encoded in nsp3 (nucleotides 4243–5553) (25) has multiple functions. Firstly, it can act as a protease to cleave the polyprotein PP1a and release the mature viral non-structural proteins (nsp2, nsp3, and nsp4) (26, 27). In addition, more importantly, the papain-like protease has strong deubiquitinating and deISGylating (Interferon Stimulated Genes, ISG) activity (28), which can remove the long polyubiquitin chain linked by Lys-K48 and Lys-K63 (26, 29). Therefore, IBV papain-like protease can remove the ubiquitin modification of proteins in antiviral innate immune pathways, thereby blocking or delaying the host innate immune response in IBV-infected cells (26, 28). It is an important immune evasion mechanism of IBV, which plays an extremely critical role for the replication of IBV in host cells (26, 28, 30). There is a research (27) showed that IBV papain-like protease can inhibit the production of IFN-β in DF-1 cells infected with IBV. Next, it was found that in the innate immune signal pathways which induce IFN-β expression, the ubiquitin modification levels of MDA5, TBK1, and their linker molecules MAVS, IKKε, and IRF3 were also reduced (27). The ubiquitination of these proteins is essential for the activation of signaling pathways, and the deubiquitination induced by papain-like protease prevents these proteins from participating in signal transduction, thus blocking the antiviral signaling pathways (27). At present, it has proved that in the innate immune signaling pathways, including NF-κB, RIG-I, and IFN stimulating factors, the signal transduction relies on the modification of polyubiquitin chains on specific proteins (29) and IBV papain-like protease can widely block the activation of these pathways through its deubiquitinating activity. In addition, other studies on papain-like protease have shown that it can not only suppress the host immune response, but also regulate other aspects of host cell life, such as the cell cycle (31), which suggested that nsp3 papain-like protease may also has other regulatory effects on host cells to promote IBV replication. Phillips et al. reported a comparative study on the complete gene sequence of pathogenic and attenuated IBV strains of the same serotype, and found that 34.75–43.66% of amino acid differences occurred in nsp3, which was much higher than the spike protein (5.8–13.4%) that was considered to be the largest difference. This result indicated that nsp3 may play an important role in IBV replication and virulence (32).

Nsp4: Induce the Membrane Rearrangement

After infecting cells, viruses need to create the necessary environment and conditions for their own replication. Reorganization of cellular membranes is one of the important links. IBV has been shown to induce the synthesis of double membrane vesicles (DMVs), zipper endoplasmic reticulum (zER), and tethered vesicles (spherules) in infected cells (33, 34). It was found that IBV nsp4 can independently induce membrane rearrangement, provide a site for the assembly and synthesis of viral RNA, and protect it from the host antiviral immune recognition (33). However, it should be noted that although nsp4 can play a necessary role in the process of membrane rearrangement, it still needs to cooperate with viral or host factors to realize the whole process of IBV replication and assembly (34).

Nsp6: Promote the Formation but Limit the Expansion of Autophagosomes

A screening and verification experiment on IBV non-structural proteins found that IBV nsp6 can activate autophagy (35). However, autophagy has a dual effect on viral replication process. On the one hand, the activation of autophagy pathways in host cells can trigger the degradation of viral components, and this is actually an innate immune defense response of host cells, which will not be conducive for viral replication (36). On the other hand, autophagosomes can promote the assembly of viral replicase protease to promote infection (37, 38). For this contradictory relationship, another study (36) confirmed that IBV nsp6 can limit the expansion of autophagosomes and omegasomes, causing them to lose their function of delivering viral components to lysosomes for degradation. All in all, IBV nsp6 can promote the formation of autophagosomes in the endoplasmic reticulum, which is conducive to its own component assembly process. At the same time, it can also limit the expansion and control the size of autophagosomes to avoid the adverse effects of autophagy for viral replication.

Nsp7 and Nsp16: Block the Antigen Presentation

Generally, it is believed that the nsp7/nsp8 complex is used as a primer enzyme to bind with IBV nsp12 and play a vital auxiliary role in the synthesis of viral RNA (3941). Recently, there was a report showing that IBV nsp7 and nsp16 can inhibit the maturation and cytokine secretion of bone marrow dendritic-like cells, and then block its antigen presentation ability (42). It implied that in addition to antagonizing the innate immune process, the non-structural proteins of IBV may also participate in the regulation of specific immune responses in the late stage of infection.

Nsp13: Block the Cell Cycle

Nsp13 is also an important enzyme in the IBV replication process, which is usually called as helicase (41). Nsp13 is a multifunctional protein with a zinc-binding domain at the N-terminus and a helicase domain at the C-terminus (41). Fang et al. (43) found that in addition to the helicase domain, the zinc-binding domain also plays a vital role in the replication and transcription of coronaviruses. In addition to its role in the IBV replication process, IBV nsp13 can interact with the DNA polymerase of host cells (44), causing damage to the normal replication process of host cells and blocking the cell cycle at S phase or G2/M phase to promote the replication of IBV itself and the production of progeny viruses.

Nsp13, Nsp14, and Nsp16: Formation of Viral mRNA Cap Structure

The cap structure of viral mRNA plays an extremely important role in the viral replication process. In detail, the cap structure of mRNA can be used as a starting point to promote protein translation, protect mRNA from cellular 5′-3′ exonuclease degradation, and limit the innate immune system to recognizing viral mRNA (45, 46). In recent years, studies have proved that coronaviruses adopt the classic eukaryotic pathway to form its cap-like structure (41).

In addition to the functions described above, the nsp13 is also predicted to have RTPase activity, which can remove 5′-γ-phosphorylation sites on mRNA and participate in the first step of RNA cap structure formation (41).

As we know, coronavirus nsp14 contains 3′-5′ exoribonuclease (ExoN) and guanine-N7-methyltransferase (N7-MTase) domains (47). The former is predicted to provide proofreading activity, which is essential for viral RNA synthesis with high replication fidelity (48, 49). Additionally, SARS-CoV nsp14 was identified as a N7-MTase at first (50) and then it was found that the nsp14 N7-MTase domains of coronaviruses are highly conserved in genome motifs, including gamma-coronavirus IBV (47). So, it can be predicted that IBV nsp14 also has a N7-MTase activity, which can participate in the formation of viral mRNA cap structure and methylate guanine at the N7 site to produce the so-called “cap 0” structure (41).

Nsp16 has been confirmed to have 2′-O-methyltransferase activity which can participate in the final step for the formation of the mRNA cap structure, transforming the “cap 0” structure into the “cap 1” structure (41). It makes viral mRNA to exhibit the same structure as eukaryotic mRNA, thereby evading host immune recognition.

Nsp15: Inhibit the Formation of Cytoplasmic Stress Granules

Nsp15 of coronaviruses was identified as a highly conserved endonuclease with uridine acid specificity (51). When nsp15 was knocked out in IBV genome, a study found that the expression of IBV mRNA and proteins in the chicken embryo kidney cells were both reduced compared with the wild type strain, which indicated that the replication of IBV was severely impaired without nsp15 (52). In addition, it has been proved that IBV nsp15 can inhibit the formation of cytoplasmic stress granules (SGs) by preventing PKR activation (53). Cytoplasmic SGs are usually produced by stress-induced translational block, which are considered as the platforms required for innate immunity initiation and PKR activation (22). Recent studies have shown that SGs can participate in protein synthesis, shutdown, and recruitment of innate immune signal transmission intermediates to exert antiviral functions (52, 53). In summary, IBV nsp15 can inhibit the formation of SGs by antagonizing the PKR activation to achieve immune evasion.

Accessory Proteins

Among the open reading frame encoding structural proteins, some non-structural proteins are also encoded, called accessory proteins. These accessory proteins are also considered to be involved in regulating virus replication or immune evasion (2).

3a and 3b: Inhibit the Formation of Type I Interferon

3a, 3b and envelope proteins are the protein expression products of mRNA3 in the nested transcription mechanism of IBV (9, 54). Initially, it was found that 3a and 3b are located in the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (55) and cell cytoplasm (56), respectively. Subsequently, Shen et al. (57) and Hodgson et al. (58), respectively, proved that 3a and 3b are not necessary for IBV replication, indicating that 3a and 3b are not directly involved in the formation of IBV RNA or proteins. However, an in vivo study showed that the deletion of 3a protein in IBV impaired the ability for IBV replication on chicken embryos (59). Another study also found that the deletion of 3a and 3b led to the weakening of the pathogenicity of the QX type IBV strain on chicken embryos, while the effect of 3b protein was greater than that of 3a protein (60). The results of in vivo activity experiments alone are insufficient to confirm the specific roles of 3a and 3b in IBV infection. However, recently, there are in vitro studies have proved that accessory proteins 3a and 3b can antagonize the host innate immune response triggered by IBV, which provided a new idea for the functions of accessory proteins 3a and 3b. After IBV infection, 3a and 3b can antagonize the host innate immune response, and delay the activation of intracellular type I IFN and IFN stimulating factors (61). The deleted 3a IBV strain has a weakened resistance to type I IFN, indicating that 3a can indeed antagonize IFN activity (62).

5a and 5b: Shut Down the Host Protein Synthesis

Similarly, the accessory proteins 5a and 5b were also initially reported to prove that they are not directly involved in the replication process of IBV and not necessary for the replication process (63, 64). In an in vivo study, the 5b deficient IBV strain could not induce delayed activation of IFN compared with the wild type strain, which revealed that the 5b protein is involved in the process of IBV antagonizing interferon (65). Zhao et al. (66) compared the genome sequence of IBV virulent strain YN with attenuated strain aYN, and observed cumulative mutations in the 5a gene. Further research found the mortality, tissue damage and virus titers of the 5a deficient IBV strain were all reduced. The result confirmed that the 5a protein is closely related to the pathogenicity of IBV, and the lack of 5a protein is one of the reasons for the attenuated virulence of IBV strains (66). Compared with the wild type strain, the 5b deficient IBV strain can make the host cells produce a higher concentration of type I interferon in an in vitro cell environment (67). Kint et al. (67) further confirmed that 5b protein can antagonize the innate immune response, and the mechanism of this immune evasion function may be due to the 5b protein having the function of shutting down host protein synthesis, which is similar to the function of the nsp1 encoded by alpha and beta coronaviruses (6871). It suggested that the 5b protein of IBV may compensate for the effect of nsp1 protein deletion on IBV virulence.

Discussion and Perspective

When IBV infects cells, it needs to create essential conditions for its own replication in host cells, and at the same time it must evade the surveillance of host innate immune response. To achieve these two conditions, the non-structural proteins encoded by IBV play an indispensable key role in it. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge on immune evasion functions of IBV non-structural and accessory proteins (Figure 2). Such as the nsp3 through its deubiquitinating enzyme activity, which can extensively regulate the host innate immune pathways, and ultimately antagonize the production of type I interferon. The nsp6 can enhance autophagosomes formation to favor its self-assembly, while limiting the size of autophagosomes to compromise the ability of autophagosomes to deliver viral components to lysosomes for degradation. The nsp13, nsp14, and nsp16 are predicted to promote the formation of viral mRNA cap structure to avoid the recognition by host innate immune response. All in all, there is a large number of reports on the immune escape mechanism mediated by IBV non-structural proteins. However, there are still some unknown functions waiting for us to explore. In order to meet the current challenges in the prevention and treatment of IBV, understanding the immune evasion functions of non-structural proteins and their role in the pathogenic mechanism is of great significance for the prevention and treatment of IBV in the future.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The immune evasion functions of infectious bronchitis virus non-structural and accessory proteins. Yellow circles, IBV non-structural proteins; orange boxes, host proteins; green arrows, promote the processes; red arrows, inhibit the protein function or signal transduction.

Author Contributions

SP, YW, and YZh: conceptualization. SP: writing—original draft preparation. YW and YZh: writing—review and editing. XS and XZ: visualization. YZo and LL: supervision. ZY: project administration and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Program Sichuan Veterinary Medicine and Drug Innovation Group of China Agricultural Research System (SCCXTD-2020-18) and the Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province (2021NZZJ0021).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Cavanagh D. Coronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus. Vet Res. (2007) 38:281–297. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lin S-Y, Chen H-W. Infectious bronchitis virus variants: molecular analysis and pathogenicity investigation. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:2030. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cong F, Liu X, Han Z, Shao Y, Kong X, Liu S. Transcriptome analysis of chicken kidney tissues following coronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus infection. BMC Genomics. (2013) 14:743. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-743

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Armesto M, Cavanagh D, Britton P. The replicase gene of avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus is a determinant of pathogenicity. PLoS ONE. (2009) 4:e7384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Najimudeen SM, Hassan MSH, Cork SC, Abdul-Careem MF. Infectious bronchitis coronavirus infection in chickens: multiple system disease with immune suppression. Pathogens. (2020) 9:779. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9100779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. de Wit JJ, Cook JKA, van der Heijden HMJF. Infectious bronchitis virus variants: a review of the history, current situation and control measures. Avian Pathol. (2011) 40:223–35. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2011.566260

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Thor SW, Hilt DA, Kissinger JC, Paterson AH, Jackwood MW. Recombination in avian gamma-coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. Viruses. (2011) 3:1777–99. doi: 10.3390/v3091777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Jackwood MW, Hall D, Handel A. Molecular evolution and emergence of avian gammacoronaviruses. Infect Genet Evol. (2012) 12:1305–11. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mondal SP, Cardona CJ. Comparison of four regions in the replicase gene of heterologous infectious bronchitis virus strains. Virology. (2004) 324:238–48. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Jordan B. Vaccination against infectious bronchitis virus: a continuous challenge. Vet Microbiol. (2017) 206:137–43. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hong SM, An SH, Lee CY, Song CS, Choi KS, Kim JH, et al. Pathobiological and genomic characterization of a cold-adapted infectious bronchitis virus (BP-caKII). Viruses. (2018) 10: 652. doi: 10.3390/v10110652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ziebuhr J, Snijder EJ, Gorbalenya AE. Virus-encoded proteinases and proteolytic processing in the Nidovirales. J Gen Virol. (2000) 81:853–79. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-81-4-853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Zhang Y, Xu Z, Cao Y. Host antiviral responses against avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV): focus on innate immunity. Viruses. (2021) 13:1698. doi: 10.3390/v13091698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zhong Y, Tan YW, Liu DX. Recent progress in studies of arterivirus- and coronavirus-host interactions. Viruses. (2016) 4:980–1010. doi: 10.3390/v4060980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Liao Y, Wang X, Huang M, Tam JP, Liu DX. Regulation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and dual-specificity phosphatase 1 feedback loop modulates the induction of interleukin 6 and 8 in cells infected with coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. Virology. (2011) 420:106–16. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.09.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Chhabra R, Kuchipudi SV, Chantrey J, Ganapathy K. Pathogenicity and tissue tropism of infectious bronchitis virus is associated with elevated apoptosis and innate immune responses. Virology. (2016) 488:232–41. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kameka AM, Haddadi S, Kim DS, Cork SC, Abdul-Careem MF. Induction of innate immune response following infectious bronchitis corona virus infection in the respiratory tract of chickens. Virology. (2014) 450–1:114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Yang A, Wei L, Zhao W, Xu Y, Rao Z. Expression, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the N-terminal domain of nsp2 from avian infectious bronchitis virus. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. (2009) 65:788–90. doi: 10.1107/S1744309109024749

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yu K, Ming Z, Li Y, Chen C, Bao Z, Ren Z, et al. Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of nonstructural protein 2 (nsp2) from avian infectious bronchitis virus. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. (2012) 68:716–9. doi: 10.1107/S1744309112018623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jiang H-Y, Wek SA, McGrath BC, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ, Cavener DR, et al. Phosphorylation of the α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 is required for activation of NF-κB in response to diverse cellular stresses. Mol Cell Biol. (2003) 23:5651–63. doi: 10.1128/mcb.23.16.5651-5663.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Baird TD, Wek RC. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 phosphorylation and translational control in metabolism. Adv Nutr. (2012) 3:307–21. doi: 10.3945/an.112.002113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Cesaro T, Michiels T. Inhibition of PKR by viruses. Front Microbiol. (2021) 12:757238. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.757238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Wang X, Liao Y, Yap PL, Png KJ, Tam JP, Liu DX. Inhibition of protein kinase R activation and upregulation of GADD34 expression play a synergistic role in facilitating coronavirus replication by maintaining de novo protein synthesis in virus-infected cells. J Virol. (2009) 83:12462–72. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01546-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Lim KP, Ng LFP, Liu DX. Identification of a novel cleavage activity of the first papain-like proteinase domain encoded by open reading frame 1a of the coronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus and characterization of the cleavage products. J Virol. (2000) 74:1674–85. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.4.1674-1685.2000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Lim KP, Liu DX. Characterization of the two overlapping papain-like proteinase domains encoded in gene 1 of the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus and determination of the C-terminal cleavage site of an 87-kDa protein. Virology. (1998) 245:303–12. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yu L, Zhang X, Wu T, Wang Y, Meng J, Liu Q, et al. The papain-like protease of avian infectious bronchitis virus has deubiquitinating activity. Arch Virol. (2017) 162:1943–50. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3328-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ojha NK, Liu J, Yu T, Fang C, Zhou J, Liao M. Interplay of the ubiquitin proteasome system and the innate immune response is essential for the replication of infectious bronchitis virus. Arch Virol. (2021) 166:2173–85. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05073-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Mielech AM, Chen Y, Mesecar AD, Baker SC. Nidovirus papain-like proteases: multifunctional enzymes with protease, deubiquitinating and deISGylating activities. Virus Res. (2014) 194:184–90. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.01.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Kong L, Shaw N, Yan L, Lou Z, Rao Z. Structural view and substrate specificity of papain-like protease from avian infectious bronchitis virus. J Biol Chem. (2015) 290:7160–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.628636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Bailey-Elkin BA, Knaap RCM, Kikkert M, Mark BL. Structure and function of viral deubiquitinating enzymes. J Mol Biol. (2017) 429:3441–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Shaw N, Ouyang S, Liu ZJ. Binding of bacterial secondary messenger molecule c di-GMP is a STING operation. Protein Cell. (2013) 4:117–29. doi: 10.1007/s13238-012-2071-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Phillips JE, Jackwood MW, McKinley ET, Thor SW, Hilt DA, Acevedol ND, et al. Changes in nonstructural protein 3 are associated with attenuation in avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. Virus Genes. (2012) 44:63–74. doi: 10.1007/s11262-011-0668-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Doyle N, Neuman B, Simpson J, Hawes P, Mantell J, Verkade P, et al. Infectious bronchitis virus nonstructural protein 4 alone induces membrane pairing. Viruses. (2018) 10:477. doi: 10.3390/v10090477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. van Dinten LC, Rensen S, Gorbalenya AE, Snijder EJ. Proteolytic processing of the open reading frame 1b-encoded part of arterivirus replicase is mediated by nsp4 serine protease and is essential for virus replication. J Virol. (1999) 73:2027–7. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.3.2027-2037.1999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Maier HJ, Cottam EM, Stevenson-Leggett P, Wilkinson JA, Harte CJ, et al. Visualizing the autophagy pathway in avian cells and its application to studying infectious bronchitis virus. Autophagy. (2013) 9:496–509. doi: 10.4161/auto.23465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Cottam EM, Maier HJ, Manifava M, Vaux LC, Chandra-Schoenfelder P, Gerner W, et al. Coronavirus nsp6 proteins generate autophagosomes from the endoplasmic reticulum via an omegasome intermediate. Autophagy. (2011) 7:1335–47. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.11.16642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Miller K, McGrath ME, Hu Z, Ariannejad S, Weston S, Frieman M, et al. Coronavirus interactions with the cellular autophagy machinery. Autophagy. (2020) 16:2131–9. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1817280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Cottam EM, Whelband MC, Wileman T. Coronavirus NSP6 restricts autophagosome expansion. Autophagy. (2014) 10:1426–41. doi: 10.4161/auto.29309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tan YW, Fung TS, Shen H, Huang M, Liu DX. Coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus non-structural proteins 8 and 12 form stable complex independent of the non-translated regions of viral RNA and other viral proteins. Virology. (2018) 513:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Subissi L, Posthuma CC, Collet A, Zevenhoven-Dobbe JC, Gorbalenya AE, Decroly E, et al. One severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus protein complex integrates processive RNA polymerase and exonuclease activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2014) 111:E3900–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323705111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Subissi L, Imbert I, Ferron F, Collet A, Coutard B, Decroly E, et al. SARS-CoV ORF1b-encoded nonstructural proteins 12-16: replicative enzymes as antiviral targets. Antiviral Res. (2014) 101:122–30. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.11.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Zuo J, Cao Y, Wang Z, Shah AU, Wang W, Dai C, et al. The mechanism of antigen-presentation of avian bone marrowed dendritic cells suppressed by infectious bronchitis virus. Genomics. (2021) 113:1719–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.04.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Fang S, Chen B, Tay FPL, Ng BS, Liu DX. An arginine-to-proline mutation in a domain with undefined functions within the helicase protein (Nsp13) is lethal to the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus in cultured cells. Virology. (2007) 358:136–47. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.08.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Xu LH, Huang M, Fang SG, Liu DX. Coronavirus infection induces DNA replication stress partly through interaction of its nonstructural protein 13 with the p125 subunit of DNA polymerase δ. J Biol Chem. (2011) 286:39546–59. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.242206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Fechter P, Brownlee GG. Recognition of mRNA cap structures by viral and cellular proteins. J Gen Virol. (2005) 86:1239–49. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80755-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Fabrega C, Hausmann S, Shen V, Shuman S, Lima CD. Structure and mechanism of mRNA Cap (Guanine-N7) methyltransferase. Mol Cell. (2004) 13:77–89. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00522-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ogando NS, Zevenhoven-dobbe JC, Van Der Meer Y, Bredenbeek PJ, Posthuma CC, Snijder EJ. The enzymatic activity of the nsp14 exoribonuclease is critical for replication of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. J Virol. (2020) 94:1–24. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01246-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Hsu JCC, Laurent-Rolle M, Pawlak JB, Wilen CB, Cresswell P. Translational shutdown and evasion of the innate immune response by SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2021) 118:e2101161118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101161118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Xu L, Khadijah S, Fang S, Wang L, Tay FPL, Liu DX. The cellular RNA helicase DDX1 interacts with coronavirus nonstructural protein 14 and enhances viral replication. J Virol. (2010) 84:8571–83. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00392-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Sun Y, Wang Z, Tao J, Wang Y, Wu A, Yang Z, et al. Yeast-based assays for the high-throughput screening of inhibitors of coronavirus RNA cap guanine-N7-methyltransferase. Antiviral Res. (2014) 104:156–64. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Cao J, Wu CC, Lin TL. Turkey coronavirus non-structure protein nsp15 - an endoribonuclease. Intervirology. (2009) 51:342–51. doi: 10.1159/000175837

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Zhao J, Sun L, Zhao Y, Feng D, Cheng J, Zhang G. Coronavirus endoribonuclease ensures efficient viral replication and prevents protein kinase R activation. J Virol. (2021) 95:e02103-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02103-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Gao B, Gong X, Fang S, Weng W, Wang H, Chu H, et al. Inhibition of anti-viral stress granule formation by coronavirus endoribonuclease nsp15 ensures efficient virus replication. PLoS Pathog. (2021) 17:e1008690. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Liu DX, Inglis SC. Internal entry of ribosomes on a tricistronic mRNA encoded by infectious bronchitis virus. J Virol. (1992) 66:6143–54. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.10.6143-6154.1992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Pendleton AR, Machamer CE. Infectious bronchitis virus 3a protein localizes to a novel domain of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum. J Virol. (2005) 79:6142–51. doi: 10.1128/jvi.79.10.6142-6151.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Pendleton AR, Machamer CE. Differential localization and turnover of infectious bronchitis virus 3b protein in mammalian versus avian cells. Virology. (2006) 345:337–45. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Shen S, Wen ZL, Liu DX. Emergence of a coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus mutant with a truncated 3b gene: functional characterization of the 3b protein in pathogenesis and replication. Virology. (2003) 311:16–27. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00117-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Hodgson T, Britton P, Cavanagh D. Neither the RNA nor the proteins of open reading frames 3a and 3b of the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus are essential for replication. J Virol. (2006) 80:296–305. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.1.296-305.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Liu S, Zhang Q, Chen J, Han Z, Shao Y, Kong X, et al. Identification of the avian infectious bronchitis coronaviruses with mutations in gene 3. Gene. (2008) 412:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Zhao X, Jiang Y, Cheng X, Yu Y, Gao M, Zhou S. Pathogenicity of a QX-like strain of infectious bronchitis virus and effects of accessory proteins 3a and 3b in chickens. Vet Microbiol. (2019) 239:108464. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Kint J, Fernandez-Gutierrez M, Maier HJ, Britton P, Langereis MA, Koumans J, et al. Activation of the chicken type I interferon response by infectious bronchitis coronavirus. J Virol. (2015) 89:1156–67. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02671-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Kint J, Dickhout A, Kutter J, Maier HJ, Britton P, Koumans J, et al. Infectious bronchitis coronavirus inhibits STAT1 signaling and requires accessory proteins for resistance to type I interferon activity. J Virol. (2015) 89:12047–57. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01057-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Casais R, Davies M, Cavanagh D, Britton P. Gene 5 of the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus is not essential for replication. J Virol. (2005) 79:8065–78. doi: 10.1128/jvi.79.13.8065-8078.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Youn S, Leibowitz JL, Collisson EW. In vitro assembled, recombinant infectious bronchitis viruses demonstrate that the 5a open reading frame is not essential for replication. Virology. (2005) 332:206–15. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.10.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Laconi A, van Beurden SJ, Berends AJ, Krämer-Kühl A, Jansen CA, Spekreijse D, et al. Deletion of accessory genes 3a, 3b, 5a or 5b from avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus induces an attenuated phenotype both in vitro and in vivo. J Gen Virol. (2018) 99:1381–90. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Zhao Y, Cheng J, Yan S, Jia W, Zhang K, Zhang G. S gene and 5a accessory gene are responsible for the attenuation of virulent infectious bronchitis coronavirus. Virology. (2019) 533:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.04.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Kint J, Langereis MA, Maier HJ, Britton P, van Kuppeveld FJ, Koumans J, et al. Infectious bronchitis coronavirus limits interferon production by inducing a host shutoff that requires accessory protein 5b. J Virol. (2016) 90:7519–28. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00627-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Kamitani W, Huang C, Narayanan K, Lokugamage KG, Makino S. A two-pronged strategy to suppress host protein synthesis by SARS coronavirus Nsp1 protein. Nat Struct Mol Biol. (2009) 16:1134–40. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Nakagawa K, Makino S. Mechanisms of coronavirus nsp1-mediated control of host and viral gene expression. Cells. (2021) 10:300. doi: 10.3390/cells10020300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Kamitani W, Narayanan K, Huang C, Lokugamage K, Ikegami T, Ito N, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp1 protein suppresses host gene expression by promoting host mRNA degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2006) 103:12885–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603144103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Yuan S, Balaji S, Lomakin IB, Xiong Y. Coronavirus Nsp1: immune response suppression and protein expression inhibition. Front Microbiol. (2021) 12:752214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.752214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: infectious bronchitis virus, non-structural proteins, accessory proteins, innate immune response, immune evasion

Citation: Peng S, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Song X, Zou Y, Li L, Zhao X and Yin Z (2022) Current Knowledge on Infectious Bronchitis Virus Non-structural Proteins: The Bearer for Achieving Immune Evasion Function. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:820625. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.820625

Received: 23 November 2021; Accepted: 24 February 2022;
Published: 08 April 2022.

Edited by:

Houhui Song, Zhejiang Agriculture & Forestry University, China

Reviewed by:

Christina Leyson, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States
Cao Yong Chang, Sun Yat-sen University, China

Copyright © 2022 Peng, Wang, Zhang, Song, Zou, Li, Zhao and Yin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhongqiong Yin, eWluemhvbmdxJiN4MDAwNDA7MTYzLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.