Dasiel Obregon
Alejandra Wu-Chuang
Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz- 1School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
- 2ANSES, INRAE, UMR BIPAR, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France
Editorial on the Research Topic
Insights into the relationships between host and vector microbiota, host health and response to disease
Microbes are often nested in large populations and have the capacity for rapid and continuous evolutionary change, which allows them to quickly adapt to diverse environments. They have evolved to live in mutualism with numerous animal species from arthropods (1) to mammals (2). Recent research has expanded our understanding of how bacterial communities within animals, regarded as microbiota, facilitate host protection (2) or disease (3). When invading a host, pathogens interact with other microbial species and modulate the microbiota (2, 3). Abiotic and biotic environmental factors (including the microbiota) influence disease dynamics (4), yet the importance of the host-microbiota-pathogen interactions has been poorly characterized in clinical settings.
Microbiota modulation in clinical disease, persistent pathogen infection, and postpartum udder skin
In this Research Topic, Gomez et al. showed that diarrhea, a leading cause of morbidity, and mortality in calves; alter the bacterial communities of the gastrointestinal tract. The main relevance of the study lies in the elucidation of microbiota changes associated with anion gap acidosis (due to increased concentrations of anions including D- and L-lactate), a metabolic disorder frequently associated with acidosis caused by diarrhea. In particular, the authors found a shift from obligate anaerobes to facultative anaerobes in diarrheic calves. Facultative anaerobes such as bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae induce inflammatory response in animal models (5). Gastrointestinal inflammation increases the release of oxygen-rich haemoglobin within the gut lumen, which in turn favours colonization of facultative anaerobes (6). This positive feedback loop may contribute to the proliferation of lactate-producing bacteria including Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Veillonella, Ligilactobacillus and Olsenella also enriched in diarrheic calves (4). By pointing at specific microbiota alterations potentially underlying the systemic acidosis and inflammation observed in diarrheic calves, the study by Gomez et al. opens the possibility of controlling clinical disease by preventing bacterial dysbiosis.
On the other hand, the longitudinal study presented by Bibbal et al. assessed the persistence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 in 13 cattle farms; specifically, in one of the farms, they compared fecal microbiota between shedders (S) and non-shedders (NS) young bulls. The study found no significant differences in diversity and composition of the fecal microbiota between S and NS, but interestingly identified six amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), mostly belonging to Firmicutes phylum, which were indicators of shedders status, whereas another four ASVs were indicators of the NS group, which were affiliated Pirellulaceae-1088-a5 gut group, Anaerovibrio, Victivallis, and Sellimonas genera. These results reveal the gut microbiota bioprospection as a promising research field for the discovery of next-generation direct-fed microbials (DFMs), which should help prevent the colonization of E. coli O157:H7, but also have beneficial immunomodulatory effects and contribute to animal nutrition (7).
The importance of host microbiota on the health-disease process was also reinforced by the study by Zhang et al., who analyze the udder skin microbiota of yak and cattle during the perinatal period. These authors showed that the microbial richness of bovine udder skin during 1–2 weeks postpartum was significantly lower than those in the 1–2 weeks prenatal and 1-month postpartum period; particularly the effects of the perinatal period on the udder skin microbial community were more significant in cattle compared to yak. Despite preliminary, this publication adds new pieces of evidence of the disturbing effects of peripartum on udder skin microbiota, which should be tested in association with the presence of pathogens causative of mastitis. The understanding of the association between udder skin microbiota disturbance and the susceptibility to mastitis can help in the prevention of this important disease, for instance, several studies have reported that udder commensal microbiota can modulate the susceptibility to intramammary infection by mastitis pathogens (8, 9).
The tempo of bacterial microbiota in arthropod vectors
Animal and human pathogens that are transmitted by arthropods are a global concern, particularly those vectored by ticks (e.g., Borrelia burgdorferi and tick-borne encephalitis virus). Several factors shape the composition of the bacterial microbiota in ticks and they include abiotic (e.g., temperature) and biotic factors (e.g., tick species, host blood-meal, and tick-developmental stages) (1). With few exceptions (10, 11), studies of tick microbiota focus on bacterial community composition in single-time points, which limits the understanding of potential fluctuations across time. In their study, Perveen et al. followed the microbiota dynamics in the tick Hyalomma dromedarii for a year. Temporal fluctuations of microbial community composition and variability in the abundance of different bacterial groups were revealed. Interestingly, some bacteria genera such as Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Francisella, and Corynebacterium were present in all months, while Brachybacterium was replaced by Acinetobacter in the winter months. The results suggest that microbial populations within ticks may be more dynamic than previously thought. However, the persistence of some genera across time suggests transovarial transmission of the microbiota or conserved and persistent patterns of microbe acquisition. Considering that microbiota influence arthropod fitness and vector competence (1), ubiquitous bacteria in the H. dromedarii microbiota could be considered for their inclusion in anti-microbiota vaccines (12) to block the transmission of pathogens such as Theileria spp., Rickettsia spp., Francisella spp., and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus transmitted by this tick species to animals and humans.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
UMR BIPAR was supported by the French Government's Investissement d'Avenir program, Laboratoire d'Excellence Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases (Grant No. ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID). AW-C was supported by Programa Nacional de Becas de Postgrado en el Exterior Don Carlos Antonio López (Grant No. 205/2018).
Acknowledgments
We would like to show our appreciation to all authors who contributed to the Research Topic and have opened more doors in the study of host–pathogen–microbiota interactions by providing major insights into these complex relationships.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Wu-Chuang A, HodŽić A, Mateos-Hernández L, Estrada-Peña A, Obregon D, Cabezas-Cruz A. Current debates and advances in tick microbiome research. Curr Res Parasitol Vector-Borne Dis. (2021) 1:100036. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2021.100036
2. Chiu L, Bazin T, Truchetet M-E, Schaeverbeke T, Delhaes L, Pradeu T. Protective microbiota: from localized to long-reaching co-immunity. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1678. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01678
3. Stevens EJ, Bates KA, King KC. Host microbiota can facilitate pathogen infection. PLoS Pathog. (2021) 17:e1009514. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009514
4. Bernardo-Cravo AP, Schmeller DS, Chatzinotas A, Vredenburg VT, Loyau A. Environmental factors and host microbiomes shape host–pathogen dynamics. Trends Parasitol. (2020) 36:616–33. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2020.04.010
5. Sorbara MT, Pamer EG. Interbacterial mechanisms of colonization resistance and the strategies pathogens use to overcome them. Mucosal Immunol. (2019) 12:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0053-0
6. Rigottier-Gois L. Dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel diseases: the oxygen hypothesis. ISME J. (2013) 7:1256–61. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.80
7. Sapountzis P, Segura A, Desvaux M, Forano E. An overview of the elusive passenger in the gastrointestinal tract of cattle: the shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli. Microorganisms. (2020) 8:877. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060877
8. Derakhshani H, Plaizier JC, De Buck J, Barkema HW, Khafipour E. Composition and co-occurrence patterns of the microbiota of different niches of the bovine mammary gland: potential associations with mastitis susceptibility, udder inflammation, and teat-end hyperkeratosis. Anim Microbiome. (2020) 2:11. doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00028-6
9. Andrews T, Neher DA, Weicht TR, Barlow JW. Mammary microbiome of lactating organic dairy cows varies by time, tissue site, and infection status. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:e0225001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225001
10. Lejal E, Chiquet J, Aubert J, Robin S, Estrada-Peña A, Rue O, et al. Temporal patterns in Ixodes ricinus microbial communities: an insight into tick-borne microbe interactions. Microbiome. (2021) 9:153. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01051-8
11. Estrada-Peña A, Cabezas-Cruz A, Obregón D. Resistance of tick gut microbiome to anti-tick vaccines, pathogen infection and antimicrobial peptides. Pathogens. (2020) 9:309. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9040309
Keywords: microbiota, ticks, infectious diseases, persistent pathogen infection, Escherichia coli
Citation: Obregon D, Wu-Chuang A and Cabezas-Cruz A (2022) Editorial: Insights into the relationships between host and vector microbiota, host health and response to disease. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:1002247. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1002247
Received: 24 July 2022; Accepted: 01 August 2022;
Published: 16 August 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Michael Kogut, United States Department of Agriculture, United States
Copyright © 2022 Obregon, Wu-Chuang and Cabezas-Cruz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dasiel Obregon, ZGFzaWVsb2EmI3gwMDA0MDt1b2d1ZWxwaC5jYQ==; Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz, YWxlamFuZHJvLmNhYmV6YXMmI3gwMDA0MDt2ZXQtYWxmb3J0LmZy