Laura Clara Grandi
Hiroaki Ishida- 1Unit of Physiology, Department of Neuroscience, Parma University, Parma, Italy
- 2Frontal Lobe Function Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan
- 3Brain Center for Social and Motor Cognition (BCSMC), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Parma, Italy
Grooming is a widespread, essential, and complex behavior with social and affiliative valence in the non-human primate world. Its impact at the autonomous nervous system level has been studied during allogrooming among monkeys living in a semi-naturalistic environment. For the first time, we investigated the effect of human grooming to monkey in a typical experimental situation inside laboratory. We analyzed the autonomic response of male monkeys groomed by a familiar human (experimenter), in terms of the heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) at different body parts. We considered the HRV in both the time (SDNN, RMSSD, and RMSSD/SDNN) and the frequency domain (HF, LF, and LF/HF). For this purpose, we recorded the electrocardiogram of two male rhesus monkeys seated in a primate chair while the experimenter groomed their mouth, chest, or arm. We demonstrated that (1) the grooming carried out by a familiar human determined a decrement of the HR and an increment of the HRV; (2) there was a difference in relation to the groomed body part. In particular, during grooming the mouth the HRV was higher than during grooming the arm and the chest. Taken together, the results represent the first evidence that grooming carried out by a familiar human on experimental monkeys has the comparable positive physiological effect of allogrooming between conspecifics. Moreover, since the results underlined the positive modulation of both HR and HRV, the present study could be a starting point to improve the well-being of non-human primates in experimental condition by means of grooming by a familiar person.
Introduction
Social grooming is a widespread behavior among mammals, birds, and arthropods. Self-grooming is directed toward the individual’s own body, while allogrooming is carried out on others’ body parts, inaccessible or invisible to self-grooming. Although the primary biological function of allogrooming is to take care of the body surface of others, many studies demonstrated its social function in many animals (1–8) and especially in non-human primates [see Ref. (9) for a review].
The grooming among non-human primates is characterized by bimanual actions with rhythmic sweeps and plucking movements of the fingernails in precision grip, while being directed at addressing skin debris, spots, blemishes, ectoparasites, or vegetation trapped in the fur (10). Allogrooming is primary carried out to clean others’ body parts, inaccessible or invisible to self-grooming (11), and for the control of lice infection (12). Nevertheless, all non-human primates devote a significant amount of time grooming other individuals, suggesting that there is a reason behind this phenomenon, besides merely the hygiene function (13–27). It has been hypothesized that the allogrooming is the most common affiliative relationship and social strategy to create and maintain relationships and reliable alliances in order to respond collectively to whatever environmental, physical, social, or predatory challenges they may face (18, 22–24). Moreover, it was reported that allogrooming enhance relaxation and feelings of security (18), while simultaneously reducing anxiety levels (14, 25). These effects were supported by the investigation of physiological parameters, such as heart rate (HR) and cortisol levels. In particular, a decrement of the HR when receiving grooming (26, 27), and a reduction of the cortisol levels during both passive grooming (28) and active grooming (29) was demonstrated.
In addition to the numerous studies related to allogrooming, also the behavioral and physiological impact of grooming conducted by humans on monkeys or other animals has been explored. For example, the effect of human contact in horses (30), cats (31), dogs (32–35), and in farm animals such as dairy cows (36), cattle, and lambs (37–39) was investigated. These studies underlined that human grooming determined a positive effect in terms of autonomic responses (30, 33, 34, 39) but also in terms of behavior of the animals, for example, the interaction and the approach to humans (31, 33, 35, 37, 38).
Concerning non-human primates, Taira and Rolls (40) demonstrated that receiving grooming from humans is a positive reinforcement in operant conditioning for rhesus monkeys. However, there is no evidence regarding the psychophysiological consequences of human grooming on monkeys at the autonomous system level. Moreover, there is currently no evidence regarding the modulation of the heart rate variability (HRV) during either allogrooming or grooming by humans. Many human studies suggested that the HRV is an important indicator for the non-invasive assessment of autonomous nervous system activity in healthy people (41–44), in patients with mental diseases (45, 46), cardiac dysfunction (47, 48), and stress (49). It was also demonstrated that HRV analysis provides a useful index for emotional states (50–54). Analyzing HRV is also important in the veterinary field, as recently reviewed by von Borell (55), to assess the autonomous changes associated with pathological situation (56–59), during stress and anxiety (60–62), training situations (63, 64), and to detect emotional states (65–67). In fact, pathological and psychological states may have an impact on the sympathovagal balance, detectable through HRV analysis and in the absence of any palpable changes in the mean of HR and/or respiration rates (41). Concerning non-human primates, HRV has only been used in pharmacological studies (44, 68), or to evaluate autonomic activations during task learning (69).
The aim of the present study was to investigate the physiological effect of human grooming to experimental non-human primates. We investigated the modulation of the HR and HRV of two experimental male rhesus monkeys receiving grooming by a familiar human (the experimenter) in relation to three different body parts (the chest, the mouth, and the arm).
Materials and Methods
Subjects
The subjects of the present study were two experimental male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) aged 4 and 5 years, and weighing 4 and 4.7 kg, respectively. All experimental protocols were approved by the Veterinarian Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Parma, and complied with European law on the humane care and use of laboratory animals.
The monkeys were kept in individual primate cages consisting of full metallic grid (Tecniplast S.p.A, Buguggiate, Italy). Each cage was of 180 cm height, 90 cm width, and 120 cm depth. In the middle of the height of each cage, it was possible to insert one or two panels for the monkey to sit on. The litter was located immediately below the cage. In the bottom part of the cage, two containers were located, one for water and one for food, which were filled by the experimenter. The monkeys were provided with food and water once a day, usually in the morning. Inside the cage, each monkey had access to toys, mirrors, and swings. Moreover monkeys had visual, auditory, and olfactory contact to each other and were able to touch and groom with the neighboring monkeys. All cages were in an air-conditioned room maintained at a consistent temperature of 25–26°C. The well-being and health conditions of the monkeys were constantly monitored by the institutional veterinary doctor of the University of Parma (Italy).
Recording Procedures
The two monkeys that we used for the experiment were also used for our another previous study. Once the previous study was finished, we performed the present one, from January 2014 to May 2014. The experimenters and the laboratory were the same. Before the start of the first experiment, the monkeys were habituated to sit in the primate chair in the laboratory, to interact with the experimenters, and to perform a fixation task. The criteria to determine whether the monkeys learned the procedure were: (1) when the monkeys learned to sit in the primate chair, i.e., they sat without struggle; (2) when the monkeys learned the task, i.e., they performed it almost without error (error rate: about 10–20%). We used juice as reward after correctly performed each trial.
At the end of the familiarization process and the training, a head fixation system was implanted. The surgery was performed under general anesthesia (ketamine hydrochloride, 5 mg/kg i.m., and medetomidine hydrochloride 0.1 mg/kg i.m.), followed by post-surgical pain medication (70). The fixation task and the head fixation device were necessary for the first experiment.
Thereafter, we performed electrocardiogram recordings (ECG). Since our purpose was to investigate the effect of grooming during experimental situation, we repeated all conditions of the previous experimental situation (head fixed and fixation task). In order to perform ECG, we used surface electrodes (Medtronic®) attached on the back of the monkey, the signal was acquired at 1000 Hz sample rate, amplified by means of CED 1902 (Cambridge Electronic Design®) and stored by Spike2 program (Cambridge Electronic Design®) (Figure 1C) (71).
Figure 1. (A) One trial of the Fixation task condition (Ft). (B) One trial of the grooming arm (GA), grooming chest (GC), and grooming mouth (GM) conditions. In Ft, GA, GC, and GM, the monkeys had to perform each of the represented trials for six consecutive minutes. Each trial consisted of: fixation of LED for 1 to 2 s, wait 800 ms, get reward, wait 1 s. Thereafter that next trial started. In GA, GC, and GM, during execution of each trial, the experimenter groomed monkeys for six consecutive minutes. (C) We attached the ECG surface electrodes (Medtronic®) on the back of the monkey. The signal was acquired at 1000 Hz sample rate, amplified by means of CED 1902 (Cambridge Electronic Design®) and stored by Spike2 program (Cambridge Electronic Design®).
Each recording was conducted in the laboratory, in the morning before feeding the monkeys, in four different conditions, and each for six consecutive minutes: fixation task (Ft), grooming arm (GA), grooming chest (GC), and grooming mouth (GM) conditions. A 1-min rest period was inserted between each condition in order to minimize any potentially overlapping effects. For each day of recording, Ft was always taken as the first condition. The three grooming conditions were not recorded in the same order each day, but rather the order was changed day by day. The Ft condition consisted of: fixation of a green light (LED) in front of monkey for 1–2 s; wait 800 ms, and receive a juice reward; waiting 1 s without any request; start the next trial. The monkey had to perform consecutively the task for 6 min (Figure 1A). During each of the three grooming conditions, the monkey had to perform the same task of Ft, meanwhile the experimenter groomed his arm or chest or mouth for six consecutive minutes (Figure 1B). Throughout the six recorded minutes, the experimenter groomed the monkey without stopping, during fixation, waiting of reward and waiting of next trial. Moreover, the identical skin point was not selected for each tested body part, but rather the entire body part was covered. The same experimenter groomed both monkeys, thus avoiding the presence of possible differences related to the experimenter’s grooming.
During each condition, the monkey received 80–130 juice rewards. All tasks were performed in a dark room, with the monkey sitting in the primate chair with the head fixed and with an eye tracking camera (ISCAN Camera, ETL-200) monitoring that the monkey fixated the green LED when requested. Due to the experimental conditions, the monkey was unable to see the experimenter or the movements, but was solely able to feel the grooming stimulation. In this manner, we avoided any visual influence. Since the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of grooming in the experimental situation, we did not analyze the performance of monkey but if the monkey ceased performing the Ft, the experiment was stopped and recommenced after a pause. The monkey remained inside the laboratory not more than 4 h a day.
Each day we recorded 1 Ft and 1 or more sets of the three grooming conditions. With one monkey, we performed experiment for 15 days, acquiring 15 Ft, 15 GA, 15 GC, and 15 GM. With the other monkey, we performed experiment for 4 days, acquiring a total of 4 Ft, 12 GA, 12 GC, and 12 GM. In sum, we collected 19 Ft (15 + 4), 27 GA (15 + 12), 27 GC (15 + 12), and 27 GM (15 + 12). The number of days in which recordings were carried out differs between the two monkeys since the decision to perform experiment was dependent on the behavior of the subject, whereby if the monkeys did not perform the tasks, we stopped experiment to avoid any stressful consequences.
Moreover, it is necessary to underline that the subjects of the present study were those already involved in a previous experiment (N = 2), since we investigated the effect of human grooming on monkeys carried out by the same familiar person under the previous experimental condition. The two monkeys were both male and almost the same age, while both experienced identical experimental and dietary conditions, and the experimenter applying the grooming was the same person, familiar to both of them. For these reasons, the sample is indeed highly uniform. Accordingly, the age, sex, and other variables such as diet and/or experimental and training conditions that could interfere with the results for each subject are not considered as factors in this study.
Data Collection
After acquisition of ECG, the RR interval values (milliseconds) were extracted with a custom script and exported as a text file to the Kubios HRV software (version 2.1; Biosignal Analysis and Medical Imaging Group, Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kupio, Finland) to obtain the HR (1/min) and HRV parameters. We analyzed the central 5 min of the six recording minutes, from 30 s after the start of condition to 30 s before the end. For the frequency domain analysis of the HRV, the power spectrum (of each 5-min recording) was obtained with a fast Fourier transform-based method (FFT; Welch’s periodogram: 256 points windows with 50% overlap). We considered the power of the low frequency (LF; 0.01–0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (HF; 0.15–0.5 Hz) bands, both expressed in absolute values (square milliseconds). The intervals of the power of the LF and HF bands were in accordance with the literature (44, 68, 69). Nevertheless, it is necessary to highlight the absence of any strong agreement in the literature regarding the interval values in macaque monkeys of the LF and HF band power, except for the 0.15 Hz upper limit of the LF band power (42, 43, 51). The power of HF band is due to the activity of the parasympathetic nervous system, therefore, to the vagal tone activation (72). The power of LF band is a non-specific index of both the sympathetic activity and parasympathetic activity (73). The LF/HF ratio was proposed as a biomarker of the sympathetic and parasympathetic balance (74).
In the time domain of the HRV, we evaluated the SD of RR intervals (SDNN, milliseconds) and the square root of the mean of the squares of the successive differences between adjacent RRs (RMSSD, milliseconds) and the ratio RMSSD/SDNN. RMSSD estimates high-frequency variations in HR, and therefore the activity of parasympathetic nervous system, while SDNN is a non-specific index of both the sympathetic activity and parasympathetic activity (74, 75). The ratio RMSSD/SDNN was proposed as parameter for vagal-sympathetic balance, as LF/HF (76, 77). The numerical results are shown as mean ± SD in the Section “Results.”
Results
Figure 2 shows the graphs of HR and time domain and frequency domain parameters analyzed, RMSSD, SDNN, RMSSD/SDNN, and HF, LF, and LF/HF, respectively. The HR (1/min) was higher during Ft (139.08 ± 2.8) in comparison to GA (125.67 ± 2.89), GC (122.54 ± 2.85), and GM (122.97 ± 2.98). In the time domain HRV, the SDNN (millisecond) was higher during GA (44.61 ± 5.6), GC (52.88 ± 5.88), and GM (59.88 ± 6.4) than during Ft (38.16 ± 5.7); the RMSSD (millisecond) was higher during GA (46.08 ± 7.14), GC (55.09 ± 7.3), and GM (65.39 ± 7.87) than during Ft (41.87 ± 7.2). In the frequency domain HRV, the LF (square milliseconds) was higher during GA (456.29 ± 94.46), GC (538.69 ± 74.2), and GM (756.79 ± 150.93) than during Ft (294.67 ± 108.83); the HF (square milliseconds) was higher during GA (1518.20 ± 391.73), GC (1683.49 ± 351.49), and GM (2243.01 ± 464.60) than during Ft (612.3 ± 219.76). The RMSSD/SDNN (Ft = 1.03 ± 0.06; GA = 0.91 ± 0.06; GC = 0.95 ± 0.05; GM = 1.01 ± 0.04) and LF/HF (Ft = 0.88 ± 0.17; GA = 0.79 ± 0.12; GC = 0.79 ± 0.15; GM = 0.75 ± 0.12) ratio seems to be not differently modulated among the four conditions. Finally, among the three grooming conditions, the HRV is higher during GM than during GC and GA.
Figure 2. The box plots represent the heart rate (HR) and the analyzed heart rate variability (HRV) parameters in the time domain (SDNN, RMSSD, RMSSD/SDNN) and in the frequency domain (LF, HF, LF/HF), for fixation task (Ft), grooming arm (GA), grooming chest (GC), and grooming mouth (GM). The horizontal line within box of 25th and 75th percentiles represents the median. The whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles, circles indicate the outliers.
Discussion
In the present study, we evaluated for the first time the HR and HRV of active grooming carried out by a familiar human (experimenter) on experimental rhesus monkeys in three different body parts (the arm, the chest, and the mouth). Since the here presented preliminary data were obtained from only two subjects, we did not apply statistical analysis. Nevertheless, we controlled the age, sex, and food diet between subjects. Thus, we will focus the discussion on physiological aspects of grooming done by human to experimental monkeys. The familiarization and a good interaction between the experimenter and each monkey were necessary in order to establish a presumably positive relationship between them. In fact, if monkeys did not want to be groomed by experimenter, they rejected experimenter both in the laboratory and in the cage. When it was established a good interaction with experimenter, the monkeys wanted to be groomed by the experimenter, but not by strangers.
The comparison between each grooming condition and the baseline revealed that the HR decreased during grooming of the arm, chest, and mouth. The results are in line with existing studies related to allogrooming, that is, grooming among free-ranging monkeys in a naturalistic environment and situation (5, 14, 19, 27). Therefore, the grooming of experimental monkeys by a familiar human in a typical experimental situation (performing the Ft with the head fixed), might have a comparable physiological effect as allogrooming, in term of decrement of the HR. Concerning the HRV, GA, GC, and GM determined an increment of SDNN, RMSSD, HF, and LF in comparison to the baseline. Both RMSSD/SDNN and LF/HF ratio were not modulated among conditions. Considered collectively, the results highlight that human grooming resulted in the decrement of the HR and the increment of the HRV of the two studied male monkeys when they were groomed by the experimenter, a person familiar to them. Moreover, the GM led to the lowest HR and the highest HRV values among the three grooming conditions.
SDNN, RMSSD, HF, and LF are positively correlated to the parasympathetic branch of the autonomous nervous system (74, 75), while SDNN and LF also correlated positively to the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system (55, 73). The grooming, especially on the mouth, modulated the time and the frequency domain of HRV toward both the parasympathetic system and sympathetic system, with more intensity than the baseline. Importantly the results underscored an increment of HRV (SDNN, RMSSD, HF, and LF) without any relevant change in both LF/HF and RMSSD/SDNN ratio. Both ratios are used as an indicator of the balance between sympathetic activity and parasympathetic activity (55, 74). The modulation of the parasympathetic system (increment of RMSSD and HF) could be determined by the positive valence of the GM while the modulation of SDNN and LF could be determined by the arousal dimension of the condition (77). In fact monkeys had to perform Ft during grooming and the performance of task required attention. Several studies show that attention induces a sympathetically related increase in HRV in animals (69, 77) and humans (78, 79).
The effect of grooming carried out by humans on animals in relation to different body parts was studied by Normando et al. (80) in respect to horses. In that study, the authors demonstrated that the HR of horses decreased during grooming in comparison to the rest period, and that there was a difference in terms of HR among groomed body parts; the HRV was not evaluated. Our results are partially in line with this study, since we detected the body part difference in term of HR. In addition, we also underlined the body parts difference in terms of HRV. One hypothetical reason for the difference of HRV modulation during GA, GC, and GM could be attributed to the different “C tactile” or “tactile C” (CT) fibers’ distribution in the three body parts involved in this study. CT fibers are low threshold mechanoreceptors of the hairy skin of various mammals, human, and non-human primates (81–90). The social touch hypothesis identified them as a specific coding channel for gentle, dynamic touch occurring during close affiliative skin-to-skin interactions with conspecifics (86, 88, 89, 91, 92). Moreover, the polyvagal theory (93) proposed their impact on the HR modulation toward its decrement.
Since grooming can have an affiliative quality (16–18), it could be considered as the equivalent of the social interpersonal skin-to-skin contact of humans. The studies (94–101) related to the consequences of affective interpersonal touch on the autonomous nervous system of humans underlined that this kind of tactile stimulation determines a decrement of HR and an increment of the HRV toward the vagal activation. Due to the positive effect on the autonomous nervous system, physical touch such as the caress and moderate massage are employed to reduce the stress of healthy people (94–96), and might help convalescence for those suffering from depression, chronic pain (97), stress (98, 99), neurological disease (100), and for cancer patients receiving chemo- and radiotherapy (101).
Here, we report that the grooming carried out by familiar humans determines an increment of HRV parameters associated with the vagal activation. Importantly, we employed HRV analysis for the first time in order to evaluate the modulation of the autonomous system in psychologically related situations, such as grooming in rhesus monkey. These results represent the first indirect evidence of the positive relaxing effect of the human-to-monkey grooming, so we can assume that it has a positive autonomic effect (toward vagal modulation) comparable to the one evoked by the interpersonal skin-to-skin contact in humans.
Further investigations will be necessary to confirm that the vagal activation proposed by our results by means of HRV evaluation is also present during allogrooming among monkeys.
Due to these autonomic responses and the affiliative value of grooming for monkey, the data here presented could be useful in order to reduce the stress under which experimental animals could be for experimental conditions. Recently Viktor and Annie Reinhardt (102) have hypothesized that the positive physical contact with personnel could be a method to increase the welfare of single house cage experimental non-human primates. Nevertheless, even the general consensus of it, there is no published data to support this hypothesis. The results of the present study represent the first evidence of the positive relaxed effect of tactile contact between human and experimental single house cage monkeys, in terms of autonomic response of monkeys.
Nevertheless, we highlight a number of open questions that require further investigation. First, the present study featured the evaluation of the effect of grooming on male monkeys, but not females. Moreover, the two monkeys included in the study were 4 and 5 years of age, and both were of a similar weight. For these reasons, the study presented here could be considered as a starting point to evaluate if there is a physiological difference, in terms of HR and/or HRV, between female and male monkeys of different ages and weights during both grooming by humans and allogrooming. An additional aspect to explore would be to investigate behavior indices and measure the serum and/or urinal concentration of acetylcholine, norepinephrine, or cortisol, in order to evaluate the effect of grooming on the different aspects of the autonomous nervous system.
In conclusion, the present study represents the first evidence that the human grooming of monkeys in a controlled experimental situation elicits similar physiological effects as those seen in allogrooming among monkeys situated in their own natural environment. The results presented here could, thus, represent an important starting point from which to enhance the welfare of laboratory rhesus monkeys under experimental conditions by means of human grooming.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Martina Ardizzi and Luca Fornia for their technical support. We also extend gratitude to Professor Giacomo Rizzolatti for his valuable comments. This experiment was in part supported by the European Commission Grant Cogsystem FP7-250013 awarded to Giacomo Rizzolatti and a Grant-in Aid for Young Scientists KAKENHI 70728162 to Hiroaki Ishida from Japan Society for Promotion of Science.
References
1. Kimura Y, Okamura K, Watanabe T, Murotsuki J, Suzuki T, Yano M, et al. Power spectral analysis for autonomic influences in heart rate and blood pressure variability in fetal lambs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (1996) 271:H1333–9.
2. Wilkinson GS. Social grooming in the common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus. Anim Behav (1986) 34:1880–9. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80274-3
3. Böröczky K, Wada-Katsumata A, Batchelor D, Zhukovskaya M, Schal C. Insects groom their antennae to enhance olfactory acuity. PNAS (2013) 110:3615–20.
4. Crowell-Davis SL, Houpt KA, Carini CM. Mutual grooming and nearest-neighbor relationships among foals of Equus caballus. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1986) 15:113–23. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(86)90057-2
5. Tyler SJ. The behaviour and social organization of the New Forest ponies. Anim Behav Monogr (1972) 5:87–196. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(72)90003-6
6. Rho RJ, Srygley RB, Choe JC. Sex preferences in Jeju pony foals (Equus caballus) for mutual grooming and play-fighting behaviors. Zoolog Sci (2007) 24:769–73. doi:10.2108/zsj.24.769
7. Cox JA. Social grooming in the Brown-headed Nuthatch may have expanded functions. Southeast Nat (2012) 11:771–4. doi:10.1656/058.011.0415
8. Radford AN. Type of threat influences postconflict allopreening in a social bird. Curr Biol (2008) 18:R114–5. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.025
9. Spruijt BM, van Hooff JA, Gispen WH. Ethology and neurobiology of grooming behavior. Physiol Rev (1992) 72:825–52.
10. Tanaka I. Matrilineal distribution of louse egg-handling techniques during grooming in free-ranging Japanese macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol (1995) 98:197–201. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330980208
11. Barton R. Grooming site preferences in primates and their functional implications. Int J Primatol (1985) 6:519–32. doi:10.1007/BF02735574
12. Zamma K. Grooming site preferences determined by lice infection among Japanese macaques in Arashiyama. Primates (2002) 43:41–9. doi:10.1007/BF02629575
13. Kummer H. Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (1968).
14. Boccia ML, Reite M, Laudenslager M. On the physiology of grooming in a pigtail macaque. Physiol Behav (1989) 45:667–70. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(89)90089-9
15. Seyfarth RM. Model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. J Theor Biol (1977) 65:671–98. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(77)90015-7
16. Kapsalis E, Berman CM. Models of affiliative relationships among free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): I. Criteria for kinship. Behaviour (1996) 133:1209–34.
17. Dunbar RI. Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatol (1991) 57:121–31. doi:10.1159/000156574
18. Dunbar RI. The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neurosci Behav Rev (2010) 34:260–8. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001
19. Matheson MD, Bernstein IS. Grooming, social bonding and agonistic aiding in rhesus monkeys. Am J Primatol (2000) 51:177–86. doi:10.1002/1098-2345(200007)51:3<177::AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-K
20. Tiddi B, Aureli F, Sorrentino EP, Janson CH, Schino G. Grooming for tolerance? Two mechanisms of exchange in wild tufted capuchin monkeys. Behav Ecol (2011) 22:663–9. doi:10.1093/beheco/arr028
21. Tiddi B, Aureli F, Schino G. Grooming up the hierarchy?: the exchange of grooming and rank-related benefits in a new world primate. PLoS One (2012) 7:e36641. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036641
22. Maestripieri D. Vigilance costs of allogrooming in macaque mothers. Am Nat (1993) 141:744–53. doi:10.1086/285503
23. De Waal FB. Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annu Rev Psychol (2008) 59:279–300. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625
24. McFarland R, Majolo B. Grooming coercion and the post-conflict trading of social services in wild barbary macaques. PLoS One (2011) 6:e26893. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026893
25. Schino G, Scucchi S, Maestripieri D, Turillazzi PG. Allogrooming as a tension-reduction mechanism: a behavioral approach. Am J Primatol (1988) 16:43–50. doi:10.1002/ajp.1350160106
26. Boccia ML. Comparison of the physical characteristics of grooming in two species of macaques (Macaca nemestrina and M. radiata). J Comp Psychol (1989) 103:177–83. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.103.2.177
27. Aureli F, Preston SD, de Waal FBM. Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. J Comp Psychol (1999) 113:59–65. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.113.1.59
28. Gust DA, Gordon TP, Hambright MK, Wilson ME. Relationship between social factors and pituitary: adrenocortical activity in female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Horm Behav (1993) 27:318–31. doi:10.1006/hbeh.1993.1024
29. Shutt K, MacLarnon A, Heistermann M, Semple S. Grooming in Barbary macaques: better to give than to receive? Biol Lett (2007) 3:231–3. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0052
30. Lynch JJ, Fregin GF, Mackie JB, Monroe RR. Heart rate changes in the horse to human contact. Psychophysiology (1974) 11:472–8. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb00575.x
31. Bernice MW. Tactile stimulation as reinforcement for cats and its relation to early feeding experience. Psychol Rep (1959) 5:297–300. doi:10.2466/pr0.1959.5.3.297
32. Fonberg E, Kostarczyk E. Motivational role of social reinforcement in dog-man relations. Acta Neurobiol Exp (1980) 40:117–36.
33. Odendaal J, Meintjes RA. Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behaviour between humans and dogs. Vet J (2003) 165:296–301. doi:10.1016/S1090-0233(02)00237-X
34. Rehn T, Keeling LJ. The effect of time left alone at home on dog welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2011) 129:129–35. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2010.11.015
35. Pagani M, Lombardi F, Guzzetti S, Rimoldi O, Furlan R, Pizzinelli P, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympathovagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res (1986) 59:178–93. doi:10.1161/01.RES.59.2.178
36. Schmied C, Boivin X, Waiblinger S. Stroking different body regions of dairy cows: effects on avoidance and approach behavior toward humans. J Dairy Sci (2008) 91:596–605. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0360
37. Tallet C, Veissier I, Boivin X. Human contact and feeding as rewards for the lamb’s affinity to their stockperson. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2005) 94:59–73. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.007
38. Tallet C, Veissier I, Boivin X. How does the method used to feed lambs modulate their affinity to their human caregiver? Appl Anim Behav Sci (2009) 119:56–65. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.03.012
39. Coulon M, Nowak R, Peyrat J, Chandèze H, Boissy A, Boivin X. Do lambs perceive regular human stroking as pleasant? Behavior and heart rate variability analyses. PLOS ONE (2015) 10:e0118617. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118617
40. Taira K, Rolls ET. Receiving grooming as a reinforcer for the monkey. Physiol Behav (1996) 59:1189–92. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(95)02213-9
41. Tiller WA, McCraty R, Atkinson M. Cardiac coherence: a new, noninvasive measure of autonomic nervous system order. Altern Ther Health Med (1996) 2:52–65.
42. Porges SW. Orienting in a defensive world: mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A polyvagal theory. Psychophysiology (1995) 32:301–18. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x
43. Porges SW. The polyvagal theory: phylogenetic contributions to social behavior. Physiol Behav (2003) 79:503–13. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00156-2
44. Bennett AJ, DePetrillo PB. Differential effects of MK801 and lorazepam on heart rate variability in adolescent rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Cardiovasc Pharmacol (2005) 45:383–8. doi:10.1097/01.fjc.0000156820.12339.db
45. Arora R, Krummerman A, Vijayaraman P, Rosengarten M, Suryadevara V, Lejemtel T, et al. Heart rate variability and diastolic heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol (2004) 27:299–303. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00431.x
46. Carney RM, Freedland KE, Veith RC. Depression, the autonomic nervous system, and coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med (2005) 67:S29–33. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000162254.61556.d5
47. Mäkikallio TH, Barthel P, Schneider R, Bauer A, Tapanainen JM, Tulppo MP, et al. Prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction: role of Holter monitoring in the modern treatment era. Eur Heart J (2005) 26:762–9. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi188
48. Delaney JPA, Brodie DA. Effects of short-term psychological stress on the time and frequency domains of heart-rate variability. Percept Mot Skills (2000) 91:515–24. doi:10.2466/pms.2000.91.2.515
49. Hall M, Vasko R, Buysse D, Ombao H, Chen QX, Cashmere JD, et al. Acute stress affects heart rate variability during sleep. Psychosom Med (2004) 66:56–62. doi:10.1097/01.PSY.0000106884.58744.09
50. McCraty R, Atkinson M, Tiller W, Rein G, Watkins A. The effects of emotions on short-term power spectrum analysis and heart rate variability. Am J Cardiol (1995) 76:1089–93. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80309-9
51. Catipović-Veselica K, Amidzić V, Durijancek J, Kozmar D, Sram M, Glavas B, et al. Association of heart rate and heart-rate variability with scores on the emotion profile index in patients with acute coronary heart disease. Psychol Rep (1999) 84:433–42. doi:10.2466/pr0.1999.84.2.433
52. Sahar T, Shalev AY, Porges SW. Vagal modulation of responses to mental challenge in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry (2001) 49:637–43. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01045-3
53. Sharpley CS, Kamen P, Galatsis M, Heppel R, Veivers C, Claus K. An examination of the relationship between resting heart rate variability and heart rate reactivity to a mental arithmetic stressor. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback (2000) 25:143–54. doi:10.1023/A:1009598607998
54. Donzella B, Gunnar MR, Krueger WK, Alwin J. Cortisol and vagal tone responses to competitive challenge in preschoolers: associations with temperament. Dev Psychobiol (2000) 37:209–20. doi:10.1002/1098-2302(2000)37:4<209::AID-DEV1>3.0.CO;2-S
55. von Borrell E, Langbein J, Després G, Hansen S, Leterrier C, Marchant-Forde J, et al. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals – a review. Physiol Behav (2007) 92:293–316. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007
56. Pomfrett CJD, Glover DG, Bollen BG, Pollard BJ. Perturbation of heart rate variability in cattle fed BSE-infected material. Vet Rec (2004) 154:687–91. doi:10.1136/vr.154.22.687
57. Little CJL, Julu POO, Hansen S, Mellor DJ, Milne MH, Barrett DC. Measurement of cardiac vagal tone in cattle: a possible aid to the diagnosis of BSE. Vet Rec (1996) 139:527–8.
58. Nolan J, Batin PD, Andrews R, Lindsay SJ, Brooksby P, Mullen H, et al. Prospective study of heart rate variability and mortality in chronic heart failure –Antivir. Chem. Chemother. results of the United Kingdom heart failure evaluation and assessment of risk trial (UK-Heart). Circulation (1998) 98:1510–6. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.98.15.1510
59. Rasmussen CE, Falk T, Zois NE, Moesgaard SG, Häggström J, Pedersen HD, et al. Heart rate, heart rate variability, and arrhythmias in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. J Vet Intern Med (2012) 26:76–84. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.00842.x
60. de Jong IC, Sgoifo A, Lambooij E, Korte SM, Blokhuis HJ, Koolhaas JM. Effects of social stress on heart rate and heart rate variability in growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci (2000) 80:273–80. doi:10.4141/A99-085
61. Carnevali L, Trombini M, Graiani G, Madeddu D, Quaini F, Landgraf R, et al. Low vagally-mediated heart rate variability and increased susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias in rats bred for high anxiety. Physiol Behav (2014) 128:16–25. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.033
62. Mohr E, Langbein J, Nürnberg G. Heart rate variability – a non invasive approach to measure stress in calves and cows. Physiol Behav (2002) 75:251–9. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00651-5
63. Kuwahara M, Hiraga A, Kai M, Tsubone H, Sugano S. Influence of training on autonomic nervous function in horses: evaluation by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Equine Vet J (1999) 30:178–80.
64. Physick-Sheard PW, Marlin DJ, Thornhill R, Schroter RC. Frequency domain analysis of heart rate variability in horses at rest and during exercise. Equine Vet J (2000) 32:253–62. doi:10.2746/042516400776563572
65. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, van der Werf JTN, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, et al. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses. Physiol Behav (2002) 76:289–96. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00698-4
66. Palestrini C, Previde EP, Spiezio C, Verga M. Heart rate and behavioural responses of dogs in the Ainsworth’s Strange Situation: a pilot study. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2005) 94:75–88. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.005
67. Désiré L, Veissier I, Desprès G, Boissy A. On the way to assess emotions in animals: do lambs (Ovis aries) evaluate an event through its suddenness, novelty, or unpredictability? J Comp Psychol (2004) 118:363–74. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.118.4.363
68. Champeroux P, Martel E, Jude S, Laigot C, Laveissière A, Weyn-Marotte AA, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability in cynomolgus monkeys in safety pharmacology studies: comparative study with beagle dogs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods (2013) 68:166–74. doi:10.1016/j.vascn.2013.02.005
69. Uchiyama H, Ohtani N, Ohta M. The evaluation of autonomic nervous system activation during learning in rhesus macaques with the analysis of the heart rate variability. J Vet Med Sci (2007) 69:521–6. doi:10.1292/jvms.69.521
70. Ishida H, Fornia L, Grandi LC, Umiltà MA, Gallese V. Somato-motor haptic processing in posterior inner perisylvian region (SII/pIC) of the macaque monkey. PLoS One (2013) 8:e69931. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069931
71. Caruana F, Jezzini A, Sbriscia-Fioretti B, Rizzolatti G, Gallese V. Emotional and social behaviors elicited by electrical stimulation of the insula in the macaque monkey. Curr Biol (2011) 3:195–9. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.042
72. Berntson GG, Bigger JT Jr, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufmann PG, Malik M, et al. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology (1997) 34:623–48. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02140.x
73. Eckberg DL. Sympathovagal balance: a critical appraisal. Circulation (1997) 96:3224–32. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.96.9.3224
74. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing Electrophysiology. Circulation (1996) 93:1043–65.
75. Malik M. Time-domain measurement of heart rate variability. Card Electrophysiol Rev (1997) 1:329–34. doi:10.1023/A:1009912905325
76. Langbein J, Nürnberg G, Manteuffel G. Visual discrimination learning in dwarf goats and associated changes in heart rate and heart rate variability. Physiol Behav (2004) 82:601–9. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.05.007
77. Zebunke M, Langbein J, Manteuffel G, Puppe B. Autonomic reactions indicating positive affect during acoustic reward learning in domestic pigs. Anim Behav (2011) 81:481–9. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.023
78. Duschek S, Muckenthaler M, Werner N, del Paso GA. Relationships between features of autonomic cardiovascular control and cognitive performance. Biol Psychol (2009) 81:110–7. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.03.003
79. Luft CDB, Takase E, Darby D. Heart rate variability and cognitive function: effects of physical effort. Biol Psychol (2009) 82:186–91. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.07.007
80. Normando S, Haverbeke A, Meers L, Ödberg FO, Ibañez Talegón M. Heart rate reduction by grooming in horses (Equus caballus). Proceedings of the Havemeyer Workshop on Horse Behaviour and Welfare. Holar, Iceland (2002). p. 23–6.
81. Bessou P, Burgess PR, Perl ER, Taylor CB. Dynamic properties of mechanoreceptors with unmyelinated (C) fibers. J Neurophysiol (1971) 34:116–31.
82. Douglas WW, Ritchie JM. On the frequency of firing of mammalian nonmedullated nerve fibres. J Physiol (1957) 139:400–7. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005900
83. Iggo A, Kornhuber HHA. Quantitative study of C-mechanoreceptors in hairy skin of the cat. J Physiol (1977) 271:549–65. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012014
84. Kumazawa T, Perl ER. Excitation of marginal and substantia gelatinosa neurons in the primate spinal cord: indications of their place in dorsal horn functional organization. J Comp Neurol (1978) 177:417–34. doi:10.1002/cne.901770305
85. Light AR, Perl ER. Spinal termination of functionally identified primary afferent neurons with slowly conducting myelinated fibers. J Comp Neurol (1979) 186:133–50. doi:10.1002/cne.901860203
86. McGlone F, Valbo AB, Olausson H, Löken L, Wessberg J. Discriminative touch and emotional touch. Can J Exp Psychol (2007) 61:173–83. doi:10.1037/cjep2007019
88. Sugiura Y, Lee CL, Perl ER. Central projections of identified, unmyelinated (C) afferent fibers innervating mammalian skin. Science (1986) 234:358–61. doi:10.1126/science.3764416
89. Vallbo AB, Olausson H, Wessberg J, Kakuda N. Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects. J Physiol (1995) 483:783–95. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020622
90. Zotterman Y. Touch, pain and tickling: an electro-physiological investigation on cutaneous sensory nerves. J Physiol (1939) 95:1–28. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003707
91. Olausson H, Wessberg J, Morrison I, McGlone F, Vallbo AB. The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2010) 34:185–91. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.011
92. Roudaut Y, Lonigro A, Coste B, Hao J, Delmas P, Crest M. Touch sense: functional organization and molecular determinants of mechanosensitive receptors. Channels (2012) 6:234–45. doi:10.4161/chan.22213
93. Porges SW. The polyvagal perspective. Biol Psychol (2007) 74:116–43. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.009
94. Lindgren L, Rundgren S, Winsö O, Lehtipalo S, Wiklund U, Karlsson M, et al. Physiological responses to touch massage in healthy volunteers. Auton Neurosci (2010) 158:105–10. doi:10.1016/.autneu.2010.06.011
95. Diego MA, Field T. Moderate pressure massage elicits a parasympathetic nervous system response. Int J Neurosci (2009) 119:630–8. doi:10.1080/00207450802329605
96. Field T. Massage therapy research review. Complement Ther Clin Pract (2014) 20:224–9. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2014.07.002
97. Tsao CIJ. Effectiveness of massage therapy for chronic, non-malignant pain: a review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med (2007) 4:165–79. doi:10.1093/ecam/nel109
98. Billhult A, Lindholm C, Gunnarsson R, Stener-Victorin E. The effect of massage on immune function and stress in women with breast cancer – a randomized controlled trial. Auton Neurosci (2009) 150:111–5. doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2009.03.010
99. Belinda G, Phillips LJ, Schmidt HM, Markulev C, O’Connor J, Wood SJ, et al. Pilot study evaluating the effect of massage therapy on stress, anxiety and aggression in a young adult psychiatric inpatient unit. Aust N Z J Psychiatry (2008) 42:414–22. doi:10.1080/00048670801961131
100. Schroeder B, Doig J, Premkumar K. The effects of massage therapy on multiple sclerosis patients’ quality of life and leg function. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med (2014) 2014:640916. doi:10.1155/2014/640916
101. Russell NC, Sumler SS, Beinhorn CM, Frenkel MA. Role of massage therapy in cancer care. J Altern Complement Med (2008) 14:209–14. doi:10.1089/acm.2007.7176
Keywords: grooming, non-human primate, laboratory animal, heart rate, heart rate variability, CT fibers, animal welfare
Citation: Grandi LC and Ishida H (2015) The physiological effect of human grooming on the heart rate and the heart rate variability of laboratory non-human primates: a pilot study in male rhesus monkeys. Front. Vet. Sci. 2:50. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00050
Received: 11 July 2015; Accepted: 12 October 2015;
Published: 28 October 2015
Edited by:
Jan Langbein, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, GermanyReviewed by:
Manuela Zebunke, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, GermanyAntonia Patt, University of Maryland at College Park, USA
Copyright: © 2015 Grandi and Ishida. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Laura Clara Grandi, lauraclara.grandi@nemo.unipr.it