Aurélie Vandenberghe1,2
Sarah Y. Broeckx1Charlotte Beerts1Bert Seys2
Marieke Zimmerman3Ineke Verweire1Marc Suls2
Jan H. Spaas1*
- 1Global Stem Cell Technology, ANACURA Group, Evergem, Belgium
- 2Equine Veterinary Pratice Dr. Suls, Nederweert, Netherlands
- 3Equine Diagnostic Center, Meldert-Lummen, Belgium
Suspensory ligament injuries are a common injury in sport horses, especially in competing dressage horses. Because of the poor healing of chronic recalcitrant tendon injuries, this represents a major problem in the rehabilitation of sport horses and often compromises the return to the initial performance level. Stem cells are considered as a novel treatment for different pathologies in horses and humans. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are well known for their use in the treatment of tendinopathies; however, recent studies report a safe use of allogeneic MSCs for different orthopedic applications in horses. Moreover, it has been reported that pre-differentiation of MSCs prior to injection might result in improved clinical outcomes. For all these reasons, the present case report describes the use of allogeneic tenogenically induced peripheral blood-derived MSCs for the treatment of a proximal suspensory ligament injury. During conservative management for 4 months, the horse demonstrated no improvement of a right front lameness with a Grade 2/5 on the American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) scale and a clear hypo-echoic area detectable in 30% of the cross sectional area. From 4 weeks after treatment, the lameness reduced to an AAEP Grade 1/5 and a clear filling of the lesion could be noticed on ultrasound. At 12 weeks (T4) after the first injection, a second intralesional injection with allogeneic tenogenically induced MSCs and platelet-rich plasma was given and at 4 weeks after the second injection (T5), the horse trotted sound under all circumstances with a close to total fiber alignment. The horse went back to previous performance level at 32 weeks after the first regenerative therapy and is currently still doing so (i.e., 20 weeks later or 1 year after the first stem cell treatment). In conclusion, the present case report demonstrated a positive evolution of proximal suspensory ligament desmitis after treatment with allogeneic tenogenically induced MSCs.
Introduction
Suspensory ligament injuries are a major issue in equine orthopedics. It is indicated in both elite and non-elite dressage horses to have a higher risk compared to horses undertaking general-purpose exercise or doing other disciplines (1). Commonly, it is the proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament that is affected in these sport horses (2).
The limited healing of tendon tissue, with the formation of scar tissue, has been attributed to the low number of residing cells in relation to the extensive volume of the extracellular matrix. The reduced healing capacity of tendons and ligaments is a major problem in the rehabilitation of sport horses and leads to chronic injuries with a poor prognosis (3, 4). Indeed, these tendinous lesions often compromise the return of the horse to the initial performance level.
Therapies for suspensory ligament pathologies consist of conservative management, regenerative therapies, and surgical therapies. Conservative management aims at promoting the optimal healing of an acutely damaged tendon by medical treatments, rest, cold applications, corrective shoeing, and controlled exercises (5–8). For chronic tendinopathies, eccentric tendon training, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and surgical therapy are indicated (8). Surgical therapy consists of a fasciotomy, with neurectomy of the deep branch of the palmar or the plantar nerve, or a suspensory desmoplasty (surgical fasciotomy and splitting) (9–11).
Recent regenerative therapies, containing growth factor-based therapies and cell therapies, report an improvement of tendon healing and reduction of recidives (2, 8, 12). For safety (no calcifications) and efficacy (functional recovery) reasons, it has been reported that inducing stem cells toward a tenogenic phenotype is a valuable alternative for conservative treatments (12) and adding platelet-rich plasma (PRP) generates superior effects in comparison to both treatments separately for the treatment of degenerative joint disease (13). Moreover, allogeneic PRP and cell-based therapies represent a valuable alternative for autologous treatments because of the immediate availability and ease to use in field circumstances. Indeed, different groups report a safe intradermal, intra-articular, and intravenous application of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in a total of more than 500 horses in all studies together (13–17). Although several studies report the safe and effective use of allogeneic MSCs in equine tendons (12, 18–20), only limited information on tenogenically induced allogeneic MSCs and allogeneic PRP for the treatment of chronic tendon lesions is currently available (21).
For all the aforementioned reasons, this case report describes the treatment of a chronic recalcitrant proximal suspensory ligament desmitis with allogeneic tenogenically induced peripheral blood-derived MSCs in combination with allogeneic PRP.
Case Details
History
A 9-year-old, KWPN stallion, intended for dressage work at higher level (sub Grand Prix), was diagnosed with a lesion at the lateral border of the proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament. The horse was treated 4 months ago with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and a single intralesional injection of PRP combined with a controlled rehabilitation program. This consisted of 2 weeks of hand walking and daily cooling of the leg with a soft protecting resting bandage during the night, followed with 1 week of walk and trot on a straight line. Afterwards, gradual walking and trotting exercises were performed for 3 weeks starting with 2 min trot a day with an increase of 2 min every 2 days up to 20 min trotting per day. Treatments remained clinically and ultrasonographically unresponsive.
Clinical Examination and Diagnostic Analgesia
Four months after the initial diagnosis and first treatment program, the horse was presented for an orthopedic examination. At the initial clinical examination, as well as 4 months later (i.e., before the first stem cell injection), the horse showed a right front lameness of 2/5 on the American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) scale (Table 1). The lameness was consistent in degree in straight lines. When trotting on the circle to the left on a soft surface, the right front lameness was more pronounced with a marked reduced cranial phase of the stride. Passive flexion of the lower part of the right front limb exacerbated the lameness.
Table 1. AAEP lameness scale.
Several diagnostic anesthesia’s of the right front limb, each with 2% Mepivacaine hydrochloride solution, were performed. A distal digital nerve block, an abaxial nerve block and a low four point nerve block were negative. A nerve block of the deep branch of the lateral palmar nerve almost completely abolished the right front lameness to a score of 0.5/5 on the AAEP scale.
Diagnostic Imaging
Radiographic Examination
Dorsopalmar, lateromedial, and oblique radiographic projections of the right proximal metacarpal region were obtained and compared with the contralateral limb. No abnormal findings were noticed.
Computed Tomography
In mutual agreement with the owner, computed tomography was performed in order to further evaluate the palmar aspect of the proximal third metacarpal bone (Figure 1A). Contrast angiography was not performed in this horse.
Figure 1. Longitudinal anatomical section of the proximal metacarpus showing the origin of the proximal third interosseus muscle (suspensory ligament) over the third metacarpal bone and distal carpus. 1 – suspensory ligament; 2 – third metacarpal bone; 3 – deep palmar metacarpal vascular anastomosis; 4 – accessory ligament of the deep digital flexor tendon; 5 – deep digital flexor tendon; 6 – superficial digital flexor tendon; 7 – skin (A). Computer tomography demonstrated a mild to moderate bone remodeling (white arrows) and sclerosis (black arrows) at the proximal aspect of the third metacarpal bone at the insertion of the suspensory ligament (B).
Mild to moderate bone remodeling of the palmar third metacarpal bone was observed. This was more pronounced medially, with the presence of a large osteophyte axially (Figure 1B). Moreover, a moderate sclerosis at the medial aspect of the proximopalmar third metacarpal bone was present (Figure 1B).
Ultrasound Examination
A 7.5-MHz linear ultrasound probe was used to evaluate the palmar aspect of the right metacarpal region. A complete examination of the suspensory ligament was performed during each ultrasound examination with both transverse and longitudinal scans. The scoring system was adapted from a previous study by Beerts et al. (21) and can be found in Table 2.
Table 2. The scoring system used to evaluate and compare the ultrasound images in the present report.
At the proximal aspect of the lateral lobe of the suspensory ligament, a focal hypo-echogenic area with an abnormal fiber alignment was present and consisted of approximately 30% of the cross sectional area of the suspensory ligament. In comparison with the clinically sound contralateral limb, the proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament was enlarged with a poor demarcation of the dorsal margin (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Transverse (encircled lesion area) and longitudinal (arrow in lesion area) ultrasound images of the proximal aspect of the lateral lobe of the suspensory ligament performed at T0, T4 (12 weeks), and T5 (16 weeks). At T0, a clear hypo-echoic area could be noticed on both ultrasounds. At T4, only limited remaining hypo-echoic areas were noticed, whereas this clearly reduced at T5.
Treatment
Four weeks after the computed tomography examination, an intralesional injection with allogeneic tenogenically induced MSCs and PRP (from Global Stem Cell Technology) in combination with NSAIDs was performed by an equine orthopedic specialist. Both tenogenically induced MSCs and PRP were prepared from a 6-year-old German Warmblood horse and characterized as previously described (12, 22).
Briefly, 50 ml of peripheral blood was collected from the vena jugularis in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes for MSC isolation. Subsequently, the blood was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 20 min and the buffy coat was collected and diluted 1:2 with Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Life Technologies). This suspension was gently layered on an equal amount of Percoll (GE Healthcare). After different washing steps with HBSS, 20 million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were seeded per T75 flask and cultured until 60% confluency was reached. Trypsinization was performed with 0.25% trypsin–EDTA until passage 6 (P6) was reached. Going to P7, 0.5 million MSCs were seeded in a T75 flask and tenogenically induced by supplementing tendogenic growth factors to the expansion medium until 80% confluency was reached, and tenogenic differentiation markers were upregulated (Gomiero et al., in review). A higher passage was used to allow upscaling in future cell manufacturing processes, which is considered to be possible thanks to the phenotypic stability of PB–MSCs from P5 up to P10 (23, Gomiero et al., in review). After trypsinization, all the cells were resuspended in 1 ml of DMEM low glucose (Life Technologies) with 10% of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma). The samples were stored in −80°C until all quality controls were completed. The latter consisted of sterility testing and flow cytometry assessment for (stem) cell markers, as previously reported (22, 23).
For PRP preparation, 300 ml of peripheral blood was taken in a citrate phosphate dextrose adenine-1 (CPDA-1) single blood bag (Terumo®) from the same donor. Platelets were purified by means of subsequent centrifugation steps, as previously reported (24) until more than 80% platelets were obtained at a concentration of more than 100 × 106 platelets in 1 ml. Cells and PRP were shipped on dry-ice for clinical application. After trypan blue staining, it became clear that more than 75% of the tenogenically induced MSCs were viable upon injection.
The horse was sedated with 0.04 mg/kg detomidine (Domosedan®) and 0.1 mg/ml butorphanol (Turbogesic®) intravenously, and the treatment site was aseptically prepared. A 7.5 MHz linear ultrasound probe was covered with a sterile glove to perform the ultrasound-guided intralesional injection. A sterile 21G needle was introduced into the lesion and connected to the syringe with the tenogenically induced MSCs (1 ml) and PRP (1 ml). After the treatment, a soft protective bandage was applied and left on for 1 day, followed by the exact same rehabilitation program as described above for the first treatment.
A second intralesional injection with allogeneic tenogenically induced MSCs and PRP was performed 12 weeks after the first injection in order to stimulate the healing after stagnation.
Outcome
Clinical Assessment
Clinical evaluation was performed 4 weeks before injection (T0), and at 4-week intervals after the first injection (T1 = 0 weeks, T2 = 4 weeks, T3 = 8 weeks, T4 = 12 weeks, T5 = 16 weeks). A second injection was performed 12 weeks after the first injection at T4. Clinical evaluation was performed according to the AAEP scoring system by the same team of veterinarians.
At T0, the horse showed a right front lameness with a Grade 2/5 consistent in degree in straight lines and more pronounced when trotting on a circle to the left on a soft surface (Table 3). At T1, 4 weeks after the diagnosis, the horse was treated by a first intralesional injection with the combination of peripheral blood-derived tenogenically induced MSCs and PRP. At subsequent evaluation time point T2, the lameness was reduced to a right front lameness with a Grade 1/5 and an improvement in the cranial phase of the stride (Table 3). At T3 and T4, the lameness was graded 0–1/5, because it was inconsistently apparent and difficult to observe.
Table 3. Evaluation of the proximal suspensory healing by clinical assessment and ultrasound examination at 4 weeks before the injection (T0), the day of injection (T1), and every 4 weeks up to week 16 (T2–5).
A second intralesional injection with MSCs and PRP was performed at T4, 12 weeks after the first injection. At evaluation time point T5, 4 weeks after the second intralesional injection (i.e., 16 weeks after the first injection), the horse trotted completely sound under all circumstances tested (Table 3). Communication with the owner revealed that the horse started performing at previous level (sub Grand Prix) at 32 weeks after the first regenerative treatment and is currently still doing so (i.e., 20 weeks later or 1 year after the first stem cell treatment).
Ultrasound Examination
A score between 0 and 5 for the ultrasound images was given. At T0 and T1, the horse received a score 1, which corresponded with the initiation of lesion filling with the presence of hypo-echoic areas, a moderate diffuse decrease in echogenicity, lacking of a parallel fiber pattern and 0–25% fiber alignment (Figure 2). At T2, a score of 2 was given, which indicated a gradual filling of the lesion with the presence of multiple areas with decreased echogenicity, an increased parallel fiber pattern and 25–50% fiber alignment. At subsequent evaluation time points, T3 and T4, a score of 3 corresponded with a less distinct demarcation between injured and uninjured tendon with remaining hypo-echoic areas, an increased parallel fiber pattern, 25–50% fiber alignment and reduced width and thickness. At 4 weeks after the second injection (T5), a score of 4 was given, which indicated hardly any demarcation between injured and healthy tissue, faint hypo-echoic areas, an almost total fiber alignment and very mild increased thickness (Figure 2). An overview of the ultrasound scores can be found in Table 3.
Discussion
Proximal suspensory ligament injuries are an important source of lameness in performance horses. Because of both soft tissue and bone components, the suspensory ligament has a complex anatomy, and therefore, diagnosis should be made by multiple modalities. A good diagnosis can be made by the combination of ultrasound examination and radiology, but often advanced imaging, such as nuclear scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography, will be required to detect certain types of injury (25).
In this case report, diagnosis was made by ultrasound, radiology, and computed tomography. However, no contrast angiography was performed, which could have provided more information on lesion severity and perfusion. Indeed, contrast angiography would have allowed us to distinguish between the normal fat and muscle tissue at the origin of the suspensory ligament and a lesion of the ligament (26–28). This would have provided more detailed information on the extent of the soft tissue lesion and should be considered for diagnostic and treatment evaluation in future studies. Nevertheless, in the present report, computed tomography accurately identified new bone formation that was not fully revealed via radiology and ultrasound. In horses with a chronic or recurring lameness origination from the proximal aspect of the third metacarpal bone, new bone formation at the proximal region of insertion of the suspensory ligament, should be considered as a differential diagnosis (29).
Since it has been described that uninduced MSCs have the ability to form ectopic bone in calcified areas (30), the use of tenogenically induced MSCs represented a safe alternative in this case report. Nevertheless, larger studies comparing both treatment modalities will have to provide more insights in this matter. In addition, treatment after ultrasound-guided intralesional injection supports suspensory ligament healing and has a better prognosis, compared to conservative therapy, for returning to sport activity (2). In the present report, PRP and peripheral blood-derived tenogenically induced MSCs were injected together, as previously described by our group (12). Since the suspensory ligament injury was irresponsive to PRP treatment alone (cfr. Patient history) and no control group without PRP was used, no conclusions can be made concerning the necessity of PRP addition in order to obtain the desired clinical effect. However, for degenerative joint disease in horses, a substantial improvement of the clinical outcome could be demonstrated after PRP addition to allogeneic MSCs (13). This was probably attributed to the stem cell stimulating growth factors that are present in PRP. For this reason, the latter substance was added to the tenogenically induced MSCs. Further studies will provide more clarity on the effect of PRP on MSC-related therapies for tendon healing in horses.
It should be mentioned though that at 12 weeks after the first treatment, hypo-echoic areas with a discrete demarcation between injured and uninjured tendon were still present on the ultrasound images. This is in contrast with 11 out of 15 horses with suspensory ligament desmitis, which demonstrated only faint signs of hypo-echoic areas and hardly any demarcation between injured and healthy tissue at 6 weeks post injection (12). In this case study, the latter state was only reached at 4 weeks after the second injection (i.e., 16 weeks after the first injection). An explanation for the noticed discrepancy might be that the present case demonstrated new bone formation, which compromised the first treatment. Indeed, it has been previously reported that carpal osteophytes might result in tendon ruptures (31). Moreover, suspensory ligament desmitis has a poor prognosis in general (32, 33) and conservative management for 4 months did not result in any improvement in this case. Nevertheless, a second injection reactivated the healing and resulted in recovery. Since it has been demonstrated that autologous MSCs elicit a similar immune response than allogeneic MSCs in equine superficial digital flexor tendons, no immunogenic hypersensitivity was expected nor observed after repeated injections (18). In the present case with a chronic suspensory ligament injury, a second injection was warranted due to remaining hypo-echoic areas and abnormal fibern pattern. Although no reports are available describing the influence of repeated MSC injections on chronic tendon injuries, repeated MSC treatments of liver fibrosis (34) and cardiomyopathies (35, 36) resulted in significantly enhanced tissue repair and functionality in comparison to single dose treatments. In both organs, reduced fibrosis was at the basis of the noticed improvements and this was achieved by remodeling of the collagen network, which is a crucial element in chronic tendon injury as well (8).
In conclusion, a positive evolution of proximal suspensory ligament desmitis could be demonstrated after repeated injection with allogeneic tenogenically induced MSCs together with PRP. However, large placebo-controlled field studies are required in order to provide more insights in their regenerative capacities and modus operandi. Moreover, follow-up data after several years are necessary to confirm the sustainability of the repaired tissue.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author Jan H. Spaas declares competing financial interests as shareholder in Global Stem cell Technology (GST). Sarah Y. Broeckx and Jan H. Spaas are both employed by GST and inventors of several pending patents owned by GST (BE2012/0656; WO2014053418A9; WO2014053420A1; PCT/EP2013/075782). All other authors declare no conflicts of interests. The content of this manuscript contains a product under development owned by GST.
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge GST-ANACURA for supporting this project.
References
1. Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TDH. Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses. Vet J (2010) 184:27–36. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.020
2. Romagnoli N, Rinnovati R, Ricciardi G, Lambertini C, Spinella G, Spadari A. Clinical evaluation of intralesional injection of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of proximal suspensory ligament desmitis in horses. J Equine Vet Sci (2015) 35:141–6. doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2014.12.011
3. Nirschl RP. Patterns of failed healing in tendon injury. In: Leadbetter WB, Buckwalter JA, Gordon SL, editors. Sports-Induced Inflammation: Clinical and Basic Concepts. Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (1990). p. 577–85.
4. Riley G. The pathogenesis of tendinopathy. A molecular perspective. Rheumatology (Oxford) (2004) 43:131–42. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg448
5. Bowring B, Chockalingam N. Conservative treatment of tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction – a review. Foot (2010) 20:18–26. doi:10.1016/j.foot.2009.11.001
6. Foland JW, Trotter GW, Powers BE, Wrigley RH, Smith FW. Effect of sodium hyaluronate in collagenase-induced superficial digital flexor tendinitis in horses. Am J Vet Res (1992) 53:2371–6.
7. Peers KH, Lysens RJ. Patellar tendinopathy in athletes: current diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. Sports Med (2005) 35:71–87. doi:10.2165/00007256-200535010-00006
8. Spaas JH, Guest DJ, Van de Walle GR. Tendon regeneration in human and equine athletes. Sports Med (2012) 42:871–90. doi:10.1007/BF03262300
9. Dyson S. Proximal suspensory desmitis in the forelimb and the hindlimb. Proceedings of the AAEP Annual Convention, 2000 Nov 26–29; San Antonio, TX (2000). 46, p. 137–42.
10. Henninger RW, Bramlage LR, Bailey M, Bertone AL, Weisbrode SE. Effects of tendon splitting on experimentally-induced acute equine tendinitis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol (1992) 5:1–9.
11. Herthel DJ. Suspensory desmitis therapies. Proceedings of the 12th ACVS Veterinary Symposium, 2002 Oct 17–20; San Diego, CA (2002). p. 165–7.
12. Broeckx S, Zimmerman M, Aerts D, Seys B, Suls M, Mariën T, et al. Tenogenesis of equine peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells: in vitro versus in vivo. J Tissue Sci Eng (2012) 11:1–5. doi:10.4172/2157-7552.S11-001
13. Broeckx S, Zimmerman M, Corcetti S, Suls M, Mariën T, Ferguson SJ, et al. Regenerative therapies for equine denegerative joint disease: a preliminary study. PLoS One (2014) 9:e85917. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085917
14. Carrade DD, Affolter VK, Outerbridge CA, Watson JL, Galuppo LD, Buerchler S, et al. Intradermal injections of equine allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells are well tolerated and do not elicit immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Cytotherapy (2011) 13:1180–92. doi:10.3109/14653249.2011.602338
15. Carrade DD, Owens SD, Galuppo LD, Vidal MA, Ferraro GL, Librach F, et al. Clinicopathologic findings following intra-articular injection of autologous and allogeneic placentally derived equine mesenchymal stem cells in horses. Cytotherapy (2011) 13:419–30. doi:10.3109/14653249.2010.536213
16. Broeckx S, Borena BM, Zimmerman M, Marien T, Seys B, Suls M, et al. Intravenous application of allogenic peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells: a safety assessment in 291 equine recipients. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther (2014) 9:452–7. doi:10.2174/1574888X09666140220003847
17. Broeckx S, Suls M, Beerts C, Vandenberghe A, Seys B, Wuertz-Kozak K, et al. Allogenic mesenchymal stem cells as a treatment for equine degenerative joint disease: a pilot study. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther (2014) 9:497–503. doi:10.2174/1574888X09666140826110601
18. Guest DJ, Smith MR, Allen WR. Monitoring the fate of autologous and allogeneic mesenchymal progenitor cells injected into the superficial digital flexor tendon of horses: preliminary study. Equine Vet J (2008) 40:178–81. doi:10.2746/042516408X276942
19. Ricco S, Renzi S, Del Bue M, Conti V, Merli E, Ramoni R, et al. Allogeneic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in combination with platelet rich plasma are safe and effective in the therapy of superficial digital flexor tendonitis in the horse. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol (2013) 26:61–8.
20. Van Loon VJ, Scheffer CJ, Genn HJ, Hoogendoorn AC, Greve JW. Clinical follow-up of horses treated with allogeneic equine mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood for different tendon and ligament disorders. Vet Q (2014) 34:92–7. doi:10.1080/01652176.2014.949390
21. Beerts C, Seifert C, Zimmerman M, Felix E, Suls M, Mariën T, et al. Desmitis of the accessory ligament of the equine deep digital flexor tendon: a regenerative approach. J Tissue Sci Eng (2013) 4:1–7. doi:10.4172/2157-7552.1000125
22. Spaas JH, De Schauwer C, Cornillie P, Meyer E, Van Soom A, Van de Walle GR. Culture and characterization of equine peripheral blood mesenchymal stromal cells. Vet J (2013) 195:107–13. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.05.006
23. Spaas JH, Broeckx SY, Chiers K, Ferguson SJ, Casarosa M, Van Bruaene N, et al. Chondrogenic priming at reduced cell density enhances cartilage adhesion of equine allogeneic MSCs – a loading sensitive phenomenon in an organ culture study with 180 explants. Cell Physiol Biochem (2015) 37:651–65. doi:10.1159/000430384
24. Araki J, Jona M, Eto H, Aoi N, Kato H, Suga H, et al. Optimized preparation method of platelet-concentrated plasma and noncoagulating platelet-derived factor concentrates: maximization of platelet concentration and removal of fibrinogen. Tissue Eng Part C Methods (2012) 18:176–85. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0308
25. Werpy N, Denoix J-M. Imaging of the equine proximal suspensory ligament. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract (2012) 28:507–25. doi:10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.005
26. Vallance SA, Bell RJ, Spriet M, Kass PH, Puchalski SM. Comparisons of computed tomography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography and standing low-field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with lameness localised to the foot. Part 2: lesion identification. Equine Vet J (2012) 44:149–56. doi:10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00372.x
27. Vallance SA, Bell RJ, Spriet M, Kass PH, Puchalski SM. Comparisons of computed tomography, contrast enhanced computer tomography and standing low-field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with lameness localised to the foot. Part 1: anatomic visualisation scores. Equine Vet J (2012) 44:51–6. doi:10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00372
28. van Hamel SE, Bergman HJ, Puchalski SM, de Groot MW, van Weeren PR. Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic evaluation of the deep digital flexor tendon in the equine foot compared to macroscopic and histologic findings in 23 limbs. Equine Vet J (2014) 46:300–5. doi:10.1111/evj.12129
29. Launois M, Vandeweerd J-M, Perrin R, Brogniez L, Desbrosse F, Clegg P. Use of computed tomography to diagnose new bone formation associated with desmitis of the proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament in third metacarpal or third metatarsal bones of three horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc (2009) 234:514–8. doi:10.2460/javma.234.4.514
30. Harris MT, Butler DL, Boivin GP, Florer JB, Schantz EJ, Wenstrup RJ. Mesenchymal stem cells used for rabbit tendon repair can form ectopic bone and express alkaline phosphatase activity in constructs. J Orthop Res (2004) 22:998–1003. doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2004.02.012
31. Ghatan AC, Carlson EJ, Athanasian EA, Weiland AJ. Attrition or rupture of digital extensor tendons due to carpal boss: report of 2 cases. J Hand Surg Am (2014) 39:919–22. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.02.010
32. Crowe OM, Dyson SJ, Wright IM, Schramme MC, Smith RK. Treatment of chronic or recurrent proximal suspensory desmitis using radial pressure wave therapy in the horse. Equine Vet J (2004) 36:313–6. doi:10.2746/0425164044890562
33. Dyson S, Murray R. Management of hindlimb proximal suspensory desmopathy by neurectomy of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve and plantar fasciotomy: 155 horses (2003-2008). Equine Vet J (2012) 44:361–7. doi:10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00445.x
34. Miryounesi M, Piryaei A, Pournasr B, Aghdami N, Baharvand H. Repeated versus single transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in mice. Cell Biol Int (2013) 37:340–7. doi:10.1002/cbin.10048
35. Richardson JD, Psaltis PJ, Frost L, Paton S, Carbone A, Bertaso AG, et al. Incremental benefits of repeated mesenchymal stromal cell administration compared with solitary intervention after myocardial infarction. Cytotherapy (2014) 16:460–70. doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.07.016
Keywords: allogenic, stem cells, tendon, suspensory, horse
Citation: Vandenberghe A, Broeckx SY, Beerts C, Seys B, Zimmerman M, Verweire I, Suls M and Spaas JH (2015) Tenogenically induced allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of proximal suspensory ligament desmitis in a horse. Front. Vet. Sci. 2:49. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00049
Received: 05 June 2015; Accepted: 09 October 2015;
Published: 22 October 2015
Edited by:
Martin Andreas Vidal, Cave Creek Equine Surgical Center, USACopyright: © 2015 Vandenberghe, Broeckx, Beerts, Seys, Zimmerman, Verweire, Suls and Spaas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jan H. Spaas, amFuLnNwYWFzJiN4MDAwNDA7YW5hY3VyYS5jb20=