Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Urol.

Sec. Urologic Oncology

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fruro.2025.1567575

This article is part of the Research Topic Advancements in Robotic Surgery for Urologic Cancer Treatment View all articles

Prevalence and Impact of Sarcopenia on Urinary Incontinence in Localized Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Provisionally accepted
Tengfei Gu Tengfei Gu Jie Li Jie Li Dan Wu Dan Wu Ting Ting Chen Ting Ting Chen Yongtao Pan Yongtao Pan Qinzhou Yu Qinzhou Yu Sha Jing Sha Jing *
  • Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: This research seeks to assess the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and to investigate the influence of sarcopenia on the incidence of urinary incontinence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.The study assessed the prevalence of sarcopenia in a cohort of 350 patients with localized prostate cancer, revealing an overall prevalence rate of 40.86%. Specifically, the prevalence was 34.2% among patients classified as low to intermediate risk and 51.11% among those classified as high risk (P<0.01). The incidence rates of urinary incontinence were documented at various postoperative intervals: immediately after surgery, at 3 months, and at 6 months, with rates of 72%, 47.81%, and 28%, respectively. Notably, patients with sarcopenia exhibited significantly higher urinary incontinence rates compared to those without sarcopenia, at 82.52%, 65.03%, and 37.06% versus 64.73%, 35.75%, and 21.74% (P<0.01). In the subgroup of low to intermediate-risk patients with sarcopenia, the postoperative urinary incontinence rates were 68.92% immediately, 54.05% at 3 months, and 18.92% at 6 months, compared to 54.61%, 21.28%, and 14.89% in patients without sarcopenia. However, the differences in incontinence rates immediately post-surgery and at 6 months were not statistically significant (P>0.05)In patients at high risk with sarcopenia, the incidence rates were 97.10%, 76.81%, and 56.52%, which were higher compared to those without sarcopenia, who exhibited rates of 86.36%, 66.67%, and 36.36%. There was no significant difference observed at three months post-surgery (P > 0.05). Regression analysis indicates that sarcopenia is significantly associated with an increased risk of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy at three months post-operation (OR = 0.448, 95% CI: 0.290-0.691, P < 0.001) and six months post-operation (OR = 0.175, 95% CI: 0.105-0.291, P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors such as age, tumor risk stratification, diabetes, and pelvic floor function scores, sarcopenia remains an independent predictor of urinary incontinence occurrence at three months post-operation (OR = 0.320, 95% CI: 0.187-0.546, P < 0.001) and six months post-operation (OR = 0.398, 95% CI: 0.224-0.708, P = 0.002).Conclusions: Sarcopenia significantly contributes to urinary incontinence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and impacts the recovery process, especially in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

    Keywords: prostate cancer, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, Sarcopenia, Urinary Incontinence, risk factor

    Received: 27 Jan 2025; Accepted: 19 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Gu, Li, Wu, Chen, Pan, Yu and Jing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Sha Jing, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more