data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Trop. Dis.
Sec. Antimicrobial Resistance
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fitd.2025.1540713
This article is part of the Research Topic Antimicrobial Resistance Response Perspectives in Africa View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Kenya has established a multisectoral national action plan (NAP) on antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which provides a common framework for action by all stakeholders from different sectors in implementing AMR containment activities. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the NAP-AMR has been weak necessitating the development of a multisectoral M&E framework in 2021. Using this M&E tool, Kenya's highest level technical body charged with containing AMR-the National Antimicrobial Stewardship Interagency Committee (NASIC), led a review of the NAP-AMR (2017-2022). During the review, 16 out of 47 counties had established County Antimicrobial Stewardship Interagency Committees mirroring the NASIC. A total of 93% (38 out of 41) of activities in the NAP-AMR M&E framework for human health were either completed or ongoing compared to 64% [28 out of 44] that were completed or ongoing in the animal and crop sectors). Key challenges for implementation of the NAP-AMR included lack of adequate funding; difficulties in effective collaboration across and within relevant sectors; weak laboratory-clinical interface; erratic supply of laboratory reagents, equipment, and supplies leading to underutilization of microbiology laboratories; and poor internet connectivity at the various facilities negatively affecting transmission of AMR data to the national level. Major learnings and recommendations include strengthening governance arrangements at the national and county level; costing of the NAP-AMR; and ramping up advocacy efforts to political leadership to gather further support for actions on AMR-were integrated into the next iteration of the NAP-AMR (2023-2027), which was released during the November 2023 World AMR Awareness Week.
Keywords: National Action Plan, antimicrobial resistance, Monitoring And Evaluation, Kenya, One Health
Received: 06 Dec 2024; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mukoko, Kusu, Hafner, Gitonga, Konduri, Joshi, Odhiambo, Wesangula, Tanui, Azegele and Ndanyi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Joseph Mukoko, Management Sciences for Health, Medford, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.