AUTHOR=Ngongang Natacha Njike , Mezajou Cybelle Fodieu , Kameni Charleine , Ngum Jubilate Afuoti , Simo Ulrich Stephane Fotso , Tatang Fabrice Junior , Ngate Nguengo Sarah , Chakam Nouthio Annick Prisca , Wandji Pajiep Michelle Alma , Toumeni Michelle Hako , Takou Madjoumo Epiphanie Sorelle , Tchinda Maxwell Fofou , Ngangue Roland Jethro Ekwala Misse , Dongmo Fabrice Fabien Dongho , Wade Abel , Akami Mazarin , Ngane Ngono Annie Rosalie , Tamgue Ousman TITLE=TNF and HNRNPL Related Immunoregulatory Long non-coding RNA (THRIL) and long intergenic noncoding RNA-p21 (lincRNA-p21) as potential useful biomarkers for the diagnosis of tuberculosis JOURNAL=Frontiers in Tropical Diseases VOLUME=3 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/tropical-diseases/articles/10.3389/fitd.2022.969307 DOI=10.3389/fitd.2022.969307 ISSN=2673-7515 ABSTRACT=

Early diagnosis is crucial in controlling tuberculosis globally and in developing countries with the emergence of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are promising tuberculosis diagnostic biomarkers. Two lncRNA diagnostic markers, lncRNA THRIL and lincRNA-p21, were studied as tuberculosis diagnostic biomarkers. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Center of Respiratory Diseases of LAQUINTINIE hospital and the National Veterinary Laboratory of Douala from December 2020 to August 2021. The ability of lncRNAs to distinguish between 19 healthy controls, 15 latent tuberculosis, and 21 active tuberculosis was estimated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis. Our analysis showed that lncRNA THRIL and lincRNA-p21 were significantly upregulated (P <0.05) in active and latent tuberculosis compared with healthy controls. LincRNA-p21 expression was significantly increased (P <0.05) in active tuberculosis compared with latent tuberculosis, whereas lncRNA THRIL was not significantly affected (P ≥0.05). Both lncRNA THRIL and lincRNA-p21 showed excellent performance in classifying latent tuberculosis and healthy controls (AUC = 92.86%). Furthermore, lncRNA THRIL was good at discriminating active tuberculosis from healthy controls (AUC = 89.79%), while lincRNA-p21 showed excellent discriminating performance (AUC = 100%). LncRNA THRIL was identified as a poor discriminator of latent tuberculosis from active tuberculosis (AUC = 64.28%), while lincRNA-p21 showed excellent diagnostic performance in this distinction (AUC = 92.86%). Our cross-sectional study suggests that lncRNA THRIL and lincRNA-p21 are promising tuberculosis diagnostic biomarkers that can differentiate between latent and active infection.