Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Trop. Dis., 23 March 2022
Sec. Emerging Tropical Diseases

Update on the Dispersal of Aedes albopictus in Mexico: 1988–2021

Aldo I. Ortega-MoralesAldo I. Ortega-Morales1Cresencio Prez-RenteríaCresencio Pérez-Rentería2Jos Ordez-lvarezJosé Ordóñez-Álvarez2Juan Adrin  SalazarJuan Adrián Salazar2Felipe Dzul-ManzanillaFelipe Dzul-Manzanilla3Fabin Correa-MoralesFabián Correa-Morales3Hern Huerta-Jimnez*Herón Huerta-Jiménez2*
  • 1Departamento de Parasitología, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro unidad laguna, Torreón, Mexico
  • 2Laboratorio de Entomología, Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • 3Centro Nacional de Programas Preventivos y Control de Enfermedades, Ciudad de México, Mexico

The Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus (Skuse) is one of the most important mosquito species in public health due to the variety of disease-causing viruses that this species can transmit. In Mexico, Ae. albopictus was reported for the first time in 1990 in the state of Tamaulipas, bordering to the state of Texas (USA). Since then, Ae. albopictus has been reported in 15 Mexican states. Currently, this species is present in all tropical and subtropical regions of the country and its presence is common in the states of the Gulf of Mexico and Chiapas. In the present study, the presence of Ae. albopictus is reported in six additional states: Colima, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Puebla, Oaxaca, and Querétaro. The rapid dispersal of Ae. albopictus in Mexico represents a risk to public health, and the surveillance of this species in regions where it has not yet been reported is essential as part of Mexican entomological surveillance programs.

Introduction

The Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus (Skuse) is a threat to human health because it is a vector of virus-causing diseases such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika and a potential vector of more than 20 other pathogens (1). In Mexico, Ae. albopictus has been found naturally infected with the virus of dengue (2), Zika (3), chikungunya (4), and the dog heartworm Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy) (5). The presence of Ae. albopictus in Mexico was first detected during a mosquito survey conducted in March 1988, where immature stages of this species were collected from a discarded tire in Matamoros, Tamaulipas, bordering with Texas state (6). In September 1993, during a mosquito survey conducted in Coahuila state, immature stages of Ae. albopictus from different artificial containers were collected on the bordering cities of Ciudad Acuña and Piedras Negras (7). In 1997, immature stages of Ae. albopictus were collected from artificial containers in Allende city, Nuevo Leon state, confirming the spreading and establishment of this species in northeastern Mexico (8). In the same year, during a mosquito survey in eight localities of Veracruz state, Ae. albopictus was collected from ovitraps displayed in Veracruz, this state being the first tropical state located in the Gulf of Mexico where the species was detected (9). On September 2002, females of Ae. albopictus were collected biting humans and immature stages were collected from a variety of artificial containers in Chiapas, bordering with Guatemala, with Chiapas being the first tropical state located on the Pacific coast where Ae. albopictus was detected (10). On July and October 2009, immature stages of Ae. albopictus were collected from a variety of artificial containers in Morelos state, being the first inland state where the species was collected (11). On September 2011, immature stages of Ae. albopictus were collected from flower vases in a cemetery of Cancun, Quintana Roo, which was the first state within the Yucatan Peninsula where Ae. albopictus was collected (12). In April 2012, Ae. albopictus was collected in Chapulhuacan, Hidalgo state. One year later, immature stages of this species were collected in the counties of Huahutla and Jaltocan, and the presence of Ae. albopictus was confirmed in Hidalgo (13). In November 2012 and September–October 2013, during mosquito surveys in tropical areas of San Luis Potosi state, immature stages of Ae. albopictus were collected from a variety of artificial and natural containers in diverse locations around Aquismon county (14). In January 2014, Ae. albopictus was collected from ovitraps in Culiacán, Sinaloa. Some larvae were reared to adults and the ribosomal second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for identity confirmation (15). In July and October 2015, immature stages of Ae. albopictus were collected from several kinds of artificial and natural containers in Tabasco state, while adult females were collected while they were approaching to humans in October and November 2016 (16). In June 2017, ovitraps were placed in tropical areas of Tizimin, Yucatan, and adult mosquitoes were collected in the same area using BioDiVector (BDV) tent traps. Specimens collected from ovitraps and the BDV tent trap included Ae. albopictus (16). In September 2017, immature stages were collected from discarded tires and flower vases in Malinalco, Mexico state, and six larvae of Ae. albopictus were identified from these collections (17). In 2018, ovitraps were placed in Mexico City and collected eggs were placed in larval trays for rearing to adults and a single adult female of Ae. albopictus was detected (18). The presence of Ae. albopictus in Mexico City was confirmed by Dávalos-Becerril etal. (19). In November 2018, mosquitoes were collected using backpack aspirators in Ometepec and Tecoanapa counties in Guerrero state. Collected mosquitoes were transported to the Entomological and Bioassay Research Unit of Guerrero and the presence of Ae. albopictus was detected (20). From January 2019 to February 2020, ovitraps were placed in Campeche state. A total of 226 larvae from ovitraps placed in Campeche, Escárcega, Hecelchakán, Tenabo, and Calkini counties were positive for Ae. albopictus (21). With the intention of knowing the current distribution of Ae. albopictus in Mexico, the published historical mosquito Mexican records available in the literature deposited in the library of the Institute of Epidemiological Diagnosis and Reference (INDRE) were reviewed, as well as the records of recent collections from the INDRE were examined.

Materials and Methods

Mosquito surveys were conducted in Mexico by personnel from the National Center for Preventive and Disease Control (CENAPRECE) from each state according to national regulation laws for vector-borne diseases control (22), which includes a national program (for all states) for mosquito collection, which is a continuous program but subject to regulatory changes; for this reason, collections are constant but irregular. Immature and adult stages of mosquitoes were collected according to the continuous and irregular mosquito collection national program during both dry and rainy seasons in diverse counties and regions of the states where the presence of Ae. albopictus had not been detected, which were as follows: Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Chihuahua, Colima, Durango, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michoacán, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Sonora, Tlaxcala, and Zacatecas. Immature stages were collected from any water body where mosquito larvae were detected during surveys. Larval habitats were classified as artificial containers (discarded tires, flower vases, plastic buckets) and natural habitats (tree holes, rock holes, bromeliad axils, bamboo internodes). A portion of immature specimens were preserved alive in plastic cups with the same water from the original habitat and labeled, while the rest were killed with hot water (80°C) and preserved in ethanol (96%). Adult mosquitoes were collected using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) light traps, aspirated intra- and peri-domiciliary in houses using mechanical aspirators, and approaching to the collector personnel with biting intention, mosquitoes were killed using lethal chambers, preserved in glass vials, and labeled. All the collected specimens were sent to the INDRE laboratory for rearing (in case of alive larvae), mounting, and identification. Immature stages were mounted in microscope slides using euparal as mounting medium, while adult mosquitoes were mounted using insect pins. All specimens were deposited in the “Collection of Arthropods of Medical Importance” (CAIM). The work of Darsie and Ward (23)—”Identification and geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, North of Mexico”—was used as basis for the identification. Historical and recent collection records of the presence of Ae. albopictus in Mexico were consulted to determine the known distribution of this species. The reports where Ae. albopictus were detected for the first time in each state are mentioned in the section of references.

Results

The presence of Ae. albopictus was detected in 34 counties of the six states sampled (Figure 1): Colima, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Querétaro, Oaxaca, and Puebla (Table 1). In Puebla, Ae. albopictus was collected in eight counties (Acateno, Tenampulco, Izucar de Matamoros, Cuetzalan, Venustiano Carranza, Jolalpan, Chicontla, and San Jose Acateno); in Querétaro, the species was collected in six counties (Cadereyta, Arroyo Seco, Pinal de Amoles, Landa de Matamoros, Jalpan de Serra, and Peñamiller); in Oaxaca, in 14 counties (Cosolapa, Loma Bonita, San Juan Cotzocon, Matías Romero, San Juan Guichicovi, San Juan Mazatlán, Barrio de la Soledad, Juchitan de Zaragoza, San Pedro Teutila, San Juan Bautista Tlacoatzintepec, San Andrés Teotilapam, Santa María Petapa, Santa María Colotepec, and San Carlos Yautepec); in Guanajuato, five counties were positive for Ae. albopictus (Atarjea, Xichú, Victoria, Allende, Santa Catarina), while in Colima and Jalisco, the species was collected in one single county, respectively (Manzanillo and Tonalá) (Figure 2). The most common habitat for immature stages of Ae. albopictus in the states where the species was collected was artificial containers, which included discarded tires, plastic containers, flower vases, and water tanks (n = 30), while in natural containers such as bamboo internodes, tree holes, and coconut shells, the number of species was fewer (n = 4).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Dispersal of Aedes albopictus in Mexico. (A) Tamaulipas and Coahuila; (B) Nuevo Leon, Veracruz, and Chiapas; (C) Morelos, Quintana Roo, and Sinaloa; (D) San Luis Potosi, Hidalgo, Tabasco, Yucatan, Mexico City, Guerrero, Campeche, Mexico State. New records: Puebla, Querétaro, Oaxaca, Guanajuato, Colima, and Jalisco.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 New mosquito records of the occurrence of Aedes albopictus in Mexico.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Distribution of Aedes albopictus by physiographic region in Mexico.

Discussion

The Asian tiger mosquito Ae. albopictus was originally described by Skuse in 1894 from three adult females collected in Calcutta, India (24). Originally, this species was mainly distributed in the Oriental Region, Oceania, Japan, and China (25). In August 1985, Ae. albopictus was first detected in the New World in Houston, Texas (USA) by personnel from the Harris County Mosquito Control District (26), and this was the beginning of a rapid dispersal in many regions of the world. Currently, Ae. albopictus is present in all continents except Antarctica (27), and this species encompasses 21 countries of the Americas (28), including bordering countries in the southern of Mexico: Belize (29) and Guatemala (30). In Mexico, the spread of Ae. albopictus has been accelerated throughout the country. Since Ae. albopictus was found for the first time in Mexico, the species has had a rapid dispersal throughout the country. Currently, the species occurs in 22 states: Campeche, Chiapas, Coahuila, Colima, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Mexico City, Mexico State, Morelos, Nuevo Leon, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosi, Sinaloa, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Yucatan, and Veracruz, with Colima, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Oaxaca, Puebla, and Querétaro being the new state records for Mexico. The Mexican states where Ae. albopictus remains absent are Aguascalientes, Chihuahua, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Durango, Michoacán, Nayarit, Sonora, Tlaxcala, and Zacatecas (Figure 1). Aedes albopictus invaded Mexico through the international border with the USA from the recently established populations in Texas, and the species quickly established in the humid and subtropical regions of northeastern Mexico (Tamaulipas, Nuevo Leon, and Coahuila) (6). Although most of northeastern Mexico includes typically arid and semiarid regions, the species found favorable environmental conditions for its establishment such as tropical–subtropical humid climate, abundant vegetation in perennial forests, and constant rainfall derived from tropical storms originating in the Gulf of Mexico. The most important regions where the species spread to the southeastern were the mountain system of the Sierra Madre Oriental (to the east) and the Northern Gulf Coastal Plain; through these regions, Ae. albopictus reached new regions at the tropical–southern such as the Southern Gulf Coastal Plain (Veracruz, Hidalgo, Querétaro, San Luis Potosi, Puebla, and Tabasco) and, a few years later, the Yucatan Peninsula (Campeche, Yucatan, and Quintana Roo). However, arid and semiarid regions of the northeastern and middle of the country were partially invaded given the adverse environmental conditions for the establishment of the species such as dry climate and presence of mountain systems with high elevations. These regions include the Grand North America Plains, the Neo-Volcanic Axis, and the Central Plateau (Morelos, Mexico City, Mexico State, and Guanajuato); for this reason, the Ae. albopictus populations are fewer than in other regions and the species is not well established in these states and regions (Figure 2). Nevertheless, it is well known that Ae. albopictus is capable of dispersing through human activities (31, 32). Immature stages (eggs, larvae, and pupae) of Ae. albopictus can be transported from one region to another in rainwater accumulated in used tires, which apparently are the primary breeding site in North America and the most likely means of its introduction to the United States (33). The spread of Ae. albopictus has been linked to global shipping routes and road networks, but much remains unknown about the human role in the dispersal mechanism. However, this species can be commonly transported also by cars and other motor vehicles (1). After 10 years of the first detection in Tamaulipas, Ae. albopictus had a natural dispersion throughout conserved regions between northern Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas, reaching the northern–middle area of Veracruz, where the species had its southernmost distributional rank. The early detection of Ae. albopictus in Tapachula, Chiapas, in 2002 was surprising because the environmental conditions between Tamaulipas and Veracruz favored the rapid expansion of the species; however, between the Southern Gulf Coastal Plain in Veracruz state and the Central Mountain Range, in southern Chiapas, there is a mountain system with high elevation that includes temperate mountain ranges where the natural dispersal of Ae. albopictus would be much slower. It is possible that the presence of Ae. albopictus in the coastal region of Chiapas was due to a second invasion of the species in Mexico, probably from Guatemala or eggs and/or larvae dispersing in discarded tires or flower vases from northern Mexico, where the species was already established. From coastal Chiapas, Ae. albopictus spread through the Central Mountain Range and the Sierra Madre del Sur reaching states in the Pacific coast such as Oaxaca and Guerrero, where the species was recently detected whose presence was still sporadic with low populations. There are two possible natural routes of dispersion of the species to the western limit of the Neo-Volcanic Axis in the states of Jalisco and Colima: a) well-established populations of Ae. albopictus from the Central Mountain Range that spreads into the Sierra Madre del Sur throughout the conserved areas near the Pacific Coast; if this is true, the species currently occurs in the forest and/or coastal areas of Michoacán; and b) not well-established populations of the species that spreads from the Sierra Madre Oriental throughout the Neo-Volcanic Axis. This hypothesis is less likely because the presence in the volcano and mountain system includes temperate forest with elevations that exceed the 1,000 m above the sea level, where the dispersal of Ae. albopictus would be much slower. Currently, Ae. albopictus occurs in 11 of the 15 physiographical regions of Mexico (34) in both the Nearctic and the Neotropical biogeographical zones. In the Nearctic zone, the species occurs in the Central Plateau, Grand North America Plains, Neo-Volcanic Axis, Northern Gulf Coastal Plain, Pacific Coastal Plain, and Sierra Madre Oriental, while in the Neotropical zone, Ae. albopictus occurs in the Central Mountain Range, Sierra Madre del Sur, Mountains of Chiapas and Guatemala, Southern Gulf Coastal Plain, and the Yucatan Peninsula. Nearctic zones where the species has not been recorded are the Baja California Peninsula, Mountain Ranges and Plains of the North, Sierra Madre Occidental, and the Sonoran Plain (Figure 2). Because of its medical importance, the surveillance of Ae. albopictus is recommended in other regions of Mexico, especially in regions where the species has not been collected.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

AO-M and HH-J: contribution to the study conception and design and analysis of data. CP-R, JO-A and JAS: material preparation and morphological identification of specimens. FD-M and FC-M: funding acquisition. AO-M, CP-R, JO-A, JAS, FD-M, FC-M, and HH-J: drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by the Entomology Department of the Institute of Epidemiological Diagnosis and Reference and the Vector-Borne Disease Control Program of the National Center of Preventive Programs and Diseases Control.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank the collecting personnel from the CENAPRECE and the entomology staff of the Entomological and Bioassay Research Unit from the states of Colima, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Oaxaca, Puebla, and Querétaro for their valuable collaboration during the collection trips.

References

1. Ertija R, Palmer JRB, Roiz D, Sanpera–Calbet I, Bartumeus F. Direct Evidence of Adult Aedes Albopictus Dispersal by Car. Sci Rep (2017) 7:14399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12652-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ibáñez-Bernal S, Briseño B, Mutebi JP, Argot E, Rodríguez G, Martínez–Campos C, et al. First Record in America of Aedes Albopictus Naturally Infected With Dengue Virus During the 1995 Outbreak at Reynosa, Mexico. Med Vet Entomol (1997) 11(4):305–9. doi: 10.11/j.1365–2915.1997.tb00413.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Huerta H, González–Roldán JF, Sánchez–Tejeda G, Correa–Morales F, Romero–Contreras FE, Cárdenas–Flores R, et al. Detection of Zika Virus in Aedes Albopictus From Mexico. Trans R Soc (2017) 111(7):238–331. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trx056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Correa–Morales F, González–Acosta C, Mejía–Zúñiga D, Huerta H, Pérez–Rentería C, Vazquez–Pichardo M, et al. Surveillance for Zika in Mexico: Naturally Infected Mosquitoes in Urban and Semi-Urban Areas. Pathog Glob Health (2019) 113(600):1–6. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2019.1706291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Alvarado–Torres H, Viveros–Santos V, Torres–Monzón JA, López–Ordóñez T, Torres–Chablé OM, Casas–Martínez M. Detección De Dirofilaria Immitis (Spirurida: Onchocercidae) En La Comunidad De Mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae) De Cementerios De La Region Soconusco, Sur De México. Entomol Mex (2019) 6:490–6.

Google Scholar

6. Francy DB, Moore CG, Eliason DA. Past, Present and Future of Aedes Albopictus in the United States. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (1990) 6:127–32.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Ibáñez–Bernal S, Martínez–Campos C. Aedes Albopictus in Mexico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (1994) 10(2):231–2.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Orta–Pesina H, Mercado–Hernández R, Valdez–Rodríguez MA. Aedes Albopictus in Allende City, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (2001) 17(4):260–1.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

9. Flisser A, Velasco–Villa A, Martínez–Campos C, González–Domínguez F, Briseño–García B, García–Suarez R, et al. Infectius Diseases in Mexico. A Survey From 1995–2000. Arch Med Res (2002) 33:343–50. doi: 10.1016/S0188-4409(02)00381-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Casas–Martínez M, Torres–Estrada JL. First Evidence of Aedes Albopictus (Skuse) in Southern Chiapas, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis (2003) 9:606–7. doi: 10.3201/eid0905.020678

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Villegas–Trejo A, Manrique–Saide P, Che–Mendoza A, Cruz–Canto W, González–Fernández M, González–Acosta C, et al. First Report of Aedes Albopictus and Other Mosquito Species in Morelos, Mexico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (2010) 26(3):321–3. doi: 10.2987/10-6014.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Salomón–Grajales J, Lugo–Moguel GV, Tinal–Gordillo VR, de la Cruz–Velázquez J, Beaty BJ, Eisen L, et al. Aedes Albopictus Mosquitoes, Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis (2012) 18(3):525–7. doi: 10.3201/eid1803.111626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ortega–Morales AI, Cueto–Medina SM, Siller–Rodríguez QK. First Record of the Asian Tiger Mosquito Aedes Albopictus in Hidalgo State, Mexico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (2016) 32(3):234–6. doi: 10.2987/16-6576.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ortega–Morales AI, Siller–Rodríguez QK. First Record of Aedes Albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. J Vector Ecol (2016) 41(2):314–5. doi: 10.1111/jvec.12229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Torres–Avendaño JI, Castillo–Ureta H, Torres–Montoya EH, Meza–Carrillo E, Lopez–Mendoza RL, Vazquez–Martinez MG, et al. First Record of Aedes Albopictus in Sinaloa, Mexico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (2015) 31(2):164–6. doi: 10.2987/14-6461R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ortega–Morales AI, Bond G, Méndez–López R, Garza–Hernández JA, Hernández–Triana LM, Casas–Martínez M. First Record of Invasive Mosquito Aedes Albopictus in Tabasco and Yucatan, Mexico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (2018) 34(2):120–3. doi: 10.2987/18-6736.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Adeniran AA, Hernández–Triana LM, Ortega–Morales AI, Garza–Hernández JA, de la Cruz–Ramos J, Chan–Chable RJ, et al. Identification of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) From Mexico State, Mexico Using Morphology and COI DNA Barcoding. Acta Trop (2021) 213:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105730

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ortega–Morales AI, Moreno–García M, González–Acosta C, Correa–Morales F. Mosquito Surveillance in Mexico: The Use of Ovitraps for Aedes Aegypti, Ae. Albopictus, and non–Target Species. Fla Entomol (2018) 101(4):623–6.

Google Scholar

19. Dávalos–Becerril E, Correa–Morales F, González–Acosta C, Santos–Luna R, Peralta–Rodríguez J, Pérez–Rentería C, et al. Urban and Semi–Urban Mosquitoes of Mexico City: A Risk for Endemic Mosquito–Borne Disease Transmission. PloS One (2019) 14(3):1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212987

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. González–Acosta C, Correa–Morales F, Canche–Aguilar I, Silva–Domíbguez R, Salgado–Alonzo MC, Muñóz–Urias R, et al. First Report of Aedes Albopictus in Guerreo State, Mexico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (2019) 35(4):285–7. doi: 10.2987/19-6829.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hernández–Rodríguez JL, Pérez–Pacheco R, Vásquez–López A, Mejenes–Hernández MC, Granados–Echegoyen CA, Arcos–Cordova IR, et al. Asian Tiger Mosquito in Yucatan Peninsula: First Record of Aedes (Stegomyia) Albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Campeche, Mexico. J Med Entomol (2020) 20:1–3. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa133

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. SEGOB. Secretaría de Gobernación. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM–032–SSA2–2014 Para La Vigilancia Epidemiológica, Promoción, Prevención Y Control De Las Enfermedades Transmitidas Por Vectores. Mexico: Diario Oficial de la Federación (2015).

Google Scholar

23. Darsie RF, Ward RF. Identification and Geographical Distribution of the Mosquitoes of North America, North of Mexico. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida (2005).

Google Scholar

24. Skuse FA. The Banded Mosquito of Bengal. Indian Mus Notes (1895) 3(5):20.

Google Scholar

25. Becker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Dahl C, Madon M, et al. Mosquitoes and Their Control. 2nd ed. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer (2010).

Google Scholar

26. Sprenger D, Wuithiranyagool T. The Discovery of Aedes Albopictus in Harris County, Texas. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (1986) 2:217–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

27. Kreamer MUG, Sinka ME, Duda KA, Mylne A, Shearer FM, Brady OJ, et al. The Global Compendium of Aedes Aegypti and Ae. Albopictus Occurrence. Sci Data (2015) 2:1–8. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.35

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. García–Rejon JE, Navarro JC, Cigarroa–Toledo N, Baak–Baak CM. An Updated Review of the Invasive Aedes Albopictus in the Americas; Geographical Distribution, Host Feeding Patterns, Arbovirus Infection, and the Potential for Vertical Transmission of Dengue Virus. Insects (2021) 12:1–13. doi: 10.3390/insects12110967

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ortega–Morales AI, Mis–Ávila P, Doínguez–Galera M, Canul–Amaro G, Esparza–Aguilar J, Carlos–Azueta J, et al. First Record of Stegomyia Albopicta [Aedes Albopictus] in Belize. Southwest Entomol (2010) 35(2):197–8. doi: 10.3958/059.035.0208

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Ogata K, López–Samayoa A. Discovery of Aedes Albopictus in Guatemala. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (1996) 12(3):503–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

31. Moore CG, Mitchell CJ. Aedes Albopictus in the United States: Ten–Year Presence and Public Health Implications. Emerg Infect Dis (1997) 3:329–34. doi: 10.3201/eid0303.970309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Roche B, Léger L, L´Ambert G, Lacour G, Foussadier R, Besnard G, et al. The Spread of Aedes Albopictus in Metropolitan France: Contribution of Environmental Drivers and Human Activities and Predictions for a Near Future. PloS One (2015) 10(5):e0125600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hawley WA, Reiter P, Copeland RS, Pumpuni CB, Criag GB. Aedes Albopictus in North America: Probable Introduction in Used Tires From Northern Asia. Science (1987) 236(4805):1114–6. doi: 10.1126/science.3576225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Regiones Fisiográficas (2021). Available at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/fisiografia (Accessed March 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

Keywords: Aedes albopictus, distribution, update, Mexico, new records

Citation: Ortega-Morales AI, Pérez-Rentería C, Ordóñez-Álvarez J, Salazar JA, Dzul-Manzanilla F, Correa-Morales F and Huerta-Jiménez H (2022) Update on the Dispersal of Aedes albopictus in Mexico: 1988–2021. Front. Trop. Dis 2:814205. doi: 10.3389/fitd.2021.814205

Received: 12 November 2021; Accepted: 29 December 2021;
Published: 23 March 2022.

Edited by:

Rubén Bueno-Marí, Lokimica Laboratorios, Spain

Reviewed by:

Indra Vythilingam, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Francisco Collantes, University of Murcia, Spain

Copyright © 2022 Ortega-Morales, Pérez-Rentería, Ordóñez-Álvarez, Salazar, Dzul-Manzanilla, Correa-Morales and Huerta-Jiménez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Herón Huerta-Jiménez, cerato_2000@yahoo.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.