
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
MINI REVIEW article
Front. Transplant.
Sec. Abdominal Transplantation
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frtra.2025.1576549
This article is part of the Research Topic Decedent Model vs Primate Model - Do We Know Enough? View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Non-human primates and decedent humans have emerged as the two principal translational models in xenotransplantation. Each model has differing advantages and drawbacks. In this manuscript, we will compare and contrast the relative strengths of each model, focusing on the physiologic function of the xenograft in a human decedent or non-human primate. Additionally, we will discuss the pharmacologic agents typically employed in each model, highlighting both the ability of the decedent model to test clinically-relevant medication strategies that may be impossible in non-human primates due to species-specificity.
Keywords: Xenotransplant, Kidney, renal physiology, pharmacokinetics, non-human primate, decedent model
Received: 14 Feb 2025; Accepted: 28 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Anderson and Locke. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Douglas J Anderson, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.