
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Transplant.
Sec. Transplantation Immunology
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frtra.2025.1568910
This article is part of the Research Topic Decedent Model vs Primate Model - Do We Know Enough? View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Xenotransplantation offers an opportunity to radically change the availability of organs for life saving human transplantation. Great progress has been made in porcine donor genetic engineering to reduce the immunogenicity of pig organs and potentially enhance their resistance to antibody mediated rejection. There is also growing insight into more effective immune suppression regimens. These advances have improved the duration of cardiac xenograft survival in non-human primates over the last decade and supported recent approval of first-in-human clinical use of pig hearts and kidneys for transplantation. This review critically examines preclinical and clinical results in cardiac xenotransplantation. We identify challenges which remain to achieving consistent and durable clinical graft survival. We discuss the relative value of preclinical non-human primate and human decedent transplant models to optimize patient cross matching, immune suppression, post-operative monitoring and graft survival.
Keywords: xenotransplantation, Cardiac, Antibody Mediated Rejection (ABMR), decedent model, Genetic Engineering
Received: 30 Jan 2025; Accepted: 28 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Byrne and McGregor. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Guerard W Byrne, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.