Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Transplant.
Sec. Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frtra.2025.1536754
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancements and Perspectives in Womb Transplantation: From Myth to Reality View all articles

Deceased Donor Uterus Transplantation: Religious Perceptions

Provisionally accepted
Jana- Emily Pittman Jana- Emily Pittman 1*Brigitte Gerstl Brigitte Gerstl 1,2Elena Cavazzoni Elena Cavazzoni 3Natasha Mireille Rogers Natasha Mireille Rogers 4,5Mianna Lotz Mianna Lotz 6Rebecca Deans Rebecca Deans 1,7
  • 1 South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales Department of Health, Sydney, Australia
  • 2 School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • 3 NSW Organ Tissue and Donation Service, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
  • 4 Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • 5 Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • 6 Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, Macquarie, Australia
  • 7 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Uterus transplant now offers an alternative deceased donation treatment option for women with uterine infertility. Limited research exists on religious opinions that may impact the addition of the uterus to current multi-organ deceased donor programs Objective: To explore the acceptability of uterus transplantation and deceased uterus donation across different religious groups. Design: A cross-sectional survey of 2,497 participants was conducted between October 2022 and January 2023 in NSW Australia. Australia is a culturally and religiously diverse nation with over 60% of people identifying with a religion, including Christianity (43%), Islam (3.2%), Buddhism (2.7%), Hinduism (2.4%). This survey captured awareness and attitudes towards deceased uterus donation. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to explore factors influencing organ donation and next-of-kin perceptions.Results: A total of 2497 respondents completed the survey. Christians had greater awareness of organ donation but were less likely to be registered donors, or consent to uterus donation. Those of Hindu faith were less likely to be registered organ donors. Next-of-kin from the Islamic faith were reluctant to consent to organ donation if the donor’s pre-death wishes were unknown and less likely to consent to uterus donation. Participants identifying as Buddhist had a higher awareness of uterus transplantation.Conclusion: Organ donor awareness and consent rates varied across religious groups, including for uterus donation. Differences may stem from varying beliefs about bodily integrity, and reproductive rights, which may influence attitudes toward uterus donation. Tailored culturally and linguistically sensitive educational campaigns should address the unique aspects of uterus donation.

    Keywords: Transplantation, Infertility, uterus transplant, Deceased donor, vascular composite allograft, Uterus, public perception

    Received: 29 Nov 2024; Accepted: 31 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Pittman, Gerstl, Cavazzoni, Rogers, Lotz and Deans. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jana- Emily Pittman, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales Department of Health, Sydney, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.