Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Toxicol.
Sec. In Vitro Toxicology
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1547640

Evaluation of Estrogenic and Anti-Estrogenic Activity of Endocrine Disruptors using Breast Cancer Spheroids: A Comparative Study of T47D and MCF7 Cell Lines in 2D and 3D Models

Provisionally accepted
Katia Barbaro Katia Barbaro 1*Elisa Innocenzi Elisa Innocenzi 1Valentina Monteleone Valentina Monteleone 1Daniele Marcoccia Daniele Marcoccia 1Annalisa Altigeri Annalisa Altigeri 1Alessia Zepparoni Alessia Zepparoni 1Daniela Caciolo Daniela Caciolo 1Cristian Alimonti Cristian Alimonti 1Marta Mollari Marta Mollari 1Paola Ghisellini Paola Ghisellini 2Cristina Rando Cristina Rando 2Roberto Eggenhoffner Roberto Eggenhoffner 2Maria Teresa Scicluna Maria Teresa Scicluna 1
  • 1 Institute of Experimental Zooprophylactic of the Lazio and Tuscany Regions (IZSLT), Rome, Lazio, Italy
  • 2 Department of Integrated Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The estrogenic and anti-estrogenic effects of endocrine disruptors were examined in vitro using twodimensional 2D and three-dimensional 3D estrogen receptor-positive T47D and MCF7 human breast cancer cells. The in vitro model system was used to test the plasticizer Bisphenol A (BPA), a known endocrine disruptor (EDs) with estrogen-like action, aga inst 17-Estradiol (E2), the endogenous nuclear estrogen receptor (nERs) ligand, and the anti-estrogenic drug Fulvestrant (FUL). Spheroid formation and gene expression of estrogen-regulated markers (pS2 and TGFβ3) both in 2D and 3D cultures were used to establish the dose-dependent cellular effects of these substances, evaluated cell viability either by separately treating with the individual substances or in co-treatment. BPA exhibited a dose-dependent estrogenic activity in both 2D and 3D cultures, significantly influencing cell proliferation and gene expression of estrogen-regulated markers (pS2 and TGFβ3). In contrast, FUL displayed anti-estrogenic properties, effectively inhibiting the proliferative effects of E2, thereby highlighting the complex interactions between these compounds and the nERs pathways in human breast cancer cells. Our findings indicate that E2 and BPA significantly increase pS2 expression while decreasing TGFβ3, and that FUL co-treatment reverses these effects. Therefore, the in vitro model system could serve to observe the cell-mediated effects caused by the interaction of EDs with nERs.Through the use of these in vitro model systems both -2D and especially 3D, the latter of which allow better emulation of complex physiological and pathological processes occurring in vivo, the effects caused by EDs on nERs pathways can be detected and studied under various conditions. This approach could be used as a preliminary screening test for the determination of substances with similar estrogenic action and therefore in substitution of the use of experimentation conducted on animals, as well as being adopted as a possible model for better environmental and health risk assessment. This approach performs as a preliminary screening tool to identify estrogenic substances, offering the potential to reduce reliance on in vivo experiments and contributing to improved environmental and health risk assessments.

    Keywords: Endocrine Disruptors, Estrogen receptor signaling, bisphenol A, 2D/3D in vitro models, breast cancer toxicological assessment

    Received: 18 Dec 2024; Accepted: 04 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Barbaro, Innocenzi, Monteleone, Marcoccia, Altigeri, Zepparoni, Caciolo, Alimonti, Mollari, Ghisellini, Rando, Eggenhoffner and Scicluna. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Katia Barbaro, Institute of Experimental Zooprophylactic of the Lazio and Tuscany Regions (IZSLT), Rome, 00178, Lazio, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.