Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Toxicol.

Sec. Environmental Toxicology

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1530209

This article is part of the Research Topic Genotoxic Pathways of Reproductive Outcomes View all 5 articles

A systematic review of the effects of nanoplastics on fish

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, United States
  • 2 University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Virginia, United States
  • 3 Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The global concern about plastics has been amplified due to their widespread contamination in the environment, and their ability to cross biological barriers in living organisms. However, our understanding of their bioaccumulation, toxicity, and interaction with other environmental pollutants remains limited. Plastics are classified into three categories: macro-(MAP>5 mm), micro-(MIP, <5 mm), and nanoplastics (NAP<100nm). Among these, NAPs have superior sorption capacity, a large surface area, and a greater ability to release co-contaminants into tissues, resulting in more complex and harmful effects compared to MAPs and MIPs. To assess the toxic effects of NAPs, particularly their genotoxicity in fish, we carried out a bibliographic search in PubMed using the search terms "nanoplastics" and "fish", which yielded 233 articles. These studies focused on various polymers including polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polypropylene (PPP), polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). We further refined our search by including fish species such as common carp, fathead minnows, medaka, tilapia, trout, and zebrafish and selecting 102 articles for review. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on the effects of NAPs on fishes, emphasizing their interaction with co-contaminants including metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, antibiotics, plastic additives, and endocrine disruptors found in the aquatic environments. Our findings indicate that among fish species, zebrafish is the most frequently studied, while PS is the most commonly encountered NAP in the aquatic ecosystems. Despite substantial experimental variability, our systematic review highlights that NAPs accumulate in various tissues of fish including skin, muscle, gill, gut, liver, heart, gonads, and brain across all developmental stages from embryos to adults. NAP exposure leads to significant adverse effects including increased oxidative stress, decreased locomotor, and foraging activities, altered growth, immunity, lipid metabolism and induced neurotoxicity. Furthermore, NAP exposure modulates estrogen-androgenthyroid-steroidogenesis (EATS) pathways and shows potential intergenerational effects. Although USEPA and EU are aware of the global impact of plastic pollution, the prolonged persistence of plastics continues to pose a significant risk to both aquatic life and human health.

    Keywords: nanoplastics, fish, Oxidative Stress, Genotoxic effects, development, intergenerational effects

    Received: 19 Nov 2024; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Dasmahapatra, Chatterjee and Tchounwou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Paul B Tchounwou, Morgan State University, Baltimore, 21251, Maryland, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more