AUTHOR=Rajagopal Ramya , Baltazar Maria T. , Carmichael Paul L. , Dent Matthew P. , Head Julia , Li Hequn , Muller Iris , Reynolds Joe , Sadh Kritika , Simpson Wendy , Spriggs Sandrine , White Andrew , Kukic Predrag TITLE=Beyond AOPs: A Mechanistic Evaluation of NAMs in DART Testing JOURNAL=Frontiers in Toxicology VOLUME=4 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/toxicology/articles/10.3389/ftox.2022.838466 DOI=10.3389/ftox.2022.838466 ISSN=2673-3080 ABSTRACT=

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) promise to offer a unique opportunity to enable human-relevant safety decisions to be made without the need for animal testing in the context of exposure-driven Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA). Protecting human health against the potential effects a chemical may have on embryo-foetal development and/or aspects of reproductive biology using NGRA is particularly challenging. These are not single endpoint or health effects and risk assessments have traditionally relied on data from Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART) tests in animals. There are numerous Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) that can lead to DART, which means defining and developing strict testing strategies for every AOP, to predict apical outcomes, is neither a tenable goal nor a necessity to ensure NAM-based safety assessments are fit-for-purpose. Instead, a pragmatic approach is needed that uses the available knowledge and data to ensure NAM-based exposure-led safety assessments are sufficiently protective. To this end, the mechanistic and biological coverage of existing NAMs for DART were assessed and gaps to be addressed were identified, allowing the development of an approach that relies on generating data relevant to the overall mechanisms involved in human reproduction and embryo-foetal development. Using the knowledge of cellular processes and signalling pathways underlying the key stages in reproduction and development, we have developed a broad outline of endpoints informative of DART. When the existing NAMs were compared against this outline to determine whether they provide comprehensive coverage when integrated in a framework, we found them to generally cover the reproductive and developmental processes underlying the traditionally evaluated apical endpoint studies. The application of this safety assessment framework is illustrated using an exposure-led case study.