Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Syst. Neurosci.
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2024.1309158
This article is part of the Research Topic Spotlight on Aging: Physiology, Prevention and Management of Gait and Balance View all 4 articles

Age-Based Stereotype Threat Effects on Dynamic Balance in Healthy Older Adults

Provisionally accepted
Liliane Borel Liliane Borel 1*Béatrice Alescio-Lautier Béatrice Alescio-Lautier 1Guillaume Chaumet Guillaume Chaumet 2Jacques LEONARD Jacques LEONARD 1Isabelle Régner Isabelle Régner 3
  • 1 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LNC, Marseille, France
  • 2 AltraBio, 30 pré-Gaudry, Lyon, France
  • 3 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPC, Marseille, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Stereotype threat can lead older adults to perceive their experiences in a biased manner, giving rise to interfering thoughts and negative emotions that generate stress and anxiety. Negative beliefs about aging may serve as an additional factor that increases the need for attentional demand, potentially resulting in a performance level below their actual capabilities. In the present study, we asked whether negative aging stereotypes influence a dynamic balance task and explored the means to counteract them in healthy elderly participants. Methods: The performance of balance was compared in two groups of participants aged 65 to 75 years (n=22) under stereotype threat or reduced-threat situation. Balance abilities were tested under dynamic conditions, requiring participants to maintain balance on a moving platform and using a gradient of difficulty (with eyes open or closed, without or with foam). Postural performance was evaluated by means of posturographic evaluation of the center of pressure displacement and motion analysis. Additionally, we investigated the effects of stereotype threat on walking tasks at preferred speeds and on the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Results: Participants under stereotype threat showed poorer balance, particularly in challenging conditions (eyes closed, on foam), with less effective body segments stabilization. Their postural stabilization on foam was worse compared to a solid surface. Conversely, those in the reduced threat condition maintained better body segment stabilization across all conditions, indicating consistent postural control regardless of the presence of foam. Stereotype threat did not affect preferred walking speed or the time to complete the "Time Up and Go" test. Discussion-Conclusion: This study provides the first description of age-based stereotype threat effects on a dynamic balance task and how to counteract them in healthy older adults. We suggest that the decrease in postural performance observed in participants exposed to stereotype threat can be attributed to a split in attentional focus between negative intrusive thoughts and the attention needed for maintaining balance. These findings open new perspectives on how to overcome negative expectations when evaluating and training physical abilities, thereby contributing to fall prevention among older adults.

    Keywords: Stereotype Threat (ST), reduced stereotype, older adults, Postural control, task difficulty, increased attentional load

    Received: 24 Oct 2023; Accepted: 22 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Borel, Alescio-Lautier, Chaumet, LEONARD and Régner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Liliane Borel, Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LNC, Marseille, France

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.