AUTHOR=Brown Matthew R. G. , Benoit James R. A. , Juhás Michal , Lebel R. M. , MacKay Marnie , Dametto Ericson , Silverstone Peter H. , Dolcos Florin , Dursun Serdar M. , Greenshaw Andrew J. TITLE=Neural correlates of high-risk behavior tendencies and impulsivity in an emotional Go/NoGo fMRI task JOURNAL=Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience VOLUME=9 YEAR=2015 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00024 DOI=10.3389/fnsys.2015.00024 ISSN=1662-5137 ABSTRACT=

Improved neuroscientific understanding of high-risk behaviors such as alcohol binging, drug use, and unsafe sex will lead to therapeutic advances for high-risk groups. High-risk behavior often occurs in an emotionally-charged context, and behavioral inhibition and emotion regulation play important roles in risk-related decision making. High impulsivity is an important potential contributor to high-risk behavior tendencies. We explored the relationships between high-risk behavior tendencies, impulsivity, and fMRI brain activations in an emotional Go/NoGo task. This task presented emotional distractor pictures (aversive vs. neutral) simultaneously with Go/NoGo stimuli (square vs. circle) that required a button press or withholding of the press, respectively. Participants' risk behavior tendencies were assessed with the Cognitive Appraisal of Risky Events (CARE) scale. The Barratt Impulsivity Scale 11 (BIS) was used to assess participant impulsivity. Individuals with higher CARE risk scores exhibited reduced activation related to response inhibition (NoGo−Go) in right orbital frontal cortex (OFC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. These regions did not show a significant relationship with impulsivity scores. Conversely, more impulsive individuals showed reduced emotion-related activity (aversive−neutral distractors) in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, perigenual anterior cingulate cortex, and right posterior OFC. There were distinct neural correlates of high-risk behavior tendency and impulsivity in terms of brain activity in the emotional Go/NoGo task. This dissociation supports the conception of high-risk behavior tendency as a distinct construct from that of impulsivity. Our results suggest that treatment for high-risk behavior may be more effective with a nuanced approach that does not conflate high impulsivity necessarily with high-risk behavior tendencies.