Walter Leal Filho
Joao Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio
Mariia Fedoruk
Tetiana Lisovska- 1Research and Transfer Centre “Sustainable Development and Climate Change Management”, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
- 2Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
This paper discusses the significant yet often neglected environmental repercussions of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, highlighting the adverse effects on soil, air, water, and biodiversity. Through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis, it examined existing research on the environmental impact of wars, focusing on key dimensions such as water, air, soil, and biodiversity. The study further explores various methods as well as sustainable-oriented solutions aimed at mitigating these effects on the environment. Furthermore, it discusses the immediate and long-term challenges Ukraine faces in its recovery efforts, emphasizing the need for environmentally conscious approaches to address the many environmental problems caused by the war issues. In the end, the paper presents findings from a workshop involving 15 Ukrainian experts from three different Ukrainian universities, which aimed to understand the broader implications of environmental damages to human health. This interdisciplinary approach offers valuable insights into the intersection of environmental degradation and public health, proposing operational strategies for recovery and sustainability in post-conflict settings.
1 Introduction
The Russian invasion of Ukraine poses great challenges for world peace and to wellbeing of many people, especially at a time when environmental problems and global issues such as climate change call for integrated action among all countries (Kuzemko et al., 2022). The environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine include the release of toxic materials into the air, water and soil from explosions, combustion, fires, military waste, construction of bunkers, and heavy military machinery. Wartime environmental degradation is spread across hundreds of square kilometers.
The environment is typically under-prioritized during conflicts, particularly in the face of so much human suffering. However, both human rights and ecosystems depend on a healthy environment (United Nations, 2021). Moreover, having access to clean water, air, soil, and biodiversity, as well as access to ecosystem services, would be one of the most important conditions for displaced people to come back to Ukraine (see Pereira et al., 2022).
Russia's war against Ukraine has already affected 20% of protected areas in Ukraine, where Russian army occupied eight nature reserves and 10 national parks, posing risk to important wildlife sites. This includes: 2.9 million hectares of the Emerald Network are at risk (Pereira et al., 2022; Wetlands International Europe, 2022; European Wilderness Society, 2023). These territories are a significant part of the nature conservation network of Europe, which is protected within the framework of EU and Council of Europe legislations. 16 Ramsar sites with an area of more than 600,000 hectares are under threat of destruction (RAMSAR, 2022). These are the territories that have the status of wetlands of international importance due to their unique biodiversity. The Great and Small Kuchugury Archipelago with an area of 7,740 ha is now liberated, but due to its proximity to the front line, it is still under threat (RAMSAR, 2022).
The impacts of the war on the environment should be carefully studied and analyzed in order to recover damaged and polluted ecosystems (Westing, 2008; Certini et al., 2013). Figure 1 illustrates how military drivers could endanger several dimensions of the environment, such as water, air, biodiversity, and soil.
Figure 1. Environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine. Source: developed by the authors.
On 21 September, Ukraine's Supreme Council adopted Bill 7475 in its first reading. The bill is intended to strengthen protection of Ukraine's state borders, but content-wise, it is primarily devoted to procedures for removing land from Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine (2024). Infrastructure support for the border zone requires significant intervention in ecosystems: building defense structures, infrastructure, and roads, draining swamps, and expanding clearcutting in forests. Thus, any hardening of the border undoubtedly results in impacts on natural ecosystems (Wetlands International Europe, 2022; European Wilderness Society, 2023).
In this context, the goal of this paper is 3-fold. Firstly, this paper aims to identify, through a bibliometric assessment, the environmental drivers that could impact the environment and understand how these military drivers can impose environmental damages to the Ukrainian protected areas, especially to the dimensions related to water, air, biodiversity and soil. Secondly, the authors discuss what the literature brings as the main methods that could be used to identify the environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine as well as the possible Nature-Friendly solutions that could be used to recover the environment, especially the Ukrainian protected areas. Finally, since this is also a health-related topic, this paper also explored the direct and indirect impacts of the war to human health, discussing the results from a workshop promoted by the Ukraine Nature Project with 15 Ukrainian experts belonging to three different Ukrainian universities.
2 Methods
To achieve the goals proposed in this study, the authors adopted a bibliometric analysis to understand the landscape of what are the military drivers are and how they impact several dimensions of the environment (Figure 2). In a second stage, the authors promoted a workshop with 15 Ukrainian experts who explored how the damage on environment could impact human's health in a direct and indirect way.
Figure 2. Methodological decisions. Source: developed by the authors.
The decision to utilize bibliometric analysis based on the co-occurrence of terms in this paper is primarily driven by the need to systematically map the complex landscape of environmental impacts arising from the wars and conflicts. This analytical method allows for the identification and visualization of key research themes and the relationships between them by examining the frequency and patterns of term usage within a large corpus of academic literature (Waltman and van Eck, 2013; van Eck and Waltman, 2014; Perianes-Rodriguez et al., 2016; VOSviewer, 2024). By employing bibliometric analysis based on the co-occurence technique, the paper aims to unveil the predominant themes in existing research related to the environmental dimensions of water, air, soil, and biodiversity that are most affected by military actions. This approach not only highlights the prevalent research areas but also identifies less explored avenues that require further investigation (Leal Filho et al., 2022; Eustachio et al., 2023), thereby supporting a comprehensive understanding of the environmental consequences of the conflict and guiding future research efforts.
The selection of 15 Ukrainian experts, in turn, was influenced by several strategic considerations. First, these experts have a profound understanding of life sciences which is essential for assessing the environmental and health impacts highlighted in the paper. Their expertise ensures that the analysis is grounded in robust scientific knowledge and is capable of bridging complex environmental issues with human health outcomes. Second, their familiarity with the Ukrainian conflict context provides invaluable insights into the local environmental challenges and the specific impacts of military actions in the region. This local expertise is critical in tailoring research findings and recommendations that are contextually relevant and actionable. Third, the convenience sample of experts attending a project conference in Hamburg presents a practical opportunity to gather a diverse array of specialists from different Ukrainian universities at one time. This setting not only facilitates the direct exchange of ideas and collaboration but also enriches the research with a variety of perspectives, thereby enhancing the depth and applicability of the study findings to the Ukrainian situation.
To conduct the bibliometric analysis, the authors were inspired by previous studies (Leal Filho et al., 2022; Eustachio et al., 2023), and created one search string for each one of the environmental dimensions: environment, soil, water and air (Appendix Table A1). Each one of the search strings was built in order to capture what the literature has been discussing on the impact of the wars and conflicts in several contexts on the environment.
In order to perform the data analysis, the authors adopted the VOSviewer (2024) software, where the selected peer-reviewed documents were used to perform the bibliometric technique co-occurrence of terms. The results are presented by a network graph, also presented in the Appendix Figures A1–A4. The diameter of the bubbles indicates the frequency of the occurrence of a specific term, while the link width indicates the strength of the connection between two terms. The terms that appear close to each other are expected to be associated, generating a thematic cluster due to their co-occurrence frequency (Waltman and van Eck, 2013; van Eck and Waltman, 2014; Perianes-Rodriguez et al., 2016; VOSviewer, 2024).
The choice to analyze the dimensions of water, air, soil, and biodiversity under the concept of the environment in this study is rooted in their fundamental significance to the ecological and human health systems (Smith et al., 2013). These elements represent critical components of the environment that sustain life and underpin the wellbeing of ecosystems and human communities. For example, water and air are essential for all biological processes, influencing public health, agricultural productivity, and climate regulation. Soil not only supports plant growth and biodiversity but also acts as a filter for pollutants, playing a pivotal role in nutrient cycling and storage. Biodiversity, in turn, encompassing the variety of all biological forms, contributes to ecosystem resilience, agricultural sustainability, and genetic resources. Examining these dimensions allows us for a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted impacts of conflict on environmental integrity. By assessing these interconnected elements, the research aims to encapsulate the complex interplay between human activity (military actions) and the natural world, thereby informing strategies for environmental preservation and rehabilitation in conflict-affected areas.
The summary of the results were presented in the Tables 1, 2 “Military drivers and environmental impacts according to different dimensions” and “Summary of Methods to Identify the Environmental Impacts of the war in Ukraine.” In a broad sense, they information about military drivers of environmental degradation, impacts and methods and techniques of assessment according to four different dimensions: soil, water, air and biodiversity.
Table 1. Military drivers and environmental impacts according to different dimensions.
Table 2. Summary of methods to identify the environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine.
Finally, the authors conducted a workshop in the helm of the project “Ukraine Nature” (https://www.haw-hamburg.de/forschung/forschungsprojekte-detail/project/project/show/ukraine-nature/), with 15 Ukrainian teachers and professors from Ukrainian universities (Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, National Forestry University of Ukraine, and the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv). The workshop was held in Hamburg on 25.08.2022, and the summary of the results of this workshop is presented in Table 3, which enriched the results from the bibliometric analysis with interdisciplinary expert knowledge, connecting with the Ukrainian context.
Table 3. War consequences to human health.
The refered workshop provided a platform for these experts to discuss and explicitly identify and discuss the primary environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine, such as soil degradation, water and air pollution, and biodiversity loss. Their firsthand experiences and professional expertise offered a nuanced understanding of how these environmental dimensions have been altered by military activities. Secondly, the workshop facilitated a critical examination of the potential human health ramifications stemming from these environmental impacts. Finally, the participants explored various health issues that could arise, including respiratory ailments from polluted air, waterborne diseases from contaminated water supplies, and food security problems due to compromised soil and agricultural disruption. The results are presented presented in the Appendix Table A2. This discussion was pivotal in linking environmental damage directly to public health outcomes, a connection that is often understood but not comprehensively documented with local expert testimony.
The collected data and insights from this workshop were synthesized, confirmed with the literature evidencing the impact on human health and presented in Table 3 of the study, enriching the initial findings from the bibliometric analysis. This integration of interdisciplinary expert knowledge tailored specifically to the Ukrainian context provided a richer, more contextualized view of the environmental and health landscapes during ongoing conflicts. It also underscored the unique contributions of localized expertise in crafting responses that are both scientifically informed and culturally relevant, thereby enhancing the study's applicability and impact on policy and practice in war-affected regions.
3 Results and discussion
The main results of this study are presented in Tables 1–3, which are intricately interconnected, serving to present a comprehensive view of the environmental impacts of war and the methodologies employed to address these impacts.
Table 1 details the specific environmental dimensions affected by military activities, such as soil, air, water, and biodiversity, and outlines the associated military drivers that exacerbate these impacts, such as the use of explosives and military vehicles. It lays the groundwork by systematically categorizing the various ways in which these activities contribute to environmental degradation. Building on this foundational knowledge, Table 2 in turn, explores the array of methods used to identify and assess these environmental impacts. This includes technologies and techniques ranging from remote sensing to chemical analyses, which help in detecting and quantifying the extent of damage as detailed in Table 1. Additionally, Table 2 proposes nature-friendly solutions aimed at mitigating the damage and restoring the ecological balance, thereby directly responding to the challenges highlighted in Table 1.
Table 3 extends the analyses by Tables 1, 2, by focusing on the human health implications of the environmental impacts discussed earlier. While Table 1 outlines the specific environmental dimensions affected by military activities and Table 2 details the methods to identify these impacts along with possible mitigation solutions, Table 3 shifts the focus toward the human aspect, examining how these environmental changes influence public health. The following subsections 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 bring a discussion of the main findings.
3.1 Military drivers and environmental impacts according to different dimensions
In the elucidation of the complex interplay between military activities and environmental degradation (Lawrence and Schaefer, 2015; Broomandi et al., 2020; Chang et al., 2023; Konuk et al., 2023), Table 1 provides a comprehensive overview of the various military drivers and their corresponding impacts across different environmental dimensions: soil, air, water, and biodiversity (Pereira et al., 2022).
The table categorizes a wide range of military operations, such as the use of bombs, explosives, and missiles, the operation of military vehicles, and the execution of chemical and atomic warfare, among others (Shukla et al., 2023; Bun et al., 2024). It systematically aligns these activities with their specific environmental consequences. For instance, the detonation of explosives not only results in soil compaction and reduced water absorption capacity but also contributes to air pollution through the release of harmful gases and particles (Giri et al., 2023; Gutierrez-Carazo et al., 2023). Similarly, the intensive use of military vehicles is linked to the increased release of toxic elements and greenhouse gases, exacerbating soil and air pollution, respectively (Gutierrez-Carazo et al., 2023; Amanambu and Nduka, 2024; Ganguly et al., 2024).
The table further illustrates how these military actions lead to water pollution through contamination of aquifers and water bodies and highlights the severe impact on biodiversity, including the loss of habitat, forced animal migration, and the disruption of ecosystems (Chowdhury et al., 2023; Faseyi et al., 2023; Grimes et al., 2023; Hashimy, 2023). In this sense, these interconnections, serves as a critical tool in understanding the multifaceted environmental repercussions of military activities, underscoring the need for integrated approaches to mitigate these impacts in conflict and post-conflict scenarios.
The detonation of bombs, missiles, and other explosives in military operations significantly alters the soil structure and composition. Such activities not only lead to direct contamination from the explosives themselves but also result in undetonated ordnance remaining in the soil, posing a persistent risk (Tuzhyk and &##1058;&##1091;&##1078;&##1080;&##1082;, 2023; Petrushka et al., 2024). Experimental data obtained in Lviv (Ukraine) from four explosion sites showed the concentrations of potentially hazardous elements (PTEs) such as zinc (Zn) 48–124 mg/kg, copper (Cu) 18–116 mg/kg, lead (Pb) 15–35 mg/kg, chromium (Cr) 33–36 mg/kg, nickel (Ni) 8–27 mg/kg, and cadmium (Cd) 0.5–2 mg/kg and some of them are up to 5 times higher in comparison with the standard of the permissible content. It was confirmed that the excess of these elements hampers plant growth by around 5–10% The environmental Cu risk index reached 58.2. when Cu in concentration above 3.0 mg/kg is highly toxic and can cause tissue damage, changes in root cell elongation, alterations in membrane permeability, and inhibition of electron transfer during photosynthesis (Petrushka et al., 2024). Moreover, the construction of trenches and bunkers, coupled with the intense circulation of heavy military vehicles, compresses and compacts the soil, diminishing its water absorption capacity and leading to erosion (Lindemann, 2023). The heavy use of military machinery, often dependent on oil, releases a range of toxic elements like Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) into the soil, thereby causing soil degradation and loss of agricultural productivity (Etherington, 2023; Konuk et al., 2023; Mahire et al., 2023). These pollutants disrupt soil microbiology, adversely affecting microflora and microorganisms, and lead to a reduction in the bioavailability of nutrients, further exacerbating the ecological impact (Rashid et al., 2023; Zeb et al., 2024).
Air quality is profoundly affected by military activities. The use of vehicles, aircraft, drones, and the burning of fossil fuels in military logistics significantly increase the emission of greenhouse gases and other pollutants such as ammonia, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrous oxides. Furthermore, the particulate pollution resulting from explosions, artillery fire, and the burning of infrastructure facilities adds to the atmospheric burden of pollutants like sulfuric acid, ammonium sulfate, and smoke. During the 1st months of the Russian war against Ukraine concentrations of PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm) drastically increased: peak concentrations of 24.2 μg m−3 which is significantly above the WHO's recommended safe levels for 24-h exposure (15 μg m−3). It correlated the most with war activities as well as NO2 (max: 139.7 μmol m−2) concentrations over 500 μmol m−2 are a health concern. At the same time CO and O3 levels increased, while SO2 concentrations reduced 4-fold as war intensified (Zalakeviciute et al., 2022). This atmospheric pollution alters atmospheric thermodynamics and contributes to broader issues such as climate change, ozone depletion, acid rain, and transborder pollution (Pereira et al., 2022; da Costa et al., 2023; Piehler and Grant, 2023; Ganguly et al., 2024).
Water bodies suffer extensively due to military operations. Explosions and military waste contaminate aquifers, rivers, seas, and groundwater with heavy metals, oil, and other harmful substances (Mensah and Tuokuu, 2023). The destruction of water supply infrastructure, such as dams and sewage systems, coupled with overconsumption of water for firefighting, exacerbates the scarcity of water resources. Furthermore, the contamination of water by military wastes, including chemical, radioactive, and biological substances, poses severe threats to water quality, making it unsafe for human consumption and aquatic life (Kitowski et al., 2023; Mardones, 2023).
Biodiversity is another victim of military operations (Antoniuk, 2023). The destruction of habitats through deforestation, wildfires, and explosions leads to a loss of biodiversity and irreversible migration of species populations (Lawrence and Schaefer, 2015; Pereira et al., 2022; Rawtani et al., 2022; Grimes et al., 2023; Ntui, 2023). Fauna and flora are contaminated by pollutants, which can lead to diseases, food shortages, and even neurotoxicity in both animals and humans (Grimes et al., 2023). Radiation exposure from atomic warfare poses a significant threat to all forms of life, leading to genetic mutations and a reduction in the number of species. Moreover, the degradation of protected areas and vegetation cover due to military activities further impacts the ecological balance (Rawtani et al., 2022; Gallo-Cajiao et al., 2023).
In sum, military activities have multifaceted environmental impacts, significantly degrading soil, air, water quality, and biodiversity. The persistence of these impacts poses a continuous threat to the environment, necessitating a reevaluation of military practices and the implementation of strategies to mitigate these detrimental effects. Understanding and addressing these environmental consequences are essential for preserving the ecological integrity and ensuring the sustainability of our planet.
3.2 Environmental impact identification methods and sustainable solutions
In the context of the War in Ukraine, the environmental impact has been profound, spanning across dimensions of soil, water, air, and biodiversity (Pereira et al., 2022). Understanding these impacts through various identification methods and implementing nature-friendly solutions is vital for ecological recovery (Sangwan and Dukare, 2018; Tiwari et al., 2019; Niyogi et al., 2023).
In the soil dimension, the presence of land mines and military operations has significantly altered soil characteristics. Electromagnetic techniques, ground penetrating radar, and nuclear quadrupole resonance/neutron probes have been pivotal in identifying these changes. These technologies, alongside semi-quantitative field surveys supported by laboratory analyses of soil samples, offer comprehensive insight into the extent of soil damage. In response, methods like manual demining, utilization of mine detection dogs, biodetection techniques, drones, robotics, and controlled detonation are being employed (Williams, 1995; Newman and Mercer, 2000; Won et al., 2001; Chiovelli et al., 2018). Additionally, for military waste and contamination, crowdsourced data has been instrumental in pinpointing the type and location of waste (Williams, 2013; Weir et al., 2019; Broomandi et al., 2020). This information, along with expert analysis and toxicological soil analysis, forms the basis for bioremediation, phytostabilization, mycoremediation, and other restoration practices like electrokinetic and thermal desorption, soil washing, and ecological restoration (Rhodes, 2013; Mishra and Venkateswara Sarma, 2017; García-Sánchez et al., 2018).
The water dimension has also been critically impacted, with issues like acid rain, pH alteration in rivers and groundwater, and pollution from heavy metals and oil. To address these, pH measurement, chemical analysis of water and soil samples, and biological monitoring are employed (Mensah and Tuokuu, 2023; Strokal et al., 2023). Remote sensing and satellite imagery provide a broader perspective on the extent of water body alteration. In tackling these issues, buffering affected waters, establishing water treatment facilities, implementing policies and legislation, and restoring damaged ecosystems are key (Sawaya et al., 2003; see. Ritchie et al., 2003; Vignolo et al., 2006; Schaeffer et al., 2013). Furthermore, bioremediation, phytoremediation, sediment removal, oil spill containment, and cleanup techniques are crucial in addressing contamination in aquifers, rivers, seas, groundwater, wetlands, surface water, and estuaries (Macaulay and Rees, 2014; Arora, 2018; Bhandari et al., 2023; Sinam et al., 2024).
Air quality has deteriorated due to wildfires, heavy military vehicle circulation, and explosions (Mehrabi et al., 2023). Methods like air particle measurement, chemical analysis, computational fluid dynamics, and computer simulation are used to assess air quality and estimate pollutants. To mitigate these impacts, establishing firebreaks, reforesting with fire-resistant species, and undertaking carbon sequestration projects are essential (Mehrabi et al., 2023).
Biodiversity loss, a critical concern, is evaluated through chemical analysis, computer modeling, field surveys, and remote sensing (Lawrence and Schaefer, 2015; Pereira et al., 2022; Rawtani et al., 2022; Grimes et al., 2023; Ntui, 2023). Efforts in habitat restoration, ecosystem-based management, pollution cleanup, and soil health restoration are underway to conserve biodiversity (Gallo-Cajiao et al., 2023).
These multifaceted environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine require a holistic approach combining advanced technological methods and nature-friendly solutions. The collaboration of scientists, environmentalists, policy-makers, and local communities is crucial in this endeavor, ensuring a sustainable recovery, conservation of the Ukrainian environment post-conflict and guaranteeing human health, as discussed in the following section.
3.3 Consequences of environmental impacts to human health
A workshop with Ukrainian professors was held to enrich the results with interdisciplinary expert knowledge and narrow it down to the Ukrainian context. The workshop, which involved 15 professors from 3 Ukrainian universities (Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, National Forestry University of Ukraine, and the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv), was held in Hamburg on 25.08.2022. As a result, the project team formed answers into the table considering four dimensions (water, soil, biodiversity, and air) and exploring the consequences and impacts to public/human health.
The war in Ukraine has illuminated the profound and multifaceted impact of conflict on environmental health and, subsequently, human health. The interplay of water, air, soil, and biodiversity within this war context has led to a cascade of health issues, which require comprehensive understanding and action (Khorram-Manesh et al., 2023; Ntui, 2023; Rashid et al., 2023).
The issues related to water in the war zone are multifarious. The risk of floods and desertification, exacerbated by climate change and environmental mismanagement, presents significant challenges. Flooding can contaminate water sources, leading to the spread of waterborne diseases, while desertification reduces water availability, contributing to dehydration and food scarcity (Shumilova et al., 2023). The scarcity of drinking water or food can lead to exhaustion and dehydration, severely impacting cognitive and physical abilities, crucial for survival in conflict situations. Furthermore, the destruction of settlements in war zones disrupts access to clean water and sanitation facilities, exacerbating the deterioration of hygiene conditions and increasing the risk of infectious diseases (Topluoglu et al., 2023). These conditions often lead to a high death rate, particularly among vulnerable populations like children and the elderly. Moreover, the lack of reliable information on water quality in these areas hampers effective responses to waterborne diseases and poses additional health risks (Spiegel et al., 2023).
The air quality in war zones is also a critical concern (Hook and Marcantonio, 2023; Warsame et al., 2023). The toxic effects on respiratory and skin health due to exposure to pollutants can cause various health issues, including respiratory problems, skin irritations, and in severe cases, life-threatening conditions like pulmonary edema. The damage caused by these pollutants extends to multiple body systems, including the respiratory, digestive, reproductive, circulatory, excretory, and nervous systems, leading to a broad spectrum of health problems. Long-term exposure to certain chemicals and toxins in the air can trigger allergic reactions, increase the risk of cancer, and cause both acute and chronic health effects, which place a significant burden on the already strained healthcare systems in war-torn areas (Sharma et al., 2023; Shetty et al., 2023; see Pat et al., 2023).
Soil pollution in the context of war leads to reduced crop yields, resulting in food shortages and subsequent malnutrition (Leal Filho et al., 2023). This weakens the immune system, making individuals more susceptible to diseases and long-term health issues, including stunted growth and developmental delays in children. Soil pollution also contaminates groundwater and surface water, leading to a wide range of health problems, from gastrointestinal diseases to chronic health conditions like kidney damage and increased cancer risk. Moreover, polluted soil can be a breeding ground for harmful pathogens, increasing the risk of soil-transmitted infections, which can exacerbate other health conditions and contribute to a compounded health impact (Antoniuk, 2023).
Biodiversity loss due to war significantly impacts human health. Exposure to chemical or biological agents can cause poisoning and burns, leading to acute and chronic health issues (Lawrence and Schaefer, 2015). The loss of dietary fibers due to reduced biodiversity can result in digestive problems and chronic diseases (Johns and Eyzaguirre, 2006; Makki et al., 2018). Toxicity and intoxication from contaminated environments impact liver and kidney function and the neurological system (Vandana et al., 2022). Loud explosions in conflict zones can cause eardrum ruptures, leading to hearing impairment and chronic ear infections. Injuries such as contusions are common, leading to various complications (Myers et al., 2009). The stress and physical strain of living in a war environment can increase the risk of unintentional abortions and stress-induced mortality (Hobfoll et al., 1991). Neurological changes, both reversible and irreversible, are consequences of exposure to neurotoxic agents and the psychological trauma of war (Marshall et al., 2019). Radiation sickness, a concern in warfare involving nuclear materials, poses long-term health risks (Hyams et al., 2002). The spread of endemic diseases is exacerbated by disrupted healthcare systems and poor environmental conditions (Pereira et al., 2022).
4 Conclusions
This paper evidences that the war in Ukriane has not only inflicted profound human suffering and infrastructural damage but has also wreaked havoc on the environment, thereby exacerbating health risks in numerous ways.
Theoretically, this paper extends the understanding of environmental degradation in war contexts, emphasizing the interconnectedness of various environmental dimension such as water, air, soil, and biodiversity, and their cumulative impact on public health. It underscores the need for an integrated approach to environmental health, particularly in conflict zones, where traditional models of environmental conservation and health promotion are often inadequate.
This paper also has contributions to practice. The research points to several immediate and long-term interventions necessary to mitigate these environmental and health impacts. In the face of water pollution, there is an urgent need for measures to ensure access to clean water, such as the installation of water filtration systems and the rehabilitation of water supply infrastructure. Soil pollution, which leads to reduced agricultural productivity and heightened health risks, calls for extensive soil remediation efforts and the promotion of sustainable agricultural practices. Air pollution, with its diverse range of health impacts, requires stringent measures to control emissions from military operations and post-conflict reconstruction activities. Lastly, the loss of biodiversity necessitates concerted efforts for habitat restoration and wildlife conservation.
One of the crucial findings of this study is the direct correlation between environmental degradation and increased health risks, particularly in the form of infectious diseases, malnutrition, respiratory problems, and neurological disorders. The deterioration of hygiene conditions, exacerbated by limited access to clean water and the destruction of sanitation facilities, further compounds these health risks. Furthermore, the stress of living in a war environment, coupled with exposure to pollutants and disrupted ecosystems, has profound psychological and physiological effects, elevating the risk of stress-induced mortality and other serious health conditions.
The workshop with Ukrainian experts provided valuable insights, reinforcing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in addressing these complex challenges. It highlighted the need for policies and practices that not only focus on immediate conflict resolution but also prioritize environmental restoration and health promotion. This involves not only the cleanup and rehabilitation of contaminated sites but also the implementation of strategies to prevent further environmental damage.
In summary, the environmental impacts of the war in Ukraine have far-reaching and long-lasting implications for human health. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach, involving environmental restoration, pollution control, healthcare provision, and sustainable development. As the conflict continues to evolve, so too must our strategies for mitigating its environmental and health consequences, ensuring a more resilient and sustainable future for the affected populations and the environment they depend upon.
Finally, it is important to acknowledge a potential limitation regarding the selection of the 15 Ukrainian experts whose perspectives were central to this study. While their expertise in life sciences and deep understanding of the local context are invaluable, relying exclusively on professionals from the conflict zone may introduce a degree of bias in the interpretation of environmental and health impacts. This selection may inherently focus more on localized experiences and potentially overlook broader, perhaps less immediate perspectives that experts from other regions might offer. Such a concentration on a specific group of local experts, although rich in contextual relevance, might limit the generalizability of the findings to other conflict or post-conflict settings. Recognizing this limitation underscores our commitment to a balanced analysis and points to the necessity for further research incorporating a more diverse array of international voices to enrich and verify our conclusions.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
WL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JE: Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MF: Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. TL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This paper has been funded by the German Federal Environment Foundation (DBU) (Grant No. 38378/01-46) within the project: Nature Conservation and Conflict in Ukraine: Determining War Damages to Nature Reserves in Ukraine (Ukraine Nature), from which all information is drawn.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsrma.2024.1423444/full#supplementary-material
References
Adeola, F. O. (2020). Global Impact of Chemicals and Toxic Substances on Human Health and the Environment. Berlin: Springer EBooks, 1–30.
Alengebawy, A., Abdelkhalek, S. T., Qureshi, S. R., and Wang, M. Q. (2021). Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: ecological risks and human health implications. Toxics 9:42. doi: 10.3390/toxics9030042
Altahaan, Z., and Dobslaw, D. (2024). Assessment of the impact of war on concentrations of pollutants and heavy metals and their seasonal variations in water and sediments of the Tigris River in Mosul/Iraq. Environments 11:10. doi: 10.3390/environments11010010
Amanambu, V. O., and Nduka, K. J. (2024). Technological contributions to environmental pollution emanating from military adventurism: a review. World News Nat. Sci. 52, 98–117.
Antoniuk, N. (2023). Environmental and Economic Aspects of Soil Pollution as a Result of Military Actions. UKRAINE INNOVATE: сучасні моделі для відновлення. Available online at: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23099 (accessed November 6, 2023).
Arora, N. K. (2018). Bioremediation: a green approach for restoration of polluted ecosystems. Environ. Sustainabil. 1, 305–307. doi: 10.1007/s42398-018-00036-y
Arpitha, C., Mehan, L., and Ghosh, D. (2019). “Arsenic exposures, poisoning, and threat to human health,” in Advances in Human Services and Public Health (AHSPH) Book Series, eds. P. Papadopoulou, C. Marouli, and A. Misseyanni (Hershey, PA: IGI Global), 86–105.
Bhandari, S., Saraswathi, M., Lakshmanna, B., and Madakka, M. (2023). “Nanoparticle-based bioremediation for crude oil removal from marine environment,” Coasts, Estuaries and Lakes: Implications for Sustainable Development, eds. N. Jayaraju, G. Sreenivasulu, M. Madakka, and M. Manjulatha (Berlin: Springer International Publishing), 347–364.
Bintsis, T. (2018). Microbial pollution and food safety. AIMS Microbiol. 4, 377–396. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.377
Brevik, E. C., Slaughter, L., Singh, B. R., Steffan, J. J., Collier, D., Barnhart, P., et al. (2020). Soil and human health: current status and future needs. Air Soil Water Res. 13:117862212093444. doi: 10.1177/1178622120934441
Broomandi, P., Guney, M., Kim, J. R., and Karaca, F. (2020). Soil contamination in areas impacted by military activities: a critical review. Sustainability 12:21. doi: 10.3390/su12219002
Bultman, M. W., Fisher, F. S., and Pappagianis, D. (2012). The ecology of soil-borne human pathogens. Essent. Med. Geol. 20, 477–504. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4375-5_20
Bun, R., Marland, G., Oda, T., See, L., Puliafito, E., Nahorski, Z., et al. (2024). Tracking unaccounted greenhouse gas emissions due to the war in Ukraine since 2022. Sci. Tot. Environ. 914:169879. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169879
Certini, G., Scalenghe, R., and Woods, W. I. (2013). The impact of warfare on the soil environment. Earth Sci. Rev. 127, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.009
Chang, S., Chen, B., and Song, Y. (2023). Militarization, renewable energy utilization, and ecological footprints: evidence from RCEP economies. J. Clean. Product. 391:136298. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136298
Chiovelli, G., Michalopoulos, S., and Papaioannou, E. (2018). Landmines and Spatial Development (Working Paper 24758). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Chowdhury, P. R., Medhi, H., Bhattacharyya, K. G., and Hussain, C. M. (2023). Severe deterioration in food-energy-ecosystem nexus due to ongoing Russia-Ukraine war: a critical review. Sci. Tot. Environ. 902:166131. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166131
da Costa, J. P., Silva, A. L., Barcelò, D., Rocha-Santos, T., and Duarte, A. (2023). Threats to sustainability in face of post-pandemic scenarios and the war in Ukraine. Sci. Tot. Environ. 892:164509. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164509
Douple, E. B., Mabuchi, K., Cullings, H. M., Preston, D. L., Kodama, K., Shimizu, Y., et al. (2013). Long-term radiation-related health effects in a unique human population: lessons learned from the atomic bomb survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Disast. Med. Publ. Health Prepared. 5, S122–S133. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2011.21
Etherington, M. (2023). Environmental Education: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Nature. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
European Wilderness Society (2023). How the War has Affected Ukrainian Protected Areas. European Wilderness Society. Available online at: https://wilderness-society.org/how-the-war-has-affected-ukrainian-protected-areas/ (accessed November 6, 2023).
Eustachio, J. H. P. P., Caldana, A. C. F., and Leal Filho, W. (2023). Sustainability leadership: Conceptual foundations and research landscape. J. Clean. Product. 415:137761. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137761
Fakhri, Z., and Dobslaw, N. D. (2024). Assessment of post-war groundwater quality in urban areas of Mosul city /Iraq and surrounding areas for drinking and irrigation purposes by using the Canadian Environment Water Quality Index CCME-WQI and Heavy Metal Pollution Index HPI. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 21, 2461–2481. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.1010
Faseyi, C. A., Miyittah, M. K., and Yafetto, L. (2023). Assessment of environmental degradation in two coastal communities of Ghana using Driver Pressure State Impact Response (DPSIR) framework. J. Environ. Manag. 342:118224. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118224
Gallo-Cajiao, E., Dolšak, N., Prakash, A., Mundkur, T., Harris, P. G., Mitchell, R. B., et al. (2023). Implications of Russia's invasion of Ukraine for the governance of biodiversity conservation. Front. Conserv. Sci. 4:989019. doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2023.989019
Ganguly, A., Nanda, S., Mandi, M., Ghanty, S., Das, K., Biswas, G., et al. (2024). “4—Air pollution, disease burden, and health economic loss,” Spatial Modeling of Environmental Pollution and Ecological Risk, eds. P. K. Shit, D. K. Datta, B. Bera, A. Islam, and P. P. Adhikary (Sawston: Woodhead Publishing), 71–85.
García-Sánchez, M., Košnár, Z., Mercl, F., Aranda, E., and Tlustoš, P. (2018). A comparative study to evaluate natural attenuation, mycoaugmentation, phytoremediation, and microbial-assisted phytoremediation strategies for the bioremediation of an aged PAH-polluted soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 147, 165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.012
Giri, A., Bharti, V. K., Garai, P., and Singh, K. P. (2023). Ecotoxicology of magnesium-based explosive: impact on animal and human food chain. Discov. Sustainabil. 4:52. doi: 10.1007/s43621-023-00173-3
Grimes, E. S., Kneer, M. L., and Berkowitz, J. F. (2023). Military activity and wetland-dependent wildlife: a warfare ecology perspective. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2023:4767. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4767
Gutierrez-Carazo, E., Dowle, J., Coulon, F., Temple, T., and Ladyman, M. (2023). Investigating residue dissolution of insensitive high explosives in two sandy soil types: a predictive modelling approach. Sci. Tot. Environ. 904:166968. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166968
Hashimy, S. Q. (2023). The Agonizing Narrative of Environmental Dilapidation in the Tussle of Armed Conflict; From the Lens of International Humanitarian Laws (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4383907). Available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4383907 (accessed November 6, 2023).
Hobfoll, S. E., Spielberger, C. D., Breznitz, S., Figley, C., Folkman, S., Lepper-Green, B., et al. (1991). War-related stress: addressing the stress of war and other traumatic events. Am. Psychol. 46, 848–855. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.848
Hook, K., and Marcantonio, R. (2023). Environmental dimensions of conflict and paralyzed responses: the ongoing case of Ukraine and future implications for urban warfare. Small Wars Insurgen. 34, 1400–1428. doi: 10.1080/09592318.2022.2035098
Hyams, K. C., Murphy, F. M., and Wessely, S. (2002). Responding to chemical, biological, or nuclear terrorism: the indirect and long-term health effects may present the greatest challenge. J. Health Polit. Pol. Law 27, 273–292. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-2-273
Islam, M. S., and Wong, A. T. (2017). Climate change and food in/security: a critical nexus. Environments 4:38. doi: 10.3390/environments4020038
Johns, T., and Eyzaguirre, P. B. (2006). Linking biodiversity, diet and health in policy and practice. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 65, 182–189. doi: 10.1079/PNS2006494
Khorram-Manesh, A., Goniewicz, K., and Burkle, F. M. (2023). Social and healthcare impacts of the Russian-Led Hybrid War in Ukraine—a conflict with unique global consequences. Disast. Med. Publ. Health Prepared. 17:e432. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2023.91
Kitowski, I., Sujak, A., and Drygaś, M. (2023). The water dimensions of Russian—Ukrainian Conflict. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 23, 335–345. doi: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.05.001
Konuk, F., Kaya, E., Akpinar, S., and Yildiz, S. (2023). The relationship between military expenditures, financial development and environmental pollution in G7 countries. J. Knowl. Econ. 23:1. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01122-1
Kumar, P., Kausar, M. A., Singh, A. B., and Singh, R. (2021). Biological contaminants in the indoor air environment and their impacts on human health. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 14, 1723–1736. doi: 10.1007/s11869-021-00978-z
Kuzemko, C., Blondeel, M., Dupont, C., and Brisbois, M. C. (2022). Russia's war on Ukraine, European energy policy responses & implications for sustainable transformations. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 93:102842. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102842
Lawrence, R. A., and Schaefer, C. (2015). “Industrial chemicals and environmental contaminants,” in Drugs During Pregnancy and Lactation (Academic Press), 847–861.
Leal Filho, W., Fedoruk, M., Paulino Pires Eustachio, J. H., Barbir, J., Lisovska, T., Lingos, A., et al. (2023). How the war in Ukraine affects food security. Foods 12:21. doi: 10.3390/foods12213996
Leal Filho, W., Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio, J., Dinis, M. A. P., Sharifi, A., Venkatesan, M., Donkor, F. K., et al. (2022). Transient poverty in a sustainable development context. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 29, 415–428. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2022.2029612
Lenart-Boro, A., and Boro, P. (2014). The effect of industrial heavy metal pollution on microbial abundance and diversity in soils—a review. Environ. Risk Assess. Soil Contamin. 2014:57406. doi: 10.5772/57406
Lindemann, M. (2023). Silent Victims: The Hidden Costs of War in Brandenburg, 1648–1700. Em Beyond the Battlefield. London: Routledge.
Macaulay, B. M., and Rees, D. (2014). Bioremediation of oil spills: a review of challenges for research advancement. Ann. Environ. Sci. 8, 9–37.
Mahire, S., Tiwana, A. S., Khan, A., Nalawade, P. M., Bandekar, G., Trehan, N., et al. (2023). Accumulation and effects of persistent organic pollutants and biogeographical solutions: appraisal of global environment. Arab. J. Geosci. 16:570. doi: 10.1007/s12517-023-11675-9
Makki, K., Deehan, E. C., Walter, J., and Bäckhed, F. (2018). The impact of dietary fiber on gut microbiota in host health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 23, 705–715. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.012
Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., Stavropoulos, A., and Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020). Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review. Front. Publ. Health 8, 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014
Mardones, C. (2023). Economic effects of isolating Russia from international trade due to its ‘special military operation' in Ukraine. Eur. Plan. Stud. 31, 663–678. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2079074
Marshall, T. M., Colvin, K. L., Nevin, R., Macrellis, J., and Dardia, G. P. (2019). Neurotoxicity Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury, Blast, Chemical, Heavy Metal and Quinoline Drug Exposure. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. EBSCOhost. Available online at: https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/gcd:135316455?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebsco:gcd:135316455 (accessed March 18, 2024).
McClellan, R. O. (2020). Health effects of nuclear weapons and releases of radioactive materials. Handb. Toxicol. Chem. Warf. Agents 6, 707–743. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819090-6.00043-x
Mehrabi, M., Scaioni, M., and Previtali, M. (2023). Air quality monitoring in Ukraine during 2022 military conflict using Sentinel-5P imagery. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 23:1488. doi: 10.1007/s11869-023-01488-w
Mensah, A. K., and Tuokuu, F. X. D. (2023). Polluting our rivers in search of gold: how sustainable are reforms to stop informal miners from returning to mining sites in Ghana? Front. Environ. Sci. 11:54091. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1154091
Mishra, R., and Venkateswara Sarma, V. (2017). “Mycoremediation of heavy metal and hydrocarbon pollutants by endophytic fungi,” Mycoremediation and Environmental Sustainability: Volume 1, ed. R. Prasad (Berlin: Springer International Publishing), 133–151.
Myers, P. J., Wilmington, D. J., Gallun, F. J., Henry, J. A., and Fausti, S. A. (2009). Hearing impairment and traumatic brain injury among soldiers: special considerations for the audiologist. Semin. Hear. 30, 5–27. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1111103
Naidu, R. (2021). Chemical pollution: a growing peril and potential catastrophic risk to humanity. Environ. Int. 156:106616. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106616
Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine (2024). Home. Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine. Available online at: https://wownature.in.ua/ (accessed March 9, 2024).
Newman, R. D., and Mercer, M. A. (2000). Environmental health consequences of land mines. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 6, 243–248. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2000.6.3.243
Niyogi, R. B., Bhattacharya, R., Majeed, M., Bhandari, M., Aziz, R., Sinha, D., et al. (2023). Environmental Rehabilitation of Industrial Waste Dumping Site. Em Biohydrometallurgical Processes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Ntui, A. I. (2023). War on Nature: How the Russian Invasion of Ukraine is Devastating the Environment.
Okereafor, U., Makhatha, M., Mekuto, L., Uche-Okereafor, N., Sebola, T., and Mavumengwana, V. (2020). Toxic metal implications on agricultural soils, plants, animals, aquatic life and human health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 17:2204. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072204
Pat, Y., Ogulur, I., Yazici, D., Mitamura, Y., Cevhertas, L., Küçükkase, O. C., et al. (2023). Effect of altered human exposome on the skin and mucosal epithelial barrier integrity. Tissue Barr. 11:2133877. doi: 10.1080/21688370.2022.2133877
Pereira, P., Zhao, W., Symochko, L., Inacio, M., Bogunovic, I., and Barcelo, D. (2022). The Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict will push back the sustainable development goals. Geogr. Sustainabil. 3, 277–287. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.003
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., and van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: a comparison between full and fractional counting. J. Informetr. 10, 1178–1195. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
Petrushka, K., Malovanyy, M., Skrzypczak, D., Chojnacka, K., and Warchoł, J. (2024). Risks of soil pollution with toxic elements during military actions in Lviv. J. Ecol. Eng. 2024:25. doi: 10.12911/22998993/175136
Piehler, G. K., and Grant, J. A. (2023). The Oxford Handbook of World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RAMSAR (2022). Ukraine. Convention on Wetlands. Available online at: https://www.ramsar.org/wetland/ukraine (accessed December 12, 2023).
Rashid, A., Schutte, B. J., Ulery, A., Deyholos, M. K., Sanogo, S., Lehnhoff, E. A., et al. (2023). Heavy metal contamination in agricultural soil: environmental pollutants affecting crop health. Agronomy 13:6. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13061521
Rawtani, D., Gupta, G., Khatri, N., Rao, P. K., and Hussain, C. M. (2022). Environmental damages due to war in Ukraine: a perspective. Sci. Tot. Environ. 850:157932. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157932
Rhodes, C. J. (2013). Applications of bioremediation and phytoremediation. Sci. Progr. 96, 417–427. doi: 10.3184/003685013X13818570960538
Ritchie, J. C., Zimba, P. V., and Everitt, J. H. (2003). Remote sensing techniques to assess water quality. Photogram. Eng. Rem. Sens. 69, 695–704. doi: 10.14358/PERS.69.6.695
Sangwan, S., and Dukare, A. (2018). “Microbe-mediated bioremediation: an eco-friendly sustainable approach for environmental clean-up,” Advances in Soil Microbiology: Recent Trends and Future Prospects: Volume 1: Soil-Microbe Interaction, eds. T. K. Adhya, B. Lal, B. Mohapatra, D. Paul, and S. Das (Berlin: Springer), 145–163.
Sawaya, K. E., Olmanson, L. G., Heinert, N. J., Brezonik, P. L., and Bauer, M. E. (2003). Extending satellite remote sensing to local scales: land and water resource monitoring using high-resolution imagery. Rem. Sens. Environ. 88, 144–156. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.04.006
Schaeffer, B. A., Schaeffer, K. G., Keith, D., Lunetta, R. S., Conmy, R., and Gould, R. W. (2013). Barriers to adopting satellite remote sensing for water quality management. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 34, 7534–7544. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2013.823524
Schulze, F., Gao, X., Virzonis, D., Damiati, S., Schneider, M., and Kodzius, R. (2017). Air quality effects on human health and approaches for its assessment through microfluidic chips. Genes 8:244. doi: 10.3390/genes8100244
Sharma, A. K., Sharma, M., Sharma, A. K., Sharma, M., and Sharma, M. (2023). Mapping the impact of environmental pollutants on human health and environment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Geochem. Explor. 255:107325. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107325
Shetty, S. S., Sonkusare, S., Naik, P. B., Kumari, N., and Madhyastha, H. (2023). Environmental pollutants and their effects on human health. Heliyon 9:e19496. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19496
Shukla, S., Mbingwa, G., Khanna, S., Dalal, J., Sankhyan, D., Malik, A., et al. (2023). Environment and health hazards due to military metal pollution: a review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monitor. Manag. 20:100857. doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2023.100857
Shumilova, O., Tockner, K., Sukhodolov, A., Khilchevskyi, V., De Meester, L., Stepanenko, S., et al. (2023). Impact of the Russia-Ukraine armed conflict on water resources and water infrastructure. Nat. Sustain. 6, 578–558. doi: 10.1038/s41893-023-01068-x
Sinam, V., Kumar, P., and Singh, J. (2024). “24—Bioremediation and ecorestoration strategies of aquatic environment,” Spatial Modeling of Environmental Pollution and Ecological Risk, eds. P. K. Shit, D. K. Datta, B. Bera, A. Islam, and P. P. Adhikary (Sawston: Woodhead Publishing), 483–499.
Smith, P., Ashmore, M. R., Black, H. I., Burgess, P. J., Evans, C. D., Quine, T. A., et al. (2013). The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 812–829. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12016
Spiegel, P. B., Kovtoniuk, P., and Lewtak, K. (2023). The war in Ukraine 1 year on: the need to strategise for the long-term health of Ukrainians. Lancet 401, 622–625. doi: 10.1016/S0140-673600383-5
Steffan, J. J., Brevik, E. C., Burgess, L. C., and Cerdà, A. (2017). The effect of soil on human health: an overview. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 69, 159–171. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12451
Strokal, V., Kurovska, A., and Strokal, M. (2023). More river pollution from untreated urban waste due to the Russian-Ukrainian war: a perspective view. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 20:2281920. doi: 10.1080/1943815X.2023.2281920
Tiwari, J., Ankit, S., Kumar, S., Korstad, J., and Bauddh, K. (2019). “Chapter 5—ecorestoration of polluted aquatic ecosystems through rhizofiltration,” Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites, eds. V. C. Pandey and K. Bauddh (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 179–201.
Topluoglu, S., Taylan-Ozkan, A., and Alp, E. (2023). Impact of wars and natural disasters on emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Front. Publ. Health 11:1215929. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1215929
Tuzhyk, B. Y., and Тужик, Б. Ю. (2023). Assessment of the Warfare Impact on the Content and Distribution of Heavy Metals in Soils of the Sumy Oblast (Thesis). National Aviation University. Available online at: https://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/61392 (accessed December 15, 2023).
United Nations (2021). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at: https://www.fao.org/home/en (accessed January 15, 2024).
van Eck, N. J., and Waltman, L. (2014). “Visualizing bibliometric networks,” Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice, eds. Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, and D. Wolfram (Berlin: Springer International Publishing), 285–320.
Vandana, P. M., Mahto, U., and Das, S. (2022). “Chapter 2—mechanism of toxicity and adverse health effects of environmental pollutants,” Microbial Biodegradation and Bioremediation, 2nd Edn, eds. S. Das and H. R. Dash (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 33–53.
Vignolo, A., Pochettino, A., and Cicerone, D. (2006). Water quality assessment using remote sensing techniques: Medrano Creek, Argentina. J. Environ. Manag. 81, 429–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.019
VOSviewer (2024). VOSviewer—Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. VOSviewer. Available online at: https://www.vosviewer.com//
Waltman, L., and van Eck, N. J. (2013). A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. Eur. Phys. J. B 86:471. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0
Warsame, A. A., Abdi, A. H., Amir, A. Y., and Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2023). Towards sustainable environment in Somalia: the role of conflicts, urbanization, and globalization on environmental degradation and emissions. J. Clean. Product. 406:136856. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136856
Weir, D., McQuillan, D., and Francis, R. A. (2019). Civilian science: the potential of participatory environmental monitoring in areas affected by armed conflicts. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 191:618. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9
Wetlands International Europe (2022). Wetlands and the War in Ukraine—Hope Amid Catastrophe. Wetlands International Europe. Available online at: https://europe.wetlands.org/blog/wetlands-and-the-war-in-ukraine-hope-amid-catastrophe/ (accessed December 12, 2023).
Williams, C. (2013). Crowdsourcing research: a methodology for investigating state crime. State Crime J. 2:30.
Williams, J. (1995). Landmines and measures to eliminate them. Int. Rev. Red Cross 35, 375–390. doi: 10.1017/S0020860400072922
Won, I. J., Keiswetter, D. A., and Bell, T. H. (2001). Electromagnetic induction spectroscopy for clearing landmines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem Sens. 39, 703–709. doi: 10.1109/36.917876
Xiong, W., Ni, P., Chen, Y., Gao, Y., Li, S., and Zhan, A. (2019). Biological consequences of environmental pollution in running water ecosystems: a case study in zooplankton. Environ. Pollut. 252, 1483–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.055
Zaghloul, A., Saber, M., Gadow, S., and Awad, F. (2020). Biological indicators for pollution detection in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Bullet. Natl. Res. Centre 44:385. doi: 10.1186/s42269-020-00385-x
Zalakeviciute, R., Mejia, D., Alvarez, H., Bermeo, X., Bonilla-Bedoya, S., Rybarczyk, Y., et al. (2022). War impact on air quality in Ukraine. Sustainability 14:13832. doi: 10.3390/su142113832
Keywords: environmental impacts, military drivers, Russian-Ukrainian war, nature-friendly solutions, human health
Citation: Leal Filho W, Eustachio JHPP, Fedoruk M and Lisovska T (2024) War in Ukraine: an overview of environmental impacts and consequences for human health. Front. Sustain. Resour. Manag. 3:1423444. doi: 10.3389/fsrma.2024.1423444
Received: 25 April 2024; Accepted: 27 June 2024;
Published: 19 July 2024.
Edited by:
Santanu Ray, Visva-Bharati University, IndiaReviewed by:
Simona Maria Frone, Romanian Academy, RomaniaDimitrios Pappas, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2024 Leal Filho, Eustachio, Fedoruk and Lisovska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mariia Fedoruk, bWFyaWlhLmZlZG9ydWsmI3gwMDA0MDtoYXctaGFtYnVyZy5kZQ==