Ikechukwu UmejesiGlobally, the intersection between resource exploitation, the environment, and social protection foregrounds the debate on sustainable use and management of natural resources (Olsen et al., 2007; Kuriakose et al., 2013). While historically, humanity has exploited the environment for its sustenance, such dependence on the environment was relatively more sustainable—due mainly to the small global population, organic systems of food production, rudimentary means of production, and very low carbon footprint in transportation, among other factors that characterized the Preindustrial Age (Giddings et al., 2002).
This relationship with nature began to change with the fossil-fuel-driven Industrial Revolution in the mid-eighteenth Century. Europe led the world in a carbon-intensive economic revolution that was never known to humankind until then. The industrial revolution was fed by coal, crude oil, and natural gas mainly from Africa, Asia, and parts of North and South America (Senge et al., 2001; Castle and Hendry, 2020). With unbridled industrialization and the discovery of steam engines, transportation was revolutionized and exploration of “unknown” parts of the world intensified, which brought about colonization, dispossession, and exploitation of new territories. Some scholars have argued that the scramble for the control of global energy resources propelled the colonization of diverse territories (Hagel, 1973; Kent, 2013) and the loss of the environmental sovereignty of colonized indigenous communities. The way these colonies were scavenged for minerals and other resources, often using forced, local labor revealed the primary goal of the colonial authorities, their mining companies, and powerful individuals. In fact, these colonies were literally treated as “mining fields” rather than spaces where human communities thrived (Watts, 2007; Umejesi and Thompson, 2015). The exploitation of these energy resources and other minerals remains the propellant of the global economy—ceaselessly saturating our atmosphere with smog, causing global climate change, environmental pollution, and biodiversity loss.
Mass production, a direct outcome of the insatiable consumerist world, inadvertently poses a serious threat to human societies, especially in countries and communities where resource extraction and exploitation take place. In these largely low-income countries, environmental and social protection and good governance are second class (Lammi et al., 2013; Devereux et al., 2015; Arfvidsson and Follin, 2020). Resource extraction takes place as though human communities do not count. Equally, local environmental justice movements and other forms of opposition to the systematic destruction of the environment and society are criminalized as “economic sabotage”. What emerges from this unsustainable arrangement is a skewed relationship between key stakeholders, mainly the state, resource extractive companies, and local communities. In this relationship, resource extraction (i.e., the extractive complex) is privileged against society and the environment (Obi, 2008; Umejesi and Akpan, 2013; Umejesi et al., 2018). Hence, in different resource-rich communities of Africa, Asia, and South America (the so-called global South), local environmental groups, often supported by international advocacy solidarity, have raised questions about social “safety nets” and the “justness” or otherwise of such skewed arrangement (Frynas, 2000; Umejesi and Thompson, 2015).
In 2013, the Africa Progress Report on the extractive sector in Africa, a study led by the former Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr. Kofi Annan, noted that although African states have experienced relative growth in the extractive sector since the 2000s,1 the benefits have eluded communities and the environment have been ruined. The Report then concluded that “Africa lags behind other regions in meeting environmental and social protection standards”. Consequently, extractive industries “leave the poor behind” and “harm the environment” (Frynas, 2000; Africa Progress Panel, 2013). Equally, studies in South America, Asia, and other regions have confirmed similar socioecological predicaments from natural resource extraction in local communities (Olivero and Solano, 1998; De Theije et al., 2014). It therefore poses the question: how do resource exploitation and economic growth intersect with environmental preservation and social protection? This is the overarching question that strikes at the heart of sustainable management of resources, especially when explored via the lens of safe and just practices.
The “Safe and Just Resource Management” Section of Frontiers in Sustainable Resource Management provides the platform for interrogating various questions related to:
• resource management between diverse stakeholders,
• access and inequality in resource ownership rights,
• resource management policy,
• environmental sovereignty in indigenous communities,
• just transition and socioecological protection in resource extraction,
• governance frameworks,
• climate change,
• risks, vulnerability, and socioecological resilience in the extractive space,
• land use,
• social and environmental justice movements,
• conservation and participatory resource management,
• critical assessment of sustainable development goals related to resource management, and
• other related subjects.
It is important to promote critical engagement, research, and publication of quality articles in these focus areas as a way of analyzing, understanding, and reducing the tensions and underlying factors. Resource-related conflicts in different parts of the world, but especially in Africa, South America, and parts of Asia, and their attendant pernicious social and environmental consequences highlight the urgency to consolidate this niche area and create a body of knowledge that focuses on resource management at community level, country, regional, and interregional contexts. More positively, we can ask whether this conflict is inevitable. Some argue that a shift toward good governance, together with the fortuitous transition away from the Industrial Revolution as we enter a new Kondratieff (in which there are no unavoidable wastes), will render it optional (Grinin et al., 2014; Thompson, 2017). This is the core mission of Safe and Just Resource Management of Section of Frontiers in Sustainable Resource Management.
Author contributions
IU: Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1. ^Growth was boosted by the boom in primary products and high demand especially from China.
References
Africa Progress Panel (2013). Equity in Extractives: Stewarding Africa's Natural Resources for All. Available online at: www.aricaprogresspanel.org (accessed March 2, 2019).
Arfvidsson, G., and Follin, A. (2020). Connectedness, consumption and climate change: the exhibition human nature. Museum Manag. Curators. 35, 684–696. doi: 10.1080/09647775.2020.1842237
Castle, J. L., and Hendry, D. F. (2020). Climate econometrics: an overview. Found. Trends Econometr. 10, 145–322. doi: 10.1561/0800000037
De Theije, M., Kolen, J., Heemskerk, M., Duijves, C., Sarmiento, M., Urán, A., et al. (2014). Engaging legal systems in small scale gold mining conflicts in three South American countries. Confl. Over Natl. Resour. Global South–Conceptual Approach. 129–146.
Devereux, S., Roelen, K., and Ulrichs, M. (2015). Where next for social protection? Evid. Rep. 124, 158. doi: 10.19088/1968-2016.158
Frynas, J. G. (2000). Shell in Nigeria: a further contribution. Third World Quart. 21, 157–164. doi: 10.1080/01436590013288
Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., and O'brien, G. (2002). Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 10, 187–196. doi: 10.1002/sd.199
Grinin, L., Devezas, T. C., and Korotayev, A. (2014). Cyclical Dynamics in Economics and Politics in the Past and in the Future. Volgograd: Uchitel Publishing House, 5–24.
Kent, M. (2013). Moguls and Mandarins: Oil, Imperialism and the Middle East in British Foreign Policy 1900–1940. London: Routledge.
Kuriakose, A. T., Heltberg, R., Wiseman, W., Costella, C., Cipryk, R., and Cornelius, S. (2013). Climate-responsive social protection. Dev. Policy Rev. 31, 19–34. doi: 10.1111/dpr.12037
Lammi, M., Repo, P., and Timonen, P. (2013). Consumerism and citizenship in the context of climate change. in Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance (London), 141–154.
Obi, C. I. (2008). Enter the dragon? Chinese oil companies and resistance in the Niger Delta. Rev. Afr. Polit. Econ. 35, 417–434. doi: 10.1080/03056240802411073
Olivero, J., and Solano, B. (1998). Mercury in environmental samples from a waterbody contaminated by gold mining in Colombia, South America. Sci. Total Environ. 217, 83–89. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00175-2
Olsen, O. E., Kruke, B. I., and Hovden, J. (2007). Societal safety: concept, borders and dilemmas. J. Contingen. Crisis Manag. 15, 69–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00509.x
Senge, P. M., Carstedt, G., and Porter, P. L. (2001). Next industrial revolution. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 42, 24–38.
Umejesi, I., and Akpan, W. (2013). Oil exploration and the character of local opposition in colonial Nigeria: exploring the roots of state-community conflict in the Niger Delta region. South Afr. Rev. Sociol. 44, 111–130. doi: 10.1080/21528586.2013.784452
Umejesi, I., and Thompson, M. (2015). Fighting elephants, suffering grass: oil exploitation in Nigeria. J. Org. Change Manag. 28, 791–811. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-03-2015-0048
Umejesi, I., Thompson, M., Marcello, M., and Vellemu, E. (2018). “Extract of Africa: towards the equitable and ecologically sound governance of mining and drilling,” in Systems Analysis Approach for Complex Global Challenges, 63–88. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71486-8_4
Keywords: safe resource management, just resource management, resource allocation, sustainable resource allocation, safe supply chain management, resource extraction
Citation: Umejesi I (2023) Safe and just resource management specialty grand challenge. Front. Sustain. Resour. Manag. 2:1320987. doi: 10.3389/fsrma.2023.1320987
Received: 13 October 2023; Accepted: 26 October 2023;
Published: 17 November 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Brian Fath, Towson University, United States
Copyright © 2023 Umejesi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ikechukwu Umejesi, aWtldW1lamVzaSYjeDAwMDQwO2dtYWlsLmNvbQ==