ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Energy Policy

Sec. Energy and Society

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsuep.2025.1579170

More Power to Them: U.S. Large-Scale Solar Neighbors' Support for Additional Solar

Provisionally accepted
Joseph  RandJoseph Rand1*Karl  HoeschKarl Hoesch2Robi  NilsonRobi Nilson1Ben  HoenBen Hoen1Sarah  MillsSarah Mills3Douglas  BessetteDouglas Bessette4Jacob  WhiteJacob White4
  • 1Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
  • 2School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • 3Center for EmPowering Communities, Graham Sustainability Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
  • 4Department of Community Sustainability, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Large-scale solar (LSS) electric capacity is expanding rapidly in the U.S., with over 18 GW added in 2023 and over 40 GW in 2024; high levels of LSS deployment are anticipated to continue in coming years to meet growing electricity demand. Such deployment relies on sustained support from host community members and local governments, but that support is not assured, with community opposition now a leading cause of LSS project delays and cancellations. We conducted a nationally representative, stratified random survey of LSS neighbors (living within 3 miles) in order to better understand factors correlated with sentiments about LSS and levels of support and opposition for additional LSS development among residents with direct lived experience. Overall, we find most LSS neighbors are neutral or supportive of additional LSS in or near their communities. While some objective measures – such as the size of the project nearest the respondent, the respondent’s education level, and whether they have solar on their own home – are important correlates with support, subjective sentiments and perceptions of respondents are much more informative. Perceptions about how LSS helps or hinders community quality of life, landscape aesthetics, residential property values, climate change, and community interests and priorities were especially salient. In addition, respondents’ familiarity with their local project was influential: seeing the project more frequently generally corresponded to lower support for additional LSS. Broadly, we find evidence to reject the NIMBY hypothesis, and, conversely, more evidence to support the relationship between LSS support and community values, identity, sense of place, and protection of that place.

Keywords: Solar Energy, National survey, Public perceptions, Support and opposition, siting and permitting

Received: 18 Feb 2025; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Rand, Hoesch, Nilson, Hoen, Mills, Bessette and White. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Joseph Rand, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more