94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Cities
Sec. Cities in the Global South
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1484194
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Dynamics of Sustainable, Inclusive and Equitable Human SettlementsView all 9 articles
A MODEL FOR HUMAN SETTLEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT IN THE FREE STATE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA
Provisionally accepted- Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This paper aims to uncover the factors that influence the formulation of informal settlements upgrading programmes in the Free State Province of South Africa, from an institutional point of view. The paper subsequently yields a transformative and multi-faceted model for human settlement development and management from a combined institutional and systems theoretical perspective. The study is situated within the critical pragmatism knowledge paradigm, applying a mixed methods exploratory research design and inclined to research procedures that include the qualitative inductive content analysis method, case study method and the semi-structured survey questionnaire method. The sample selection is comprised of the non-probability sampling method, which is purposive and deliberate in nature. The data collection processes included document reviews, field observations and online surveys. The data analysis involved the abstraction and mapping of categories for the reviewed documents, descriptive analysis such as photos, written notes, and discussions with municipal officials for the field observations, and the software QuestionPro to analyse the collected data through online surveys. The research findings of the study revealed significant shortcomings related to policy design and implementation, stakeholder engagement practices, competencies of housing and human settlement practitioners, corrupt activities in the provision of adequate housing, disconnect in theory and practices during identification and definition of informal settlements, and the influence of illegal immigration on increasing housing need in South Africa. The study's findings form the foundation of the proposed model in this paper. They may assist human settlement practitioners in both the public and private sectors in developing and managing sustainable human settlements in the forthcoming decades.
Keywords: Informal, Upgrading, settlement, planning, urbanisation
Received: 21 Aug 2024; Accepted: 04 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Dintsi, Mbanga and Smallwood. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sive Dintsi, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.